Long time lurker first time poster. Working with .Net / Linq for just a few years so I'm sure I'm missing something here. After countless hours of research I need help.
I based my code on a suggestion from https:http://damieng.com/blog/2010/01/11/linq-to-sql-tips-and-tricks-3
The following code currently saves a chosen file (pdf, doc, png, etc) which is stored in an sql database to the C:\temp. Works great. I want to take it one step further. Instead of saving it automatically to the c:\temp can I have the browser prompt so they can save it to their desired location.
{
var getFile = new myDataClass();
//retrieve attachment id from selected row
int attachmentId = Convert.ToInt32((this.gvAttachments.SelectedRow.Cells[1].Text));
//retrieve attachment information from dataclass (sql attachment table)
var results = from file in getFile.AttachmentsContents
where file.Attachment_Id == attachmentId
select file;
string writePath = #"c:\temp";
var myFile = results.First();
File.WriteAllBytes(Path.Combine(writePath, myFile.attach_Name), myFile.attach_Data.ToArray());
}
So instead of using File.WriteAllBytes can I instead take the data returned from my linq Query (myFile) and pass it into something that would prompt for the user to save the file instead?). Can this returned object be used with response.transmitfile? Thanks so much.
Just use the BinaryWrite(myFile.attach_Data.ToArray()) method to send the data since it is already in memory.
But first set headers appropriately, for example:
"Content-Disposition", "attachment; filename="+myFile.attach_Name
"Content-Type", "application/vnd.openxmlformats-officedocument.wordprocessingml.document"
Content-type guides the receiving system on how it should handle the file. Here are more MS Office content types. If they are known at the point the data is stored, the content-type should be stored, too.
Also, since the file content is the only data you want in the response, call Clear before and End after BinaryWrite.
I'm currently new to python programming. My problem is that my python program doesn't seem to pass/encode the parameter properly to the ASP file that I've created. This is my sample code:
import urllib.request
url = 'http://www.sample.com/myASP.asp'
full_url = url + "?data='" + str(sentData).replace("'", '"').replace(" ", "%20").replace('"', "%22") + "'"
print (full_url)
response = urllib.request.urlopen(full_url)
print(response)
the output would give me something like:
http://www.sample.com/myASP.asp?data='{%22mykey%22:%20[{%22idno%22:%20%22id123%22,%20%22name%22:%20%22ej%22}]}'
The asp file is suppose to insert the acquired querystring to a database.. But whenever I check my database, no record is saved. Though if I do copy and paste the printed output on my browser url, the record is saved. Any input on this? TIA
Update:
Is it possible the python calls my ASP File A but it doesn't call my ASP File B? ASP File A is called by python while ASP File B is called by ASP File A. Because whenever I run the url on a browser, the saving goes well. But in python, no saving of database occurs even though the data passed from python is read by ASP File A..
Use firebug with Firefox and watch the network traffic when the page is loaded. If it is actually an HTTP POST, which I suspect it is, check the post parameters on that post and do something like this:
from BeautifulSoup import BeautifulSoup
import urllib
post_params = {
'param1' : 'val1',
'param2' : 'val2',
'param3' : 'val3'
}
post_args = urllib.urlencode(post_params)
url = 'http://www.sample.com/myASP.asp'
fp = urllib.urlopen(url, post_args)
soup = BeautifulSoup(fp)
If its actually HTTP POST, this will work.
In case anybody stumbles upon this, this is what I've come up with:
py file:
url = "my.url.com"
data = {'sample': 'data'}
encodeddata = urllib.parse.urlencode(data).encode('UTF-8')
req = urllib.request.Request(url, encodeddata)
response = urllib.request.urlopen(req)
and in my asp file, I used json2.js:
jsondata = request.form("data")
jsondata = replace(jsondata,"'","""")
SET jsondata = JSON.parse(jsontimecard)
Note: use requests instead. ;)
First off, I don't know Python.
But from this : doc on urllib.request
the HTTP request will be a POST instead of a GET when the data
parameter is provided
Let me make a really wild guess, you are accessing the form values as Request.Querystring(..) in the asp page, so your post wont pass any values. But when you paste the url in the address bar, it is a GET and it works.
just guessing, you could show the .asp page for further check.
I need a snippet to check file for validity (I'm allowing users to upload xml files). So I need to check whether uploaded file is XML.
The best I can think of is just check if extension is ".xml". What if its replaced?
You can try loading it like this and catch the exception:
XDocument xdoc = XDocument.Load("data.xml"));
Presumably, if they're uploading XML, then you're going to use it for something afterwards. In this case you should validate the XML against a Schema (XSD etc) so that you know you aren't going to hit unexpected values/layouts etc.
In Urlmon.dll, there's a function called FindMimeFromData.
