So lets say I have a custom element
<template>
<style include="stylesheet"></style>
<div class="main">
stufff
<other-custom-element></other-custom-element>
</div>
</template>
and "other-custom-element" is
<template>
<style include="stylesheet"></style>
<div class="main">
stufff
</div>
</template>
and "stylesheet" is
.main {
padding: 10rem;
}
How to I make it so the padding from "other-custom-element" will not show up on the custom element without removing the padding from that element? Just want the padding gone while I'm on the parent page.
So far I've tried:
other-custom-element .main{
padding: 0;
}
and giving the "other-custom-element" a class and trying that:
.other-custom-element-className .main {
padding: 0;
}
I'm not terribly good at Polymer and I did not make this website, I'm merely the CSS guy making it look good. I figured it wouldn't hurt to ask here while I continue to try to solve this in case someone figured it out sooner or already knew. If I find the solution before someone can answer I'll be sure to share.
Try removing the other-custom-element and .other-custom-element-className these break it. The thing is Polymer uses ShadowRoot which does not allow css to change it´s children. So every Polymer Element needs its own css file which is always relativ to the Element itself. You will find the Documentation here.
The short answer is as far as I know, you cannot change child element parameters from a parent element, at least not the way I was doing it that's for sure. This is what I found out and my solution that worked.
So I'll add some dimension to the problem so you can understand my solution and why I did it.
<other-custom-element> was a page, and the element it was on was also a page. Both were pages, so both needed the margins and such and I could not remove those. The solution is using polymer the way it was meant to be used (in my opinion): making a page of elements.
One way to do polymer, is to have a page FULL of interchangeable elements. That way if you want to use them again you can.
What this means is making <other-custom-element> look something like this:
<template>
<style include="stylesheet"></style>
<style> /*custom css*/ </style>
<div class="main">
<other-page-element1></other-page-element1>
</div>
<div class="main">
<other-page-element2></other-page-element2>
</div>
<div class="main">
<other-page-element3></other-page-element3>
</div>
</template>
instead of this:
<template>
<style include="stylesheet"></style>
<style> /*custom css*/ </style>
<div class="main">
stuff
</div>
</template>
What this allows me to do now is with the new page I can simply pull the elements (whether it be some or all) from the <other-custom-element> page like so.
<template>
<style include="stylesheet"></style>
<style> /*custom css*/ </style>
<div class="main">
<this-page-element>
</div>
<div class="main">
<other-page-element2>
</div>
</template>
This was the correct way to deal with this instead of trying to do some css selector (also that wouldn't work anyways).
Hope my answer helps anyone else who runs into css issues with polymer!
Related
I have a simple problem that is driving me insane. I want to override a CSS rule from bootstrap. By default, bootstrap assigns position: relative to elements with a class of navbar. I want my navbars to be position: absolute.
From my research on similar questions, I have tried:
Loading Bootstrap first and then my custom CSS file, as to override the rules there. Makes no difference
Make it so that my rule has more specificity:
In Bootstrap's file, all they have is (from what I can tell):
.navbar {
position: relative;
}
So in mine, I have:
div .navbar.menu {
position: absolute;
}
Makes no difference
I even put !important in there (just to try it out, I wasn't going to leave it like that), no luck. I also tried throwing in random IDs and classes to the selector to no avail.
It works if I:
Use inline styling (don't want to do this)
Add the attribute using jQuery on DOM ready (don't want to do this)
Ill be glad to provide any more info if needed
Any ideas will be appreciated !
EDIT:
My HTML snippet (for loading the css)
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../bower_components/bootstrap/dist/css/bootstrap.css">
<link rel="stylesheet" href="../styles/main.css">
The thing I am trying to target is here (its under body -> nav -> div):
<div class ="navbar menu">
I tried selecting it as body nav div .container.menu too
By your css
div .navbar.menu {
position: absolute;
}
the html structure would have to be
<div>
<div class='navbar menu'>
....
</div>
</div>
but if you have just this
<body>
<div class='navbar menu'>
....
