I want use Google Assistant from my phone to send HTTP POST command to my server. I have a simple webnms app running over it, this server support REST API and now I want to use Google Assistant to shoot GET or POST command to that server and return my output.
Is it something possible? I am not full time developer.
Yes, as #Prisoner says it is possible. It is not what you asked - but have you seen these ways that Google provides to get skills published without requiring a lot of developer savvy?
https://developers.google.com/actions/content-actions/
https://developers.google.com/actions/templates/first-app
I don't speak for them, but IMO Google's target audience for Action building apart from the above is those who have at least some familiarity with the JavaScript language and its "run-time" Node.
There is also this - which I haven't tried by the way.
https://www.techadvisor.co.uk/how-to/digital-home/easy-actions-google-assistant-3665372/
In case it is not obvious, Google Actions are essentially websites that interact with Google's assistant running on a Home device or a smart phone, say. Think of the Assistant as a browser initiating requests and your Action as serving them. If you can (build and?) deploy a server that handles POSTS over HTTPS on a publicly addressable URL, and if you can understand the JSON payload that the Assistant sends and respond with appropriate JSON to carry out you application then you are good to go.
Where you don't have a public IP address - e.g. in testing - you can use a tool like ngrok ( https://ngrok.com/ ) to reverse proxy requests emanating from the Assistant to your server.
I have slides for a presentation I did targeting fledgling developers who had never built an Action here
https://docs.google.com/presentation/d/1lGxmoMDZLFSievf5phoQVmlp85ofWZ2LDjNnH6wx7UY/edit?usp=sharing
and the code that goes with it here
https://github.com/unclewill/parrot
On the upside the code is about as simple as it gets. On the downside it does almost nothing. In particular, it doesn't try to understand language. As #Prisoner says you'll likely need a tool like Dialog Flow for that.
Yes, it is possible.
Your server will need to implement the Actions on Google API. This is a REST API which will accept JSON containing what the user is intending to do and specific information about what they have said. Your server will need to send back JSON indicating the reply, along with additional information about how to continue the conversation.
You will likely also want to use a tool such as Dialogflow to handle building the conversational script and converting a user's phrases into something that makes sense to you. You'll also need to use the Actions on Google console to manage your Action and provide additional details about how users contact your Action. All of this is explained in the Actions on Google documentation.
Simple Actions are fairly easy to develop, and can certainly be done by a developer as a hobby. Good Actions, however, take a lot more thought and planning. Google offers you to the tools - it is up to you to best take advantage of them.
I've found the solution.
In the "Action" console https://console.actions.google.com/project/sandbox-csuite/scenes/Start
Go to menu "Webhook", click "Change fulfillment method", and then select "HTTPS endpoint"
Related
I'm working on some app which should use Google Maps JS API (browser version).
And there exists one problem I've got very concerned about.
API keys have restriction to be used only from your domain, however, any request from your domain (for example, from code inspector) is considered a valid request. So, anyone can make a simple script and kick my quota out easily.
So, here is my question:
Is there any option or command to run to block such activity ? Like the script will load just one instance and then will not accept creation of a new one or something like that.
P.S. I know about free quota for mobile versions of API, but I need the browser to work too. Obviously, I don't load this in any public area, but anyone can pretend to be a client and even order some service for couple bucks, but then run the script to make an impact for thousands ((
Best I could find was this wiki entry
I I thought "surely there must be more to it than this".
Am I missing something?
From the doc:
What is WebHook?
The concept of a WebHook is simple. A WebHook is an HTTP callback: an
HTTP POST that occurs when something happens; a simple event-notification via HTTP POST.
A web application implementing WebHooks will POST a message to a URL
when certain things happen. When a web application enables users to
register their own URLs, the users can then extend, customize, and
integrate that application with their own custom extensions or even
with other applications around the web. For the user, WebHooks are a
way to receive valuable information when it happens, rather than
continually polling for that data and receiving nothing valuable most
of the time. WebHooks have enormous potential and are limited only by
your imagination! (No, it can't wash the dishes. Yet.)
Why should I care?
As integrated as we perceive the web, most web applications today
operate in silos. With the rise of API's we've seen mashups and some
degree of integration between applications. However, we have not seen
the vision of the programmable web: a web where you as the user can
"pipe" data between apps much like the Unix command line. Some say RSS
is the answer. They are wrong. The heart is in the right place, but
the implementation is wrong. RSS is still useful, but it is not going
to bring us the true programmable web.
