I used the token generated by my authentication server to sign my users in using signInWithCustomToken(token). Now what I cannot figure out is if they sign out, how will I sign them back in ?
I don't think saving the generated token in the database is a good idea because then I am going to have to give it public access so the user can access it.
Any ideas ?
If the user signs out. You have to go through the same mechanism you used initially to generate the custom token. Do not save the custom token. Besides it is only valid for a short period of time.
One example is if you are using our own username/password auth system. You ask the user for the username/password, verify it in your own server and then issue the custom token back to the client, client calls signInWithCustomToken and user is signed in. If the user signs out, you have to repeat the process.
Related
I like to implement the functionality
where if two users are trying to login with the same credentials then the first user should log out as soon as the second user login.
consider user one is logged in with his credentials from one machine
and he/ another user is trying to log in from another machine
then the user one session should be removed as soon as user one logged in.
Ps:
I tried to implement that by saving the current session id in the user table and overriding the OnCreated method from the IAuthSession interface and then checking in that if the request sessionId is the same as the saved session Id if same then process the request else call the lout endpoint.
But It will be not good for performance and I am not sure if it is a good way to do that?
PS: I am using a JWT token.
Update :
I am able to clear the session by using ICacheClient to get the session and then remove a session from the server using IRequest.RemoveSession(sessionId), but is it not log out the specific user.
You can't invalidate a user authenticating with stateless authentication like JWT which has the signed authentication embedded in the Token which is valid until the JWT expiry.
i.e. you can't revoke a JWT Token after it's already been issued.
There is a JwtAuthProvider.ValidateToken filter you can use to execute custom logic to prevent a user from authenticating which you may be able to use however that would require that you manage a collection of Token info you want to prevent from authenticating before its Token expiry.
How does FusionAuth work if you just completed the Change Password API, tried to re-login using the Login API with the oneTimePassword token, but you have two-factor enabled? Because, from my understanding, it sounds like I would need to interrupt the re-authentication flow for the user to get their two-factor code, after they just changed their password while already being logged in. Is this desired behavior? This line in the docs makes me think this is unintentional:
For this reason, this API will return a oneTimePassword that is intended to be used programatically after a Change Password request completes to keep the user logged in and provide a better user experience. A successful login will return you a new access token (JWT) and a refresh token. This will allow you to make the change password workflow seamless to the user.
There is an app that wants to authenticate with my users using oAuth2.
So they open a window, with the authorize URL, and parameters (such as redirect uri)
Like: https://my-website.com/api/authLauncherauthorize?redirect=SOME_URI
Now I have my own firebase-login, and when the user logs in, I get their access token from firebase. Which is what I want to respond with.
However, in oAuth2 guides/explanations like https://aaronparecki.com/oauth-2-simplified/ I see I am supposed to return an authorization code, and I don't understand where can I get that from?
What I can do, is generate a bullshit code, pair it in the DB to the access token, and then in the "token" request, send the correct access token. Is that what I am supposed to do?
Just to be clear, this is my first time writing an oAuth2 service myself.
OAuth is a system that provides authenticated access to resources. This resource can be for example a user page or editing rights to that user page. So your goal is to provide access to permissions to the right people.
When someone logs in, they get a token. Your part is to generate that token however you want, may it be some form of userdata into base64 or completely random. Take this token and link it against permissions, like viewing a page, editing it or even simpler things like viewing the email of a user.
OAuth2 tokens and/or permissions should be revokable without deleting a user. You should not use OAuth2 to identify someone.
If I am understanding your question correctly:
User visits some website
User wants to register or login using your websites OAuth2
You redirect back to the original page and send your generated token
The page can access content on your site with this token
Assuming you are the Host Site, given a User who wants to connect a 3rd party application, then the flow would be like this:
User lands on site - Clicks Login with Github
User is redirected to Github site where they login and click "Authorize"
Github redirects user back to your site /authorize with an auth token.
Your site then passes that token back to the 3rd party API (github in this case) in exchange for an access token and refresh token.
You can then pass that Authorization token to an API endpoint to get details about it. If the token expires, you can use the refresh token to get a new Auth token. Both Tokens should be stored in your database for your user.
However writing that all out I realize you are asking how do you generate the Authorization token, so I'm guessing you're actually the 3rd party API in this example. So you would want to generate an Authorization token using a random generator. Since you are using firebase, you'll probably wanna try out their token generator: https://github.com/firebase/firebase-token-generator-node
There's also some more up-to-date info here I believe: https://firebase.google.com/docs/auth/admin/#create_a_custom_token
And like you said, you would store that in a database associated with the user, and then when the Host Site sends that user's auth token to your server, you exchange it for the Authorization token (and refresh token if requested).
It's also worth reading through how google does it, because you'd be doing something similar: https://developers.google.com/identity/protocols/OAuth2UserAgent#validatetoken
JWT is another option of generating tokens: https://jwt.io/
I'm building an installed application that will have features requiring the Google Drive REST API using Qt and C++. I understand Qt is now releasing new libraries to support OAuth flows but let's assume I'm a student and learning to use OAuth at this layer is a requirement for this project.
In my application, I have a working OAuth flow for installed applications that ends with an Access Token and Refresh Token being stored using QSettings (I'm open to input on whether this is a disastrously bad idea too). The application requires no authentication/login for its own sake/data, but it does need authentication to Google for calling API's using an Access Token. This application has no associated web backend being hosted; its simple and should be deployable completely locally (I've written and included a simple TCP server that will receive the authorization redirect_uri and will run and close when called from within the application).
