This is my code in callbackController.php file
$url = 'https://' . $_GET['shop'] . '/admin/webhooks.json';
$webhookData = [
'webhook' => [
'topic' => 'app/uninstalled',
'address' => config('app.url').'uninstall.php?shop='.$shop,
'format' => 'json'
]
];
$uninstall = $sh->appUninstallHook($accessToken, $url, $webhookData);
This is my uninstall.php file code , these file is in laravel root folder.
$connection = new mysqli("localhost", "username", "******", "database");
$delete_shop = "DELETE FROM tablename WHERE store_name= '".$_GET['shop']."'";
$connection->query($delete_shop);
I found solution here, but i can't understand how it works.
Thanks !!
If you get an uninstall Webhook, there is no rush to suddenly delete the store from your DB before the merchant re-installs.
First off, merchants don't uninstall re-install Apps unless they are really outliers. Most just uninstall and never come back.
Second, if a merchant did uninstall, and then re-install, and you recognized their shop, they would be coming to you with a new token. You can therefore tell that this is a new install, and you could therefore decide to keep the same data, and just update the token, or do whatever you want.
But there is no need to rush to delete. That is you being the frog in the game Frogger :)
Related
I've a multisite installation of Drupal 8, the "main" website expose some REST webservices, locally i've some troubles on testing them, because there's no way for the various sites to see each other, when i try to do something like that
try {
$response = $this->httpClient->get($this->baseUri . '/myendpoint', [
'headers' => [
'Accept' => 'application/json',
'Content-type' => 'application/hal+json',
],
'query' => [
'_format' => 'json',
'myparameters' => 'value'
],
]);
$results = $this->serializer->decode($response->getBody(), 'json');
}
catch (RequestException $e) {
$this->logger->warning($e->getMessage());
}
return $results;
I always receive a timeout and there's no way i can make it work, i've my main website with the usual url project.ddev.site (and $this->baseUri is https://myproject.ddev.site ) and all the other websites are in the form subsite.ddev.local
If i ssh in the project and run ping myproject.ddev.site i see 172.19.0.6
I don't understand why they cannot see each other...
Just for other people who can have a similar problem: my issue was with xdebug i have it with the autoconnect, so when the request from the subsite to the main site was made, it get stuck somewhere (phpstorm didn't stop anywhere by the way) so it made the request time out.
By disabling, or configuring only for the subdomain, and avoiding it to accept the external connenction from unconfigured servers (in phpstorm) it started working, still have to do some work as i need to debug "both sides" of the request, but in this way i can work with that...
I've not thought before to try disabling xdebug because actually it didn't came into my mind...
When uninstall module then why delete all table from database without module_uninstall() function in .install file.
Also, why create table without module_install() function
.install file code is only:
function commerce_quickpay_schema() {
$schema['webc_crypto_meta'] = [
'description' => 'Custom Cryptography Meta',
'fields' => [...],
'primary key' => ['wcm_id'],
];
$schema['webc_crypto_payment'] = [
'description' => 'Custom Cryptography Payment',
'fields' => [...],
'primary key' => ['wcp_id'],
];
return $schema;
}
Also, please, CREATE TABLE IF NOT EXISTS condition in .install file.
This is how it behaves, the tables defined in hook_schema will be created or removed from the database when the module is installed or uninstalled, the hook_install() or hook_uninstall() hooks should be used when you want to do something extra.
It is simply assumed that the database schema should be removed when a module is uninstalled and come back when installed, if you think about it, it makes perfect sense.
https://api.drupal.org/api/drupal/core%21lib%21Drupal%21Core%21Database%21database.api.php/function/hook_schema/8.7.x
"The tables declared by this hook will be automatically created when
the module is installed, and removed when the module is uninstalled.
This happens before hook_install() is invoked, and after
hook_uninstall() is invoked, respectively."
i'm having a bit of a problem with my PHPUnit integration tests, i have a method which handles a form upload for a video file as well as a preview image for that video.
public function store($request)
{
/** #var Video $resource */
$resource = new $this->model;
// Create a new Content before creating the related Photo
$contentRepo = new ContentRepository();
$content = $contentRepo->store($request);
if($content->isValid()) {
$resource->content_id = $content->id;
$directory = 'frontend/videos/assets/'.date("Y").'/'.date('m').'/'.time();
\File::makeDirectory($directory, 0755, true);
$request->video->move($directory.'/', $request->video->getClientOriginalName());
$resource->video = '/'.$directory.'/'.$request->video->getClientOriginalName();
$request->preview_image->move($directory.'/', $request->preview_image->getClientOriginalName());
$resource->preview_image = '/'.$directory.'/'.$request->preview_image->getClientOriginalName();
$resource->highlighted = intval($request->input('highlighted') == 'on');
$resource->save();
return $resource;
}
else {
return $content;
}
}
The important part to keep is the $request->video->move() call which i probably need to replace in order to use Virtual Filesystem.
and then the test
public function testVideoUpload(){
File::put(__DIR__.'/frontend/videos/assets/image.mp4', 'test');
$file = new UploadedFile(__DIR__.'/frontend/videos/assets/image.mp4', 'foofile.mp4', 'video/mp4', 100023, null, $test=true);
File::put(__DIR__.'/frontend/images/assets/image.jpg', 'test');
$preview = new UploadedFile(__DIR__.'/frontend/images/assets/image.jpg', 'foofile.jpg', 'image/jpeg', 100023, null, $test=true);
$this->post('/admin/videos', [
'title' => 'My Video #12',
'description' => 'This is a description',
'actors' => [$this->actor->id, $this->actor2->id],
'scenes' => [$this->scene->id, $this->scene2->id],
'payment_methods' => [$this->paymentMethod->id],
'video' => $file,
'preview_image' => $preview
])->seeInDatabase('contents', [
'title' => 'My Video #12',
'description' => 'This is a description'
]);
}
As you can see, i need to create a dummy file in some local directory and then use that in the HTTP request to the form's endpoint, then after that, that file would be moved and i need to delete the created folder and the new moved file... it's an authentic mess.
