after upgrading 2sxc to 09.08.00 we get an error:
error CS1502: The best overloaded method match for 'ToSic.SexyContent.Razor.SexyContentWebPage.AsDynamic(ToSic.Eav.Interfaces.IEntity)' has some invalid arguments at System.Web.Compilation.BuildManager.PostProcessFoundBuildResult
So the part it talks about is:
var Content = AsDynamic(dict.Value);
What should I do about this?????
Just for context - because of new features related to using data from any kind of source (json, sql, web-api, csv, etc.) we had to change how we work with lists of items.
Previously, all items were handled in dictionaries, so the list was a Dictionary<entityId, entity>, which meant that you had to use .Value. This ID=Key would have caused a lot of problems in the future, because lists containing persons and lists containing pages could both have the same ID, basically breaking any dictionary-setup.
So in 9.8 we were forced to introduce a breaking change
See also: https://github.com/2sic/2sxc/releases/tag/v09.08.00
We didn't do this lightly, but it's an essential step towards opening up the EAV & 2sxc for upcoming features. Sorry about this!
Related
I am working on AEM 5.6 to 6.2 upgrade project. There are some nodes in aem 5.6 environment which contains invalid character(as per JCR naming convention like rte[2] is one of the node name which doesn't follow the naming convention)but somehow we are able to replicate those nodes in 5.6 environment. After upgrade it to aem 6.2,it seems like JCR is more restricted and won't allow the nodes to replicate if it is having invalid characters.
Getting the below error in aem 6.2: error:
com.day.cq.replication.ReplicationException: Repository error during node import: Cannot create a new node using a name including an index
Is there any way we can configure AEM 6.2 to stop checking JCR node names?or any other solution?
JCR 2 does not allow [ as a valid character therefore you won't get an easy workaround for this. It's one of the limitations just like the same-named-sibling.
My recommendation will be to modify these nodes before the upgrade/migration to 6.2. This can be complicated and costly for business but 6.2 won't allow it.
As a background [ was allowed in older version due to twisted support for grammar syntax for same-named-siblings.
Assuming that these are all content nodes as nothing out-of-the-box in AEM 5.x follows this naming convention.
Some ways to fix it:
Write a custom servlet to query and rename the paths across all references. You will have to test your content for these renames.
Use Groovy console (https://github.com/OlsonDigital/aem-groovy-console) to rename the nodes.
In either case, you will need to modify the nodes before the migration as the structure is not oak compliant therefore you cannot use crx2oak commit hooks also. This can be done with both in-place upgrade and side-by-side migration. This is similar to the problem with same named siblings that must be corrected before the migration.
Some efficiency techniques that might help:
Write queries to find invalid node names on top-level nodes like /content/mysite-a, /content/mysite-b etc. Don't run root level queries on /content as it might downgrade to
traversal and halt the execution.
Ensure that all references are updated in same commit. If you are using custom servlet, call session.save() only after updating all the node names and it's corresponding references.
As i mention in the comment this replication failure causes because of the oak workspace restriction as the code snippet below
//handle index
if (oakName.contains("["))
{ throw new RepositoryException("Cannot create a new node using a name including an index");
}
and i feel you can't escape this constraint as it it required by the repository to maintain consistency
you can find nodes that ends with '[', by below query
SELECT [jcr:path] FROM [nt:base] WHERE ISDESCENDANTNODE('/content/path/') AND [jcr:path] like '%\['
and to modify the JCR/CRX nodes you can use CURL or SlingPostServlet method
Some helpful posts are blow.
https://github.com/paulrohrbeck/aem-links/blob/master/curl_cheatsheet.md
http://sling.apache.org/site/manipulating-content-the-slingpostservlet-servletspost.html
Can you try migrating using a tool like oak-upgrade and let us know if you are still facing this issue.
The tool is robust and you have the flexibility to configure specific sub-trees for migration using this tool.
