I've created a QML UI that has a dial and a custom control. The custom control is basically a progress bar with a MouseArea to allow the user to set the value by clicking it. As Qt's property binding docs point out, as soon as I assign to the custom control's value from Javascript in the MouseArea click handler, I lose the declarative binding between it and the dial.
Is it possible to make this binding bidirectional, or even better, to link the values of both controls to a single value above both of them in the QML hierarchy? And is it possible to do this with declarative syntax so I don't have complex event handler code in every control?
import QtQuick 2.9
import QtQuick.Layouts 1.3
import QtQuick.Controls 2.3
import QtQuick.Window 2.2
import QtQuick.Shapes 1.0
Window {
id: window
visible: true
width: 800
height: 200
readonly property int range: 10
RowLayout {
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
anchors.verticalCenter: parent.verticalCenter
spacing: 5
Dial {
id: dial1
live: true
from: 0
to: window.range
stepSize: 1
snapMode: Dial.SnapAlways
}
Control {
id: dut
implicitWidth: 200
implicitHeight: 50
property int range: window.range
property int value: dial1.value
onValueChanged: {
console.log("New value: " + value);
}
Rectangle {
width: parent.width
height: parent.height
color: Qt.rgba(0,0,0,0)
border.color: Qt.rgba(0,0,0,1)
border.width: 1
}
Rectangle {
width: parent.width * dut.value/dut.range
height: parent.height
color: Qt.rgba(0,0,0,1)
}
MouseArea {
anchors.fill: parent
onClicked: {
dut.value = Math.round(mouseX/width * dut.range);
}
}
}
}
}
Note that if I reverse the relationship ie. have dial1.value: dut.value, then the binding isn't broken (although it's not quite bidirectional).
I realise that this example basically reinvents the scrollbar, but I'm trying to work my way up to more complex controls, for which declarative relationships between values would make life much easier.
Elaboration from a comment: What I don't understand, but want to, is how it's done for other QML components. For example, with a Dial I can set its value property to be bound to some other component's property, and clicking on the dial doesn't remove that binding. I don't have to hook into its mouse events to do that. Despite looking through the source for how this is done, I'm not really any closer to understanding it.
There are other questions about bidirectional property bindings in QML, but I haven't been able to apply them to my problem because (a) I really, really want something declarative, and (b) the MouseArea properties and events don't seem to work well with Binding objects (as in, I can't figure out how to integrate the two things).
I would have done this:
import QtQuick 2.9
import QtQuick.Layouts 1.3
import QtQuick.Controls 2.3
import QtQuick.Window 2.2
import QtQuick.Shapes 1.0
Window {
id: window
visible: true
width: 800
height: 200
readonly property int range: 10
property int commonValue
RowLayout {
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
anchors.verticalCenter: parent.verticalCenter
spacing: 5
Dial {
id: dial1
live: true
from: 0
to: window.range
stepSize: 1
snapMode: Dial.SnapAlways
onValueChanged: {
commonValue = dial1.value
console.log("New value: " + value);
}
}
Rectangle {
width: 200
height: 50
color: Qt.rgba(0,0,0,0)
border.color: Qt.rgba(0,0,0,1)
border.width: 1
MouseArea {
anchors.fill: parent
onClicked: {
commonValue = Math.round(mouseX/width * window.range)
dial1.value = commonValue
}
}
Rectangle {
width: parent.width * window.commonValue/window.range
height: parent.height
color: Qt.rgba(0,0,0,1)
}
}
}
}
Use a Binding QML Type:
MouseArea {
id: mouseArea
anchors.fill: dut
}
Binding {
target: dut
property: 'value'
value: Math.round(mouseArea.mouseX/mouseArea.width * dut.range);
when: mouseArea.pressed && mouseArea.containsMouse
}
Note that the when property on the Binding means it's only active as a binding when those conditions are fulfilled ie. the mouse is over the area and one of the "accepted buttons" is pressed.
This does not mean that the value reverts when the conditions aren't met, just that the value stops updating when they're not met. However, if you have another binding active somewhere else, that one may cause the the value to "snap back" because it will "take over" when this Binding ceases to apply.
Depending on the other components you use, this might not even be enough, and you might need to implement your properties in C++ to get them to work as you expect.
Related
I've been trying to create a function that programmatically scrolls to bottom a ScrollView using Qt Quick Controls 2.
