I want to use powermock to state a static method on a class (fragment of class below):
public class TestService<T> {
public static <T> TestService<T> function1(Class<T> rawType, Object id) {
The relevant portion of the test class is listed below. While setting up the mock, if I explicitly set a value for the integer parameter, then call with that same value, everything works as expected. The call to function1 returns the testServiceProxy.
However, what I want to do is return that value no matter what value of the integer is passed in. To do this I comment out the first line:
// PowerMockito.when(TestService.function1(Subscription.class,id)).thenReturn(testServiceProxy);
and remove the comments from the second line.
After doing this, the calls to function1 return null.
Why??
#RunWith(PowerMockRunner.class)
#PrepareForTest(TestService.class)
public class TestServiceTest {
#Mock
private TestService<Subscription> testServiceProxy;
#Mock
private Subscription subscription;
#Test
public void testStart() throws Exception {
Integer id = new Integer(5);
PowerMockito.mockStatic(TestService.class);
PowerMockito.when(TestService.getString()).thenReturn("Hello!");
PowerMockito.when(testServiceProxy.getInt()).thenReturn(new Integer(15));
PowerMockito.when(TestService.function1(Subscription.class,id)).thenReturn(testServiceProxy);
// PowerMockito.when(TestService.function1(Subscription.class,Matchers.eq(any(Integer.class)))).thenReturn(testServiceProxy);
System.out.println("String: " + TestService.getString());
System.out.println("TestServiceProxy: "+testServiceProxy);
// id = new Integer(6);
System.out.println("Function1: "+TestService.function1(Subscription.class, id));
TestService<Subscription> foo = TestService.function1(Subscription.class, id);
if (foo != null) {
System.out.println(" foo instrumentId: "+foo.getInt());
System.out.println(" subselect instrumentId: "+testServiceProxy.getInt());
} else {
System.out.println("Foo is null");
}
}
}
After further work, I've come to understand that you can't be specific about one value and specify any for another.
Also I needed to use the Mockito class to ensure that the correct functions where being called.
PowerMockito.when(TestService.function1(Mockito.any(Class.class), Mockito.any(String.class))).thenReturn(testServiceProxy);
This method call correctly sets up the mocks to be used in my test case.
Related
In app I'm bulding I used data model presented by James_D here:
Applying MVC With JavaFx
I just can find a way to bind labels text to property of object held in DataModel
Data is structured like this:
model class Student
//partial class
public class Student {
private final StringProperty displayName = new SimpleStringProperty();
public final StringProperty displayNameProperty(){
return this.displayName;
}
public Student(){
}
public final String getDisplayName() {
return this.displayNameProperty().get();
}
public final void setDisplayName(String displayName) {
this.displayNameProperty().set(displayName);
}
}
Student instaces are held by StudentDataModel class
public class StudentDataModel {
// complete student list
private final ObservableList<Student> studentList = FXCollections.observableArrayList();
private final ObjectProperty<Student> selectedStudent = new SimpleObjectProperty<>(new Student());
public final Student getSelectedStudent() {
return selectedStudent.get();
}
public final ObjectProperty<Student> selectedStudentProperty() {
return selectedStudent;
}
public final void setSelectedStudent(Student student) {
selectedStudent.set(student);
}
}
StudentList is displayed by Table View, there is change listener that sets selectedStudent like this:
public class TableViewController {
public void initModel(StudentDataModel studentDM) {
// ensure model is set once
if (this.studentDM != null) {
throw new IllegalStateException("StudentDataModel can only be initialized once");
}
this.studentDM = studentDM;
tableView.getSelectionModel().selectedItemProperty().addListener((obs, oldSelection, newSelection) -> {
if (newSelection != null) {
studentDM.setSelectedStudent(newSelection);
}
});
}}
There is another controller ActionsBarController that has label to display selected student (this seems redundant, but there is option for selecting multiple objects to perform bulk operations).
StudentDataModel is initialized properly (I can see it in debuger) but below doesn't do anything:
chosenStudentLabel.textProperty().bind(studentDM.getSelectedStudent().displayNameProperty());
//this shows class name with instance number changing correctly
chosenStudentLabel.textProperty().bind(studentDM.selectedStudentProperty().asString());
I could inject ActionsBarController to TableViewController and change label text from change Listener there, but this seems counter productive with data model.
What am I doing wrong?
