Suppose I have a large vector of integers in which a single integer can occur in the vector multiple times. I do not know the order of the values within the vector. Consider the code below: I have vector and I want to remove a single 1 to get newVector. Since the order within the vector is not known outside this example, I cannot simply use vector[-1].
vector<-c(1,1,2,2,3)
newVector<-c(1,2,2,3)
Some background: I iteratively pick two values from the vector (using sample) and then want to remove the values I picked from the vector.
Of course I could loop through the vector until I find the first occurrence of the value I wish to remove and remove it using the index, however, that is very time consuming. All the other results I found end up removing all occurrences of the value, which I don't want.
I think this would work, as which.max returns the index of the first match and then we can remove them using negative subsetting.
vector[-which.max(vector == 1)]
#[1] 1 2 2 3
Also, match does the same
vector[-match(1, vector)]
#[1] 1 2 2 3
You could use match. This finds the first occurrence of the specified value returning its index
vector<-c(1,1,2,2,3)
vector[-match(1, vector)]
# [1] 1 2 2 3
Related
I have a code I'm working with which has the following line,
data2 <- apply(data1[,-c(1:(index-1))],2,log)
I understand that this creates a new data frame, from the data1, taking column-wise values log-transformed and some columns are eliminated, but I don't understand how the columns are removed. what does 1:(index-1) do exactly?
The ":" operator creates an integer sequence. Because (1:(index-1) ) is numeric and being used in the second position for the extraction operator"[" applied to a dataframe, it is is referring to column numbers. The person writing the code didn't need the c-function. It could have been more economically written:
data1[,-(1:(index-1))]
# but the outer "("...")"'s are needed so it starts at 1 rather than -1
So it removes the first index-1 columns from the object passed to apply. (As MrFlick points out, index must have been defined before this gets passed to R. There's not default value or interpretation for index in R.
Suppose the index is 5, then index -1 returns 4 so the sequence will be from 1 to 4 i.e. and then we use - implies loop over the columns other than the first 4 columns as MARGIN = 2
I have a vector containing a large number of strings that are all of the same length. For example:
vec = c("keep", "teem", "meat", "weep")
I would like to compare every possible pair of strings from within this vector and count the number of characters that differ between them. Using the vector above, "keep" would be compared to every other string in the vector, "teem" would be compared to every other string, and so on.
I'm only interested in counting the number of characters from the same position within each string that are different. So for example "keep" vs. "teem" would have 2 differences, "keep" vs. "meat" 3 differences, etc. I'd like to output the results as a pairwise matrix, where the strings in the vector make up the row names and column names.
I've learned from another post (How can I compare two strings to find the number of characters that match in R, using substitution distance?) that I can use the adist argument in mapply to calculate the number of differences between two strings:
mapply(adist,string1,string2)
But I'm not sure how to modify this to operate over every possible pairwise combination in my vector, and to place the results in a pairwise matrix. Any ideas for how to do that? Thanks!!
Do you mean using adist like below?
> `dimnames<-`(adist(vec),rep(list(vec),2))
keep teem meat weep
keep 0 2 3 1
teem 2 0 3 2
meat 3 3 0 3
weep 1 2 3 0
An option with stringdistmatrix
library(stringdist)
out <- as.matrix(stringdistmatrix(vec))
dimnames(out) <- list(vec, vec)
cv.uk.df$new.d[2:nrow(cv.uk.df)] <- tail(cv.uk.df$deaths, -1) - head(cv.uk.df$deaths, -1) # this line of code works
I wanted to know why do we -1 in the tail and -1 in head to create this new column.
I made an effort to understand by removing the -1 and "R"(The code is in R studio) throws me this error.
Could anyone shed some light on this? I can't explain how much I would appreciate it.
Look at what is being done. On the left-hand side of the assignment operator, we have:
cv.uk.df$new.d[2:nrow(cv.uk.df)] <-
Let's pick this apart.
cv.uk.df # This is the data.frame
$new.d # a new column to assign or a column to reassign
[2:nrow(cv.uk.df)] # the rows which we are going to assign
Specifically, this line of code will assign a new value all rows of this column except the first. Why would we want to do that? We don't have your data, but from your example, it looks like you want to calculate the change from one line to the next. That calculation is invalid for the first row (no previous row).
