I know crm utility command has been people's preferred method to manage clusters when it comes to High Availability with corosync & pacemaker. Now, its been deprecated and we are told to work with pcs utility commands which suppose to do all sort of things that we used to do with crm.
Now what I am troubling with is to find the pcs equivalent command to;
crm node attribute <node_name> set <resource_name> <some_parameters>
I am at CentOS 7.2 version & working with Percona master-slave cluster.
This actually can be done with pcs version 0.9.158.
The reason I had trouble of finding the pcs equivalent to crm was I was using older version which is pcs-0.9.143
Related
I am looking for a way to monitor changes to Microsoft Edge Web driver programmatically.
Some possiblities:
* Would be great if there is an API (REST) to monitor latest available Edge webdriver.
* Since Edge driver is dependent on windows build version. some information about windows 10 build version in the API would be useful.
* Or Even better.. Since Edge driver depends on windows 10 build version, is there any chance for the Edge driver to get shipped with windows 10 builds. something like the native calc.exe in the system32 folder...
Any guidance/information would be very helpful.
Thank you..
Primary versions of Web Driver can always be found on dev.microsoftedge.com. Presently, this includes versions for 10240, 10586, and the Fast Ring of the Windows Insider Program. Monitoring that page will give you insight as to when a newer version of Web Driver is available for Edge.
With regards to your other questions:
Can we have a REST API to identify latest/supported Web Driver / OS versions
Can Web Driver be shipped in Windows 10 directly
I'll reach out to the appropriate team member(s), and see if this is something they've considered.
For the time being, you may be able to infer the machine's build of Windows by leveraging common APIs. For instance, via Node, you could do the following:
require("os").release().match(/\d+$/);
Depending on your build of windows, this will return, [10240], [10586], or some newer build number, like [14379]. You could then use this to instruct the user as to which version of Web Driver they should download.
We are running an AS400 v5r2 and I have iSeries Client access installed. Since v5r2 does not support a x64 ODBC driver does anyone know how I can either install two versions (v5r4 supports x64) of iSeries Client Access on the same box or just install the x64 odbc driver from the more recent version without uninstalling all of v5r2 components.
Installing two versions of Client Access is probably not going to work, since both register their ODBC drivers with the same name, so only one would be available at a given time.
OTOH the PC side of V5R4 Client Access would probably work without problem with a V5R2 OS/400; perhaps even 6.1 iSeries Access, too. So you can upgrade the x64 box and check whether everything is working. FYI, I had problems with the first versions of 6.1 iSeries Access when running on x64 boxes, later versions were a bit better; also, I do not remember that V5R4 Client Access had a 64-bit variant at all.
Do not forget that on a x64 PC, there are two different ODBC drivers, one for 32-bit applications (stored on C:\WINDOWS\SysWOW64\cwbodbc.dll and that you can manage with the 32-bit administradorC:\WINDOWS\SysWOW64\odbcad32.exe), and another one for 64-bit applications (stored on C:\WINDOWS\System32\cwbodbc.dll and that you can manage with the 64-bit administrador C:\WINDOWS\System32\odbcad32.exe.) Unless your application is recompiled for 64-bit, what you are interested in is the former one, and if V5R2 Client Access runs flawlessly on that PC, everything is fine. Some applications like Office 2010 come in two flavours, but precisely for compatibility reasons like ODBC, it is still recommended to run the 32-bit variant even on 64-bit workstations.
1) V5R2 is very dead. You aren't going to get a lot of help when it comes to supporting an OS this old.
2) V5R4 is also dead.
3) Generally speaking, IBM intends that Client Access will work for operating systems two levels back and two levels ahead, so you could try using a V5R4 ODBC driver against a V5R2 DB2. The issue is going to be getting a V5R4 version of Client Access.
4) If you have questions about admin issues like this, Server Fault is probably the better choice.
EDIT: Add details of Client Access installation
Client Access has two logical pieces, a server side component and a client side component. Both pieces are available in the IFS, in the QIBM directory tree. If you have an already-working setup of Client Access on the server side, you can install the client side one of two ways:
1) Map a network drive to the IFS and run setup from there. This obviously won't be helpful to you because the V5R2 software doesn't support x64. If you are still under software maintenance, you could order a newer version of Client Access and install it on the server, and then use the newer version to install the needed ODBC driver.