Your code doesn't work, because you call (and evaluate) getSelectedStudent() at the time the binding is created (i.e. when you initialize the model). As a consequence, you only bind to the displayName property of the student that is selected at that time. (If nothing is selected, you'll get a NullPointerException.) The binding will only change if that initially-selected student's display name changes; it won't change if the selection changes.
You need a binding that unbinds from the old selected student's display name, and binds to the new selected student's display name, when the selected student changes. One way to do this is:
chosenStudentLabel.textProperty().bind(new StringBinding() {
{
studentDM.selectedStudentProperty().addListener((obs, oldStudent, newStudent) -> {
if (oldStudent != null) {
unbind(oldStudent.displayNameProperty());
}
if (newStudent != null) {
bind(newStudent.displayNameProperty());
}
invalidate();
});
}
#Override
protected String computeValue() {
if (studentDM.getSelectedStudent() == null) {
return "" ;
}
return studentDM.getSelectedStudent().getDisplayName();
}
});
Note that there is also a "built-in" way to do this, but it's a bit unsatisfactory (in my opinion) for a couple of reasons. Firstly, it relies on specifying the name of the "nested property" as a String, using reflection to access it. This is undesirable because it has no way to check the property exists at compile time, it requires opening the module for access, and it is less good performance-wise. Secondly, it gives spurious warnings if one of the properties in the "chain" is null (e.g. in this case if the selected student is null, which is will be initially), even though this is a supported case according to the documentation. However, it is significantly less code:
chosenStudentLabel.textProperty().bind(
Bindings.selectString(studentDM.selectedStudentProperty(), "displayName")
);
I'd like to make wrapper to implement simple data binding pattern -- while some data have been modified all registered handlers are got notified. I have started with this (for js target):
class Main {
public static function main() {
var target = new Some();
var binding = new Bindable(target);
binding.one = 5;
// binding.two = 0.12; // intentionally unset field
binding.three = []; // wrong type
binding.four = 'str'; // no such field in wrapped class
trace(binding.one, binding.two, binding.three, binding.four, binding.five);
// outputs: 5, null, [], str, null
trace(target.one, target.two, target.three);
// outputs: 5, null, []
}
}
class Some {
public var one:Int;
public var two:Float;
public var three:Bool;
public function new() {}
}
abstract Bindable<TClass>(TClass) {
public inline function new(source) { this = source; }
#:op(a.b) public function setField<T>(name:String, value:T) {
Reflect.setField(this, name, value);
// TODO notify handlers
return value;
}
#:op(a.b) public function getField<T>(name:String):T {
return cast Reflect.field(this, name);
}
}
So I have some frustrating issues: interface of wrapped object doesn't expose to wrapper, so there's no auto completion or strict type checking, some necessary attributes can be easily omitted or even misspelled.
Is it possible to fix my solution or should I better move to the macros?
I almost suggested here to open an issue regarding this problem. Because some time ago, there was a #:followWithAbstracts meta available for abstracts, which could be (or maybe was?) used to forward fields and call #:op(a.b) at the same time. But that's not really necessary, Haxe is powerful enough already.
abstract Binding<TClass>(TClass) {
public function new(source:TClass) { this = source; }
#:op(a.b) public function setField<T>(name:String, value:T) {
Reflect.setField(this, name, value);
// TODO notify handlers
trace("set: $name -> $value");
return value;
}
#:op(a.b) public function getField<T>(name:String):T {
trace("get: $name");
return cast Reflect.field(this, name);
}
}
#:forward
#:multiType
abstract Bindable<TClass>(TClass) {
public function new(source:TClass);
#:to function to(t:TClass) return new Binding(t);
}
We use here multiType abstract to forward fields, but resolved type is actually regular abstract. In effect, you have completion working and #:op(a.b) called at the same time.
You need #:forward meta on your abstract. However, this will not make auto-completion working unless you remove #:op(A.B) because it shadows forwarded fields.
EDIT: it seems that shadowing happened first time I added #:forward to your abstract, afterwards auto-completion worked just fine.
hi I want to stop further test execution when there is no data in dataprovider. My dataproviders get filled up dynamically on the fly. So i want my tests to stop from execution if there is not data in dataprovider. Below is my code snippet.
package myTest;
import org.testng.Reporter;
import org.testng.annotations.DataProvider;
import org.testng.annotations.Factory;
import org.testng.annotations.Test;
public class NewTest
{
String str;
#DataProvider
public Object[][] test123()
{
System.out.println(" Filling dataprovider.");
return new Object[][]{};
}
#Factory(dataProvider="test123")
public NewTest(String str)
{
System.out.println("Running through factory.");
this.str=str;
}
#Test
public void test1234()
{
Reporter.log("--->>> running test "+str,true);
}
}
I want that test1234 should not run if dataprovider is empty.
