we upgraded from HV 4.x to HV 5.4.2 and now when we have interface like following
#NotNull
List<AccountInfo> getMultiClientAccountBalances(#NotNull ClientContext clientContext, #NotNull Optional<AccountFilter> accountFilter);
I'm getting error:
javax.validation.UnexpectedTypeException: HV000186: The constraint of type 'javax.validation.constraints.NotNull' defined on 'getMultiClientAccountBalances.arg1' has multiple matching constraint validators which is due to an additional value handler of type 'org.hibernate.validator.internal.engine.valuehandling.OptionalValueUnwrapper'. It is unclear which value needs validating. Clarify configuration via #UnwrapValidatedValue.
I know it can be fixed by adding #UnwrapValidatedValue to the field, but this must be added to every method what is a lot of work for me. Is there any simpler solution (besides upgrade to HV6.x)
Unfortunately I don't see how we could change this behavior in 5.4 without breaking other use cases.
And there is no easy way to disable the optional value handler as it's added unconditionally.
So I would say you have two solutions:
a search and replace of all #Constraint Optional to add the UnwrapValidatedValue option
or move to HV 6, where we totally reworked this feature and where, I think, it should work as you expect it. I know you didn't want this answer but it is what it is...
The issue with 1. is that we removed this annotation from HV (it was experimental) in favor of a standard feature included in Bean Validation so you will have to remove it when moving to 6.
I don't know your exact environment but HV 6 is highly compatible with the previous versions so it might work very well. Just be careful about the dependencies as we changed the groupId of the artifact from org.hibernate to org.hibernate.validator. Also be aware that you need to update the validation-api from 1.1 to 2.0.
6 is already very stable and if you have any issues with it, we will fix them right away.
Related
I changed Change in persistence.xml
I also changed column definition (columnDefinition="XDB.XMLType") for xml fields
I checked OpenJpa(http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/Oracle-XMLType-fetch-problems-td6208344.html) site and IBM (http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SS7J6S_7.5.0/com.ibm.wsadapters.jca.jdbc.doc/env/doc/rjdb_problemsolutions.html)
My env is OpenJpa 2.0 and WAS 7
its throwing exception
org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceException: ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small
ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 169
Please suggest without changing OpenJpa2.0 as its part of IBM WebSphere Application Server V7.0 how can i handle sys.XMLTYPE data, i am migrating my application from db2 to Oracle in same environment.
Writing XML data can be tricky some times! Getting the correct drivers and things defined properly can have its challenges. I can not say exactly what you need to do given the lack of info on your domain model and such, but let me give some general things to look for. First, there is an XML test in the OpenJPA test framework if you want to make reference to it. It can be seen publicly here:
https://apache.googlesource.com/openjpa/+/refs/heads/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/oracle/
Or, another test using an "XMLValueHandler" (likely this is beyond the scope of what you are looking for):
https://apache.googlesource.com/openjpa/+/refs/heads/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/xmlmapping/query/
Second, (stating the obvious) I assume you have a column in Oracle defined as "XMLTYPE". Also, I see you are using schema SYS. I'm sure you are aware but this is a system/admin schema......just for sanity sake you might want to first get things running using a non-system/admin schema just so we don't get hung up with any issues with your OpenJPA client not having the correct permissions.
Next, you need the following definition:
#Lob #Basic
#Column(name = "ANXMLCOLUMN", columnDefinition="XMLCOLUMN XMLType")
private String anXMLString;
The #Lob I think will be necessary if you are using data greater than 4000 chars (this was mentioned in one of the comments). To start I'd use a very small set of data (a couple characters), once that works, then experiment with > 4k.
Next, make sure to use the correct JDBC driver. The last time I experimented with an XMLType I used the Oracle JDBC 11.2.0.2 driver.
Finally, you might need to use the property "openjpa.jdbc.DBDictionary" with value "oracle(supportsSetClob=true,maxEmbeddedClobSize=-1)". Again, experiment with this AND look at the OpenJPA documentation on these properties to determine if they are necessary in your scenario. I think the supportsSetClob=true will only be necessary for older version (pre-2.2.x) of OpenJPA. You might also need to use property "openjpa.jdbc.SchemaFactory" with value "native". I would suggest you first try without either or these two properties. If that doesn't help, then experiment with these two properties. I know this is vague, but I don't know what your DDL or domain model looks like so I have to keep in vague.
Thanks,
Heath Thomann
In roboelectric when you write your test class you have declare the #RunWith annotation of which there is RobolectricGradleTestRunner and RobolectricTestRunner.class. What is the difference and which one should we use ? Why is there 2 in the first place. If I use RobolectricTestRunner then it does not work for me it says some weird error like :
"java.lang.IllegalStateException: You need to use a Theme.AppCompat theme (or descendant) with this activity."
However this seems to go away if I use RobolectricGradleTestRunner.
RobolectricTestRunner was first and is for maven based projects.
RobolectricGradleTestRunner was for gradle based projects because some paths have changed.
Since robolectric 3.1.1 this is not more necessary and is now deprecated.
For more details see also http://robolectric.org/getting-started/
I have a Plone 4 site which stopped to rename new Archetypes objects; after creation (as something like /temp/portaltype.2015-04-23.1234567890) and saving the first changes, including giving it a title, it should be renamed to something nicer (/temp/an-object-with-a-meaningful-name), but this doesn't happen anymore.