I changed Change in persistence.xml
I also changed column definition (columnDefinition="XDB.XMLType") for xml fields
I checked OpenJpa(http://openjpa.208410.n2.nabble.com/Oracle-XMLType-fetch-problems-td6208344.html) site and IBM (http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/SS7J6S_7.5.0/com.ibm.wsadapters.jca.jdbc.doc/env/doc/rjdb_problemsolutions.html)
My env is OpenJpa 2.0 and WAS 7
its throwing exception
org.apache.openjpa.persistence.PersistenceException: ORA-06502: PL/SQL: numeric or value error: character string buffer too small
ORA-06512: at "SYS.XMLTYPE", line 169
Please suggest without changing OpenJpa2.0 as its part of IBM WebSphere Application Server V7.0 how can i handle sys.XMLTYPE data, i am migrating my application from db2 to Oracle in same environment.
Writing XML data can be tricky some times! Getting the correct drivers and things defined properly can have its challenges. I can not say exactly what you need to do given the lack of info on your domain model and such, but let me give some general things to look for. First, there is an XML test in the OpenJPA test framework if you want to make reference to it. It can be seen publicly here:
https://apache.googlesource.com/openjpa/+/refs/heads/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/jdbc/oracle/
Or, another test using an "XMLValueHandler" (likely this is beyond the scope of what you are looking for):
https://apache.googlesource.com/openjpa/+/refs/heads/trunk/openjpa-persistence-jdbc/src/test/java/org/apache/openjpa/persistence/xmlmapping/query/
Second, (stating the obvious) I assume you have a column in Oracle defined as "XMLTYPE". Also, I see you are using schema SYS. I'm sure you are aware but this is a system/admin schema......just for sanity sake you might want to first get things running using a non-system/admin schema just so we don't get hung up with any issues with your OpenJPA client not having the correct permissions.
Next, you need the following definition:
#Lob #Basic
#Column(name = "ANXMLCOLUMN", columnDefinition="XMLCOLUMN XMLType")
private String anXMLString;
The #Lob I think will be necessary if you are using data greater than 4000 chars (this was mentioned in one of the comments). To start I'd use a very small set of data (a couple characters), once that works, then experiment with > 4k.
Next, make sure to use the correct JDBC driver. The last time I experimented with an XMLType I used the Oracle JDBC 11.2.0.2 driver.
Finally, you might need to use the property "openjpa.jdbc.DBDictionary" with value "oracle(supportsSetClob=true,maxEmbeddedClobSize=-1)". Again, experiment with this AND look at the OpenJPA documentation on these properties to determine if they are necessary in your scenario. I think the supportsSetClob=true will only be necessary for older version (pre-2.2.x) of OpenJPA. You might also need to use property "openjpa.jdbc.SchemaFactory" with value "native". I would suggest you first try without either or these two properties. If that doesn't help, then experiment with these two properties. I know this is vague, but I don't know what your DDL or domain model looks like so I have to keep in vague.
Thanks,
Heath Thomann
Is there a simple way to check if a content-type, or a specific object, has Versioning enabled/disabled in Plone (4.3.2)?
For context, I am making some unique conditionals around portal_actions. So instead of checking path('object/##iterate_control').checkout_allowed(), I need to first see if versioning is even enabled. Otherwise, the action in question does not display for items that have versioning disabled, because obviously it isn't checkout_allowed.
I didn't have any luck with good ole Google, and couldn't find this question anywhere here, so I hope it's not a dupe. Thanks!
I was able to get this working by creating a new script, importing getToolByName, and checking current content type against portal_repository.getVersionableContentTypes(). Then just included that script in the conditional.
I was looking for something like this that already existed, so if anyone knows of one let me know. Otherwise, I've got my own now. Thanks again!
The first thing that checkout_allowed does is check if the object in question supports versioning at all:
if not interfaces.IIterateAware.providedBy(context):
return False
(the interface being plone.app.iterate.interfaces.IIterateAware:
class IIterateAware( Interface ):
"""An object that can be used for check-in/check-out operations.
