I am using sinon v4.1.2. According to the documentation (http://sinonjs.org/releases/v4.1.2/sandbox/), I should be able to set a property using the following:
sandbox.stub(myObject, 'hello').value('Sinon');
However, I am getting the error:
Property 'value' does not exist on type 'SinonStub'
What is the real way to do this? I looked through all the available functions, and tried returnValue, but that isn't a valid function either.
The following was working on an older version of sinon:
sandbox.stub(myObject, 'hello', 'Sinon');
This works for me with Sinon.JS v4.1.2:
myObject = {hello: 'hello'}
sandbox = sinon.createSandbox()
sandbox.stub(myObject, 'hello').value('Sinon')
myObject.hello // "Sinon"
sandbox.restore()
myObject.hello // "hello"
In my expirience, it's not necessary to create a sandbox everytime. You can use stubs without it to reduce complexity in your code.
Just define a stub like this:
const stubHello = sinon.stub(myObject, 'helloFunction');
And then you will have all stub powers!
Related
I have added System.Messaging to my assemblies.xml cause I need to use this in my Progress OpenEdge application. However I ran into a problem.
In C# when assigning:
m.Formatter = new XmlMessageFormatter(new[] { typeof(TrowConfiguration) });
TrowConfiguration myConfiguration = m.Body as TrowConfiguration;
However I now want to do this in ABL. I first used a method to read a string and just passed a CHARACTER EXTENT 1 INITIAL "System.String" to the XmlMessageFormatter object. However I tried changing this to the path of my object, TrowConfiguration, but this doesn't work and gives me an error.
If you're looking for the System.Type reference, use
Progress.Util.TypeHelper:GetType ("<your fully qualified type name>").
TLDR
I like to really focus on keeping business logic away from the view model / controller. I find this sometimes rather hard in Meteor. Maybe I'm missing the point but I am after one of two things really:
1) A really good document explaining at a really low level how reactive values are being used.
2) A package that somehow manages an object so that if any of the setters are altered, they notify all of the get functions that would change as a result.
Unfortunately I've not seen either.
My Example
I have a fair bit ob business logic sitting behind a dialog used to document a consultation. I might have an event that sets a change of state.
I'd like to do something like this in the event:
const cc = new ConsultationEditor();
cc.setChiefComplaint(event.target.value);
console.log(cc.data());
ConsultationDict.set("consEdit", cc.data() );
When the user has updated this value, I'd then like to show a number of fields, based on the change. For this I have a helper with the following:
fields: function(){
console.log("trying to get fields");
const obj = ConsultationDict.get('consEdit');
cc = new ConsultationEditor(obj);
return cc.getFields();
}
But unfortunately this does not work for me.
What is your ConsultationDict?
The way you describe it, you want it to be a ReactiveDict as in the official ReactiveDict package.
https://atmospherejs.com/meteor/reactive-dict
Check this tutorial for examples:
https://themeteorchef.com/snippets/reactive-dict-reactive-vars-and-session-variables/
If you really need more fine tuning in your reactivity, you can also set a dependency tracker tracker = new Tracker.Dependency, and then refer to it wherever you change a variable with tracker.changed() and where the data needs to be notified with tracker.depend() like this:
var favoriteFood = "apples";
var favoriteFoodDep = new Tracker.Dependency;
var getFavoriteFood = function () {
favoriteFoodDep.depend();
return favoriteFood;
};
var setFavoriteFood = function (newValue) {
favoriteFood = newValue;
favoriteFoodDep.changed();
};
getFavoriteFood();
See the full Tracker doc here:
https://github.com/meteor/meteor/wiki/Tracker-Manual
I also found this gist to be useful to build reactive objects:
https://gist.github.com/richsilv/7d66269aab3552449a4c
and for a ViewModel type of behavior, check out
https://viewmodel.meteor.com/
I hope this helps.
I have issue using OpenCV 3 tracking module for tracking. It behaves same, either I use interface class (cv::Tracker) or class with implementation (like cv::TrackerMedianFlow or cv::TrackerMIL, etc). Sample is a bit modified sample from OpenCV sample folder
After correct creation
Ptr<Tracker> tracker = Tracker::create( tracker_algorithm );
if ( tracker == NULL )
{
std::cout << "***Error in the instantiation of the tracker...***\n";
return -1;
}
initialization works just fine
if ( !tracker->init( frame, boundingBox ) )
{
std::cout << "***Could not initialize tracker...***\n";
return -1;
}
Problem occurs late on, withing main loop, when tracking is lost. I use separate detector for defining new target. When I find new target, I clear tracker and initialize it with new value
tracker->clear( );
if ( !tracker->init( frame, detectedNewBBox) )
{
std::cout << "***Could not initialize tracker without history...***\n";
return -1;
}
However, initialization always returns false. I am trying to find out WHY tracker cannot be initialized?
Data was check few time, and looks pretty correct. I even conducted small experiment, trying to initialize tracker right after creation with same data it won't initialize withing loop and it works perfect.
Am I doing something wrong? I was unable to find any documentation on this...
Here is link to available documentation on this:
OpenCV 3 Tracker documentation
Thanks for any effort!