</div>
</body>
your css has to be
div.navbar.menu {
position: absolute;
}
Unless I'm missing something, can't you just do:
.navbar{
position:absolute;
top:#px;
left:#px;
width:100%;
}
like here: http://www.bootply.com/pcyQsgEQVP
Is there a common CSS layout technique for controlling the vertical source order of a page?
For example, can I change this...
<container>
<header></header>
<content></content>
<footer></footer>
</container>
...to this...
<container>
<content></content>
<header></header>
<footer></footer>
</container>
...while still having the <header> appear at the top of the page, above the <content>?
In other words, I'd like to apply the techniques used for controlling horizontal source order, such as "One True Layout" and "Holy Grail", to the vertical source order of the page.
This question asks essentially the same thing, but the responders didn't seem to get what was being asked and the asker's solution seems cumbersome.
I might get criticism for micro-optimizing, but Mega Menus and responsive design keep pushing my page content down further and further.
Littlefool's answer works well if you know the height of the block you are moving (if you are swapping two blocks, it's sufficient for either of them to have a fixed height).
However it doesn't help if the blocks all have flexible height. In that case you can try the technique from http://tanalin.com/en/articles/css-block-order/:
<div class="container">
<div class="block-1">1st block</div>
<div class="block-2">2nd block</div>
<div class="block-3">3rd block</div>
</div>
<style>
.container { display: table; width: 100%; }
.block-1 { display: table-footer-group; } /* Will display at the bottom. */
.block-2 { display: table-row-group; } /* Will display in the middle. */
.block-3 { display: table-header-group; } /* Will display at the top. */
</style>
(see demo: http://jsbin.com/etujad/11/edit)
Caveats:
It only works for up to 3 blocks (you may be able to achieve more by nesting).
It doesn't work in IE6/7, and there are some wrinkles in IE8.
Many browsers (except Firefox?) don't allow replaced elements like images to be given these display values (testcase), so you'd have to wrap them in a div and reorder the div instead.
You could either supplement this with JavaScript for old IE, or depending on the design it might be acceptable to just leave the blocks in the wrong order in old IE (note that very few smartphones run old versions of IE, as even Windows Phone 7.5 runs IE9, so this is a good option if you're only swapping the source order on mobile devices).
You cannot alter the source of a page with CSS. You can, to some mild degree, alter the HTML output, but not in this way.
The order of elements in an HTML document has meaning. So typically it won't make sense for your source to have a heading which comes after its related content. It is the order which defines that relationship in many cases.
What you can do is use CSS techniques to lay out these elements visually so that they appear to be in different order.
But their vertical order in HTML should be semantically logical.
You should know that searching for "the holy grail" is quite useless. Although I can understand why you want to have the content section in front. Usually search engines index the pages on the content as they appear in html. Having first a bunch of headers and other things won't do any good.
I haven't had time to look into HTML5 and CSS3 yet, but it is quite possible to alter your layout with only css. I'm a developer so my css and html skills are less then real web producer but you can play around with the position properties in CSS.
<div id="content">this is your content</div>
<div id="header">this is the header</div>
<div id="footer">this is your footer</div>
This html can still show the header tag on top of your page with the following css.
#header
{
height:100px;
width:100%;
background-color:Red;
position:absolute;
top:0;
}
#content
{
margin-top:100px;
height:500px;
background-color:Green;
}
#footer
{
height:100px;
background-color:Blue;
}
I hope it gives you an idea of what is possible. (since you mention HTML5 I suppose you don't need to worry about older browsers but only the latest releases).
You can use the old friend display:table to re order your element.
Lets say this is your source.
<div id="container">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="content"></div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</div>
In order to reorder try this.
#container{
display: table;
}
#content{
display: table-header-group;
}
#header{
display: table-row-group;
}
#footer{
display: table-footer-group;
}
bam. you got it. Here is the proof of concept. http://jsfiddle.net/k0La8egp/1/
This may be the simplest question ever, but try as I might I simply couldn't figure it out. I'm working on a website right now and I wish to use as few <div> elements as possible to keep the HTML pretty and easy to edit. At the moment I essentially have:
<html doctype etc etc>
<head>
<title and meta tags>
</head>
<body>
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="header"></div>
<div id="body"></div>
<div id="sidebar"></div>
<div id="footer"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
Very simple and elegant, yes? However the client wants their header to consist of a single large image which contains their company name and logo. So my options were pretty clear - either use an <img> tag, or set the background-image property on the header <div>. However then I got to thinking about SEO. For Google's sake it would be nice if the header <div> contained an <h1> element with her website's title, but then this element would have to be hidden so that human users only see the background image.
