I refer to the document https://developers.google.com/calendar/v3/reference/events/insert to call the insert method, but there is an error insufficientPermissions. I want to know what the general situation is, and I can use gapi.client.calendar.events.list() method to get the result normally.
You are probably using one of the Calendar API Quickstarts which is why calls to events.list works but events.insert doesn't. You need to change the scope to https://www.googleapis.com/auth/calendar because that is required for events.insert.
Also don't forget to delete the previously saved credentials when adding the new scope.
Related
I have an Event called Ecommerce_purchase, when I try to add parameter for reporting from analytics dashboard of Firebase, it gives me two errors:
Internal error ! try again (In Red in center)
One or more parameters have not been registered! try again! (right top corner)
Did you change parameters for this event? When you add/remove parameters for an event, you may get this error.
Recently, I did a tidy up for Firebase Analytics of my app. Some events' names were kept but added/removed some parameters. I then started getting this internal error. When Firebase receives one set of parameters for one event from one user and a different set of parameters from another user, it gets confused.
When you want to change parameters for an event, I suggest you change the event name as well to avoid the confusion.
Problem gets solved when you try adding parameters using incognito window of chrome .
I have a task to export a repeat grid's content to Excel. I have read an
article, but I still can't realize how to properly use it. I tried to repeat article's steps to provide pzRDExportWrapper, but after I click "Save" button I get the error:
Method: Rule-Obj-Activity instance not found:
Sb-FW-CTrackFW-Work.pzRDExportWrapper. Details: Invalid value for
Activity name passed to ActivityAssembler.
Could anybody give me any suggestions? Thank you.
You invoke activity from another activity which applies to class Sb-FW-CTrackFW-Work. Rule Resolution use primary context Sb-FW-CTrackFW-Work class and try invoke activity pzRDExportWrapper from it and you get error (because rule resolution can't found invoked activity in this class).
Activity pzRDExportWrapper applies to Rule-Obj-Report-Definition class. Try invoke from it.
Try activity step as below:
Call Rule-Obj-Report-Definition.pzRDExportWrapper
Or use step page for this step which defined as applies to Rule-Obj-Report-Definition class(you can declare it on Pages&Classes tab)
Okay. I have resolved the issue (thank you njc). I have two sections on a lone web page.
A context of the first section is my custom data page Co-Name-FW-Data-Search. The Search page has some single value properties which are initialized by an user via an UI.
The second section is a repeat grid section, a report definition as a source. My Search page pointed out in a Pages and Classes tab. Also there is a Page, which is created by report definition and contains results. The report definition takes Search’s values as parameters.
So, I have created an activity and passed the Search page and a Cods-Pega-List MyResultList as parameters. There are some steps in the activity:
Check if Search is null. If true- skip step; else - transfer Search properties into Params props with Data Transform.
Set Param.exportmode = "excel"
Call pzRDExportWrapper with Step Page MyResultList.pyReportDefinition. Pass current parameter page.
P.S.: If it doesn’t work try to play with report definition’s settings.
P.P.S.: An only minus of pzExportWrapper is that it invokes report definition again.
I have a table with a trigger that points to an assembly:
CREATE TRIGGER [dbo].[triggername] ON [dbo].[tablename]
WITH EXECUTE AS CALLER
AFTER DELETE, UPDATE
NOT FOR REPLICATION
AS EXTERNAL NAME [Namofassembly].[blahblah].[blahblah]
We also using code first EF in .net 4.
When I use delete everything works fine but the trigger does not get called.
dataRepo.UsersPermanentAuditAssignments.Remove(isInsertFound)
When I use update I get a permissions error. This is either when I try it through the object model or a dataRepo.Database.ExecuteSqlCommand(updateSql)
System.Data.SqlClient.SqlException: The context transaction which was active before entering user defined routine, trigger or aggregate "name" has been ended inside of it, which is not allowed. Change application logic to enforce strict transaction nesting.
Everything works fine when I run the queries via the sql management studio.
I also am not able to change this configuration so while I don't care for this design I am not able to change it.
My questions are:
1> Why would the delete not get logged but work?
2> Do I need to add something extra to my repo configuration object that will allow this to work? Do I need to add some transaction like unitofwork before I start this since it has a trigger maybe?
I have figured out the causes of this issue.
It relates to having a composite primary key (station,user) and trying to update one of the values.
I could not update any column of the primary key, ie change the user assigned to a station.
The trigger failure masked the issue of not being able to update a value inside the key.
My experiments show the following for the compositekey/pk update:
Method History Trigger Result
EF.SaveChanges Enabled Fail at trigger
EF.SaveChanges Disabled Fail at trigger
EF.ExecuteSQLCommand(sql) Enabled Fail at trigger
EF.ExecuteSQLCommand(sql) Disabled Works
Unfortunately, I don't have the ability to change to a surrogate with a unique index which would work. Also, the trigger CLR prevents me from using DataBase.ExecuteSQLCommand(sql) also which I believe is actually a problem with the CLR of which I have not ability to modify.
