Make CSS Grid row height flexible - css

I am building a CSS Grid layout, and somehow I'm unable to get the "auto" value to work for the sizing of row height.
The items keep a minimum height of 1fr, even if their content is small enough to allow them to shrink.
Here is a code example that explains the problem - you can also check it out on https://codepen.io/16kbit/pen/RJbMWM
section {
display: grid;
grid-template-areas: "one top" "one bottom";
align-items: start;
border: 1px solid hotpink;
}
article {
border: 1px solid green;
}
#one {
grid-area: one;
}
#top {
grid-area: top;
}
#bottom {
grid-area: bottom;
background: yellow;
}
<section>
<article id=one>
<h1>One</h1>
<p>Lorem cool dolizzle sit amizzle, dope sizzle elizzle. Nullam shiznit velizzle, get down get down volutpizzle, suscipizzle quizzle, dizzle mammasay mammasa mamma oo sa, arcu. Pellentesque sheezy tortizzle. Sed erizzle. Fusce izzle dolor shiznit pimpin'
tempizzle tempor. Maurizzle pellentesque nibh shizzlin dizzle turpizzle. Vestibulum in tortor. Pellentesque cool rhoncus black. In hac fo shizzle my nizzle check out this dictumst. Black uhuh ... yih!. Mammasay mammasa mamma oo sa tellizzle shiz,
pretizzle shiznit, mattizzle fo, gangster vitae, nunc. Get down get down suscipizzle. Own yo' away izzle sed cool.Nullizzle fizzle shut the shizzle up yo mamma orci daahng dawg viverra. Phasellus nizzle shizzle my nizzle crocodizzle. Curabitizzle
sure velit vizzle check out this dizzle doggy. Maecenas sapien nulla, iaculis shiz, molestie hizzle, egestas a, erizzle. Shit vitae turpis quizzle nibh bibendizzle boom shackalack. Nizzle pulvinar dope velizzle. Aliquizzle mammasay mammasa mamma
oo sa volutpat. Nunc izzle its fo rizzle at lectus pretizzle faucibizzle. We gonna chung nec lacizzle own yo' fizzle pizzle ultricizzle. Ut nisl. Crunk et owned. Integer laoreet ipsum shizzlin dizzle mi. Donizzle at shiz.</p>
</article>
<article id=top>
<h1>Top</h1>
<p>Just Two Words</p>
</article>
<article id=bottom>
<h1>Bottom</h1>
<p>Help Me! How can I get closer to my Top neighbour?</p>
</article>
</section>
The result I want:
I want the #bottom item to move as close as possible to the #top item. And I want them to shrink to their contents size.
Actual result:
The CSS Grid doesn't allow the item's height to be smaller than 1fr unit (50% of the total height) – which is changing depending on the #one item, that has a lot of text.
Visual explanation: instead of the result on the left, I want the result on the right:

It appears, based on what you've written in your question and answer, that you are overlooking an important concept of grid layout (and grids, in general).
A row extends across an entire grid. It's not confined to a single column.
So when you write:
If we had three rows in our right column...
There's no such thing. All rows exist in all columns (and vice versa).
Here's an illustration of your layout from dev tools:
As you can see, all rows extend across all columns.
The height of the third row is set by the content in #one, just as you specified.
The third row in the right column must be the same height as the third row in the left column, because a row can only have one height.
However, you can adjust the size and alignment of grid areas within rows and columns.
align-self: stretch (default value)
align-self: end
align-self: center
align-self: start (what you may be looking for)
section {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 1fr 1fr;
grid-template-rows: auto auto 1fr;
grid-template-areas:
"one top"
"one center"
"one bottom";
border: 1px solid hotpink;
}
article {
border: 1px solid green;
}
#one { grid-area: one;}
#top { grid-area: top;}
#center { grid-area: center;}
#bottom { grid-area: bottom; align-self: start; background-color: aqua;}
<section>
<article id=one><h1>One</h1><p>Lorem cool dolizzle sit amizzle, dope sizzle elizzle. Nullam shiznit velizzle, get down get down volutpizzle, suscipizzle quizzle, dizzle mammasay mammasa mamma oo sa, arcu. Pellentesque sheezy tortizzle. Sed erizzle. Fusce izzle dolor shiznit pimpin' tempizzle tempor. Maurizzle pellentesque nibh shizzlin dizzle turpizzle. Vestibulum in tortor. Pellentesque cool rhoncus black. In hac fo shizzle my nizzle check out this dictumst. Black uhuh ... yih!. Mammasay mammasa mamma oo sa tellizzle shiz, pretizzle shiznit, mattizzle fo, gangster vitae, nunc. Get down get down suscipizzle. Own yo' away izzle sed cool.Nullizzle fizzle shut the shizzle up yo mamma orci daahng dawg viverra. Phasellus nizzle shizzle my nizzle crocodizzle. Curabitizzle sure velit vizzle check out this dizzle doggy. Maecenas sapien nulla, iaculis shiz, molestie hizzle, egestas a, erizzle. Shit vitae turpis quizzle nibh bibendizzle boom shackalack. Nizzle pulvinar dope velizzle. Aliquizzle mammasay mammasa mamma oo sa volutpat. Nunc izzle its fo rizzle at lectus pretizzle faucibizzle. We gonna chung nec lacizzle own yo' fizzle pizzle ultricizzle. Ut nisl. Crunk et owned. Integer laoreet ipsum shizzlin dizzle mi. Donizzle at shiz.</p>
</article>
<article id=top><h1>Top</h1> <p>Just Two Words</p></article>
<article id=center><h1>Center</h1></article>
<article id=bottom><h1>Bottom</h1><p>Help Me! How can I get closer to my Top neighbour?</p></article>
</section>

