Can you set Page Output Cache by an Individual user? - asp.net

I have a master page which has a rather simple menu system. The menu items available are based on the logged on user. However, the database calls to determine this logic are over a second which is probably too long for my liking.
Is there a way to wrap the Menu into a UserControl but along with having a duration to refresh but obviously also the output cache should be on a per user basis?
I know the other solution is to cache the data for each user and then rebuild but I thought the more efficent place to start would be Page Output cache.
Please note also this application does not user Session state.

You can look at VaryByParam method of Page Output Caching.
When your user logs in add a query string to your page something like page.aspx?uid=x123
then add the following to your page:
<%# OutputCache Duration="10800" VaryByParam="uid" %>
This will make it per user cache.
Do remember:
Even if you put your user as a query string, still do the validation, that its the same user who logged in, to avoid users peeking into each other's view by simply changing the query string.

Related

ASP.NET page caching and session variable

I have a asp.net webpage that displays a link Login or Logout depending on a session variable "IsLogged". I want to implement caching in that page. But after applying caching the Login/Logout becomes inconsistent with the session variable. What is the best approach to address this problem so that I can also apply caching in that page?
Thanks,
Partha
I am not sure how you are caching specifically but you could break your page up into two user controls (ascx).
Your aspx page could contain the user control to that shows the login information (make sure that when you load the user control with a dynamic url so that the caching ignores it because the address is diff everytime like:
yourSessionInfo.ascx?stopcache=32487239875 (the number could be just current time in ticks)
You just need something that changes in your url so that the page 'looks' like it is different and reloads.
Then have the rest of your page in another user control that has a static url:
yourRestOfPage.asx
Notice nothing changing in the url so page can be cached.
Not sure if this will solve your exact problem but it should at least start you down the right path.

How to implement customized home-page for different users?

I have an ASP.Net(VB.Net) project which has various modules/functionality. I want to give users the freedom to set their own default startup page.
I don't know how to get a head-start implementing this feature.
Also, I am NOT using MVC
On the master page place some control to choose current page as default (i.e. button or checkbox). After user has select current page as default you can store the page address to user's profile or any storage you like.
Set the site start page like Default.aspx and in the Page_Load method of this page read user's saved default page if exists and redirect to it.
You'd want to set up a way for the User to store their preferred home page in your database (or your preferred method). Once that's done you should be able to do this in a simple fashion:
ASP.NET WebForms:
On the Master Page / Default page, check to see if they're logged in in your Page_Load event.
If they are, check to see if they have a start up page saved, if they do then use Response.Redirect and send them to their preferred location.
If they don't, or aren't logged in, then show them the default page.
ASP.NET MVC:
On the HomeController's Index method check to see if they're logged in.
If they are, check to see if they have a start up page saved, if they do then use RedirectToAction and send them to their preferred location.
If they don't, or aren't logged in, then show them the default view.
There are probably plenty of other ways to accomplish this as well, but this should be a straight forward way to get your started.

Something like viewstate and session

The problem that I am having is as follows:
I currently have a custom class that generates buttons and places them on a placeholder on a master page.
The events for these buttons put specific values into session that differs values for a database query. In essence, the buttons serve as filters for charts.
After creating all the buttons, I realized that session values will stay constant from page to page, so everytime a user enters a different page while another is open, the filters selected on the open page will remain constant for the new page that is opened.
At first, I wanted to use viewstate rather than session, but then realized that a master page and a content page do not share the same viewstate.
At the current time, I am thinking of using a prefix for the sesson key that will identify what page the filters actually exist for. However, I am not wanting to overload session with numerous values if the user wishes to have many pages open at the same time.
Any solutions that would entail a way to share viewstate (or some other way to store values) between app_code, the master, and the content page?
Use HttpContext.Current.Items, it is a key-value pair collection with a lifetime of a single Http Request.
Have you considered Context.Items?
How many filters are we talking here? Store the filter values in the URL. Have you seen some of the URLs that google or an ecommerce site uses? They are quite long. Here is how I do it:
I store the filter values in the query like, www.chart.com?filter1=val1&filter2=val2 etc.
I user JQuery's query plugin to manipulate the query on the client side, and then request the chart from the server again, using the new query.
This way, I'm not junking up session, cookies, or anything like that, and if the user wants to store a bookmark to a particular chart or email it to a friend, they can and the filters are preserved.
I'm starting to think the answer shown in the following question will work:
ViewState object lost in Master Page Load
Exposing the desired variables via a property.
If the data isn't too long, cookies are a typical solution.
Another option is to use Silverlight isolated storage. The Silverlight control itself could be invisible (no UI).