I've tried various options, but much of the support I found online refers to Qt Quick Controls 1, not 2. This is what I've tried:
import QtQuick 2.8
import QtQuick.Controls 2.4
ScrollView {
id: chatView
anchors.top: parent.top
anchors.left: parent.left
anchors.right: parent.right
anchors.bottom: inputTextAreaContainer.top
function scrollToBottom() {
// Try #1
// chatView.contentItem.contentY = chatBox.height - chatView.contentItem.height
// console.log(chatView.contentItem.contentY)
// Try #2
// flickableItem.contentY = flickableItem.contentHeight / 2 - height / 2
// flickableItem.contentX = flickableItem.contentWidth / 2 - width / 2
// Try #3
chatView.ScrollBar.position = 0.0 // Tried also with 1.0
}
TextArea {
id: chatBox
anchors.fill: parent
textFormat: TextArea.RichText
onTextChanged: {
// Here I need to scroll
chatView.scrollToBottom()
}
}
}
Does anyone know how this can be achieved using Qt Quick Controls 2?
If no, does anyone have any alternatives to this approach?
Cause
You are trying to set the ScrollBar's position to 1.0:
chatView.ScrollBar.position = 0.0 // Tried also with 1.0
however, you do not consider its size.
Solution
Take into account the size of the ScrollBar when you set its position like this:
chatView.ScrollBar.vertical.position = 1.0 - chatView.ScrollBar.vertical.size
How I came up with this solution?
I was curious of how Qt itself solves this problem, so I took a look at how QQuickScrollBar::increase() is implemented and I saw this line:
setPosition(qMin<qreal>(1.0 - d->size, d->position + step));
Then I took the first argument of qMin, i.e. 1.0 - d->size, and the solution was clear.
Example
Since you did not provide a MCE, I wrote one myself. I hope you can adapt it for your particullar case. Here it is:
import QtQuick 2.8
import QtQuick.Controls 2.4
import QtQuick.Layouts 1.12
ApplicationWindow {
width: 480
height: 640
visible: true
title: qsTr("Scroll To Bottom")
ColumnLayout {
anchors.fill: parent
ScrollView {
id: scrollView
Layout.fillWidth: true
Layout.fillHeight: true
function scrollToBottom() {
ScrollBar.vertical.position = 1.0 - ScrollBar.vertical.size
}
contentWidth: children.implicitWidth
contentHeight: children.implicitHeight
ScrollBar.vertical.policy: ScrollBar.AlwaysOn
clip: true
ColumnLayout {
Layout.fillWidth: true
Layout.fillHeight: true
Repeater {
model: 50
Label {
text: "Message: " + index
}
}
}
}
TextField {
Layout.fillWidth: true
}
}
Component.onCompleted: {
scrollView.scrollToBottom()
}
}
Result
The example produces the following result:
I am using QML's inbuilt DropShadow type (import QtGraphicalEffects) to generate a shadow of some rectangles that are contained within an Item. The DropShadow is also a child of said Item. But sometimes the shadow is rendered very badly. I am dynamically creating the screen and adding it to a SwipeView; the code is as follows:
swipeView.addItem(tasksScreen.createObject(swipeView))
swipeView.incrementCurrentIndex()
"tasksScreen" is the screen that the rectangles and DropShadow are part of.
The following video depicts the issue and the code that generates this behavior:
https://yadi.sk/i/mwl_8IZmm_jetQ
I believe the issue is you are making the DropShadow a child of its source - which is creating a looping dependency.
Instead, try making it a sibling of your Item or even better, set it up as your Item's layer.effect.
You can see these different techniques in the DropShadow documentation:
https://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qml-qtgraphicaleffects-dropshadow.html
The problem is the source property in your code you have set the source as the parent item in your code. Give the source as your visual object(Rectangle). I have attached the code for your reference.
import QtQuick 2.9
import QtQuick.Window 2.2
import QtQuick.Controls 2.2
import QtGraphicalEffects 1.0
Window {
visible: true
width: 640
height: 480
title: qsTr("Hello World")
Component {
id: swipeviewComponentId
Item {
id: itemId
Rectangle {
id: rectangleId
anchors.fill: parent
anchors.margins: 10
radius: 10
}
DropShadow {
anchors.fill: source
horizontalOffset: 3
verticalOffset: 3
radius: 8.0
samples: 17
color: "#80000000"
source: rectangleId
}
}
}
Column {
anchors.fill: parent
anchors.margins: 10
spacing: 10
SwipeView {
id: swipeViewId
width: parent.width
height: parent.height - addButtonId.height - (2 * parent.spacing) - pageIndicatorId.height
}
PageIndicator {
id: pageIndicatorId
currentIndex: swipeViewId.currentIndex
count: swipeViewId.count
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
}
Button {
id: addButtonId
width: parent.width
height: 40
text: "Add item"
onClicked: {
swipeViewId.addItem(swipeviewComponentId.createObject(swipeViewId,
{height: swipeViewId.height, width: swipeViewId.width}))
swipeViewId.incrementCurrentIndex()
}
}
}
}
I try to save index of ComboBox for choosing supported map types of Open Street Map. When opening the app again, the last chosen map index should be displayed. Qt.labs.settings didn't work as the example below:
import QtQuick 2.6
import QtQuick.Controls 2.0
import QtLocation 5.12
import QtPositioning 5.12
import Qt.labs.settings 1.0
ApplicationWindow{
id: root
width: 500
height: 500
visible: true
Settings{
id:mycombo
property alias maptype: selectmap.currentIndex
}
Flickable {
height: parent.height
width: parent.width
clip: true
contentHeight: Math.max(mapColumn.implicitHeight, height)
Column{
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
id:mapColumn
spacing: 5
anchors.fill : parent
Row{
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
spacing:25
Rectangle{
width:mapColumn.width
height:mapColumn.height-80
Map {
id:map
anchors.fill: parent
plugin: Plugin {
name: "osm"
}
}
}
}
Column{
id: combos
spacing: 10
width: parent.width
anchors.verticalCenter: root.verticalCenter
Row{
anchors.horizontalCenter: parent.horizontalCenter
spacing:1
Label{ text:"Map Type: "; height: selectmap.height; verticalAlignment: Text.AlignVCenter; }
// Map Types
ComboBox {
id: selectmap
width: 200
model:map.supportedMapTypes
textRole:"description"
onCurrentIndexChanged: map.activeMapType = map.supportedMapTypes[currentIndex]
}
}
}
}
}
}
Is it possible to save the current index of ComboBox for maps?