After some more trial and error, I found a working solution:
grid-template-rows: auto 1fr;
When the last item has a value of 1fr, the other item is allowed to adapt it's size with auto.
If we had three rows in our right column, the working CSS would look like this:
grid-template-rows: auto auto 1fr;
The result of this would be: the two first items (auto) adapt according to their content, the third item (1fr) will fill any vertical space that is left.
In other words: you need one item to have a value of 1fr, in order for the other items to be fully flexible with auto.

Solution based on the others but without defined template areas.
Set grid-row: 1 / -1; for the main/primary content element.
https://codepen.io/gynekolog/pen/eYyGNma
Or responsive version by tailwind:
https://play.tailwindcss.com/h4RvbInNXB

Related

CSS Inner Div Fill Outer Div

I'm new to CSS and have a question about expanding the content of an inner DIV to fill the entire outer div.
I have been researching an answer to my problem for hours and have found dozens of similar questions, but none of the suggested solutions work for me. I'm sure it's that I'm misunderstanding something fundamental, but I can't seem to put my finger on it.
I need to have the blue background cover the entire block between "Some other stuff" and "More different stuff" and the text must be centered vertically and horizontally in the blue block - and maintain the same hover qualities and text-decoration rules.
<div>
<span>Some other stuff</span>
</div
<div class="outer-container">
<h2>
<a class="inner-container" href="https://www.google.com" target="_blank">
Lorem ipsum
</a>
</h2>
</div>
<div>
More different stuff
</div>
I have so much trouble with CSS because I don't know how to gracefully describe what I'm wanting - I'm a developer not a designer!
.outer-container {
background-color: #337AB7;
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
position: relative;
}
.inner-container {
background-color: #337AB7;
color: #fff;
height: 100%;
font-size: x-large;
&:focus, &:hover, &:link {
background-color: #286090;
color: #fff;
text-decoration: none;
}
}
If I put the focus, hover CSS stuff in the outer-container the hover mechanics are not consistent.
I hope I'm making sense...like I said, I have a horrible time explaining design stuff.
Any suggestions?
You just need to set background color to outer-container.
When you set background-color to <a> tag, the background color is assigned to the text only.
Here is you updated fiddle.
Here is the snippet.
.outer-container {
text-align: center;
vertical-align: middle;
position: relative;
background: #337AB7;
}
.inner-container {
background-color: #337AB7;
color: #fff;
height: 100%;
font-size: x-large;
}
<div> <span>Some other stuff</span>
</div>
<div class="outer-container"> <a class="inner-container" href="http://www.google.com" target="_blank">Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Cras vestibulum purus vel iaculis accumsan. Nulla vel massa velit. Proin a nisl vel tortor tincidunt pharetra. Nulla tristique porttitor erat. In laoreet, erat non ultricies vulputate, massa mauris tempor ligula, sed dignissim ex augue sit amet sapien. Donec malesuada massa eget turpis consectetur, at feugiat velit aliquam. Fusce dictum ornare dignissim. Vestibulum ante ipsum primis in faucibus orci luctus et ultrices posuere cubilia Curae; Integer non consectetur nunc, at sollicitudin nibh.</a>
</div>
<div>More different stuff</div>
Why can you not change the background colour to be on the parent .outer-container?
This would solve your immediate issue.
See http://jsfiddle.net/n1gva5b4/
If a was you i would make a div-container and inside the div(innerContainer) insert the a-link-tag. So the Conainer does what its called (contain-something), applies the color as you want it and the link also works fine.
like this:
<div class="outer-container">
<div class="inner-container" >
Lorem ipsum dolor sit
</div>
</div>
Just in case the outer-container responses don't help, an alternative is to set display: block on inner-container. Block-level elements are the ones that take up all available horizontal space on their parent by default (an example might be, one of these answers), and "inline-level" elements like a (by default anyway) can be placed in the middle of a block of text, only affecting its own text without re-flowing any layout around it.