Although if you were to use the display:none; css property then the entire <div> disappears, including the background. Is there a good way to hide the contents of a <div> without hiding the <div> itself?
Have you tried to apply the hide on the H1 itself?
<div id="header">
<h1>Company title</h1>
</div>
Your style would be: #header h1{display:none;visibility:hidden;}
UPDATE
Apparently, we're both just having one of those days. If you want to make the H1 truly SEO/Screen reader friendly, it would be better to do this with your CSS:
#header h1{
width:XXXpx;
hight:XXXpx;
background:url('image/location.png');
text-indent:-9999px;
overflow:hidden;
}
This way your text is actually there on the page and rendered, it's just kind of off screen.
You could replace #header div with h1 if you want this tag, set background image on said h1 and even put some text in it (company name) and use text-indent to hide it.
Plus, in your quest to minimize number of elements you can use body as a wrapper, and if you need full page background just set in on html element.
Set display: none on the H1 tag rather than the div, and use the background image on the div.
I am trying to make something look like following (don't concern color here. my concern here is the shape);
I tried something with following code but didn't succeed!
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
#header{border:3px solid gray;padding:10px;}
#header-left-container{border:1px solid gray;float:left;width:30%;}
#header-right-container{border:1px solid gray;float:right;width:69%;}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="header">
<div id="header-left-container">
pooo
</div>
<div id="header-right-container">
bla bla bla.....
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
I know this can be done with table easily but I don't wanna use table in my application where I can do the same with div elements.
any suggestion here?
http://jsfiddle.net/j4DnG/7/
What you need to do is clearing the area arround the 2 floated divs.
Doing this by modern technuiqe is giving the parent the property of Overflow:Hidden or Auto (what ever fitting you more. I recommend hidden)
In the past people user clearfix (google on that). Todays we use that approach.
As well people used to put clear:both after the creation of the two elements. That has a negative side- 1 more element in the dom.
You need to add overflow:auto; to the #header css; without that divisions don't expand to contain floated elements.
your code looks fine...
suggestions:
Just Add clearfix after floating divs so as they will be contained inside the parent object like:
<style>.clarFix{clear:both;}</style>
<div class="clearfix"></div>
Add
<br style="clear:both" />
after second div. Or make the container div float: left. Or use one of the css frameworks if You don't want to become css master before You create a webpage. One is http://960.gs/
Do you use firebug? go on twitter.com and see how they have defined a left and a right container is the style sheet . They're not using table to implement it. just div
Just replace the float: right; declaration with a margin-left: 30%; declaration for #header-right-container. You don't need to float both of them. This way, you will only need to clear floats if the left block is taller than the right block. See this fiddle.
I have some problem that i want to change it with css
<div class="a">
<div class="b">
<span></span>
</div>
<div class="c">
<span></span>
</div>
<div class="d">
<span class="e"></span>
</div>
</div>
I want to change background of div.b and div.c by using span.e
Please help me.
Thanks
The following answer assumes you are asking how to use span.e as part of a selector to change the rules for div.b and div.c. For example:
span.e:parent:prevAll.b { background:red } // concept-code, doesn't actually work
You can't do that with CSS alone, you would need to use something like jQuery (javascript) to handle this for you. With CSS, you can reference children from parents, but not parents from children. Or in this case uncles from nephews...
At current, CSS cannot go up the chain (child to parent) only down the chain (parent to child). You could probably use jQuery to do what you want here, but you should probably rewrite the HTML so its not difficult.
You can't do that with CSS, you'd need something like jQuery. It's difficult to know exactly what to suggest since it's unclear how you want the system to work, but this should help:
$('.e').parents('div').eq(0).addClass('red');
You would already have a class in your CSS: .red { background-color: red; } (you might want to name it better though).