I'm trying to create React Components with VMWare Clarity styles. Is there a way to import component-specific .scss instead of importing clr-ui.min.css?
It is currently non-trivial to isolate styles for Clarity on a per-component basis. There may be a few options for you, which all should be considered carefully. I'm not familiar enough with React build tooling to know how well these may work.
Use a tool like https://github.com/uncss/uncss that can remove unused CSS from your bundles.
Build your own version of Clarity that imports only what you need, but know that this is unsupported unless you follow the themes documentation https://vmware.github.io/clarity/documentation/v0.12/themes. In the future, we plan to make this easier but its a major overhaul.
Copy our SCSS files into your project, but this means you lose upgradability for Clarity in the future.
Related
I found MS DOC about Css in razor. But it isn't work with Scss file.
I resolve this problem by creating two files: css and scss. And use sass --watch. But I need write this every time, when creating new component.
Unfortunately SASS is not supported for CSS Isolation feature of Blazor. At least, not at this moment.
In our project, we use CSS Isolation for the CSS component isolation feature, but we use SASS files to manage our theme, for style we want accros the application.
That being said, if you really need some SASS for an unique component, you totally can, by adding for example a wrapper with a specified id, and use this id in your scss file, with a dedicated name for it, for example MyComponent.scss.
In addition, I've found this article, but I preferred to not use it because it is a bit heavy to setup, but up to you: https://joren-thijs.medium.com/how-to-add-scss-support-to-blazor-cd2a62995441
You can use AspNetCore.SassCompiler which supports both normal and isolated scss. I believe it has a watch mode when using Blazor Server, WASM is not supported yet.
It can also do minification with source mapping.
I'm using CSS Modules (Sass) with rollup on a component library project, which is working well. Each component ends up with a dist folder containing a single JS bundle file, and a corresponding CSS file with the scoped CSS classes so consumers of the component don't have to worry about CSS class name conflicts. All they do is include the JS bundle and the CSS file and everything is great. Yay CSS Modules.
The problem I'm now facing is that some components really need separate "themes" - ideally, separate CSS files, one per theme. So consumers can continue as they've been doing: including the JS bundle, but now choosing which CSS file to include to pick a theme.
I'm not sure how to get this going with CSS modules & rollup, and whether this is even the sort of approach others are taking. From what I can see, rollup always handles bundling things together, whereas I want separate CSS files, all of which get their classes renamed identically during the build phase. That way, if within my JS I refer to styles.myclass, if myclass had gotten renamed to scoped-myclass by CSS modules for the original CSS file, for a second CSS file it would also get the same name.
This would keep consumption of the component extremely simple - just a matter of including a different CSS file.
Any suggestions?
Awfully late, but let me answer this 3 years on. So what I ended up doing was totally detaching the CSS generation step from rollup and relying on the Sass CLI to handle that portion of the build process. It felt a bit klutzy, but I remember it wasn't awfully hard to do and solved the problem I outlined above. I don't believe there was a plain rollup solution at the time, nor do I think there's one today.
However... in my case the whole approach was kinda mistaken. This certainly won't be everyone's scenario, but let me spell it all out because hey it may be useful and it definitely wasn't obvious to me at the time.
This was for an in-house shared component library, where each component and its corresponding CSS was a separate npm package stored in our Artifactory. When it grew, plenty of internal references popped up, e.g. multiple components would reference the Button component, and over time they'd reference different versions of the Buttons component - each of which needed its own properly scoped CSS, unique to that package-version.
So what I found was that by doing it this way - having the CSS generated as part of the npm package dist files - I had to write an additional layer for the consumer applications that would parse their node_modules/ folder for our own internal components and combine all the different CSS files, such as the multiple versions of buttons. e.g. the main application would directly import buttons v1.0.0 in its package.json file, but the Dialog component (also included in the package.json) could include buttons 2.0.0 as its own dependency. For every version of the package, there was a uniquely scoped version of the CSS - so the consuming application HAD to include every version otherwise the styling would be borked.
So all in all, it ended up being way more complex that I wanted. I thought I could make it easier & better with the separate generated themed CSS files as part of the package dist, but it didn't end up that way. If I could revisit that project today, I'd re-examine a solution used by Material UI and others which I kinda poo-poo'd at the time: automatic injection of the CSS into the page by the component JS, rather than generating standalone CSS files which required extra work by the consumer applications to gather up and add to the final webpage. Frankly, now I regard it as the "least crap". There are definite downsides to the injection approach (extra work done on every page render for everyone! Yikes!), but there's no doubt in my mind it hugely simplifies the job of the consumer applications. It's a balancing act, but in 20-20 hindsight I'd lean towards the injection approach. With that, scoping & theming is a different and much simpler problem.
