In my for loop, I need to remove RAM. So I delete some objects with rm() command. Then, I do gc() but the RAM still the same
So I use .rs.restartR() instead of gc() and it works: a sufficient part of my RAM is removed after the restart of the R session.
My problem is the for loop which is interrupted after the R restart. Do you have an idea to automatically go on the for loop after the .rs.restartR() command ?
I just stumbled across this post as I'm having a similar problem with rm() not clearing memory as expected. Like you, if I kill the script, remove everything using rm(list=ls(all.names=TRUE)) and restart, the script takes longer than it did initially. However, restarting the session using .rs.restartR() then sourcing again works as expected. As you say, there is no way to 'refresh' the session while inside a loop.
My solution was to write a simple bash script which calls my .r file.
Say you have a loop in R that runs from 1 to 3 and you want to restart the session after each iteration. My bash script 'runR.sh' could read as follows:
#!/bin/bash
for i in {1..3}
do
echo "Rscript myRcode.r $i" #check call to r script is as expected
Rscript myRcode.r $i
done
Then at the top of 'myRcode.r':
args <- commandArgs()
print(args) #list the command line arguments.
myvar <- as.numeric(args[6])
and remove your for (myvar in...){}, keeping just the contents of the loop.
You'll see from print(args) that your input from your shell script is the 6th element of the array, hence args[6] in the following line when assigning your variable. If you're passing in a string, e.g. a file name, then you don't need as.numeric of course.
Running ./runR.sh will then call your script and hopefully solve your memory problem. The only minor issue is that you have to reload your packages each time, unlike when using .rs.restartR(), and may have to repeat other bits that ordinarily would only be run once.
It works in my case, I would be interested to hear from other more seasoned R/bash users whether there are any issues with this solution...
By saving the iteration as an external file, and writing an rscript which calls itself, the session can be restarted within a for loop from within rstudio. This example requires the following steps.
#Save an the iteration as a separate .RData file in the working directory.
iter <- 1
save(iter, file="iter.RData")
Create a script which calls itself for a certain number of iterations. Save the following script as "test_script.R"
###load iteration
library(rstudioapi)
load("iter.RData")
###insert function here.
time_now <- Sys.time()
###save output of function to a file.
save(time_now, file=paste0("time_", iter, ".Rdata"))
###update iteration
iter <- iter+1
save(iter, file="iter.RData")
###restart session calling the script again
if(iter < 5){
restartSession(command='source("test_script.R")')
}
Do you have an idea to automatically go on the for loop after the .rs.restartR() command ?
It is not possible.
Okay, you could configure your R system to do something like this, but it sounds like a bad idea. I'm not really sure if you want to restart the for loop from the beginning or pick it up where left off. (I'm also very confused that you seem to have been able to enter commands in the R console while a for loop was executing. I think there's more than you are not telling us.)
You can use your rprofile.site file to automatically run commands when R starts. You could set it up to automatically run your for loop code whenever R starts. But this seems like a bad idea. I think you should find a different sort of fix for your problem.
Some of the things you could do to help the situation: have your for loop write output for each iteration to disk and also write some sort of log to disk so you know where you left off. Maybe write a function around your for loop that takes an argument of where to start, so that you can "jump in" at any point.
With this approach, rather than "restarting R and automatically picking up the loop", a better bet would be to use Rscript (or similar) and use R or the command line to sequentially run each iteration (or batch of iterations) in its own R session.
The best fix would be to solve the memory issue without restarting. There are several questions on SO about memory management - try the answers out and if they don't work, make a reproducible example and ask a new question.
You can make your script recursive by sourcing itself after restarting session.
Make sure the script will take into account the initial status of the loop. So you might have to save the current status of the loop in a .rds file before restarting session. Then call the .rds file from inside the loop after restarting session. This would help you start the loop where it was before restarting r session.
I just found out about this command 'restartSession'. I'm using it because I was also running into memory consumption issues as the garbage collector will not give back the RAM to the OS (Linux).
library(rstudioapi)
restartSession(command = "print('x')")
An approach independent from Rstudio:
If you want to run this in Rstudio, don't use R console, but terminal, otherwise use rstudioapi::restartSession() as in other answers - not recommended (crashes) -.
create iterator and load script (in system terminal would be:)
R -e 'saveRDS(1,"i.rds"); source("Script.R")'
Script.R file:
# read files and iterator
i<-readRDS("i.rds")
print(i)
# open process id of previous loop to kill it
tryCatch(pid <- readRDS(file="pid.rds"), error=function(e){NA} )
if (exists("pid")){
library(tools)
tools::pskill(pid, SIGKILL)
}
# update objects and iterator
i <- i+1
# process
pid <- Sys.getpid()
# save files and iterator
saveRDS(i, file="i.rds")
# process ID to close it in next loop
saveRDS(pid, file="pid.rds")
### restart session calling the script again
if(i <= 20 ) {
print(paste("Processing of", i-1,"ended, restarting") )
assign('.Last', function() {system('Rscript Script.R')} )
q(save = 'no')
}
Related
Here's my problem:
I'm working on a Linux system and run R in a console.
Within an R programs loop, I load a really huge Data file, several GB.
Pseudocode:
for(i in 1:n){
data=read(Hugefile[i])
...
# do some stuff
...
rm(data)
}
When R was started new from console, the first iteration loads the data successfully. But in the second iteration, I get an allocation error. Even when I clear everything by using rm(list=ls()) and gc(), I get the same error trying to load this file manually. First, when I close R and open it again, I then can load another file of that size.
Does anyone know how to clear the memory of R within a loop and without restarting R?
