"who" on CentOS does not show WinSCP clients [closed] - ip

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I use CentOS 7 with Apache server. The problem who command does not show clients connected with WinSCP. Can't understand why.

The problem who command does not show clients connected with WinSCP. Can't understand why.
Apparently, then, you are operating from a false premise. The who command does not promise to name everyone interacting with the system in any way whatever. Roughly speaking, who tells you about users who have an associated terminal, whether physical or virtual. Connecting via an scp client does not establish a login session or allocate a terminal for who to report on.
Contrast users who connect via ssh clients: these do get a terminal assigned to them, and they do show up in the output of a suitably-timed who command.

Related

Force 5G on SIM8200EA-M2 [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
I've been having problems getting a 5G only connection using waveshares https://www.waveshare.com/wiki/SIM8200EA-M2_5G_HAT for the raspberry pi.
Anyone know the the appropriate AT-commands ?
I am also using this 5G module but with Jetson Nano and Windows. To force 5G, run this command.
AT+CNMP=71 //if your module green led turns off using this command, run the following command
AT+CNMP= 39 //AT command for 4G (LTE)
I never get 5G on my module.
You can get information about which access technology that is used with the AT+CREG network registration command (AcT parameter) and you can control which to used with the AT+COPS command.
In your case, the manufacturer documentation is linked as "SIm8200 Series AT Command Manual" on the wiki page you linked, and that should be your primary source of information. The commands are standardized by 3GPP in 27.007 so you could have a look there as well.
PS Make sure you properly understand how to send and read and parse AT command lines and response lines.

What is this meaning `Name query nb {random char}<00>` [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
The scene is under VMWare, and the os in vm is Ubuntu 12.
What I have to say is the network was actually suddenly cut off when I was coding. My two colleagues were all have the problem. It seems very odd. It just is a vm dev environment. Why three person will occur it in a not long time periods. I couldn't ping the IP in VM from my host, and vice versa.
At the first time, I think it is the problem of network adapter of VMware. But it didn't work after I removed the network adapter and re-added it.
But this time, I think ping it. But the network is very slow. I just ping a IP, not a domain.
So, when I used wireshark to see what is the problem.
As the picture show below. I think it is a virus. The random string before <00>.
Anyone can give me the solution or some hints? Thanks!!
Perhaps it's a virus called Chrome, from a company called "Google"; Chrome appears to make various weird name queries.

How can I run simple http server on my dynamic IP? [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
Closed 9 years ago.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Improve this question
Sorry for the language mistakes I've made. I don't have static IP to be accessible from outside world so I want to run a dead simple http server on my dynamic IP which I get from DHCP of my local provider. How can I make it?
I use Ubuntu and similar with nginx. I tried something like this:
~path/to/index.html$ python -m SimpleHTTPServer 80 #of course nothing
Yes you can,
But you must use a proxy like:
DYN DNS
NO-IP
etc.
These sites gives you a link static IP and forwards it to your dynamic IP address.
The IP provider needs to be updated with your current IP.
This is done either via a service on your computer, or via your router (if it supports Dynamic DNS it).
The conclusion is that your current IP address must somehow be connected to a DNS (like www.something.org).

Accessing local servers across network routers [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have recently added a dlink router to my existing network, and connected some computers with it. The existing network uses ip range 192.168.1.x and the new router uses 192.168.0.x. Internet services is accessible on both the networks, but a shared resource or a web server connected to one network is not accessible to the systems of other network.
I googled this issue but I am unable to resolve the issue, please help.
If you are just going to be using the router as a switch on an existing network, you need to turn off its router-y features.
Go onto the web interface of the device and turn of "NAT", that way they'll use the same address space as everything else on the network.
They'll be other features as well you may want to turn off but that's one causing your current issue.

Simultaneous VPN and internet access windows 7 [closed]

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
I use Cisco secure mobility client to connect to my office VPN. After I connect to VPN all my requests go through the office gateway and my access to internet through my locally installed router (connected wirelessly) is blocked/not reachable. How do i rectify this?
I've searched on the web and stack overflow, and they suggest split tunneling which I think is not an option here as I cant change the Cisco settings. Is there any work around for this? I've tried adding router address to the IP table , but that isn't helping.
My OS is windows 7.
Please let me know if you need any other information.
Mike is right, this is off-topic but I can tell you that unless the Cisco VPN administrator allows split-tunneling then there's no work-around for this. The best solution I can tell you, is to make a VirtualBox VM with your OS of choice and use that VM to connect to the VPN, thereby leaving your host machine free to browse the internet locally.

Resources