Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 5 years ago.
Improve this question
Obviously the difference is that one can and one cannot access Netflix. But how does Netflix ban VPNs while not catching VPNs designed specifically to access Netflix?
The main difference is the question of whether Netflix knows about them yet or not.
In time, the VPNs which can access Netflix today will likely end up being blocked by from accessing the service when Netflix's analysis of incoming connections reveals IP addresses which could belong to VPNs used to circumvent their restrictions.
It is possible that some operators of VPN services may make use of IP addresses which are changed periodically to make detection less likely and this is how they may go for an extended period of time without being blocked.
Related
Closed. This question is not about programming or software development. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 13 hours ago.
Improve this question
I am confused as to what the statelessness of HTTP means in terms of the client.
I get that stateless-ness means the server does not store any state information about the client but does the client still remember the identities of the servers it has interacted with, assuming cookies are not used?
The “remembering” logic you are talking about would have to be added to either the server, or the client, or both. HTTP is just a protocol, not an implementation, and that protocol is stateless because it doesn’t define any remembering logic as part of its specification
Closed. This question is not about programming or software development. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 7 days ago.
Improve this question
We are setting up an ikev2 client vpn using strongswan. So far we have managed to setup a single server using letsencrypt certificate with eap-radius authentication method. We are able to connect to our server without any issue. Now we want to auto-scale the vpn so that the server gets scaled up or down depending on the number of users connected to the server but how do we do it?
What would be the best approach to achieve this?
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 1 year ago.
Improve this question
Whats the difference bewteen a GSLB and ADC. I can see that both can do load balancing, but i want to know the difference and additional functionalities each can perform. And i'd also want to know if one can replace the other.
GSLB is a general Term: Global Server Load Balancing
ADC is a Citrix product which does GSLB as well as proxying traffic.
To replace an ADC deployment, which saves f**king money(man they charge lots for it),
the proxy part can be replaced with NGINX + Server, the GSLB(which is just DNS with healthchecks) can be replaced with BIND(which actually runs on ADC as a service) and healthckeck to the backend server to remove/add record to DNS.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
Suppose my Skype integration wants to filter notifications for a user to messages that contain the string "server down". Is this possible?
Per default Skype for Business (=SfB) can only block URL or attachments as written here. Maybe there exist an 3rd party application which can do that, but I do not think so. Reason: The problem here is that SfB can perform peer2peer connections (see more here). That means if you and your workmade are in the same network and no firewall restricts you both and you both perform a chat together, the chat is done between both of you (without a real server connection; for more infos see the official documentation inside the 2nd link). So a 3rd party software (which might sitting on the server) will not capture that kind of information. So what you might need is a client software on every PC. But what about the mobile clients then? So I do not think that such a software exists or would be possible to build.
Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
This question does not appear to be about a specific programming problem, a software algorithm, or software tools primarily used by programmers. If you believe the question would be on-topic on another Stack Exchange site, you can leave a comment to explain where the question may be able to be answered.
Closed 9 years ago.
Improve this question
I have recently added a dlink router to my existing network, and connected some computers with it. The existing network uses ip range 192.168.1.x and the new router uses 192.168.0.x. Internet services is accessible on both the networks, but a shared resource or a web server connected to one network is not accessible to the systems of other network.
I googled this issue but I am unable to resolve the issue, please help.
If you are just going to be using the router as a switch on an existing network, you need to turn off its router-y features.
Go onto the web interface of the device and turn of "NAT", that way they'll use the same address space as everything else on the network.
They'll be other features as well you may want to turn off but that's one causing your current issue.