Thanks for your help :)
I have a series of R scripts for doing the multiple steps of data
analysis that I require. Some of these take a very long time and create really
large objects. I've noticed that if I just source all of them in a row (via a main.R script), the
processing for later steps takes much longer than if I source one script, save
what I need, and restart R for the next step (loading the data I need).
I was wondering if there was a
way, via Rscript or a Bash script perhaps, that I could carry this out.
There would need to be objects that persist for the first 2 scripts (which load
my external data and create the objects that will be used for all further
steps). I suppose I could also just save those and load them in further scripts.
(I would also like to pass a number of named arguments to this script, which I think I can find on other SO posts and can use something like optparse.)
So, the script would look something like this, I think:
#! /bin/bash
Rscript 01_load.R # Objects would persist, ideally
Rscript 02_create_graphs.R # Objects would persist, ideally
Rscript 03_random_graphs.R # contains code to save objects
#exit R
Rscript 04_permutation_analysis.R # would have to contain code to load data
#exit
And so on. Is there a solution to this? I'm using R 3.2.2 on 64-bit CentOS 6. Thanks.
Chris,
it sounds you should do some manual housekeeping between (or within) your steps by using gc() and maybe also rm(). For more details see help(gc) and help(rm).
So instead of exit R and restart it again you could do:
rm(list = ls())
gc()
But please note: rm(list = ls()) would throw away all your objects. Better you create a suitable list of objects you really want to throw away and pass this list to rm().
I want an R script to continuously run and check for files in a folder and do something with those files.
The code simply checks for a file, then moves the file to somewhere else and renames it, deleting the old file (in reality it's a bit more elabore than this).
If I run the script it works fine, however I want R to automatically detect for the files. In other words, is there a way to have R run the script continuously so that I don't have to run the script if I put files in that folder?
In pure R you just need an infinite repeat loop...
repeat {
print('Checking files')
# Your code to do file manipulation
Sys.sleep(time=5) # to stop execution for 5 sec
}
However there may be better tools suitable to do this kind of file manipulation depending on your OS.
You can use the function tclTaskSchedule from the tcltk2 package to schedule a function or expression to run on a regular interval. You can have multiple such tasks scheduled and still work in the R session (just be careful not to modify something that the scheduled task could also modify or you can get unpredictable results).
Though an OS based solution that runs a given rscript may still be a better approach.
I've an R script, that takes commandline arguments, where the top line is:
#!/usr/bin/Rscript --slave
I wanted to interrupt execution in a function (so I can interactively use the data variables that have been loaded by that point to work out the next bit of code I need to write). I added this inside the function in question:
browser()
but it gets ignored. A bit of searching suggests it might be because the program is running in non-interactive mode. But even more searching has not tracked down how I switch the script out non-interactive mode so that browser() will work. Something like a browser_yes_I_really_mean_it() function.
P.S. I want to avoid altering the rest of the script if at all possible. My current approach is to copy and paste the code chunks, needed to prepare the data, into an interactive session; but as the script gets more and more complex this is getting more and more unreasonable.
UPDATE: for anyone else with the same question, it appears the answer to the actual question is that it is impossible. Once you start R in a non-interactive mode the die is cast. The given answers are therefore workarounds: either you hack your code (remembering to unhack it afterwards), or you refactor to make debugging easier. (This comment is not intended as a criticism of the answers; the suggested refactoring makes the code cleaner anyway.)
Can you just fire up R and source the file instead?
R
source("script.R")
Following mdsumner's answer, I edited my script like this:
if(!exists("argv")){
argv=commandArgs(TRUE)
if(length(argv)!=4)usage_and_exit()
}else{
if(length(argv)!=4){
stop("Must set argv as a 4 element vector. E.g. argv=c(...)")
}
}
Then no other change was needed, and I was able to do:
R
> argv=c('a','b','c','d')
> source("script.R")
In addition to the previous answer, I'd create a toplevel function (e.g. doStuff) which performs the analysis you want to perform in batch. The function takes the cmd line options as input. In the batch script you source the script that contains this function and call it. In this way you can easily run the function in interactive mode and use e.g. browser().
In some cases, the suggested solution (workaround) may not work - for example, when the R code needs to be run as a part of an existing bash script. For those cases, I suggest to write in your R script into the bash script using here document:
#!/bin/bash
R --interactive << EOT
# R code starts here
argv=c('a','b','c','d')
print(interactive())
# Rest of script contents
quit("no")
# R code ends here
EOT
This way, print(interactive()) above will yield TRUE.
Sidenote: Make sure to avoid the $ character in your R code, as this would not be processed correctly - for example, retrieve a column from a data.frame() by using df[["X1"]] instead of df$X1.
I would like to write a script main.r that returns the workspace to the state it was in before being run (i.e., at the end of the script, remove all and only the objects that had been added to the workspace). Running the following:
#main.r
initial.objects <- objects()
tmp1 <- 1
remove(list = setdiff(objects(), initial.objects)
via source('main.r') from the R console works as desired. HOWEVER, this does NOT work in Splus with tmp1 being left in the working directory (it does work when I run each line individually rather than sourcing the entire file). Investigating a little further, I found that in R objects() keeps track of the objects entering the workspace even in the MIDDLE of a call to source(). In Splus, objects() doesn't seem to "know" about the objects that have been added to the workspace until the END of a source() call.
Q: What's going on? What can I do to get something similar to main.r working in Splus?
I'm not sure what you're trying to do here, but the best way to reload an environment is to save it and reload it.
save("pre-environ.Rdata")
## Your script goes here
rm(list=ls()) ## clean the environment
## Reload the original environ at end of your script
load("pre-environ.Rdata")