2) Use the IBM-supplied CD to install the client component directly on the client. This allows you to install a different client version than the one on the server. Not generally recommended but in the case where you're migrating away from an unsupported machine, it's probably not a big worry. If your company ordered V5R4 at any time, you have the Client Access CDs.
The key thing for you is that you don't need to install the full Access product if all you need is the ODBC driver.
The biggest problem facing you is the age of the software. IBM stopped supporting V5R4 in Sep 2013. You aren't going to be able to place an order for it with IBM. You might be able to order V6R1 but the ODBC driver may not work with V5R2 - you'd have to try it. See the IBM i Access web site for details, but it's not downloadable.
If you can use OLEDB, try IBM's FTP site.
I have some questions:
Is it possible to install openstack on a Notebook with a 4GB DD3 Ram? Because the website says it needs atleast 8GB of RAM.
They say it requirs a double-QuadCore , I assue that means Octacore. Can we install that on a Quadcore?
They say that there is no possibility to install it on a NAS . Did you find any where if there is a possibility to do?. I dint find any even after asking our friend(google).
All in all, is it at-all possible to install on it a notebook/Desktop?
That advice is for production environments,
so 1)If you just want to play around your notebook will do fine. I had a succesful test-run on a 1.2 Ghz 1GB Netbook. It became incredibly slow when it launched it's first instance...
With a Double Quadcore they actually mean two seperate Quad-cores, as in two quad-core xeon processors on a single motherboard
So 2) yes you can install it on a quad-core.
3) a NAS device running openstack an openstack storage service seems to be unlikely indeed. You will most likely need more computing power.However If your NAS supports NFS or SSH or sth you can probably mount this drive and use it for storage.
4) You can perfectly build a all-in-one openstack test setup on your notebook. Performance will be low, but acceptable for testing.
It depends on what you mean by "install OpenStack". OpenStack itself is an extremely modular framework consisting on many services (Compute, Networking, Image service, Block Storage, Object Storage, Orchestration, Telemetry, ...). On top of that, a typical production deployment of OpenStack also requires several components, like load balancers, caching systems, firewalls, web servers and others. It is definitely possible to install a minimal openstack system, even on an average laptop.
The simplest way to run OpenStack on a laptop/desktop is to use Devstack, a shell script that installs all services from source and run them (by default) on a single machine. It is customizable enough to provide very good testing ground; it's used by OpenStack developers as well as the OpenStack QA team to test latest developments against "real" systems.
To avoid messing up your system, it's generally recommended to install OpenStack in a VM. From devstack doc:
DevStack should run in any virtual machine running a supported Linux release. It will perform best with 2Gb or more of RAM.
As of the time of this writing (Jan 2015), supported distros are:
Ubuntu (latest LTS)
Fedora
CentOS
Regarding NAS: you can of course use it, but "outside" Openstack apis, by providing mount points to your vms. It's even mandatory if you want to support live migration.
I've run into this problem with my three-node SQL Cluster, though it's not unique to clusters. We have a dozen different ODBC drivers installed, both x86 and x64 versions, and we're constantly finding instances where some nodes in our cluster has either a different version of the driver, are missing the driver, or it's not configured properly. Especially in a cluster, it's critical that different nodes all have the same configurations, or jobs can fail unexpectedly on one node and run fine on another, and it leads to hours of frustration.
Is there a tool out there that will compare the installed/configured ODBC drivers and data sources and produce a report of what's out of sync? I've considered writing something in the past to do this, but haven't gotten around to it. If it's an issue for others and there's not a tool that does it, I'll put one together.
It seems that all the information related to your ODBC settings is stored in the registry, all together. Since nobody else knows of an app to compare these settings, I'll throw one together and post it on my website, putting a link here.
If you want to compare the settings yoursef, they're stored at:
HKLM\SOFTWARE\ODBC\ODBC.INI\ (your data sources)
HKLM\SOFTWARE\ODBC\ODBCINST.INI\ (your installed providers)
Also, it's worth noting that if you're on an x64 machine, there are both x64 and x86 ODBC drivers and data sources, and they're stored separately - in this case, check out the accepted answer on the following post to see which location you should be checking in:
http://social.msdn.microsoft.com/Forums/en/netfx64bit/thread/92f962d6-7f5e-4e62-ac0a-b8b0c9f552a3
I'm currently working in web development and my default desktop is Ubuntu and I'm kind of happy with the setup and applications I got going. But I need to test web pages for cross browser compatibility while still being on Ubuntu.