You can try adding another method in different class and add Factory
annotation on that. From this method you can call the constructor of this Test Class in order to execute the tests. Before calling the constructor, check if the argument is correct and you actually want to run the tests for this argument. Now you need to call this Factory class.
<code>
Class NewTestFactory(){
#Factory(dataProvider="test123")
public Object[] executeTests(String str){
Object obj[] = new Object[1];
if (str != null){
obj[0] = new NewTest(str)
}
}
return obj
}
</code>
Simply return an empty 2D array.
Something like:
#DataProvider
public Object[][] test123()
{
Object[][] data= null;
System.out.println(" Filling dataprovider.");
if(someSplCondition) //Returning empty 2D so that test doesn't execute
data = Object[0][0]
else
data = fillTestData()
return data;
}
Also, if you are using maven don't forget to put -DfailIfNoTests=false in mvn command
I have code like this:
//Fields
Product _prod, _existingProd;
void Test()
{
_prod = MakeAndPopulateSomeRandomProduct();
_existingProd = GetProdFromDb(1);
Mapper.CreateMap()
.AfterMap((s, d) =>
{
Console.WriteLine(d==_existingProd); //Why does this print false?
//Customize other properties on destination object
});
Mapper.Map(_prod, _existingProd);
}
When I call Test(), false is printed but I expected true. In my scenario, it is important to be able to access the original destination object via the AfterMap argument. I only included the fields to demonstrate the problem but in my real code, I don't have direct access to them. How can I access the object instances passed in to Map() when customizing the mapping?
The following example works. Probably you are using some type converter which creates new instance... Also please provide all mapping configurations to better understand the problem.
[TestFixture]
public class AfterMap_Test
{
//Fields
private Product _prod, _existingProd;
[Test]
public void Test()
{
Mapper.CreateMap<Product, Product>()
.AfterMap((s, d) =>
{
Trace.WriteLine(d == _existingProd); //Why does this print false?
//Customize other properties on destination object
});
_existingProd = new Product {P1 = "Destination"};
_prod = new Product {P1 = "Source"};
Mapper.Map(_prod, _existingProd);
}
}
internal class Product
{
public string P1 { get; set; }
}
I am trying to pass a variable from a method in my Controller to a method in a Model. Since the method in the Model takes one argument (which was designed earlier), I cannot pass my variable as an argument to the method in the Model. And also, the method in this Model is called by other controllers too, so if I change the argument, I have to change all the controllers too, which would be a tedious task.
What I have been trying so far is- I created one MyVariableClass and declared a property. Then I instantiated that class and set the property string to the variable that I wanted to pass. Now, in my Model's method, I instantiated the same MyVariableClass again, but when I did that, the value of the variable was set to null. The code I have right now is -
public ActionResult ItemInformation( string id)
{
//Pass a string to MyVariable
MyVariableVClass params = new MyVariableClass();
params.myVariable = "abc";
//This is what My Model is taking as an argument(id), and I don't want to
//pass mYvariable along with that argument because it will break other controllers
// too which calls this method
var itemInformation = _repository.GetItemInformation(id);
return View(itemInformation);
}
and MyVariableClass
public class MyVariableClass
{
public string myVariable { get; set; }
}
and the method in My Model
public IList<Items> GetItemInformation(string itemId)
{
MyVariableClass webType = new MyVariableClass();
var _params = webType.myVariable;
//Check this variable and perform database query
if (_params =="this")
{
var query = myFirstQuery;
}
else
{
var query = mySecondQuery;
}
//return ....
}
Anybody has solution to this? Thanks in Advance!
Any reason why subclassing your model and overriding the GetItemInformation method wouldn't work? Or, even easier, why not just overload the GetItemInformation method with one that takes two strings? Your other controllers can still use the one that only takes a single string.
public IList<Items> GetItemInformation(string itemId, MyVariableClass webType)
{
var _params = webType.myVariable;
//Check this variable and perform database query
if (_params == "this")
{
var query = myFirstQuery;
}
else
{
var query = mySecondQuery;
}
//return ....
}
public IList<Items> GetItemInformation(string itemId)
{
MyVariableClass fauxType = new MyVariableClass();
fauxType.myVariable = "not this";
return GetItemInformation(itemId, fauxType);
}
Try using session variable.