If I got you right, consider looking at SCSS plugin: rollup-plugin-scss. It captures all spare .css files imported in the components, and then processes them through underlying node-sass. The catch is, it seems like you can write a custom callback function that'd handle your CSSs differently based on conditions you throw in.
Based on the example from the plugin's page:
import scss from 'rollup-plugin-scss'
...
export default {
input: 'src/index.tsx',
output: [...],
plugins: [
...
output: function (styles, styleNodes) {
// replace this with conditioned outputs as needed:
writeFileSync('bundle1.css', styles)
writeFileSync('bundle2.css', styles)
},
]
}
I'm trying to break up my monolithic React app into reusable parts that can be shared with other projects.
I want to extract some generic components (e.g. Button, Header, Dropdown, etc.) into my own little UI library. The problem I'm running into is how to manage the CSS. Right now, my app just has a single stylesheet that takes care of everything.
These are the solutions I have seen:
Embed the CSS styles for each component in the JS for the component itself (CSS in JS).
import or require the CSS files in the JS for the component and use webpack to bundle the CSS file for you.
I really don't love either option. I understand the appeal of co-locating the styles with the component, but I feel like: a) it clutters the component definition, and b) it fights with how CSS works (no more taking advantage of cascading styles since everything is so tightly scoped to the individual component).
And, I can't bring myself to import a CSS file. That just feels so wrong. We're not even writing javascript anymore at that point.
I realize that these aren't exactly popular opinions, but is there a 3rd option that I'm missing for getting a good old fashioned CSS file from an NPM module that I can just drop in my HTML and use? Ideally one that doesn't involve copy/pasting it from node_modules. :)
Thanks to the tip from #EmileBergeron I found the PostCSS import plugin. It can find and inline stylesheets in node_modules and in your own code.
So, my workflow will be:
npm install my-ui-library
Import the React components you want to use into your JS files import { Button } from 'my-ui-library'
Import the corresponding stylesheets into your CSS files #import 'my-ui-library/Button.css'
That way I'm importing CSS into CSS and JS into JS which feels a lot more natural to me. It might also make sense to just have one stylesheet for all components instead of breaking it up per-component, but that's a detail I can figure out later.
Then, I just need to add PostCSS into my build system to inline everything which has been pretty simple in testing.
I'm trying to sift through all the CSS options / packages available for EmberJS and am looking for suggestions. I suppose it will help if I list what I need:
SASS syntax (variables, nesting, creating mixins, and extending)
Ability to import other CSS libraries
Pod support (although I'm not positive I'll be using this feature at the moment, but I at least want to be able to have one CSS per route/component)
Autoprefixer
Is there an all-in-one Ember package that will give me all these? Thanks!
SASS syntax (variables, nesting, creating mixins, and extending)
You should think long and hard before taking the blue SASS pill. SASS is a technology trending towards obsolescence, which was designed mainly to support some bad CSS coding practices, as well as overcome some deficiencies in earlier versions of CSS.
Variables are supported by postCSS plugins in a standard way which is compatible with the upcoming CSS variable syntax.
Nesting is an answer in search of a problem. It promotes a bad style of coding involving excessive dependency on HTML structure. Properly constructed systems of CSS classes, orthogonal to HTML, make nesting unnecessary.
With regards to mixins, I have not seen a real-life situation in which mixins or other more advanced SASS features were actually necessary. Using them, you end up learning yet another (weird) programming language, which you have to debug, and make sure all the people on your team know.
When it comes to extending, CSS experts counsel against it. Besides potential issues of performance and code size, they hide the logic of the CSS code, and require jumping back and forth from file to file to maintain and extend and debug. Everything that is accomplished with extending can be handled with properly-designed CSS classes.
SASS is slow, is bifurcated (binary version vs. Ruby version), and can give rise to strange npm installation problems. My advice is to avoid it.
There is an interesting read about SASS vs. postCSS here.
Ability to import other CSS libraries
Ability to import other CSS libraries is not a function of any other decision you make, or what package you choose. You can simply import these.
Pod support (although I'm not positive I'll be using this feature at the moment, but I at least want to be able to have one CSS per route/component)
Indeed. There is at least one new-ish Ember add-on to do this (and probably more), which IMHO is designed extremely poorly and grossly over-engineered. It follows the Ember approach of doing way too much, in an opaque way, in the name of being "helpful" (until it isn't, at which point you're screwed). This is great if you want your CSS to be littered with classes like .my-component-a34fba.
