Does anyone knows about software with encryption of owner password stronger than 254 bit? More than 500 or 1000 bit? Algorithm may be AES or other one. It's necessary to protect my copyright laws.
I need this software to create text files in pdf, rtf or in other kind of text format, file. To publish them in the internet.
This software should be for Win system and in freeware, open source or in similar licenses.
Thanks for your help.
It is all about the quality of the key.
A 128-bit random AES key can not be brute forced so that is all that is necessary. AES supports only three key sizes: 128, 192 & 256 bits. You will also want to use a mode such as CBC or GCM with a random per encryption IV.
If a password is being used the encryption key needs to be derived from it, for that use PBKDF2, Argon2 or similar with a CPU work factor of ~100ms or greater. Verify that the password/passphrase is not on a list of frequently used passwords such as at SecLists.
Related
I am planning to create an application that has to be able to securely (that is, encrypted) send messages between clients. These messages may include images and videos (up to 50MB in size). Due to how public-key cryptography works, the encryption process has to be run once for each public key.
For these reasons, I am looking for an algorithm that can encrypt the media fairly quickly on modern devices (eg. mid-level smartphones).
I am asking the question because all algorithms I came across (Blowfish and RSA for example) have a relatively small payload limit, which means that even an image will not fit into it.
Don't roll your own protocol. You're thinking about this at a far too low level. People who know exactly what they're doing have a hard time writing secure code. You don't even know where to start, so you don't stand a chance of getting it right.
If you can establish a direct connection between the two endpoints, use TLS. If you can't establish a direct connection, consider using TLS and relaying the encrypted packets; if that's impractical, use Signal. TLS is ubiquitous; your operating system(s) probably come with an implementation in their default installation. Signal is less ubiquitous, so you'll probably have to embed a library. Make sure to keep up with updates to this library. And once again, don't implement your own library.
Under the hood, all systems that use public-key cryptography to store or transmit more than a few bytes of data use hybrid cryptography. Public-key cryptography is used to establish a symmetric key and authenticate the data, and symmetric cryptography does the heavy lifting.
For example, RSA can be used to encrypt a symmetric key. It's pretty difficult to get it right in practice, however. It's also slower than more modern methods that use elliptic-curve cryptography. TLS can use RSA encryption, but this is deprecated. TLS preferably uses an (elliptic curve) Diffie-Hellman key exchange and an RSA or (EC)DSA signature to set up the secure connection. If you'd like more explanations about how TLS works, read an overview of the protocol, a history of problems and how they were resolved, and an explanation of why RSA encryption is problematic.
Note that Blowfish has been obsolete for a while. If you ever need to choose a specific symmetric cryptosystem — which usually means you're doing it wrong — pick AES-GCM, AES-CCM or ChaCha20-Poly1305.
You are correct about the input size for RSA. In general, for any public key cryptography, the input size of limited and as opposed to your needs, it's quite a bit slower than what you need. Public key cryptography is usually used to share small pieces of data.
For example, in the TLS implementation using RSA (TLS_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256), the RSA step is used to share a symmetric key, generally, AES, between 2 parties and then all the heavy lifting is done by AES.
What you need is a symmetric encryption algorithm. You can use AES (key sizes of 128, 192 or even 256) to encrypt your images which can be of any size. AES is a block cipher and, using a suitable block cipher mode, theoretically does not have an input limit to it. AES-128 is a fairly standard NIST approved (FIPS 197) symmetric encryption scheme, so it should be safe, but you can always go for a higher key size, say 256.
Since, you have the security of the algorithm defined, we can now talk about the speed.