As such i want to use Virtual Filesystem instead, but i have no idea how to set it up in this particular case, i've already downloaded a package and set it up, but the questions are, first, which package have you used/recommend and how would you tweak the class and the test to support the Virtual Filesystem? Would i need to switch over to using the Storage facade instead of the $request->video->move() call? If so how would that be done exactly?
Thank you in advance for your help
I couldn't figure out the VFS system, however i do have somewhat of an alternative that's still kinda messy but gets the job done.
Basically i set up two methods on my PHPUnit base class to setup and teardown the temp folders i need on any test that requires them, because i'm using Database Transactions the files get deleted on every test run and i need to create new dummy files every time i run the test.
So i have two methods setupTempDirectories and teardownTempDirectories which i will call at the beginning and at the end of each test that requires those temporary directories.
I put my temp files in the Storage directory because sometimes i run my tests individually through PHPStorm and the __DIR__ command gets messed up and points to different directories when i do that, i also tried __FILE__ with the same result, so i just resorted to using Laravel's storage_path instead and that works fine.
Then that leaves the problem of my concrete class which tries to move files around and create directories in the public folder for them... so in order to fix that i changed the code to use the Storage facade, then i Mock the Storage facade in my tests
So in my concrete class
$directory = 'frontend/videos/assets/'.date("Y").'/'.date('m').'/'.time();
Storage::makeDirectory($directory, 0755, true);
Storage::move($request->video, $directory . '/' . $request->video->getClientOriginalName());
$resource->video = '/'.$directory.'/'.$request->video->getClientOriginalName();
Storage::move($request->preview_image, $directory . '/' . $request->preview_image->getClientOriginalName());
$resource->preview_image = '/'.$directory.'/'.$request->preview_image->getClientOriginalName();
And then in my test i mock both the makeDirectory and the move methods like such
// Override the Storage facade with a Mock version so that we don't actually try to move files around...
Storage::shouldReceive('makeDirectory')->once()->andReturn(true);
Storage::shouldReceive('move')->twice()->andReturn(true);
That makes my tests work and does not actually leave files behind after it's done...i hope someone has a better solution but for the time being this is what i came up with.
I was actually trying to use VFS but it never worked out... i keep getting errors that the original file in the storage directory is not found even though it's right there...
I'm not even sure the Storage facade was using VFS in the background to begin with even though it should...
Is there any url like
http://mysymfony.app/_profiler/LAST_ID?panel=db ???
Have no Symfony Profile Footer when profile a json API and it cost time to go back to the overview everytime.
There should be a response header called: "X-Debug-Token-Link" which is a direct link to the latest profiler. You can inspect that in google chrome devtools after each request.
There is no way to do this that I'm aware of. I checked the bundle and there's no route that seems to cover this.
It seems plausible to me, however, that you could write you own route and action for it. Start here and then I think the basic logic of your action would look like this
$token = array_pop($this->profiler->find(null, null, 1, null, null, null));
return new RedirectResponse(
$this->generator->generate(
'_profiler',
array('token' => $token, 'panel' => 'db')
),
302,
array('Content-Type' => 'text/html')
);
I'm working with SiteCore and I need to pull some data out of the software via either that API or the SQL database using a PHP script. The reason I say both are possible is because even if the database changes later on, that doesn't matter to me.
Anyway...
I'm trying to pull any data fields that I can get from a particular issue. This is my SOAP code so far, and it connects to the service and such, but the return isn't what I need...
try
{
$client = new SoapClient('http://localhost:8083/sitecore/shell/webservice/service.asmx?WSDL');
$credentials = array('Password' => 'mypassword','Username' => 'sitecore\myusername');
$Current_Issue = array(
'id' => '{043B69BA-3175-4184-812F-C925CE80324E}',
//'language' => 'en',
//'version' => '1',
//'allFields' => 'true',
'databaseName' => 'web',
'credentials' => $credentials
);
$response = $client->GetItemMasters($Current_Issue);
print_r($response);
}
catch(SoapFault $e)
{
echo $e->getMessage();
}
catch(Exception $e)
{
echo $e->getMessage();
}
This is my output:
stdClass Object
(
[GetItemMastersResult] => stdClass Object
(
[any] => <sitecore xmlns=""/>
)
)
ANY help is appreciated. If anybody knows an example SQL query that I can use, that would be just as useful as an alternative method.
Thanks
If you are running Sitecore 6.5 / 6.6 you may want to take a look at the Sitecore Item Web API which was released yesterday (5/11/12).
http://sdn.sitecore.net/Products/Sitecore%20Item%20Web%20API.aspx
This allows you to perform RESTful operations against Sitecore items without the need for the old web service / SOAP interface. Using this module you can receive a JSON representation of a Sitecore item or collection of items and even post back changes. You may find it easier to work with :)
If you have to use the SOAP interface, are you sure that your items are published ? Try changing the databaseName -> 'master' and see if you get any results. Other things to check are the permissions of the user credentials you are using.