Until there is a better alternative, I'd do this manually, which is quite easy. Simply place your CSS files in the pod, and then import, from your styles/app.css or equivalent file, the CSS files from the pods you want, such as #import '../pods/thingie/; to import its index.css file. Yes, you will have to do some maintenance of these imports yourself, but how many pods do you have?
What I do to avoid a huge styles/app.css that would require constant updating is to place an index.css file in each pod and import that. From there, import a stylesheet for that directory itself and any necessary subdirectories:
/* styles/app.css */
#import '../app/pods/thingie';
/* app/pods/thingie/index.css */
#import `./style`;
#import `./subdir1';
#import `./subdir2';
Autoprefixer
You need look no further than the excellent postcss/autoprefixer.
Is there an all-in-one Ember package that will give me all these?
It would be nice if all our problems could be handled by all-in-one packages. Unfortunately, all-in-one packages are always missing two features we wanted, and we can never figure out how to add them. They always do one thing we didn't want them to do, and we can never figure how to turn it off. They import old versions of their subpackages. They break when there's an Ember upgrade. They stop being maintained. The Ember philosophy itself sadly promotes this pernicious all-in-one mentality--all my problems can be solved by yet another add-on!
You are better off understanding individual technologies, choosing simple, bounded, reliable implementations of them, and weaving them together yourself. Just my two cents.
This might be the closest thing you're looking for:
https://github.com/ebryn/ember-component-css
Which supports using pods layout, and lets you use ember-cli-sass.
To use auto-prefixing, there are plenty of sass libraries out there to help you out, like Bourbon.io, which you can install via npm. Then, it should just be matter of configuring the import paths via the sass options in the ember-cli-build.js
I recommend PostCSS. Last I checked, it doesn't work out-of-the-box with ember-component-css, but you don't need ember-component-css to namespace your styles.
You can modify Ember's Component generator / blueprint to (assuming you're using pods):
Add classNames: ['component-name-here'], to the generated component.js file.
Create a _component-name-here.css file/partial in app/styles/components (or similar), with a class .component-name-here to contain all styles in the partial.
If necessary, #import that new partial in your app.css.
Then all your Component styles will be namespaced.
To handle variables, nesting and Autoprefixer, you just need to set up PostCSS with the right plugins, e.g.:
plugins: [
{
module: require('postcss-partial-import'),
},
{
module: require('postcss-nested'),
},
{
module: require('postcss-custom-media'),
},
{
module: require('postcss-custom-properties'),
},
{
module: require('autoprefixer'),
options: { browsers: ['last 2 versions'] }
},
],
I'm using ember-cli-css-preprocess, which gives you the option to use SASS as well (alongside PostCSS), if you wish.
I am making a static website with Flask and using the flask-bootstrap extension to simplify the front-end development. I concurrently have been learning Rails and so I understand that there are a few of these languages that compile down to CSS (LESS/SASS/SCSS). As I understand it, Bootstrap by default uses LESS, and in my Rails app I had to convert LESS variables (with an # symbol at the beginning) into SCSS variables (with a $). This wasn't too difficult, no problem.
I noticed that in Miguel Grinberg's tutorial (Flask Web Development, O'Reilly) Bootstrap is used (Flask-Bootstrap extension), and there is the brief mention of {% block styles %} used to include stylesheets that way, I am confused about how I can go about modifying the existing LESS variables that come by default with Bootstrap so that I can modify the grid structure and not mess things up with my own custom stylesheets. I want to be able to do, for example, is modify the #body-bg LESS variable, or any of the ones here: http://getbootstrap.com/customize
It is very interesting question. I also was interesting in creating styles dynamically. You need follow another ways. It is not possible by the way you have described above.
You mentioned you used Flask-Bootstrap. This extension adopts the Flask project to use the Twitter Bootstrap styles. I have not fond any SASS/LESS functionality.
http://pythonhosted.org/Flask-Bootstrap/#
https://github.com/mbr/flask-bootstrap
If you look at the static folder of the extension you will not find any tracks of SASS/LESS.
As I know Twitter Bootstrap is generated by LESS. There is also a SASS fork. You regenerate styles and replace them in the static folder of the Flask-Bootstrap project.
If you want to do it dynamically you need create your own solution. I do not know a ready extension. It is the very challenging task.