"""
The semantics Interface.providedBy(instance) are a bit unfortunate for usage in conditions or TAL scripts, because you'd need to import the interface, but there's a reversal helper:
context.portal_interface.objectImplements(context,
'plone.app.iterate.interfaces.IIterateAware')
I have inherited a naming convention form a tutorial but am not sure that it is the best:
Posts = new Meteor.Collection("posts", {.......
Note the case on the naming, now this gets quite confusing when working between code/the mongo console/minimongo console - are there any reasons not to use the same name:
Posts = new Meteor.Collection("Posts", {.......
You can go with your own convention as long as you abide by a few restrictions that are native to mongodb.
Basically, stick with letters and numbers and you're all good.
Using the same name, though, can get confusing very quickly. You'll hit log messages, error messages etc in very different places and you'll soon find yourself wondering which Posts the message is referring to.
I, personally, like it when the name is verbose. For example, I'd go even further to do:
PostsCollection = new Meteor.Collection("postsdb", {.......);
Also, mongodb database (collection) names being case sensitive, it is always a safeguard measue to keep your db names all lowercase to avoid any potential portability issues that you may get between dumps and restores or direct porting between *nix and windows machines.
The Meteor recommendation meteor docs is to use:
CamelCaseCollectionName = new Mongo.Collection('lowercasecollectionname')
Posts = new Mongo.Collection('posts', {...});
In this way, there is no confusion, when you received a message, with lowercase is a mongo side, if is an uppercase will be Meteor Collection's side.
As well, keep names in plural ;-)
When I am publishing my page from tridio 2009, I am getting the error below:
Destination with name 'FTP=[Host=servername, Location=\RET, Password=******, Port=21, UserName=retftp]' reported the following failure:
A processing error occurred processing a transport package Attempting to deploy a binary [Binary id=tcm:553-974947-16 variantId= sg= path=/Images/image_thumbnail01.jpg] to a location where a different binary is already stored Existing binary: tcd:pub[553]/binarymeta[974950]
Below is my code snippet
Component bigImageComp = th.GetComponentValue("bigimage", imageMetaFields);
string bigImagefileName = string.Empty;
string bigImagePath = string.Empty;
bigImagefileName = bigImageComp.BinaryContent.Filename;
bigImagePath = m_Engine.AddBinary(bigImageComp.Id, TcmUri.UriNull, null, bigImageComp.BinaryContent.GetByteArray(), Path.GetFileName(bigImagefileName));
imageBigNode.InnerText = bigImagePath;
Please suggest
Chris Summers addressed this on his blog. Have a read of the article - http://www.urbancherry.net/blogengine/post/2010/02/09/Unique-binary-filenames-for-SDL-Tridion-Multimedia-Components.aspx
Generally in Tridion Content Delivery we can only keep one version of a Component. To get multiple "versions" of a MMC we have to publish MMC as variants. By this way we can produce as many variants as we need via templating.
You can refer below article for more detail:
http://yatb.mitza.net/2012/03/publishing-images-as-variants.html#!/2012/03/publishing-images-as-variants.html
When adding binaries you must ensure that the file and it's metadata is unique. If one of the values e.g. the filename appears to be the same but the rest of the metadata does not match, then deployment will fail.
In the given example (as Nuno points out) the binary 910 is trying to deploy over binary 703. The filename is the same but the binary is identified to be not the same (in the case a different ID from the same publication). For this example you will need to rename one of the binaries (either the file itself or change the path) and everything will be fine.
Other scenarios can be that the same image is used from two different templates and the template id is used as the varient ID. If this is the case it is the same image BUT the varient ID check fails so to avoid overwriting the same image the deployer fails it.
Often unpublishing can help, however, the image is only removed when ALL references to it are removed. So if it is used from more than one place there are more open references.
This is logical protection from the deployer. You would not want the wrong image replacing another and either upsetting the layout or potentially changing the content to another meeting (think advertising banner).
This is actual cause and reason for above problem (Something got from forum)