So my advise (that I can't take) is if you get this use a surrogate key and a unique index instead of combining the 2.
If anyone knows any way to allow EF to allow you to change a value inside a composite/primary key please comment.
After creating a model and adding it to a repository I want to have the new ID for different purposes (creating a mail, updating other fields outside the Extbase world)
$page = t3lib_div::makeInstance('Tx_MyExt_Domain_Model_Page');
$page->setTitle('Hello World');
$this->pageRepository->add($page);
At this point $page hasn't got an ID yet, uid is null.
$page->getUid(); // returns null
When does it get it? And how can I retrieve in on runtime?
In ExtBase, objects are "managed". This means every persistence transaction (add/remove/update) is simply noted in the underlying logic, but not yet executed until the appropriate time (like the end of processing a request). So, just because you add an object to a repository doesn't mean that it's actually added yet. That actually happens once $persistenceManager->persistAll() is called, which isn't something you need to do manually, ever. The point is, your $page object won't have a UID until it's saved and that's why $page->getUid() returns null. Look here for a great explanation.
I suspect that you are trying to do something outside of the ExtBase object/MVC lifecycle. At least, last time I got null when I tried to get the UID of an object, it was because I wasn't operating within the framework appropriately.
However, if you post some more code and give us a bigger picture of what you're trying to achieve, maybe we can help you get to a point where that object actually has a UID. For instance, if you're in a Controller object, tell us which Action method you're in, or if you're in a Repository object, tell us what you're trying to get from the repository and where/how you plan on using the query results.
EDIT
Just guessing here, but I'm assuming you're executing this code in some action of a controller. Since after the controller is executed a view is rendered, you can just pass the page object to the view:
$this->view->assign('page', $page);
And then in your view you can use the page object in a link:
<f:link.action action="show" arguments="{page:page}">
See this page object
</f:link.action>
And then in the show action of your controller you can show the page:
public function showAction(Tx_MyExt_Domain_Model_Page $page) {
// Do whatever you need to show the page in the `Show.html` template
}
I really am just guessing here. If you can give us a larger picture of what you're trying to do, what your action methods are supposed to do and things like that, we can answer your question a little more confidently.
(I'm also assuming that your page object isn't a replacement for the regular TYPO3 pages and that they are something totally different. It's much easier to deal with those TYPO3 pages through the backend interface than at the php level.)
You can call persistence manager explicitly in Your controller like this
#TYPO3 4.x
$persistenceManager = $this->objectManager->create('Tx_Extbase_Persistence_Manager');
$persistenceManager->persistAll();
#TYPO3 6.x
$persistenceManager = \TYPO3\CMS\Core\Utility\GeneralUtility::makeInstance('TYPO3\CMS\Extbase\Persistence\Generic\PersistenceManager');
$persistenceManager->persistAll();
I am using methods with the Attribute [WebMethod] in my aspx pages. I don't use any asp.net ajax but jQuery to call these methods and return objects in JSON. This all works fine.
Next I added an authorization check inside the webMethod, if the current user doesn't have access to the feature I need to let the calling JavaScript know.
So I am throwing an AccessViolationException exception which can then be parsed by the OnError callback function in JavaScript. This works too but the exception includes the full StackTrace and I don't want to make this available to the calling client.
What other ways I could use to return an "Access Denied" to the client when the WebMethod returns a business object?
I'm using ASP.Net 3.5SP1 and jQuery 1.32
You can also add a:
customErrors mode="On"/
in your web.config, this will cut away the stack trace and leave you only the exception message
Why propagate errors through the wire? why not use an error response ?
Just wrap your object in a response object wich can contain an error code for status and an error message to present to users.
As suggested by NunFur I changed my approach and rather than throwing an error, I return a 'richer' object.
There are at least two options, the first one would be to encapsulate my business object into a response object with some status properties. I tried this but it makes the JSON more complicated.
So rather than adding a new object I added two properties to my business object, something like ServiceStatus and ServiceMessage. By default these are 200 and '', but can be set by the WebMethod code if anything goes wrong (no access, proper error). In this case they business object will be 'empty' (no data). The JavaScript code then first checks for the ServiceStatus and reacts appropriately.
I add the two fields to all my objects that are returned by WebMethods, even a simple string. They have to implement an Interface with those two properties.
Now I have complete control over that goes over the wire in case something unexpected is happening.
Thanks for the input
I save exceptions for when things go really wrong. (e.g. can't connect to the database)
Either return nothing (null/nill/whatever), or return a false bool value.
Sorry that I don't have a better answer than that...I'll have to keep looking myself.
You could look at SoapException: http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/system.web.services.protocols.soapexception(VS.71).aspx
I'm just not sure, if it will work when it is called from JavaScript. Espeially if it's called with a get-request.
BTW AccessViolationException is to my best knowlegde ment to be thrown when the application is accessing memory it has no access to.
/Asger