Vertically align a div in a parent which has height auto AND min-height set?

I'm stuck on this one.
I want to vertically center a div. Its parent has an unknown height, however, it does have a min-height.
How can I do this?
Here is one approach using the CSS3 transform property.
Use absolute positioning to place the top edge of the child element at 50% from the top, and then use the transform: translateY(-50%) to adjust for the child's height.
.parent {
height: auto;
min-height: 200px;
border: 1px dotted gray;
position: relative;
}
.child {
border: 1px dotted blue;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 0;
transform: translateY(-50%);
}
.content {
margin-left: 100px;
margin-right: 400px;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="child">child</div>
<div class="content">
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Integer facilisis velit ut neque tempor quis cursus tortor suscipit. Curabitur rutrum magna vitae arcu pharetra eget cursus ante accumsan. Nunc commodo malesuada adipiscing. Pellentesque consequat laoreet sagittis. Sed sit amet erat augue. Morbi consectetur, elit quis iaculis cursus, mauris nulla hendrerit augue, ut faucibus elit sapien vitae justo. In a ipsum malesuada nulla rutrum luctus. Donec a enim sapien. Sed ultrices ligula ac neque vulputate luctus. Suspendisse pretium pretium felis, in aliquet risus fringilla at. Nunc cursus sagittis commodo.
</div>
</div>
An other solution requires Javascript.
Javascript can help you to get the real height of the parent element :
var myElt = <your parent selector>;
var myEltHeight = myElt.offsetHeight;
After that, you can set the 'line-height' property of the parent to be equal to this height,
myElt.style.lineHeight = myEltHeight + 'px';
And finally add a 'vertical-align: middle' to him.
myElt.style.verticalAlign = 'middle';
Of course you have to re-do the maths each time the parent element is resized (with a window resizing for instance)...
For the record, I did not test this solution. It probably needs some adjustments ...
Use a table display, like this:
div {
height: 80vh;
/* Random height and width */
width: 80%;
border: 5px solid blue;
display: table;
}
p {
display: table-cell;
height: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
text-align: center;
}
<div>
<p>
Some centered content.
</p>
</div>
I do not recommend this usage, but you can use a display:flex on the parent element, and use one of the following, according to your needs, on the child item :
The flex-direction property establishes the main axis.
The justify-content property defines how flex items are laid out along the main axis on the current line.
The align-items property defines the default for how flex items are laid out along the cross axis on the current line.
The align-self property defines how a single flex item is aligned on the cross axis, and overrides the default established by align-items.
Source : Using CSS flexible boxes
This guide can be helpful to understand the mechanism : A Complete Guide to Flexbox
/!\ Warning :
flexbox properties are really attractive (I have been really interested in them some times ago) but they become really instable as soon as you use some absolute positionning within the DOM.
flexbox properties needs some vendor prefixes for not-even-so-old version of almost all browsers. And sometimes the properties does not even have the same names (there are the old, tweener and new syntaxes. See the end of this post : A Complete Guide to Flexbox)