From the documentation
MIME type detection, or "data
sniffing," refers to the process of
determining an appropriate MIME type
from binary data. The final result
depends on a combination of
server-supplied MIME type headers,
file extension, and/or the data
itself. Usually, only the first 256
bytes of data are significant.
So, read the first (up to) 256 bytes from the file and pass it to FindMimeFromData.
If you must validate the xml (assuming you want to validate the entire thing) you can use the XmlDocument class and catch an exception if it's not XML.
I'm breaking my head over this for a while now and I have no clue what I do wrong.
The scenario is as followed, I'm using swfupload to upload files with a progressbar
via a webservice. the webservice needs to return the name of the generated thumbnail.
This all goes well and though i prefer to get the returned data in json (might change it later in the swfupload js files) the default xml data is fine too.
So when an upload completes the webservice returns the following xml as expected (note I removed the namespace in webservice):
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<string>myfile.jpg</string>
Now I want to parse this result with jquery and thought the following would do it:
var xml = response;
alert($(xml).find("string").text());
But I cannot get the string value. I've tried lots of combinations (.html(), .innerhtml(), response.find("string").text() but nothing seems to work. This is my first time trying to parse xml via jquery so maybe I'm doing something fundemantally wrong. The 'response' is populated with the xml.
I hope someone can help me with this.
Thanks for your time.
Kind regards,
Mark
I think $(xml) is looking for a dom object with a selector that matches the string value of XML, so I guess it's coming back null or empty?
The First Plugin mentioned below xmldom looks pretty good, but if your returned XML really is as simply as your example above, a bit of string parsing might be quicker, something like:
var start = xml.indexOf('<string>') + 8;
var end = xml.indexOf('</string>');
var resultstring = xml.substring(start, end);
From this answer to this question: How to query an XML string via DOM in jQuery
Quote:
There are a 2 ways to approach this.
Convert the XML string to DOM, parse it using this plugin or follow this tutorial
Convert the XML to JSON using this plugin.
jQuery cannot parse XML. If you pass a string full of XML content into the $ function it will typically try to parse it as HTML instead using standard innerHTML. If you really need to parse a string full of XML you will need browser-specific and not-globally-supported methods like new DOMParser and the XMLDOM ActiveXObject, or a plugin that wraps them.
But you almost never need to do this, since an XMLHttpRequest should return a fully-parsed XML DOM in the responseXML property. If your web service is correctly setting a Content-Type response header to tell the browser that what's coming back is XML, then the data argument to your callback function should be an XML Document object and not a string. In that case you should be able to use your example with find() and text() without problems.
If the server-side does not return an XML Content-Type header and you're unable to fix that, you can pass the option type: 'xml' in the ajax settings as an override.
My app generates PDFs for user consumption. The "Content-Disposition" http header is set as mentioned here. This is set to "inline; filename=foo.pdf", which should be enough for Acrobat to give "foo.pdf" as the filename when saving the pdf.
However, upon clicking the "Save" button in the browser-embedded Acrobat, the default name to save is not that filename but instead the URL with slashes changed to underscores. Huge and ugly. Is there a way to affect this default filename in Adobe?
There IS a query string in the URLs, and this is non-negotiable. This may be significant, but adding a "&foo=/title.pdf" to the end of the URL doesn't affect the default filename.
Update 2: I've tried both
content-disposition inline; filename=foo.pdf
Content-Type application/pdf; filename=foo.pdf
and
content-disposition inline; filename=foo.pdf
Content-Type application/pdf; name=foo.pdf
(as verified through Firebug) Sadly, neither worked.
A sample url is
/bar/sessions/958d8a22-0/views/1493881172/export?format=application/pdf&no-attachment=true
which translates to a default Acrobat save as filename of
http___localhost_bar_sessions_958d8a22-0_views_1493881172_export_format=application_pdf&no-attachment=true.pdf
Update 3: Julian Reschke brings actual insight and rigor to this case. Please upvote his answer.
This seems to be broken in FF (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=433613) and IE but work in Opera, Safari, and Chrome. http://greenbytes.de/tech/tc2231/#inlwithasciifilenamepdf
Part of the problem is that the relevant RFC 2183 doesn't really state what to do with a disposition type of "inline" and a filename.
Also, as far as I can tell, the only UA that actually uses the filename for type=inline is Firefox (see test case).
Finally, it's not obvious that the plugin API actually makes that information available (maybe someboy familiar with the API can elaborate).
That being said, I have sent a pointer to this question to an Adobe person; maybe the right people will have a look.
Related: see attempt to clarify Content-Disposition in HTTP in draft-reschke-rfc2183-in-http -- this is early work in progress, feedback appreciated.
