Cacti - ERROR: RPN final stack size != 1 with 4 Graphs - graph

I use Cacti and rrdxport to get the sum of 2 Graphs and it is working fine.
rrdtool xport --start now-5min --end now-5min DEF:out1=sbc1_fs_call_five_min_do_137.rrd:fs_call_five_min_do:LAST DEF:out2=sbc2_fs_call_five_min_do_147.rrd:fs_call_five_min_do:LAST CDEF:sum=out1,out2,+ XPORT:sum:"output sum"
Output:
<xport>
<meta>
<start>1524226500</start>
<step>300</step>
<end>1524226500</end>
<rows>1</rows>
<columns>1</columns>
<legend>
<entry>output sum</entry>
</legend>
</meta>
<data>
<row><t>1524226500</t><v>7.1630000000e+02</v></row>
</data>
</xport>
Now I want to add 4 graphs but I always get the error RPN final stack size != 1.
rrdtool xport --start now-5min --end now-5min DEF:out1=sbc1_fs_call_five_min_do_137.rrd:fs_call_five_min_do:LAST DEF:out2=sbc1_berlin_fs_call_five_min_do_1176.rrd:fs_call_five_min_do:LAST DEF:out3=sbc2_fs_call_five_min_do_147.rrd:fs_call_five_min_do:LAST DEF:out4=sbc2_berlin_fs_call_five_min_do_1187.rrd:fs_call_five_min_do:LAST CDEF:sum=out1,out2,out3,out4,+ XPORT:sum:"output sum" ERROR: RPN final stack size != 1
Why does it work with 2 graphs but not with 4?
thanks for help!

You are incorrectly specifying your RPN function, and have more than one item left in the stack.
This function works as expected:
CDEF:sum=out1,out2,+
This is because the sequence of RPN commands says:
Put out1 on the stack,
Put out2 on the stack,
Remove the top two items and add them, and push the result onto the stack
This results in the stack holding a single item, with a value (out1+out2).
However, your second attempt does this:
CDEF:sum=out1,out2,out3,out4,+
This means:
Put out1 on the stack,
Put out2 on the stack,
Put out3 on the stack,
Put out4 on the stack,
Remove the top two items and add them, and push the result onto the stack
As a result, the stack now holds three things -- out1, out2, and (out3+out4). RRDTool checks the stack size to catch any RPN errors, and errors because it sees more than one item left in the stack.
What you should do is to add two more addition operations to your definition:
CDEF:sum=out1,out2,out3,out4,+,+,+
This adds two more steps to the RPN, to add in the remaining two items on the stack and obtain the result you want.
I suggest you work through the RPN tutorial to gain a better understanding of how to specify RPN.

Related

Sabre Scribe Scripting Specifically Looping

Anybody have any tips for looping, and continue? For example, I placed about 2500 pnrs on a queue, and I need to add a remark to each of them. Is it possible for a script to add the remark then move to the next pnr?
For example, I placed about 2500 pnrs on a queue, and I need to add a remark to each of them. Is it possible for a script to add the remark then move to the next pnr?
Loops are supported in Scribe but have to be built manually by creating your own iteration variables and breaking the loop manually when you know the work is complete.
What you are describing is definitely possible, but working in queues can be difficult as there are many possible responses when you try to end the PNRs. You'll have to capture the response to detect whether you need to do something else to get out of the error condition (e.g. if a PNR warning indicates you have to double-end the record).
If possible, its likely simpler to work off the queue by collecting all PNR locators and then looping through that list, adding your remarks, and then ending the PNRs. You'll still have to capture the response to determine if the PNR is actually ended properly, but you won't have to deal with the buggy queue behavior. A basic Scribe loop sample is below. Note that I haven't been a Scribe developer for a while and I did this in Notepad so there might be some errors in here, but hopefully it's a good starting point.
DEFINE [ROW=N:8] ;iteration variable/counter
DEFINE [LOCATOR_FILE=*:60] ;File Path
DEFINE [TEMP_LOCATOR=*:6] ;pnr locator variable, read from the temp file
DEFINE [BREAK=*:1] ;loop breaking variable
OPEN F=[TEMP_LOCATOR] L=0 ;open the file of locators
[BREAK] = ""
[ROW] = 0
REPEAT
[ROW] = [ROW] + 1
[TEMP_LOCATOR] = "" ;Reset temp locator variable, this will break our loop
READ F=[LOCATOR_FILE] R=[ROW] C=1 [TEMP_LOCATOR]
IF $[TEMP_LOCATOR] = 6 THEN ;test length of locator, if this is 6 chars, you have a good one, pull it up and add your remark
»"5YOUR REMARK HERE"{ENTER}«
»ER{ENTER}«
;trap errors
READ F="EMUFIND:" R=0 C=0 [TEMP_LOCATOR] ;read for the locator being present on this screen, which should indicate that the ER was successful - you'll have to trap other errors here though
IF [#SYSTEM_ERROR] = 0 THEN ;this locator was found, ER appears successful
»I{ENTER}« ;Ignore this PNR and move to the next one
ELSE
[BREAK] = "Y" ;error found afeter ER, break loop. Maybe show a popup box or something, up to you
ENDIF
ELSE ;No locator found in file, break the loop
[BREAK] = "Y"
ENDIF
UNTIL [BREAK] = "Y"
CLOSE [LOCATOR_FILE]