white-space pre-wrap not recalculating

Fiddle illustrating the problem - click the button a few times and the box will shrink, revealing the issue.
This issue appears to only happen in Internet Explorer.
Basically, when an element that contains white-space: pre-wrap is resized slowly, IE doesn't recalculate word wrapping, resulting in text being pushed outside the element. Some recalculating does happen, but not all of it. The more the element is resized, it seems, the more recalculation is actually done.
Zooming the page fixes the issue, but is obviously not a practical solution.
How can I force IE to recalculate word wrapping when the container's size changes?
New (ridiculous) HTML Change Solution (but works!)
Because of the odd first line failure, the solution depended upon generating a non-important first line and then accommodating it. This fiddle demonstrates what appears to be a now "bug free" solution for IE9 (some tweaking to account for my pseudo-element/class use would be needed for earlier IE versions).
The HTML requires an excessive amount of wrapping, such that each section of text is "double wrapped." The demo has three different means of gaining the block level wrap, but all use the same fix.
Essential HTML
<div id="cnt">
<p class="ieFixBlockWrap">
<span>Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Donec tincidunt consectetur tortor, sed vestibulum lectus hendrerit at. Praesent fermentum augue molestie lectus pharetra eget cursus erat cursus.
</span>
</p>
<span class="ieFixBlockWrap">
<span>Cum sociis natoque penatibus et magnis dis parturient montes, nascetur ridiculus mus. Praesent fringilla nisl posuere tortor rutrum lobortis.
</span>
</span>
<div class="ieFixBlockWrap">
<span>In risus libero, faucibus ac congue et, imperdiet ac purus. Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. Morbi aliquam lobortis ullamcorper. Proin risus sapien, pulvinar in adipiscing non, rutrum hendrerit magna. Praesent interdum pharetra vehicula. Integer molestie mi neque.
</span>
</div>
</div>
CSS
#cnt {
white-space: pre-wrap;
border:1px solid black;
line-height: 1.2em; /* set explicitly, see below */
/* prevent shifted :before from interfering with elements preceeding #cnt */
overflow: hidden;
}
.ieFixBlockWrap:before { /* this becomes the first line, but also an extra line gap */
content:'';
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
}
.ieFixBlockWrap {
display: block; /* just to demo span as block level */
margin: -1.2em 0; /* offset by line-height to remove gaps from :before*/
}
.ieFixBlockWrap:last-child {
margin-bottom: 0; /* last one does not need the bottom margin adjusted */
}
Original HTML Change Solution (still failed on first line)
Wrapping all the text in a single span inside the div set with pre-wrap seemed to make it behave in this fiddle.
It looks like you can force IE to redraw the container by removing the element and then adding it back (unfortunate you have to resort to this, but oh well). Here's a resize function that will do just that, along with a fiddle to see it in action:
var resize = function(element, changeWidth, changeHeight){
changeWidth = parseInt(changeWidth) || 0;
changeHeight = parseInt(changeHeight) || 0;
element.style.width = (parseInt(element.style.width) + changeWidth) + 'px';
element.style.height = (parseInt(element.style.height) + changeHeight) + 'px';
var parent = element.parentNode;
parent.removeChild(element);
parent.appendChild(element);
};

Fluid, Max-Width element (subtitle), respective of left float, if present. Possible? Currently it ignores margins and padding