RSA:
$ openssl speed rsa2048
Doing 2048 bit private rsa's for 10s: 296 2048 bit private RSA's in 10.00s
Doing 2048 bit public rsa's for 10s: 6171 2048 bit public RSA's in 9.99s
LibreSSL 2.6.5
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(ptr,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
sign verify sign/s verify/s
rsa 2048 bits 0.033784s 0.001619s 29.6 617.7
AES-128 in GCM mode
$ openssl speed aes-128-gcm
Doing aes-128 gcm for 3s on 16 size blocks: 3778792 aes-128 gcm's in 2.99s
Doing aes-128 gcm for 3s on 64 size blocks: 1611239 aes-128 gcm's in 3.00s
Doing aes-128 gcm for 3s on 256 size blocks: 485243 aes-128 gcm's in 2.99s
Doing aes-128 gcm for 3s on 1024 size blocks: 125054 aes-128 gcm's in 2.99s
Doing aes-128 gcm for 3s on 8192 size blocks: 15366 aes-128 gcm's in 2.96s
LibreSSL 2.6.5
built on: date not available
options:bn(64,64) rc4(ptr,int) des(idx,cisc,16,int) aes(partial) blowfish(idx)
compiler: information not available
The 'numbers' are in 1000s of bytes per second processed.
type 16 bytes 64 bytes 256 bytes 1024 bytes 8192 bytes
aes-128 gcm 20220.96k 34373.10k 41545.89k 42827.86k 42526.44k
You can see the difference, how AES can blow away RSA in the dust with respect to speed. Symmetric Encryption algorithms are inherently faster due to its design. Asymmetric algorithms use math operations on huge numbers and primes which are slower.
Since AES is so popular, CPU manufacturers started implementing special instructions to make AES computations more and more native (AES-NI). So AES will be faster on almost all popular CPUs.
A small note on security between RSA and AES, although it's like comparing apples to oranges.
RSA2048 offers only 112 bits of security whereas AES128 offers 128 bits of security (ref: aes-vs-rsa)
Another challenge in the above problem would be key management. How would you safely manage the keys? If the keys are to be ephemeral, i.e. session based or one key per use, then you can use RSA to exchange symmetric keys and then perform the encryption. This would guarantee perfect forward secrecy. If you want persistent keys, then obviously there are much more elaborate methods to do that which is out of scope of this question.
i am trying to encrypt/decrypt some long text with RSA public/private key encryption using cryptopp. I found many examples including the official on http://www.cryptopp.com/wiki/RSA but all of the examples have one problem:
They only allow me to encrypt data that is a bit shorter then the key size.
So the question is: Do i really have to split the data and encrypt block for block myself, or does crypto++ already provide some functions to handle this (like GCM or CFB modes on AES encryption)?
Thanx
Generally you should not encrypt large plaintexts using RSA. You can use RSA-OAEP using the ECB mode of encryption, but that's extremely slow and does not give you any advantages over the more common hybrid encryption modes.
In hybrid encryption modes you simply generate a symmetric data key using a secure random number generator. Generally AES-128 bit will be sufficiently strong. You then encrypt the plaintext using this key, e.g. using AES in CBC mode; you may use a zero-IV and PKCS#7 padding. Finally you encrypt the AES key using RSA-OAEP; use either PKCS#1 v1.5 padding if OAEP cannot be used.
The reverse is obvious, decrypt the AES key, decrypt the ciphertext.
Note that you need at least 11 bytes of padding overhead (not just 1 bit) to subtract from the key size to encrypt using RSA in PKCS#1 v1.5. The padding is part of the security of RSA.
You could add integrity protection by signing and then encrypting your data. You could use AES-GCM as you propose, but note that an attacker may still encrypt any data and send it to the receiver. So AES-GCM would only provide limited integrity protection.
I am trying to use asymmetric encryption to encrypt firmware. The bootloader will decrypt and update the flash. This is on a embedded device with 32 bit CPU executing at 60MHz.
I want to use ECC due to its varies advantages. I am new to encryption and my understanding os ECC as implemented in ECIES is to use ECC for the key generation and use AES for actual data encryption. Due to code and ram size, I cannot support multiple encryption algorithms.
Is there a implementation of ECC that can be used just like AES. All I am looking for is to use a "Private key" to encrypt firmware and the bootloader uses "Public Key" to decrypt it.
Thanks.
I'm not sure that you completely understand what ECIES consists of:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Integrated_Encryption_Scheme
That's quite a bit of work, and it requires a whole lot of primitives, including at least one symmetric primitive, it seems to me. That might as well be AES.