Robot Framework: How to sort by

I have a webpage with a combobox to sort a list by Price, Name,... The list is in many pages, so I need to get all elements first and after, I will sort by and check if the elements are correct. Right?
I am trying to do it and navigate for all pages and get all elements. But it is only taking the elements in first page. I am totally new in Robot framework.
Does anyone have a suggestion how I can do it?
${name_list_actual} Create List
${cnt_pages}= Get Element Count //div[#class='container index-new-p']/div/nav[#class='text-center']/ul/li/*
Log To Console ${cnt_pages}
:FOR ${n} IN RANGE 1 ${cnt_pages}
\ Click link //div[#class='container index-new-p']/div/nav/ul/li[${n}]/a
\ ${cnt}= Get Element Count //*[#class="title"]/*
:FOR ${i} IN RANGE 1 ${cnt}
\ ${get_names} Get Element Attribute //table[#class='result-table']/tbody/tr[${i}]/td/div/div[2]/div/a text
\ Append To List ${name_list_actual} ${get_names}
${get_names}= Select All From List //table[#class='result-table']/tbody/tr[${i}]/td/div/div[2]/div/a
\ Log To Console ${name_list_actual}
\ Continue For Loop
Thanks so much
First and foremost, by your code sample's indent it looks like you're doing nested for loops - an outer one for the changing the pages, and an inner that'll get the text in each row. The thing is - Robot Framework doesn't support nested for loops - see the documentation.
What happened on execution is the first loop (the pagination) ran with just two statements and finished:
\ Click link //div[#class='container index-new-p']/div/nav/ul/li[${n}]/a
\ ${cnt}= Get Element Count //*[#class="title"]/*
Then all the rest were executed as part of the second.
A solution would be to have a keyword "Get All Values In The Table" that'll hold the inner loop, and call it in the current outer, which will paginate.
Another issue - you're using IN RANGE, passing 1 as start and ${cnt} as end; if it had value of 4, you probably expect the tracking variable to get all values from 1 to 4.
Yet range works with the first argument inclusive, and up to - but not getting to - the second argument; thus it covers the range 1 to 3. To salvage that, you'd need to set the upper bound to cnt+1, e.g. ${cnt + 1}.
Minor stuff:
You have a statement that's within the loop block, but not prefixed with \:
${get_names}= Select All From List //table[#class='result-table']/tbody/tr[${i}]/td/div/div[2]/div/a
I'm surprised it didn't give you a syntax error - it effectively breaks the loop, and the framework should complain the next lines are prefixed as if in a loop, but one is not started.
-
When you are changing the pages by the click, you are not making sure the UI has loaded the data for the new page. If this happens through ajax calls, you may very well be working with the previous page's data, thinking it is the new one - the selenium click returns control very fast, and the operands for getting the text are running - while the UI still waits for the new data and is displaying the previous one.
-
In RF version 3.1 the loop syntax is different - the block members are not prefixed with \, and it's closed with an END statement.
I'd suggest to migrate to it - a) the current one is going to be eventually deprecated, and b) in the new one the nesting would have been marked as syntax error (you're starting a new loop without END-ing the running one), instead of silently passing with unexpected behavior.

How to get the size of symbols in the symbol table of Mach-O file?

