calling a R function from python code with passing arguments - r

rtest = function(input ,output) {
a <- input
b <- output
outpath <- a+b
print(a+b)
return(outpath)
}
I have just return this R code for as a function for getting sum of two numbers. I tried to run this function from my python code using subprocess by passing 2 numbers as arguments. But it does not return sum value as return output. Do you know any method for implement this in python3 by passing function arguments.
my python code using subprocess is:
args=['3','10'] # (i tried to pass aruments like this)
command="Rscript"
path2script = '/...path/rtest.R'
cmd = [command, path2script] +args
x = subprocess.check_output(cmd, universal_newlines=True)
print(x)
but x return ' ' null value

This could be easily done by rpy2 library in python.
import rpy2.robjects as ro
path="specify/path to/ R file"
def function1(input,output):
r=ro.r
r.source(path+"rtest.R")
p=r.rtest(input,output)
return p
a=function1(12,12) # calling the function with passing arguments
Thanks.

Related

Evaluating strings in Julia_Eval for diffeqr solver

I am trying to evaluate strings within a for loop within an R script using JuliaCall::julia_eval. While I was able to accomplish this in R using the deSolve package, I am running into issues when converting the code to one that is compatible with Julia. The base code for the correctly functioning R deSolve code is shown below.
library(deSolve)
library(dplyr)
Combine <- c(" - 1*0.4545*(H2O2^1) - 1*27000000*(`$OH`^1)*(H2O2^1)", " - 1*3100000000*(`1,4-dioxane`^1)*(`$OH`^1)",
" - 1*33000*(TOC^1)*(`$OH`^1)", "2*0.4545*(H2O2^1) - 1*3100000000*(`1,4-dioxane`^1)*(`$OH`^1) - 1*33000*(TOC^1)*(`$OH`^1) - 1*27000000*(`$OH`^1)*(H2O2^1) - 1*8500000*(`$OH`^1)*(`HCO3-`^1) - 1*390000000*(`$OH`^1)*(`CO3 2-`^1)",
" - 1*8500000*(`$OH`^1)*(`HCO3-`^1)", " - 1*390000000*(`$OH`^1)*(`CO3 2-`^1)"
)
time <- seq(from=0, to=0.01, by = 1E-4)
State <- c(H2O2 = 0.000294117647058824, `1,4-dioxane` = 0.00000113494,
TOC = 0, `$OH` = 0, `HCO3-` = 0.003766104, `CO3 2-` = 0.0000167638711956647)
ODEcreater2 <- function(t, state, parameters){
with(as.list(c(state)),{
for (i in 1:6) { #
dY[i] <- eval(parse(text=Combine[i]))}
return(list(dY))
} )}
out1<- ode(y = state, times = time, func = ODEcreater2, parms = NULL)
I am trying to use replicate the code and run it in Julia to improve the speed of the ODE solver by using diffeqr vs. deSolve. Unfortunately, I am running into evaluating the string/expression within a for loop in julia_call.
library(diffeqr)
diffeqr::diffeq_setup()
library(JuliaCall)
julia <- julia_setup()
ODEcreater <- JuliaCall::julia_eval("
function (dY,t,state)
for i in 1:6
dY[i] = eval(Meta.parse(:Combine[i]))
end
end")
tspan <- list(1E-6, 1E-3)
sol = diffeqr::ode.solve(ODEcreater,state,tspan, abstol=1e-8, reltol=1e-8)
Does anyone have any insight into the best way to evaluate the strings within the for loop? I have been investigating metaexpressions on the JuliaLang website but am still lost.
As mentioned in the duplicate question https://stackoverflow.com/a/58766919/1544203 , building the string and then doing
sprintf("function f(du,u,p,t)\n%s\nend", paste(Combine, collapse="\n"))
from the R side builds a single string which matches the format that works. This is also optimal since it excludes any extra function calls from the generated function.
from julia docs:
parse(str; raise=true, depwarn=true)
Parse the expression string greedily, returning a single expression. An error is thrown if there are additional
characters after the first expression. If raise is true (default), syntax errors will raise an error; otherwise, parse
will return an expression that will raise an error upon evaluation. If depwarn is false, deprecation warnings will be
suppressed.
julia> Meta.parse("x = 3")
:(x = 3)
so, Meta.parse accepts a string and returns an expression. this should evaluate correctly:
eval(Meta.parse(Combine[i]))
one problem i see is the use of non-valid julia variable names, like $OH