Let's start from the last sentence of the question:
All I am looking for is to use a "Private key" to encrypt firmware and the bootloader uses "Public Key" to decrypt it.
There's some confusion in terminology here. Private keys are used to decrypt (or sign) and public keys are used to encrypt (or verify). If I understand correctly, what you want is for the bootloader to verify a signature on the firmware so that only a firmware that was properly signed by yourself will be accepted by the bootloader.
There are various asymmetric signature schemes which can be used for this purpose, including some which are based on eliptic curve cryptography. For example you could use the OpenSSL implementation of ECDSA (see http://www.openssl.org/docs/crypto/ecdsa.html).
I'm afraid there's not enough information in the question to properly choose the best signature scheme (and possibly an encryption scheme as well if there is a need to keep the firmware secret). In any case, good cryptography is not enough to make a system secure and other considerations such as secure implementation are no less important.
If this is is something that is important for you to protect and that you are worried that hackers may try to break, I would strongly advise procuring the services of a security professional. Using cryptography correctly is a very tricky business that requires a full understanding of the system - otherwise you may find yourself in a situation like this
If you look for "authentication" you have to use asymmetric algorithm like EC, this usually done because if the user or process want to update the "firmware" he should identify him self to the bootloader by his "signature" to check who request this update.
After that is done, the bootloader will load the symmetric key from a secure memory to decrypt what you want to do.
So, you have a symmetric key for encryption (AES), and asymmetric two keys for authentication (=Who are you?).
Note: there is no advantages of EC on 32 bit CPU executing at 60MHz for Encryption, unless your application need asymmetric for Encryption NOT authentication, this happen due to line between the user and bootloader is not secure.
Therefore, you could use bootloader's "public key" to encrypt firmware and the bootloader uses its "private Key" to decrypt it, however, the implementation cost a lot due to the high computing for asymmetric algorithm.
Look for "lightweight cryptography", it is typical for your application.
I have a pair of transceivers connected to the micro-controller from Port A, and a MM232R connected to Port B on a separate PCB. Each transceiver will send encrypted data, while MM232R will receive a decrypted data. I need write encryption algorithm and decryption code. Can anyone give me idea on how to go about it? I am new to programming and encryption algorithm.
I'm not sure about the ROM/RAM limits of the PIC18F1320, that is the main constraint.
This page contains an implementation of AES on a PIC18F4620. It uses 2K words of ROM and 240 bytes of RAM.
This other page seems to have an implementation of RSA on a PIC18F4550, but it warns that it is very slow (which does't surprise me, since RSA encryption requires modular arithmetic on large integers).
How does public key encryption work, using a private and public/public key to decrypt/encrypt? What does it mean for the key to be 256 bits? How is it decrypted? Is there a language for writing encryption programs or is any language fine?
In brief:
the data is encrypted using symmetric algorithm and a random symmetric key. Then the random key is encrypted using public asymmetric key. The encrypted random key is stored together with the encrypted data. To decrypt the data one uses private asymmetric key to decrypt the stored random key, then the decrypted random key is used to decrypt the data.
256-bit is the length of the key. However, it has dramatically different meaning for symmetric and asymmetric keys. For symmetric keys 256 bits are a very strong key (you can have even longer keys with AES 384 or AES 512 where the numbers specify the key length the algorithm operates with). For asymmetric algorithms 256 bits is nothing, and comparable strength is 2048 bits.
Public key encryption can be implemented using any language, that supports math operations and arrays. However, doing this is reinventing the wheels. There exists a number of cross-platform libraries for PKI: open-source OpenSSL for C++, BouncyCastle for Java and some more. Our company offers a supported and maintained SecureBlackbox product for .NET, Windows and Linux (MacOS X version to come soon).
Also there's a couple of books about PKI that we recommend to all our users. RSA's guide is an easy reading (but very useful) and the second book goes into deeper details.
For the first question see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public-key_cryptography
you can google for more details.
256 bit key means we are using key of length 256. you will understand that after more reading about answer of first question.
Many language have inbuilt or third party api to implement these calls.