Now let's look at the right-hand side.
<- tail(cv.uk.df$deaths, -1) - head(cv.uk.df$deaths, -1)
The cv.uk.df$deaths column has the same number of rows as the data.frame. R gets grouchy when the numbers of elements don't follow sum rules. For data.frames, the right-hand side needs to have the same number of elements, or a number that can be recycled a whole-number of times. For example, if you have 10 rows, you need to have a replacement of 10 values. Or you can have 5 values that R will recycle.
If your data.frame has 100 rows, only 99 are being replaced in this operation. You cannot feed 100 values into an operation that expects 99. We need to trim the data. Let's look at what is happening. The tail() function has the usage tail(x, n), where it returns the last n values of x. If n is a negative integer, tail() returns all values but the first n. The head() function works similarly.
tail(cv.uk.df$deaths, -1) # This returns all values but the first
head(cv.uk.df$deaths, -1) # This returns all values but the last
This makes sense for your calculation. You cannot subtract the number of deaths in the row before the first row from the number in the first row, nor can you subtract the number of deaths in the last row from the number in the row after the last row. There are more intuitive ways to do this thing using functions from other packages, but this gets the job done.
The problem
I would like to find a length of a list.
The expected output
I would like to find the length based on a condition.
Example
Suppose that I have a list of 4 elements as follows:
myve <–list(1,2,3,0)
Here I have 4 elements, one of them is zero. How can I find the length by extracting the zero values? Then, if the length is > 1I would like to substruct one. That is:
If the length is 4 then, I would like to have 4-1=3. So, the output should be 3.
Note
Please note that I am working with a problem where the zero values may be changed from one case to another. For example, For the first list may I have only one 0 value, while for the second list may I have 2 or 3 zero values.
The values are always positive or zero.
You just need to apply the condition to each element. This will produce a list of boolean, then you sum it to get the number of True elements (i.e. validation your condition).
In your case:
sum(myve != 0)
In a more complex case, where the confition is expressed by a function f:
sapply(myve, f)
Use sapply to extract the ones different to zeros and sum to count them
sum(sapply(myve, function(x) x!=0))
I watched video on YouTube re finding mode in R from list of numerics. When I enter commands they do not work. R does not even give an error message. The vector is
X <- c(1,2,2,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9)
Then instructor says use
temp <- table(as.vector(x))
to basically sort all unique values in list. R should give me from this command 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 but nothing happens except when the instructor does it this list is given. Then he says to use command,
names(temp)[temp--max(temp)]
which basically should give me this: 1,3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 where 3 shows that the mode is 2 because it is repeated 3 times in list. I would like to stay with these commands as far as is possible as the instructor explains them in detail. Am I doing a typo or something?
You're kind of confused.
X <- c(1,2,2,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9) ## define vector
temp <- table(as.vector(X))
to basically sort all unique values in list.
That's not exactly what this command does (sort(unique(X)) would give a sorted vector of the unique values; note that in R, lists and vectors are different kinds of objects, it's best not to use the words interchangeably). What table() does is to count the number of instances of each unique value (in sorted order); also, as.vector() is redundant.
R should give me from this command 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 but nothing happens except when the instructor does it this list is given.
If you assign results to a variable, R doesn't print anything. If you want to see the value of a variable, type the variable's name by itself:
temp
you should see
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
1 3 1 1 1 1 1 1 1
the first row is the labels (unique values), the second is the counts.
Then he says to use command, names(temp)[temp--max(temp)] which basically should give me this: 1,3,1,1,1,1,1,1,1 where 3 shows that the mode is 2 because it is repeated 3 times in list.
No. You already have the sequence of counts stored in temp. You should have typed
names(temp)[temp==max(temp)]
(note =, not -) which should print
[1] "2"
i.e., this is the mode. The logic here is that temp==max(temp) gives you a logical vector (a vector of TRUE and FALSE values) that's only TRUE for the elements of temp that are equal to the maximum value; names(temp)[temp==max(temp)] selects the elements of the names vector (the first row shown in the printout of temp above) that correspond to TRUE values ...