Reverse order recursion

I want to print out the elements in the list in reverse order recursively.
def f3(alist):
if alist == []:
print()
else:
print(alist[-1])
f3(alist[:-1])
I know it is working well, but I don't know the difference between
return f3(alist[:-1])
and
f3(alist[:-1])
Actually both are working well.
My inputs are like these.
f3([1,2,3])
f3([])
f3([3,2,1])
There is a difference between the two although it isn't noticeable in this program. Look at the following example where all I am doing is passing a value as an argument and incrementing it thereby making it return the value once it hits 10 or greater:
from sys import exit
a = 0
def func(a):
a += 1
if a >= 10:
return a
exit(1)
else:
# Modifications are made to the following line
return func(a)
g = func(3)
print(g)
Here the output is 10
Now if I re-write the code the second way without the "return" keyword like this :
from sys import exit
a = 0
def func(a):
a += 1
if a >= 10:
return a
exit(1)
else:
# Modifications are made to the following line
func(a)
g = func(3)
print(g)
The output is "None".
This is because we are not returning any value to handle.
In short, return is like internal communication within the function that can be possibly handled versus just running the function again.

Error in running a Python code from R with the package rPithon

I would like to run this Python code from R:
>>> import nlmpy
>>> nlm = nlmpy.mpd(nRow=50, nCol=50, h=0.75)
>>> nlmpy.exportASCIIGrid("raster.asc", nlm)
Nlmpy is a Python package to build neutral landscape models. The example comes from the website
To run this Python code from R, I 'm trying to use the package rPithon. However, I obtain this error message:
if (pithon.available())
{
nRow <- 50
nCol <- 50
h <- 0.75
# this file contains the definition of function concat
pithon.load("C:/Users/Anaconda2/Lib/site-packages/nlmpy/nlmpy.py")
pithon.call( "mpd", nRow, nCol, h)
} else {
print("Unable to execute python")
}
Error in pithon.get("_r_call_return", instance.name = instname) :
Couldn't retrieve variable: Traceback (most recent call last):
File "C:/Users/Documents/R/win-library/3.3/rPithon/pythonwrapperscript.py", line 110, in <module>
reallyReallyLongAndUnnecessaryPrefix.data = json.dumps([eval(reallyReallyLongAndUnnecessaryPrefix.argData)])
File "C:\Users\ANACON~1\lib\json\__init__.py", line 244, in dumps
return _default_encoder.encode(obj)
File "C:\Users\ANACON~1\lib\json\encoder.py", line 207, in encode
chunks = self.iterencode(o, _one_shot=True)
File "C:\Users\ANACON~1\lib\json\encoder.py", line 270, in iterencode
return _iterencode(o, 0)
File "C:\Users\ANACON~1\lib\json\encoder.py", line 184, in default
raise TypeError(repr(o) + " is not JSON serializable")
TypeError: array([[ 0.36534654, 0.31962481, 0.44229946, ..., 0.11513079,
0.07156331, 0.00286971], [ 0.41534291, 0.41333479, 0.48118995, ..., 0.19203674,
0.04192771, 0.03679473], [ 0.5188
Is this error caused by a syntax issue in my code ? I work with the Anaconda 4.2.0 platform for Windows which uses the Python 2.7 version.
I haven't used the nlmpy package hence, I am not sure what would be your expected output. However, this code successfully communicates between R and Python.
There are two files,
nlmpyInR.R
command ="python"
path2script="path_to_your_pythoncode/nlmpyInPython.py"
nRow <-50
nCol <-50
h <- 0.75
# Build up args in a vector
args = c(nRow, nCol, h)
# Add path to script as first arg
allArgs = c(path2script, args)
Routput = system2(command, args=allArgs, stdout=TRUE)
#The command would be python nlmpyInPython.py 50 50 0.75
print(paste("The Output is:\n", Routput))
nlmpyInPython.py
import sys
import nlmpy
#Getting the arguments from the command line call
nRow = sys.argv[1]
nCol = sys.argv[2]
h = sys.argv[3]
nlm = nlmpy.mpd(nRow, nCol, h)
pyhtonOutput = nlmpy.exportASCIIGrid("raster.asc", nlm)
#Whatever you print will get stored in the R's output variable.
print pyhtonOutput
The cause of the error that you're getting is hinted at by the
"is not JSON serializable" line. Your R code calls the mpd
function with certain arguments, and that function itself will
execute correctly. The rPithon library will then try to send the
return value of the function back to R, and to do this it will try
to create a JSON object
that describes the return value.
This works well for integers, floating point values, arrays, etc,
but not every kind of Python object can be converted to such a
JSON representation. And because rPithon can't convert the return value
of mpd this way, an error is generated.
You can still use rPithon to call the mpd function though. The following
code creates a new Python function that performs two steps: first
it calls the mpd function with the specified parameters, and then it
exports the result to a file, of which the filename is also an argument.
Using rPithon, the new function is then called from R. Because myFunction doesn't return anything, representing the return value in JSON format will not be a problem.
library("rPithon")
pythonCode = paste("import nlmpy.nlmpy as nlmpy",
"",
"def myFunction(nRow, nCol, h, fileName):",
" nlm = nlmpy.mpd(nRow, nCol, h)",
" nlmpy.exportASCIIGrid(fileName, nlm)",
sep = "\n")
pithon.exec(pythonCode)
nRow <- 50
nCol <- 50
h <- 0.75
pithon.call("myFunction", nRow, nCol, h, "outputraster.asc")
Here, the Python code defined as an R string, and executed using
pithon.exec. You could also put that Python code in a separate file
and use pithon.load to process the code so that the myFunction
function is known.