We just need a simple way to get data out in real-time to let the user easily do whatever >they wantwith it. That means no polling, no content constraints, and no XML
parsing. That means no RSS. Using HTTP is simpler and easier to use.
PHP is a very popular and accessible programming environment, so it's
likely to be used often for writing hooklets... getting data from a
web POST in PHP is as simple as $_POST['something']. And making the
request to the user script is as simple as making an HTTP request,
something already built-in to most programming environments. In fact,
web hooks are easier to implement than an API.
I'm implementing an API for a several different client programs to connect to, and I want the api to be able to send back an "are you sure you want to do this?" message, such as when trying to delete something via the api. Looking over the list of established http response codes, I don't see one that seems quite appropriate. I could always skip using a code and provide some other manner of communicating the confirmation, but I would really like to use a standardized method if possible.
The api is normally accessed via a client application, currently a JavaScript-powered one, but I've also made it so that it can be effectively used by directly accessing the api via web browser url.
In what regard would the "Yes I'm sure"-message differ from the "Delete entity 42" message? What would keep clients from immediately sending the "Yes I'm sure"-message? Does your API get accessed by machines or humans?
IMHO this should be solved in the user interface, not in the transport layer.
Say, I'm developing a Windows (if OS is important) application that will be available to download for free and I would like then to collect some usage statistics. In the easiest case - count of application launches. It looks superfluous to maintain a server (e.g. VDS) just for this.
I've been thinking to use Google Analytics for this (manually send requests to GA server). This will probably work, but it is not GA designed for - the idea looks like a hack.
What are the options here?
I don't think this is a hack. It's all just data about user interaction. There is little logical difference between opening a desktop app and clicking a button vs opening a web page and following a link. Both are measurable user actions you can track, aggregate and put on graphs.
In fact, Google provides a lower level HTTP based "Measurement Protocol" that is intended for exactly that.
https://developers.google.com/analytics/devguides/collection/protocol/v1/
From the overview:
The Google Analytics Measurement Protocol allows developers to make
HTTP requests to send raw user interaction data directly to Google
Analytics servers. This allows developers to measure how users
interact with their business from almost any environment
Just put an HTTP request with the correct parameters in your application launch or button click code and it will collect the data. Any data you want to collect.
In other answers to this question there are suggestions like making web services or storing the data locally but why reinvent the wheel? Google Analytics already provides the collecting and reporting tools and it seems like a good solution.
I'm using this link https://www.google.com/reader/api/0/stream/contents/feed/FEEDHERE?output=json&n=20
to fetch feeds using Google's algorithm. As you can see I'm not adding any other parameters, just fetching the returned data in JSON format. My app will be heavily used hopefully and if I send a lot of requests to this link, will Google block my access or something?
Is there anything I can include, like userip, url for my app (so if they have problem to just contact me) or something else?
The most basic answer to your question is that Google will change its Terms of Service whenever it likes, and you've got no say in the matter. So if it's allowed today, it might not be allowed tomorrow, at Google's whim.
On this issue, though, you seem fairly safe. From the Terms of Service (these is the general document, since Reader doesn't seem to have a specific one):
Don’t misuse our Services. For example, don’t interfere with our Services or try to access them using a method other than the interface and the instructions that we provide.
Google provides RSS and Atom. They provide these feeds, so I assume they expect that they'll be used. They don't say that it's a misuse to point someone else at those feeds, so it looks OK for now, but they could add such a clause at any time.
All online services are subject to the terms and conditions of the providers of those services. So, as others have said, they may be ok with your use today, but they can change their mind any time down the line. I doubt including a URL or email or contact info will help anything, because when these services change, they don't notify every user of the service, they just announce the change publicly, and usually they give several month's notice in order to give users a chance to adapt their applications, but this is not standardized or enforced so there is no guarantee. One example would be the fairly recent discontinuance of the Google Finance API (for which no replacement has been announced).
The safest approach would be to design your app such that this feature that uses google's functionality is decoupled as much as possible from the rest of your app, so that, when or if the availability of the service changes (ie it's no longer available at all) you can adapt your app to use some other source for the feeds with minimal impact to the rest of the app. Design for change and plan for the worst.