As such, I'm curious about the best way to make sure that, when a user opens my application and wants to use the Google Drive features, they are appropriately authenticated on Google's end. Say, if I maintain an access token in the registry, and this access token is granted per-user/per-application basis (right?), then how can I make sure only the user the token belongs to is able to make calls to the API with it?
Here's my understanding and approach; feel free to correct me or educate me if I've got the wrong interpretation.
If an Access Token is found, perform the following:
Open a browser page to a Google login domain and have the user authenticate there (this could prohibit a user from being able to use a cached login session that would have access to a token they otherwise shouldn't have access to)
If user has correctly authenticated with a Google account, return control to the application and make a test call to an API using the stored token.
If the call fails (responds with an invalid_credentials) I should be able to be sure its because the access token has expired and the application will go through the flow to renew an Access Token from a Refresh Token.
If no Access Token is initially found:
Start a normal OAuth installed application flow
Get the tokens and store them so that when the user opens the application next time the former procedure is used
My issue then is the first two steps if the Access Token is found. Nominally this could be done by the typical OAuth flow but it appears that when using a localhost as the redirect uri, Google will always prompt for consent, regardless of settings for prompt and access_type authorization query parameters.
What can be done to accomplish these first two steps in a way that my application can control (i.e. not a solution that relies on a backend server being hosted somewhere)?
If this question is too open-ended for SO requirements I can make some more restrictions/assumptions to limit the problem domain but I'd rather not do that yet in case I unknowingly rope off a good viable solution.
Thanks for reading! Sorry if its a verbose; I wanted to ensure my problem domain was fully fleshed out!
If you are using an installed application, I wouldn't recommend using or storing refresh tokens. Storing refresh tokens on the client side means that if an intruder gains access to the client's application, they have infinite access to the user's application without ever having to enter the user's credentials. If you do insist on having a refresh token, ensure you follow the Google's installed app flow, with the code_verifier parameter included in your requests.
If the access token is found, you should try to verify it, and if verified then use it at the google api, otherwise force the user to login again (or refresh it if you chose to still use refresh tokens).
If no access token is found, your flow sounds fine.
A few notes on loggin in with Google:
Google will only return a refresh token if you specify access_type=offline in your auth request.
Google will only return a refresh token on the user's first authorization request, unless you always specify prompt=consent in your query params.
In my experience, when leaving out the prompt query param, the user is not prompted for their consent again. If they are logged in to google, you will get a new access token, but no refresh token, unless you have prompt=consent.
I think the idea is you use prompt=consent if you have no record of the user ever using your application. Otherwise if they have used it before, you may prefer to use prompt=select_account to allow the user to select which account he wants to use in case he has more then one, or you can just use prompt=none.
This is just my understanding of it all.
My approach I ended up using was just to deploy with an SQLite db that will be stored in the AppData roaming directory. The db schema includes a field for the user's Name (from the OpenID IDToken field if it exists), the user's picture URL (again from IDToken if it exists), the refresh and access token strings (will be stored as encrypted strings when I get around to it), the user's UID/sub string, and a field for a user name and password.
These latter two fields are authentication fields for within my own application, which, again, I wanted to avoid but it seems impossible to do so. So the user will be prompted to enter a username and password into a form, and these credentials will be checked against the existing SQLite db file mentioned previously.
If they exist and are correct, the user gets logged in and will have access to their respective access and refresh token.
If the user has forgotten their password, they'll be asked for reconsent (going through the installed app flow again), and whatever password they provided during initial login will be used as the reset password. It is considered, for my purposes, that logging into Google for the installed app flow is proof enough that the user account belongs to them and they should have authorization to reset the password.
If the user is a new user and doesn't have a record in the local SQLite db file, then they can also click a button to "Create New Account" - which effectively goes through the authorization flow as well but this time a whole new record is posted to the SQLite db with the appropriate fields filled.
There's still more optimization that could be done but at least I am getting closer to the level of security and control of access to Google user accounts that I want.
I'm not marking this as an answer because I feel like this solution is still not desired and that there should be an easier way. So if someone has evidence or experience of providing an equivalent level of authentication control without needing to maintain a local user account database then I would be more than happy to mark such a method as the solution!
Thanks again!
In Webserver Grant Flow
After I obtain the Authorization Code from the authorization authority (after the user has authorized my access) how long is that code usually valid form?
The reason i am asking is, can my webserver store that code and use it in later sessions to retrieve a new access token without the need for the user to re-authenticate again? Should that be the flow?
FYI my goal is make requests from Adobe Analytics and Google Analytics on behalf of my customer. So i would want to ask my customer for authorization once until he revokes my access.
Speaking strictly of Google Oauth. There are three types of codes or tokens you should be aware of.
Authorization code
Access token
Refresh token
Authorization code is return when the user clicks accept to your application accessing their data. This code is used to exchange for an access token and a refresh token. This code can only be used once and is extremely short lived 10 minutes I believe.
Access tokens are used to access private user data. They are valid for approximately one hour.
Refresh tokens are used to gain a new access token when the access token has expired. For the most part refresh tokens do not expire however if it has not been used for six months it will no longer be valid and of course the user can always remove your access.
Answer: No storing the authentication code would be pointless. You will need to store the refresh token. make sure you are requesting offline access of your users.
I cant help you with adobe analytics however I suspect it is similar this is standard Oauth protocol we are talking about.