By saying "opening the app again" it is possible that the app has been killed, and in that case all values are lost. You have to store the index value in the file system, like config data, which is read when application loads. I guess there will be several of these data, including last typed places and history(for which cache is better). However for config data you may use JSON format.
Make a JSON file where you store all data, and make a controller like GuiConfigurationController which parses the file with QJsonValue. You may also consider to make a GuiConfiguration Singletonn class which will have all the values loaded as getter method. To write to the JSON file from QML use the Q_PROPERTY WRITE method which calls the setter method for the variable.
Q_PROPERTY(quint32 savedIndex READ savedIndex WRITE setSavedIndex NOTIFY savedIndexChanged)
quint32 savedIndex() const {return m_savedIndex;}
void setSavedIndex(quint32 index) {m_savedIndex = index;}
QML:
_someController.savedIndex = currentIndex
make sure _someController is set as rootContext -> ContextProperty to QQuickView
so when index changes the value is set in someController which saved the value to JSON. When app is loading read JSON and get the value of index. Update QtQuick using the onLoaded method
onLoaded: {currentindex = _someController.savedIndex}
Could anyone point me in the right direction on how to best organise my QML?
Currently for common single components I make a new QML file and add it to a Common directory under my resources.
E.g. My Label.qml
Text{
width: parent.width * 0.5
height: parent.height * 0.1
color: "#ffffff"
font.underline: true
font.pointSize: 16
verticalAlignment: Text.AlignBottom
horizontalAlignment: Text.AlignLeft
}
And then in my Form.qml I can import and use it like this:
import "Common"
Page {
Label{
id: username_lbl
text: "Username"
anchors.topMargin: parent.height * 0.1
}
...
}
But how would I do the above if I want to group together multiple components and reference them for use with connections?
For example I'd like a pair of buttons that sit at the bottom of a page (below is just an example and doesn't work):
So I'd like to have a ButtonPair.qml which would like a bit like this:
Button {
id: left_btn
width: parent.width * 0.5
height: parent.height * 0.1
anchors.bottom: parent.bottom
anchors.right: parent.right
}
Button {
id: right_btn
width: parent.width * 0.5
height: parent.height * 0.1
anchors.bottom: parent.bottom
anchors.left: parent.left
}
And then in my Form.qml I'd like to use these buttons and add an event handler to each:
import "Common"
Page {
ButtonPair{id: back_forward_buttons}
Connections {
target: back_forward_buttons.left_btn
onClicked: {
stackView.pop();
}
Connections {
target: back_forward_buttons.right_btn
onClicked: {
stackView.push("AnotherPage.qml");
}
}
Do I need to wrap my ButtonPair in a Component and use a Loader on my page and if so how do I then get to the individual left/right buttons in order to bind to onClicked?
When a component is designed, it is considered a black box that has properties and signals that must be viewed from the outside.
For example in your case ButtonPair must expose 2 signals: one when the left button is pressed and another when the right button is pressed, another thing that I have added are 2 properties to be able to establish the name of the buttons.
I see that you have set the height of the buttons as 10% of the height of the father and should be in the lower part and if you want to use that same component on the top? I would have to create another topButtonPair component, and if I want them to be on the right, etc. For the size should be established when the component is created not in the implementation. In this case each button must occupy half of the parent item.