Update: I have added a test case, which seems to indicate that the Acrobat reader plugin doesn't use the response headers (in Firefox), although the plugin API provides access to them.
Set the file name in ContentType as well. This should solve the problem.
context.Response.ContentType = "application/pdf; name=" + fileName;
// the usual stuff
context.Response.AddHeader("content-disposition", "inline; filename=" + fileName);
After you set content-disposition header, also add content-length header, then use binarywrite to stream the PDF.
context.Response.AddHeader("Content-Length", fileBytes.Length.ToString());
context.Response.BinaryWrite(fileBytes);
Like you, I tried and tried to get this to work. Finally I gave up on this idea, and just opted for a workaround.
I'm using ASP.NET MVC Framework, so I modified my routes for that controller/action to make sure that the served up PDF file is the last part of the location portion of the URI (before the query string), and pass everything else in the query string.
Eg:
Old URI:
http://server/app/report/showpdf?param1=foo¶m2=bar&filename=myreport.pdf
New URI:
http://server/app/report/showpdf/myreport.pdf?param1=foo¶m2=bar
The resulting header looks exactly like what you've described (content-type is application/pdf, disposition is inline, filename is uselessly part of the header). Acrobat shows it in the browser window (no save as dialog) and the filename that is auto-populated if a user clicks the Acrobat Save button is the report filename.
A few considerations:
In order for the filenames to look decent, they shouldn't have any escaped characters (ie, no spaces, etc)... which is a bit limiting. My filenames are auto-generated in this case, and before had spaces in them, which were showing up as '%20's in the resulting save dialog filename. I just replaced the spaces with underscores, and that worked out.
This is by no names the best solution, but it does work. It also means that you have to have the filename available to make it part of the original URI, which might mess with your program's workflow. If it's currently being generated or retrieved from a database during the server-side call that generates the PDF, you might need to move the code that generates the filename to javascript as part of a form submission or if it comes from a database make it a quick ajax call to get the filename when building the URL that results in the inlined PDF.
If you're taking the filename from a user input on a form, then that should be validated not to contain escaped characters, which will annoy users.
Hope that helps.
Try placing the file name at the end of the URL, before any other parameters. This worked for me.
http://www.setasign.de/support/tips-and-tricks/filename-in-browser-plugin/
In ASP.NET 2.0 change the URL from
http://www. server.com/DocServe.aspx?DocId=XXXXXXX
to
http://www. server.com/DocServe.aspx/MySaveAsFileName?DocId=XXXXXXX
This works for Acrobat 8 and the default SaveAs filename is now MySaveAsFileName.pdf.
However, you have to restrict the allowed characters in MySaveAsFileName (no periods, etc.).
Apache's mod_rewrite can solve this.
I have a web service with an endpoint at /foo/getDoc.service. Of course Acrobat will save files as getDoc.pdf. I added the following lines in apache.conf:
LoadModule RewriteModule modules/mod_rewrite.so
RewriteEngine on
RewriteRule ^/foo/getDoc/(.*)$ /foo/getDoc.service [P,NE]
Now when I request /foo/getDoc/filename.pdf?bar&qux, it gets internally rewritten to /foo/getDoc.service?bar&qux, so I'm hitting the correct endpoint of the web service, but Acrobat thinks it will save my file as filename.pdf.
If you use asp.net, you can control pdf filename through page (url) file name.
As other users wrote, Acrobat is a bit s... when it choose the pdf file name when you press "save" button: it takes the page name, removes the extension and add ".pdf".
So /foo/bar/GetMyPdf.aspx gives GetMyPdf.pdf.
The only solution I found is to manage "dynamic" page names through an asp.net handler:
create a class that implements IHttpHandler
map an handler in web.config bounded to the class
Mapping1: all pages have a common radix (MyDocument_):
<httpHandlers>
<add verb="*" path="MyDocument_*.ashx" type="ITextMiscWeb.MyDocumentHandler"/>
Mapping2: completely free file name (need a folder in path):
<add verb="*" path="/CustomName/*.ashx" type="ITextMiscWeb.MyDocumentHandler"/>
Some tips here (the pdf is dynamically created using iTextSharp):
http://fhtino.blogspot.com/2006/11/how-to-show-or-download-pdf-file-from.html
Instead of attachment you can try inline:
Response.AddHeader("content-disposition", "inline;filename=MyFile.pdf");
I used inline in a previous web application that generated Crystal Reports output into PDF and sent that in browser to the user.