R List functions in file

How do I list all functions of a certain R file doing something like
list = list.all.functions(file.name, alphabetical = TRUE, ...)
where list is a string vector containing the names of the functions in file.name?
The solution of How to list all the functions and their arguments in an R file? gives no output for me (since I am not interested in arguments I opened a new question).
EDIT
File allometry.R starts with
#==========================================================================================#
#==========================================================================================#
# Standing volume of a tree. #
#------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------#
dbh2vol <<- function(hgt,dbh,ipft){
vol = pft$b1Vol[ipft] * hgt * dbh ^ pft$b2Vol[ipft]
return(vol)
}#end function dbh2ca
#==========================================================================================#
#==========================================================================================#
My main looks like
rm(list=ls())
here = "/directory/of/allometry.R/"
setwd(here)
is_function = function (expr) {
if (! is_assign(expr))
return(FALSE)
value = expr[[3]]
is.call(value) && as.character(value[[1]]) == 'function'
}
function_name = function (expr)
as.character(expr[[2]])
is_assign = function (expr)
is.call(expr) && as.character(expr[[1]]) %in% c('=', '<-', 'assign')
file_parsed = parse("allometry.R")
functions = Filter(is_function, file_parsed)
function_names = unlist(Map(function_name, functions))
Probably too late to join the party, but better late than never.
There is a package called NCmisc which has a function to list all functions in a file and returns a list where the names of the components are the names of the packages they belong to. If there are any functions in the global environment, they will be under the .GobalEnv list component. Simply load all packages the file uses and then run the following:
all.functions <- list.functions.in.file(
filename = "/path/to/file/my_file.R")

Logging and writing error messages to a dataframe

I intend to record the errors in my R code while calling functions in a dataframe (ERR_LOG, say). I want to use 'try' to identify errors while calling a function,if any.The dataframe(ERR_LOG) will have the following columns :
Time : The time at which the function was called (Sys.time)
Loc : For which function call was this error recorded (name of the
function)
Desc : Description of the error which R throws at us (Error message
in R)
Example :
First I would like to initialize a blank dataframe 'ERR_LOG' with these columns
Then write the function
f <- function(a){
x <- a*100
return(x)
}
Now I put the output of the call to 'f' in 'chk'
chk <- try(f())
The above call gives the error 'Error in a * 100 : 'a' is missing' (description of the error)
Check
if(inherits(chk,'try-error'))
{then I want to populate ERR_LOG and stop the code execution}
How can this be done in R?
use tryCatch instead of try
Then inside tryCatch(), use the argument error=function(e){}
e will have an element named message, which is what you would like
Use the following call with browser to explore e$message:
x <- tryCatch(stop("This is your error message"), error=function(e) {browser()})
Note that your function need not be anonymous.
MyErrorParser <- function(e) {
m <- e$message
if (grepl("something", m))
do something
return (something_else)
}
## THEN
tryCatch(stop("This is a test"), error=MyErrorParser)

Resources