I have gone through hell trying to get IE7 or IE8 (with wine) to run on ubuntu and when they finally worked they were very buggy and the graphics/scrolling was insanely slow.
Of course there is the option of virtual box but again, too much GBytes just to run a small application!
So to all the CSS gurus out there, how can I continue with my beloved Ubuntu and still deliver a good quality (tested) page.
Thank you.
Edit:
Update for freshness:
I now use the paid service from browserstack.com to provide the multitude of different browser testing environments via flash tunnelling. I'm a paid user, but there is an initial free trial period. browserstack has freed me of the need to run the windows os on my machines in any form, virtual image or otherwise. Since it also allows tunnelling, I can host the site on my local machine but still test in browserstack browsers. I consider the monthly fee money very well spent.
End Edit
Various options I have tried, including "the final solution": free downloadable windows testing OSes from microsoft
I've tried a number of the options below, but virtualbox may be your best bet for full & complete testing, especially because in a professional capacity you often have to test ie8, ie7 -and- ie6. Which gets tricky with only a single os installed. So in order of simplest and most shallowly testing to most complex and most fully testing:
browserlab.adobe.com
A newer, interesting online solution is: browserlab.adobe.com. It's actually very specific and fast compared to browsershots. It only gives you screenshots, but it's a great first step. So I do recommend that for purely visual (and thus relatively shallow) testing.
Browsershots.org
And while browsershots.org is also something that you should use for an overview experience of what users might see, you really can't get by without the real browsers for javascript and behavior testing (instead of just display & rendering testing that browsershots provides). The delay before you can see the images is also killer.
Dual booting into windows
Another that I've tried is dual booting, I work 99% of my time in ubuntu, and I have windows installed & available to dual boot into. Not a fast way to test, but if you don't have any other way to access ie, it should work for at least the latest version.
Remote desktop-ing over to a running windows box
Before I mention the "covers-all-the-bases" option, another useful possibility is to set up a windows machine and boot it up and connect to it via remote desktop so that you can work from one machine and test from both.
The final solution, using virtualbox
Finally, the mother of all solutions, using virtualbox:
Luckily (I know you said you didn't like the virtualbox solution, and I know it's an annoying setup process, but...) Microsoft provides available-for-a-year-or-more virtualmachine distros with different versions of ie pre-installed, available without the need for a license for a year or so before you'd have to update the virtualmachine, #
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=21EABB90-958F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EF&displaylang=en
Installing a virtualmachine from microsoft's freely available browser testing images
Because this guide to setup on ubuntu is no longer available in full anywhere else, just in case you or someone else actually need it I feel compelled to include the actual details of the install process that were suggested to me on the ubuntu forums and worked when I went through them. I apologize for their length. Courtesy of the now anonymous original poster on the ubuntu forums:
Free Access to Microsoft Browser Compatibility Virtual OSes, Install Steps for Ubuntu
http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=1097080 (Ed: I can't find this thread online any more)
HOWTO: run IE6, IE7, IE8 on Linux in
VirtualBox You need: virtualbox, qemu,
wine
Code: apt-get install virtualbox qemu
wine
Download the free(!) Microsoft
Internet Explorer Application
Compatibility Check VPC Images here:
http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?FamilyId=21EABB90-958F-4B64-B5F1-73D0A413C8EF&displaylang=en
(Note: you don't have to download the
full pack, you can cherry pick
specific combinations of XP/Vista and
IE6-8)
Extract the VPC image(s) with wine
(double-click). (Note: it might take a
while before the first window shows
up)
Turn the VPC image(s) into (a) VMWare
image(s) (which is/are readable by
VirtualBox): qemu-img convert -f vpc
image.vhd -O vmdk image.vmdk
Setup a new VM in VirtualBox, using
the vmdk image as an existing disk.
Boot it, you will see the Windows boot
progress bar and ... it will BSOD
shortly after.