Before watch the mail list, I'm confused with the lack of "size" of symbol table in the Mach-o file. And I found the solution in source file posted in that E-Mail, which note that:
//Mach-O symbol table does have size in it
//so need to scan ahead to find symbol with next highest address.
But when I parse out the symbol table in a Mach-O file (I got the symbol table from the symtab_command and the following nlists) and trying to calculate the size of one global symbol as the same way, I was confused again when I compared the symbol table from the output of dwarfdump (dwarfdump -ae). The end address of the symbol in the symbol table from the dwarfdump is different from the result my program's output. Is there some problem with the symbol table I parsed out? Or is there some other way to work out it?
Some of the output from my program:
<start address> <section index> <method>
0x0006d030 1 ___arclite_objc_autoreleasePoolPop
0x0006d048 1 _patch_lazy_pointers
0x0006d1f0 1 ___arclite_objc_autoreleasePoolPush
The corresponding part of the output from dwarfdump:
0x0014a37b: [0x0006d030 - 0x0006d046) __arclite_objc_autoreleasePoolPop
0x0014a122: [0x0006d048 - 0x0006d1ee) patch_lazy_pointers
0x0014a3a0: [0x0006d1f0 - 0x0006d212) __arclite_objc_autoreleasePoolPush
So if I use the way in the "MachONormalizedFileToAtoms.cpp" to calculate the end address of the symbol (look ahead to find symbol with next highest address), the result must be different from the output of dwarfdump. And does anyone know how dwarfdump calculate it?
Thank you!
From the answer by Nick Kledzik:
The compiler often aligns functions to start at aligned address (e.g. 8 or 16 bytes). So, there is padding bytes (usually NOPs) after the end of a function and before the start of the next function.
dwarfdump has access to the debug info which does have size info for functions. So dwarfdump can show the size of a function without the alignment padding at the end. Whereas the linker just looks at the next symbol address. There is not much point in the linker digging through the debug info to get a function’s true size, because when writing the output, the linker has to align the next function which would just add back the pad bytes.
I hope that can help others who has the same confusion.

asp.net For each within For each

I have the following:
For Each dist In dtDataTableDist.Rows
For Each det In dtDataTableDet.Rows
If Not (det("LoginName") Is dist("LoginName")) Then Continue For
Next
Next
Within the inner For Each I have
Not (det("LoginName") Is dist("LoginName")) Then Continue For
What I am trying to do here is to say that if the login in the inner for each is not the same
as the LoginName in the out then skip the rest of the code in the inner loop and continue to the next inner for each.
Although the det("LoginName") and dist("LoginName") both have the same value of "899"
I would think that it would not skip the rest of the code in the inner loop but it does.
Is is used for comparing objects... in other words are the two object references the exact same object.
You should be using normal comparison...
If Not (det("LoginName") = dist("LoginName")) Then Continue For
Or...
If det("LoginName") <> dist("LoginName") Then Continue For

Set a breakpoint at a given line number in Adobe's FDB?

I'm learning the Flex command-line debugger, and I haven't been able to find information on this particular use case.
I'd like to add a breakpoint to a specific line in one of my class files. I can add breakpoints at the start of a function in a class, but I can't figure out how to set it at a specific line (e.g. line 117 in Foo.as)?
When I try to set one for a file on a given line, I get one at a different location:
(fdb) break Foo 111
Breakpoint 1 at 0x######: file Foo.as, line 115
I've verified the line # I'm specifying is valid, so I don't think the FDB is trying to compensate.
Am I doing something wrong? Is this possible in FDB?
Abso-lutely,
check out the help in fdb, it's fairly helpful :). Just type help or type help then a command. help break gives the output below, lots of nice ways to hook in there, the syntax your using is just missing a colon in between the class and the line number specified, just tried with an MXML file and it worked fine.
Set breakpoint at specified line or function.
Examples:
break 87
Sets a breakpoint at line 87 of the current file.
break myapp.mxml:56
Sets a breakpoint at line 56 of myapp.mxml.
break #3:29
Sets a breakpoint at line 29 of file #3.
break doThis
Sets a breakpoint at function doThis() in the current file.
break myapp.mxml:doThat
Sets a breakpoint at function doThat() in file myapp.mxml.
break #3:doOther
Sets a breakpoint at function doOther() in file #3.
break
Sets a breakpoint at the current execution address in the
current stack frame. This is useful for breaking on return
to a stack frame.
To see file names and numbers, do 'info sources' or 'info files'.
To see function names, do 'info functions'.
Abbreviated file names and function names are accepted if unambiguous.
If line number is specified, break at start of code for that line.
If function is specified, break at start of code for that function.
See 'commands' and 'condition' for further breakpoint control.

Resources