File download dialog (PDF) with save and open option
Points To Remember:
Return Stream with correct array size from service
Read the byte arrary from stream with correct byte length on the basis of stream length.
set correct contenttype
Here is the code for read stream and open the File download dialog for PDF file
private void DownloadSharePointDocument()
{
Uri uriAddress = new Uri("http://hyddlf5187:900/SharePointDownloadService/FulfillmentDownload.svc/GetDocumentByID/1/drmfree/");
HttpWebRequest req = WebRequest.Create(uriAddress) as HttpWebRequest;
// Get response
using (HttpWebResponse httpWebResponse = req.GetResponse() as HttpWebResponse)
{
Stream stream = httpWebResponse.GetResponseStream();
int byteCount = Convert.ToInt32(httpWebResponse.ContentLength);
byte[] Buffer1 = new byte[byteCount];
using (BinaryReader reader = new BinaryReader(stream))
{
Buffer1 = reader.ReadBytes(byteCount);
}
Response.Clear();
Response.ClearHeaders();
// set the content type to PDF
Response.ContentType = "application/pdf";
Response.AddHeader("Content-Disposition", "attachment;filename=Filename.pdf");
Response.Buffer = true;
Response.BinaryWrite(Buffer1);
Response.Flush();
// Response.End();
}
}
I believe this has already been mentioned in one flavor or another but I'll try and state it in my own words.
Rather than this:
/bar/sessions/958d8a22-0/views/1493881172/export?format=application/pdf&no-attachment=true
I use this:
/bar/sessions/958d8a22-0/views/1493881172/NameThatIWantPDFToBe.pdf?GeneratePDF=1
Rather than having "export" process the request, when a request comes in, I look in the URL for GeneratePDF=1. If found, I run whatever code was running in "export" rather than allowing my system to attempt to search and serve a PDF in the location /bar/sessions/958d8a22-0/views/1493881172/NameThatIWantPDFToBe.pdf. If GeneratePDF is not found in the URL, I simply transmit the file requested. (note that I can't simply redirect to the file requested - or else I'd end up in an endless loop)
You could always have two links. One that opens the document inside the browser, and another to download it (using an incorrect content type). This is what Gmail does.
For anyone still looking at this, I used the solution found here and it worked wonderfully. Thanks Fabrizio!
The way I solved this (with PHP) is as follows:
Suppose your URL is SomeScript.php?id=ID&data=DATA and the file you want to use is TEST.pdf.
Change the URL to SomeScript.php/id/ID/data/DATA/EXT/TEST.pdf.
It's important that the last parameter is the file name you want Adobe to use (the 'EXT' can be about anything). Make sure there are no special chars in the above string, BTW.
Now, at the top of SomeScript.php, add:
$_REQUEST = MakeFriendlyURI( $_SERVER['PHP\_SELF'], $_SERVER['SCRIPT_FILENAME']);
Then add this function to SomeScript.php (or your function library):
function MakeFriendlyURI($URI, $ScriptName) {
/* Need to remove everything up to the script name */
$MyName = '/^.*'.preg_quote(basename($ScriptName)."/", '/').'/';
$Str = preg_replace($MyName,'',$URI);
$RequestArray = array();
/* Breaks down like this
0 1 2 3 4 5
PARAM1/VAL1/PARAM2/VAL2/PARAM3/VAL3
*/
$tmp = explode('/',$Str);
/* Ok so build an associative array with Key->value
This way it can be returned back to $_REQUEST or $_GET
*/
for ($i=0;$i < count($tmp); $i = $i+2){
$RequestArray[$tmp[$i]] = $tmp[$i+1];
}
return $RequestArray;
}//EO MakeFriendlyURI
Now $_REQUEST (or $_GET if you prefer) is accessed like normal $_REQUEST['id'], $_REQUEST['data'], etc.
And Adobe will use your desired file name as the default save as or email info when you send it inline.
I was redirected here because i have the same problem. I also tried Troy Howard's workaround but it is doesn't seem to work.
The approach I did on this one is to NO LONGER use response object to write the file on the fly. Since the PDF is already existing on the server, what i did was to redirect my page pointing to that PDF file. Works great.
http://forums.asp.net/t/143631.aspx
I hope my vague explanation gave you an idea.
Credits to Vivek.
Nginx
location /file.pdf
{
# more_set_headers "Content-Type: application/pdf; name=save_as_file.pdf";
add_header Content-Disposition "inline; filename=save_as_file.pdf";
alias /var/www/file.pdf;
}
Check with
curl -I https://example.com/file.pdf
Firefox 62.0b5 (64-bit): OK.
Chrome 67.0.3396.99 (64-Bit): OK.
IE 11: No comment.
Try this, if your executable is "get.cgi"
http://server,org/get.cgi/filename.pdf?file=filename.pdf
Yes, it's completely insane. There is no file called "filename.pdf" on the server, there is directory at all under the executable get.cgi.
But it seems to work. The server ignores the filename.pdf and the pdf reader ignores the "get.cgi"
Dan