Fixing the BSOD:
The BSOD is caused because the virtual
Windows tries to load processor
drivers for the wrong processor (it is
not running on VirtualPC proc, but on
VirtualBox proc). Or something like
that... We need to force Windows not
to attempt to load drivers for the
processor (it doesn't need any proc
drivers, because it's all virtual
anyway). Start safe mode by
(frantically) hitting F8 at Windows
boot and choosing safe mode.
Ignore all the 'New hardware' detected
warnings (we will deal with those
later). Start a command box and run
the following command to disable the
loading of processor drivers:
Code: sc config processor start=
disabled (note the space between '='
and 'disabled'!)
Restart the virtual Windows, it should
now boot all the way to the Windows
Desktop.
Now just when you think you can start
browsing the web with IE, you will
find out that the virtual Windows
needs to install the drivers for the
AMD PCnet NIC, which are located on
the Windows install disk. Fortunately
for those without a Windows install
disk, there is another way :)
Download AMD PCnet drivers here:
http://www.amd.com/us-en/ConnectivitySolutions/ProductInformation/0,,50_2330_6629_2452%5E2454%5E2486,00.html
Make an iso file containing the
drivers. I used Brasero for
simplicity. Choose to create a Data
Project, add the zip file (or the
unzipped files, saves you a step in
Windows), create the iso. No need to
burn an actual cd!
Stop the virtual Windows, edit the
settings in VirtualBox: mount your
brand new iso.
Start the virtual Windows, when it
asks to install the drivers for the
PCnet nick, point it to the (unzipped)
drivers. Et voila! You have teh
innernets! (Now you can also try to
install the other drivers it complains
for, but it's not really necessary)
The image README says the image will expire after about a year. In my experience the system gets hobbled against multi-hour use, but is still usable for the kind of short periods that you might want when booting up to test a website. At worst you might have to go through these steps again, so be sure to put them somewhere where you can find them again after a year or so.
I think setting up a virtual machine (Virtualbox or VMWare or...) with a proper Windows will be your only (local) option.
I you don't have one, buy a used Windows XP license. XP is cheap (around 20-30 euros here in Germany, for example) and all relevant versions of IE run on it. Home edition is enough. No need for Windows 7 or anything.
You could install IETester on that to get all the IE versions on one OS. IETester has flaws and is not always 100% reliable in what it renders, but for a general CSS compatibility check it should be okay.
I've never tried IE using Wine, but even trying to imagine the combination gives me goose bumps :D
If you have a copy of Windows you could install it in a virtual machine (Virtualbox is a good, free option). Or if you don't mind a lot of lag time and publicly exposing your web pages you could use a service like BrowserShots.
I have not tried this on Ubuntu or anything but windows - but this seems to be a pretty good testing system over the web.
http://spoon.net/browsers/
however, I think your best result would be to use a VM if possible.
I have to add my voice to those opting for VirtualBox.
VMs are the only way to get an accurate representation of how IE platforms behave. They also allow you to keep your main Linux install free of WINE and IE gunk, which is otherwise always troublesome and fragile. (Especially if you're trying to run multiple IEs, which is unreliable and inaccurate even under Windows).
They're not necessarily that big, if you take care to prune the unneeded features, turn off swap, compact the disc image and so on. My XPSP3 test image is just over 800MB.
I didn't want to install all this stuff as I wanted to move forward quick.
I found public AWS images with pre installed browser that you just can start and use.
http://www.hens-teeth.net/html/products/cross_browser_testing.php
If you already have an AWS account this will take you only 5 min. Make sure that you enable the RDP port on the incoming traffic in your security group.
As I use ubuntu I was looking for a way to connect from it to MS Win.
I'm connection on to them via remote desktop.
The way to go here is rdesktop, a command line utility for Windows Remote Desktop. (sudo apt-get install rdesktop)
If you feel like a GUI use tsclient. It's very close to the windows version.
From a work flow perspective I develop for Chrome in Ubuntu first, then have a look at the other browsers via browserlab.adobe.com.
After that I start my new AWS instance to debug.
The small AWS Windows instance is a $0.12 per hour (http://aws.amazon.com/ec2/#pricing). I can work for a long time on that before it's worth installing all this stuff.
CrossBrowserTesting.com works from Linux. Allows you to access Mac, Windows, and Ubuntu configurations and all the browsers loaded on them via vinagre vnc client.