Using the above we obtain the following:
ButtonPair.qml
import QtQuick 2.0
import QtQuick.Controls 2.4
import QtQuick.Layouts 1.11
Item{
// expose properties and signals
property string leftname: ""
property string rightname: ""
signal leftClicked()
signal rightClicked()
// internals
RowLayout{
anchors.fill: parent
spacing: 0
Button {
text: leftname
onClicked: leftClicked()
Layout.fillWidth: true
Layout.fillHeight: true
}
Button {
text: rightname
onClicked: rightClicked()
Layout.fillWidth: true
Layout.fillHeight: true
}
}
}
Note: The use of the layout is optional, you could use the anchors.
Now used on the page:
Page {
// other components
ButtonPair{
anchors.bottom: parent.bottom
height: 0.1*parent.height // <--- Here the height is established
anchors.left: parent.left
anchors.right: parent.right
leftname: "left text"
rightname: "right text"
onLeftClicked: console.log("left clicked")
onRightClicked: console.log("right clicked")
}
}
Generally, the black-box appraoch taken by #eyllanesc is the better one and should be preferred whenever possible. However, if you really need to access child items from the outside, you can:
ButtonPair.qml:
Item {
property alias leftButton: left_btn
property alias rightButton: right_btn
// … declarations of left_btn and right_btn as in your question
}
Usage:
ButtonPair {
leftButton {
onClicked: {
stackView.pop();
}
}
rightButton {
onClicked: {
stackView.push("AnotherPage.qml");
}
}
}
You can also use it in Connections. However, in 95% of cases you should forward properties and signals as in #eyllanesc’s approach, which leads to a much cleaner and readable interface.
I am working with QML and I want to add elements to SplitView dynamically eg. onMouseClick, but so far I didn't find the answer.
What I've found out so far is that the SplitView has it's default property set to it's first child's data property. So I guess I should try and add new dynamically created components with the parent set to that child (splitView1.children[0]). Unfortunately that doesn't work either. What is more the number of children of that first child is zero after the component has finished loading (seems like the SplitLayout's Component.onCompleted event calls a function that moves those children somewhere else). Thus the added children do not render (and do not respond to any of the Layout attached properties).
Please see the following code snippet:
import QtQuick 2.1
import QtQuick.Controls 1.0
import QtQuick.Layouts 1.0
ApplicationWindow {
width: 600
height: 400
SplitView {
anchors.fill: parent
Rectangle {
id: column
width: 200
Layout.minimumWidth: 100
Layout.maximumWidth: 300
color: "lightsteelblue"
}
SplitView {
id: splitView1
orientation: Qt.Vertical
Layout.fillWidth: true
Rectangle {
id: row1
height: 200
color: "lightblue"
Layout.minimumHeight: 1
}
// Rectangle { //I want to add Rectangle to splitView1 like this one, but dynamicly eg.onMouseClick
// color: "blue"
// }
}
}
MouseArea {
id: clickArea
anchors.fill: parent
onClicked: {
console.debug("clicked!")
console.debug("len: " + splitView1.__contents.length); // __contents is the SplitView's default property - an alias to the first child's data property
var newObject = Qt.createQmlObject('import QtQuick 2.1; Rectangle {color: "blue"}',
splitView1, "dynamicSnippet1"); //no effect
// var newObject = Qt.createQmlObject('import QtQuick 2.1; import QtQuick.Layouts 1.0; Rectangle {color: "blue"; width: 50; height: 50}',
// splitView1, "dynamicSnippet1"); //rectangle visible, but not in layout(?) - not resizeable
}
}
}
Is there any way I can make the dynamically created components render properly in the SplitView as the statically added ones?
It appears that the API does not provide support for dynamic insertion of new elements. Even if you do get it to work it would be a hack and might break with future releases. You may need to roll your own control to mimic the behavior you want. Ideally it should be backed by some sort of model.
As of QtQuick Controls 1.3, SplitView has an addItem(item) method.
you have to use the Loader for load dinamicaly objects. in onClicked handle you have to declare sourceComponent property to change the source of the Loader, something like this:
ApplicationWindow {
width: 600
height: 400
SplitView {
anchors.fill: parent
Rectangle {
id: column
width: 200
Layout.minimumWidth: 100
Layout.maximumWidth: 300
color: "lightsteelblue"
}
SplitView {
id: splitView1
orientation: Qt.Vertical
Layout.fillWidth: true
Rectangle {
id: row1
height: 200
color: "lightblue"
Layout.minimumHeight: 1
}
Loader {
id:rect
}
}
}
MouseArea {
id: clickArea
anchors.fill: parent
onClicked: {
console.debug("clicked!")
console.debug("len: " + splitView1.__contents.length) // __contents is the SplitView's default property - an alias to the first child's data property
rect.sourceComponent = algo
}
}
Component {
id:algo
Rectangle {
anchors.fill: parent
color: "blue"
}
}
}
I saw the source code of SplitView, it calculate each split region when Component.onCompleted signal. So I think that is a key point. No matter how you do (insert, dynamic create). The region won't be reset after you insert a new region for split.