See the notes in the blue areas on the page below to see what I am trying to achieve.
http://www.a3financial.com/subtitleproblem.php
Here I have 2 p's which are subtitles, illustrated in blue, which I'm wanting to fluidly be as wide as possible within the fixed-width content area, while respecting any float:left image's padding/margin.
From what I understand this is the expected behavior when you don't set any width for the p and do have one set for the float:left.. but for some reason my subtitles' background are going behind the image and not respecting its' margins. Perhaps I'm wrong on my expectation. I know liquid widths with floats are difficult/impossible to achieve. Is there any way to do this?
For clarity, I want the page to look like this. I've added borders for additional clarity.
http://a3financial.com/images/clarity.png
To my knowledge, this is all that is being applied to the float:right:
#content .subtitle {
padding-top: 2px;
float: right;
background-color: #8FD2E3;
letter-spacing: -1px;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 18px;
color: #969696;
}
And here is the code for the float:left:
img.alignleftimg {
float: left;
width: 163px;
/*margin-right: 30px;F*/
padding-right: 30px;
}
HTML (apologies for long latin, text is needed to illustrate flow):
<p class="subtitle">Subtitle 1 - should be as wide as possible, respecting the image's padding/margin.</p>
<img src="images/homepage09.jpg" alt="" width="163" height="163" class="alignleftimg" />
<p>nunc nisl velit, fringilla ut ornare non, iaculis in ipsum. Vivamus volutpat quam et dui vestibulum ultricies. Fusce vitae sapien sed ipsum hendrerit dignissim. Lorem ipsum dolor at tellus. Etiam vitae ligula non ante iaculis. Curabitur elementum diam nec etiam lorem ipsum mauris dapibus arcu, sed bibendum libero elit et sem. Nunc at nunc tortor, ut aliquam augue. Etiam ut sem quis tellus iaculis convallis. Nulla viverra, metus eget accumsan. Maecenas pede nisl, elementum eu, ornare ac, malesuada at, erat. Proin gravida orci porttitor enim accumsan lacinia. Donec condimentum, urna non molestie semper, ligula enim ornare nibh, quis laoreet eros quam eget ante. Quisque erat. Vestibulum pellentesque, justo mollis pretium suscipit, justo nulla blandit libero, in blandit augue justo quis nisl. Fusce mattis viverra elit. Fusce quis tortor. Aliquam libero. Vivamus nisl nibh, iaculis vitae, viverra sit amet, ullamcorper vitae, turpis. Aliquam erat volutpat. Vestibulum dui sem, pulvinar sed, imperdiet nec, iaculis nec, leo.Pellentesque tristique ante ut risus. Quisque dictum. Integer nisl risus, sagittis convallis, rutrum id, elementum congue, nibh. Suspendisse dictum porta lectus. Donec placerat odio vel elit. </p>
<p class="subtitle">Subtitle 2 - should also be as wide as possible, pushing text out of the way in this case, to fill 100% of body width.</p>
<p>Aliquam libero. Vivamus nisl nibh, iaculis vitae, viverra sit amet, ullamcorper vitae, turpis. Aliquam erat volutpat. Vestibulum dui sem, pulvinar sed, imperdiet nec, iaculis nec, leo. Fusce odio. Etiam arcu dui, faucibus eget, placerat vel, sodales eget, orci. Donec ornare neque ac sem. Mauris aliquet.</p>
edit: starting to think i'm using the wrong element for this.. perhaps an h2 would function as i'm intending.. continuing to research.
edit 2: it doesn't appear h2 has any discernible difference from using p.
edit 3: added an image to clarify what i'm after.
final edit: Found what I was looking for and answered the question myself! Adding overflow:auto; to the subtitle class made its' background respect the float's margin and padding! See the accepted answer. Cleaned up the question for those searching in the future, as initially I didn't understand how to use floats correctly. Here's a link to the final product:
http://www.a3financial.com/subtitletest.php
OK, a couple of things first:
float applies to how a block elment is rendered with respect to the text of the main document. Float is not intended to be a way to control the size or positions of the actual elements themselves.
The best way to see this is an example:
<div id="A" style="float:right;background-color:#0f0;height:20px;">
my title
</div>
<div id="B" style="background-color:#00f;height:35px;">
my impressive language skills
</div>
Then this means that div A will float left of the content(text) in the document's main flow (div B is in the main flow). This does not affect the physical size of either div A or div B. You will see that in this example, div B is 100% wide (the backgrounds mark the container's actual size). Div's default behavior is to take up 100% of the available width of its container.
Div A is only as big as it needs to display it's content, so it may seem that its behavior is differnet. This is not really the case though. Because div A floats, it is rendered in its own virtual container outside of the main document. The fake container is set to be the minimum size possible, which is basically 0% wide. So, like any 0% continer, it stretches as much as necessary to accomidate the contents within). In effect, div A is 100% wide in a container that is 0% wide (by default).
You should also note that in this example, div A is not just floating to the right of the content within div B, but it is floating right in regards to ALL content in the main document flow. This is where a div with the "clear:both;" css attribute comes in handy, as this ensures that things that are floating stop floating at a specific point in the document (content that would have floated is pushed down).
Now, when we look at your document in particualr, what your were effectivly trying to do was stack 3 floats with each other... A floating right of B, and B floating left of C. But the containers themselves will just be however big they need to be. This gets very hard to manage, and can be unpredictable on different browsers... and you end up trying to manage everyting's width, height, padding, and margin plus doing all kinds of other still just to keep the containers from overlapping and piling up on top of each other.
The best bet when using floats for positioning, is to ensure that within any one container, you have no more than one thing floating. So in your document's case, something like this:
.subtitle {
padding-top: 2px;
background-color: #8FD2E3;
letter-spacing: -1px;
font-family: Arial, Helvetica, sans-serif;
font-size: 18px;
color: #969696;
}
img.alignleftimg {
float: left;
width: 163px;
/*margin-right: 30px;F*/
padding-right: 30px;
}
Note that in this CSS, only the image is setup to float. The subtitle doesn't need to float because you always want it 100% wide relative to whatever container contains it.
Then for HTML:
<img src="images/homepage09.jpg" alt="" width="163" height="163" class="alignleftimg" />
<div class="section">
<p class="subtitle">Subtitle 1</p>
<p>
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
my impressive language skills
</p>
</div>
<div style="clear:both;"></div>
<div class="section">
<p class="subtitle">Subtitle 2</p>
<p>Aliquam libero. and some other stuff</p>
</div>
Note here that we used a div to group the subtitles and the text to which that subtitle applies into one content container (section). The image is set to float left starting at the first section, so all the text will slide out of the way. We use a clear div to make sure that we stop floating at this point, then we start the container for the next subtitle and text.
As with anything in HTML, the less you specify the better off you are. Instead of managing sizes, floats, positions, and all that junk I recommend that you specify as little as is possible in CSS. It's a subtle art, but it pays off.
Now, in the example I give, the content area's container and the image actually overlap. So if you try background styles, or borders, etc. it can get ugly. So, this is when you might want to specify widths and margins to control the containers themselves; but this is easier is you are careful to keep floating down to just one element within any one container.
You could elminiate container overlap in the above by adding in this CSS (in addition to what was already there):
img.alignleftimg + div.section{
margin-left: 170px;
}
This is an unusual css selector called the adjacent sibling selector... basically it says, "Applies to all div elements with a class-name of "section", that is also an immediate sibling to an img element with a class-name of "alignleftimg".... blah! Anyway, I just set the margin to a value a little bigger than the width of the image, and overlap is eliminated ONLY in the very specific case we want.
You might want to look at the HTML 5 section element; but I didn't use it here because it is a semantic element and so cross-browser support requires a bit more than just replacing the div tags with section tags.
Also, I want to point out that this entire discussion is the fault of the W3C. We needed real layout mechanisms that did the job of HTML layout tables way back in 1994... 18 years later, CSS grid is STILL not finalized and is probably another 10 years from being widly supported in shipping browsers.
Turns out this is possible!
By adding overflow: auto; to the subtitle class, it forces it to respect the image's margin and padding! Additionally, adding it to unordered lists has the added benefit of making sure the list stays in-line horizontally until it's complete before word-wrapping around the image.
See my final product here:
http://www.a3financial.com/subtitletest.php
Thanks to the following thread for pointing me in the right direction. I'd given up but happened to stumble upon it looking for a somewhat different issue:
Floated image to left of a ul is ignoring margin/padding
To make HTML elements fluid widely, You must set CSS width to:
width:**percent**%
While percent keyword is number between 0 and 100.
This is a calculation. Calculate the padding and margin to set the correct width percent.
For example:
Setting 3 fluid divs with no Padding or Margin:
<div class="first"></div>
<div class="second"></div>
<div class="third"></div>
CSS
.first, .second, .third{
float:left;
width:33%;
}
Hope this helps you.