Perhaps the problem arose when I applied some changes to update Plone from 4.3.3 to 4.3.4 (to make one step at a time); but I have inherited a long versions.cfg which is solely sorted by package names and doesn't include any hints why certain versions were chosen ...
I'm able to go back two months and have a version which does the renaming, but without more knowledge about what to look for, it will be a very time-consuming process of re-applying every single change, rebuilding, starting and testing; but there have not been any changes to my schema definitions. I have a temp browser which is involved in delivering the primary edit form. but this doesn't seem to be the case for the saving action.
Sadly I don't fully understand yet the mechanisms of the base_edit action which should - as far as I understand - call Archetypes.BaseObject.processForm and implicitly ._renameAfterCreation, so I'd be grateful for some pointers how to debug this. Thank you!
Update:
I have a few triggers in my product's configure.zcml, e.g.:
<subscriber
for=".content.portaltype.PortalType
Products.Archetypes.interfaces.IObjectInitializedEvent"
handler=".events.onInitPortalType"/>
… with, in events.py:
def onInitPortalType(self, event):
"""
Called after first edit of new objects?
"""
print '/// onInitPortalType(%(self)r, %(event)r)' % locals()
setInitialOwner(self, event)
setStateToPrivate(self, event)
However, the event doesn't seem to be triggered, since I couldn't find the output in an instance fg session.
Update 2:
I noticed that zope.event had been pinned to a quite old version (3.5.2), so I'm trying to update to 4.3.4 more seriously now (following this how-to). This got me zope.event v4.0.3, but I have a version conflict now:
There is a version conflict.
We already have: zc.recipe.egg 1.3.2.
While:
Installing.
Getting section test.
Initializing section test.
Installing recipe zc.recipe.testrunner.
There seems to be a requirement for zc.recipe.egg < 2dev somewhere, but I can't find it.
Nothing significant changed between Plone 4.3.3 and 4.3.4 on Archetypes. Products.Archetypes changed from 1.9.7 to 1.9.8 and Products.ATContentTypes remains on the same version.
Pointers could be:
There's a _at_rename_after_creation flag, which is True by default. This can be changed on the content type class.
Is your type still activated in portal_factorytool? (Afaik this should have no impact on renaming after creation - but who knows :-))
Any Products.Archetypes.interfaces.IObjectInitializedEvent subscriber?
Issue I had once was, that the tmp id portaltype.2015-04-23.1234567890 had the wrong format and AT did no recognise it as tmp id and therefore it did not rename it after creation. The method AT uses to check if the id is autogenerated --> https://github.com/plone/Products.CMFPlone/blob/4.3.4/Products/CMFPlone/utils.py#L111 AFAIK the problem was, that the meta_type and portal_type was not the same anymore.
So what I understood after upgrading my flyway version because of some requirements is that flyway-core-2.2 introduced some validation for Flyway placeholders.
Now, the convention of placeholder syntax is ${name} uniform across most libraries. In our migration scripts, we are inserting a string in a mysql table column called stretchySql and that string holds some placeholder elements of our own which is meant to be interpreted at runtime by the application layer.
UPDATE `stretchy_parameter` SET `parameter_sql`='select r.id as report_id from stretchy_report r where r.report_category = \'${reportCategory}\'
I don't want flyway to interpret something embedded in a string as its own placeholder and throw an error. So basically, is there some way to switch off flyway placeholder validation(since we don't use it) without reverting back to an older version?
As of Flyway 3.2.1 (not sure when it was introduced) there is a new boolean setting called flyway.placeholderReplacement, which defaults to true, and you can use that to effectively disable the feature. On the API it can be accessed via the setPlaceholderReplacement(value) and isPlaceholderReplacement() methods of a Flyway object.
I know 2.2 probably didn't have that option and the accepted answer was probably the best way to solve it, but I decided this alternative could be useful to users of newer versions bumping into this page.
While you can't disable it, you can set the placeholder prefix or suffix to something that will never match. This will effectively achieve the same thing.
http://flywaydb.org/documentation/api/javadoc/org/flywaydb/core/Flyway.html#setPlaceholderPrefix(java.lang.String)
Is there a simple way to check if a content-type, or a specific object, has Versioning enabled/disabled in Plone (4.3.2)?
For context, I am making some unique conditionals around portal_actions. So instead of checking path('object/##iterate_control').checkout_allowed(), I need to first see if versioning is even enabled. Otherwise, the action in question does not display for items that have versioning disabled, because obviously it isn't checkout_allowed.
I didn't have any luck with good ole Google, and couldn't find this question anywhere here, so I hope it's not a dupe. Thanks!
I was able to get this working by creating a new script, importing getToolByName, and checking current content type against portal_repository.getVersionableContentTypes(). Then just included that script in the conditional.
I was looking for something like this that already existed, so if anyone knows of one let me know. Otherwise, I've got my own now. Thanks again!
The first thing that checkout_allowed does is check if the object in question supports versioning at all:
if not interfaces.IIterateAware.providedBy(context):
return False
(the interface being plone.app.iterate.interfaces.IIterateAware:
class IIterateAware( Interface ):
"""An object that can be used for check-in/check-out operations.
"""
The semantics Interface.providedBy(instance) are a bit unfortunate for usage in conditions or TAL scripts, because you'd need to import the interface, but there's a reversal helper:
context.portal_interface.objectImplements(context,
'plone.app.iterate.interfaces.IIterateAware')