How to Track F5/Refresh in ASP.Net

I am using VS 2005, C# 2, ASP.Net 2.0
I am unable to find out how to track that user pressed F5/Ctrl+F5/ Open a new Window(Ctrl + N) in ASP.Net.
I know that there is a Page.IsPostBack property, which tells that a page is loaded in response to an action taken by user.
I am just curious to know, that why isn't there a property as IsRefresh or Page.IsRefresh in ASP.Net, which will return true,
whenever user takes any of the above actions.
Is there a way to know this?
Actually my problem is that i have a DLL using which all of my aspx pages are inherited, I have to
insert some values in a table whenever the page is opened for the first time that's it, if user just opens the page or do not take any action,
an entry should be inserted into the database, but as far as I have tried, I controlled it anyhow using the Page.IsPostBack property, but I got stuck
in the refresh case, as it is inserting records unconditionally.
Similar to using a function in Global.asax (as others have suggested) you could use a session variable "flag". When the page first loads set a session variable and then just check against it in your page load function:
if (Session("visited") != "true"
//page has not been visited, log visit to DB
Just make sure you set the session flag sometime after the above check during the page load.
It won't be exact (sessions can timeout while a page is active, users can completely leave the site and come back in the same browser and the session stays alive, etc) but for your tracking it is much better than counting every page hit in the DB.
Perhaps you want the Session_Start method in the Global.asax file, which will be triggered once at the start of each user session?
In your Global.asax file, add or edit the method:
void Session_Start(object sender, EventArgs e)
{
}
why isn't there a property as IsRefresh or Page.IsRefresh in ASP.Net
Because ASP.NET cannot possibly know. The browser does not send any information that could allow it to determine whether the page is being requested due to a refresh or normal load. You will need to reconsider your requirements: what is the actual purpose of the database logging?
Session_Start method in Global.asax file is fired every time when a browser session is started. You can use this method to count number of unique users on your website.
Session_End method in Global.asax is fired when a session ends (explicitly or timedout). So you can decrement the count here.
Hope the above to example uses of these methods helps you understand how you can use them.
Because of the stateless nature of HTTP protocol there is no way to tell apart the initial load from the refresh
As has already been said. This isn't possible. A request issued due to a refresh is no different to a request issued the first time the page is loaded.
It sounds to me like you are trying to track page views somehow. This is certainly possible though it will require some work on your part. Your best bet is probably to log the URL of the page. You may also want to include the query string in order to differentiate between page loads for different pieces of data (if this happens in your application). You will also want to log the ID of the current user, and the ID of their session.
You can then make sure that you don't insert two page views for the same user for the same page in the same session, effectively filtering out any reloads of a page.
You do need to be aware that this isn't the same as detecting a refresh, what you are detecting is two page views in the same session, this could be a refresh, or it could be use of the back button, or just reloading from the address bar.
My suggestion would be to create a cookie on very first load, then on Page_Load check to see if the cookie exists. If it does, don't insert the record. You can use Session_End to destroy or create the cookie as someone suggested if that works with your application's architecture.

How in ASP.NET, do you deal with session and multiple tabs?

I have written an application in ASP.net, that is designed to let the user add records to a database. The page is set up that when a user adds a record, the ID number of the newly added record is set in session, the page Response.Redirects to a "Thank you for submitting" page, then redirects back to the original page to allow further edits. Users can also use the Back button on this screen to go back to the original record adding page, which allows them to make edits to the data.
However, I have found that storing the ID in session isn't a terribly good solution, as a user might try to create two documents in different tabs or windows. I have also tried setting the ID in a literal control, but this causes the problem that when the user uses the Back button, the literal control isn't set to the ID, and new records get added instead of one being edited.
Is there any kind of solution for this?
I'd recommend storing your ID in the QueryString. After the record is added, redirect to your "thankyou" page, which then I am guessing contains a link to the edit form which you will generate with the ID in the querystring. When that link is followed, the edit page shouild pull the ID out of the query string in order to load up the correct record to edit.
Your add and edit form can even be the same page, when an ID is provided in the querystring, your form knows to edit that record, otherwise your form adds a new record.
Silly question, why can the user use the back button to edit the data just accepted in a post?
If the edit previously posted data is a common scenario why not just redirect to a page when the data is accepted that lets them edit it. Then if the hit the back button they would be going back to the original "clean" insert/add new data page.
This would give the following flows
Add->[Post]->Edit->.....
Add->[Post]->Edit->[Back button]->Add->[Post]->Edit->[Post]->Edit....
Have you tried adding the ID in the querystring? Then you could read it, and add it to the session as needed (say on a user clicking the back button).
Seems like a lot of problems allowing editing of an object in a page rendered when using the back button. Would it be too much to give them an edit button instead?
The controls save their state in the ViewState. If you choose to use SessionState instead of ViewState to store the information, then the controls will save their state in the session state and it won't work properly with multiple tabs.
I have not yet found a way to bypass this issue while still using SessionState. Our solution was to use the normal ViewState.
I've tried storing the ID in the querystring (which is mostly fine for editing), but the problem with that is when the information is stored in session for when they use the Back button. If the user does the following:
User creates a record (1st record), the ID is passed along in the querystring, and temporarily stored in session.
User creates another record (2nd record), the ID is passed along in the querystring, temporarily stored in session.
User uses the Back button on the first record to go to the page that doesn't have the querystring.
It's probably a far-fetched scenario, but it's one that may happen. The only solution I have is to block the usage of the Back button to go back to the adding page, by using window.history.forward() in JavaScript. But this as a solution is terrible.
My question for you is why are you storing anything in the session to begin with? If you can avoid storing anything in the session, I think you will be better off altogether.
Having thought about this, does the following sound like a decent solution to the problem I outlined above?
When first adding a record, store a timestamp of when the add page was accessed in a hidden field.
This timestamp is passed through session when the user clicks save. Along with the ID.
If the user opens another tab at the same time and saves, then the new page's timestamp gets passed through session.
If the user tries to access the add page of first record (using the back button), the system looks up session, and sees if there is a timestamp, and whether it matches the one in the hidden field for that page.
If it doesn't match, then the user gets a prompt, and told to edit the record properly.
Does this sound reasonable, or too overly complex?

Resources