Eliminate gap between lines of text

When you increase the line-height of an element, you start getting gaps between each line of text. Most of the time this is fine, since you don't see the specific gap.
But it is problematic when you have a narrow column, with a link that runs over multiple lines. If you move your mouse over the link, there is a small gap between the lines, which makes the link hover effect flash on and off.
From a design/usability perspective, I feel this makes for a bad user experience (no one likes random flashing). Try it with this:
Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet, consectetur adipiscing elit. In est. Nunc aliquam, eros a aliquam consequat, ante diam rutrum risus, et dignissim ligula turpis et ante. Maecenas leo neque, euismod in, aliquam et, molestie ac, ligula. Integer venenatis. Pellentesque enim. Maecenas aliquet, tortor at molestie sodales, urna velit pulvinar lorem, ac malesuada nibh turpis eu tortor.
I can add some padding to links to prevent this happening in some cases, but it doesn't work when text is larger; I need more padding. Anyone have ideas for solutions?
Try fixing your flashing problem by setting display:block for your <a> element in that narrow column.
If you know the start and end point of each line you could put a span round each line, and turn it into an inline block
#wrap {font-size:14px; line-height:16px;}
a span{display:-moz-inline-block; display:inline-block;line-height:14px;padding:1px 0;}
a:hover {background:red;}
<div id="wrap">
dsvlaksvh; asvj asdfh;dhldv hd d dl h dfhd d dfh; daljfda k;d <a href="#" >
<span>hdv </span><span>dvh ldvhldf dhk </span><span>;dhkdf hdl hdfk
</span><span>dfhkldf h vkhg j</span></a> glj gj f gjl fjl fj f
</div>
Use relative units to set the padding.
Adding padding: 0.2ex 0; background: red; using Firebug/Dragonfly to the example link in the question works just fine for me, whatever the font size (set through CSS or zooming in).
The only problem with changing the font-size in Firefox is that the background starts overlapping the previous line; but that's a line-height issue.

Resources