I just ran into the same problem, here's how I got it to work :
tracker->clear();
Ptr<Tracker> trackerNew = Tracker::create( tracker_algorithm );
tracker = trackerNew;
tracker->init( image, boundingBox );
Might not be the right way or the prettiest but it does the job :)
If you want to track a new ROI (region of interest) then I suggest that you should create a new tracker instead of clearing and trying to reuse a previous tracker. Re-use when you need to call init will provide no extra benefit. As you have observed, re-initializing a tracker is not allowed by default.
But if you want to resume tracking of the same object with your correction, it might be possible by doing following steps (I have not tried it myself yet. following code is just a pseudo code)
Ptr<TrackerModel> model = tracker->getModel();
Ptr<TrackerTargetState> lastTargetstate = getLastTargetState();
// Make changes to lastTargetState (update position etc)
// Set lastTargetState, I am not sure if you need to actually set it
// or just editing the object through pointer should work.
model->setLastTargetState(lastTargetstate);
I ran into the same problem and here's my solution:
Open the file in opencv_contrib/modules/tracking/src/tracker.cpp and apply the following changes:
- if( isInit )
+ /*if( isInit )
{
return false;
}
+ */
I recompiled opencv3 and reinstalled it. That fixed it for me. I think they did not want people to reinitialize the tracker for some reason. I am not sure why?
From time to time I have the requirement to bind a control property to based on data out of model A to another model B.
For example the syntax could look like this (but will not work):
text : "{B>/rootB/{A>someValue}/propertyB}"
I normally solve this problem by "misusing" an unused control property in combination with the format function. It would look like this:
tooltip : {
path : "A>someValue",
formatter : function(oValue) {
// do some checks on oValue
var path = "B>/rootB/"+oValue+"/propertyB";
this.bindProperty("text", path);
return undefined; // because tooltip is not used
}
The benefit of this, each time "A>someValue" will be changed the binding of "text" will be updated automatically.
It is also possible to do this in template code (like items aggregations).
But you may smell the code ;)
Any suggestions to make it cleaner?
As far as I know, there is no such possibility in UI5 (yet). I always use a formatter function as you already mentioned. I say not YET, because developers seem to be aware of this feature request: see on GitHub
BUT, you dont need to missuse a random control property! Just use the formatter to read the needed values from any model you have access to:
text : {
path : "A>someValue1",
formatter : function(oValue) {
// read model B to get someValue2 (based on someValue1)
var path = "B>/rootB/"+oValue+"/propertyB";
var B = getModel("someModel");
var someValue2 = B.getProperty(path);
return someValue2
}
I'm writing a GUI extension and using the Anquilla framework to get a list of Keywords within a Category. I'm obtaining an XML document for the list of keywords then working with that document within my extension.
My problem is that the returned XML doesn't contain the Keyword's 'Description' value. I have the Title and Key etc.
My original code looks like this:
var category = $models.getItem("CATEGORYTCMID:);
var list = category.getListKeywords();
list.getXml();
A typical node returned is this:
<tcm:Item ID="tcm:4-1749-1024"
Type="1024" Title="rate_one" Lock="0" IsRoot="true"
Modified="2012-12-17T23:01:59" FromPub="010 Schema"
Key="rate_one_value" IsAbstract="false"
CategoryTitle="TagSelector"
CategoryID="tcm:4-469-512" Icon="T1024L0P0"
Allow="268560384" Deny="96" IsNew="false"
Managed="1024"/></tcm:ListKeywords>
So I've tried using a Filter to give me additional column information:
var filter = new Tridion.ContentManager.ListFilter();
filter.columns = Tridion.Constants.ColumnFilter.EXTENDED;
var list = category.getListKeywords(filter);
Unfortunately this only gives the additional XML attributes:
IsShared="true" IsLocalized="false"
I'd really like the description value to be part of this XML without having to create a Keyword object from the XML. Is such a thing possible?
cough any ideas? cough
I'm afraid you'll have to load the Keyword itself to get the Description.
It's not used in any lists, so it's not returned in the XML.
You could always create a List Extender to add this information to the list, but try to be smart about it since this extender will execute everytime a GetList is called.
Won't save you from having to open every keyword in the list, but you'll be doing it server-side (with Core Service/NetTcp for instance) which will probably be easier and faster than opening each keyword with Anguilla.
In this instance I only need the one keyword, so I simply get it from the CMS. Getting an object in Anguilla is a bit weird, here's the code:
In your main code area:
var selectedKy = $models.getItem("TcmUriOfKeywordHere");
if (selectedKy.isLoaded()) {
p.selectedKy = selectedKy;
this.onselectedKyLoaded();
} else {
$evt.addEventHandler(selectedKy, "load", this.onselectedKyLoaded);
selectedKy.load();
}
It's worth noting how I store the keyword in the properties of the item, so I can obtain it in the onselectedKyLoaded function
The function called once the item is loaded
ContentBloom.ExampleGuiExtension.prototype.onselectedKyLoaded = function (event) {
var p = this.properties;
var selectedDescription = p.selectedKy.getDescription();
// do what you need to do with the description :)
};
I resolved this, thanks to the answer here: https://stackoverflow.com/a/12805939/1221032 - Cheers Nuno :)