I'm using <p-dataTable [rowStyleClass]="rowStyler" etc>, and the method in my component looks like this:
newRowFormat(rowData, rowIndex) {
return('newRow');
}
And in the component CSS, that class newRow looks like this:
:host /deep/ .newRow {
background-color: gold;
}
The result is that every other row of the table is being colored gold, when every row should have that class applied to it. Long story, but I want the class applied to every single row, not every other row.
Ideas?
Well, the solution (at least for now) turned out to be to use the forbidden !important rule:
:host /deep/ .newRow {
background-color: gold!important;
}
Don't really like it (or understand why it works), but it works. Trying to override PrimeNG styles is requiring me to use :host /deep/ as well as !important in this case.
Related
I'd like to get the result below using sass nesting
css
.box {...}
h3.box-title {...}
I tried code like this, but it causes an error.
sass
.box {
h3.&-title {
...
}
}
I'd like to know if there is any way to do this keeping sass nesting?
I know that it's not good to write HTML element on CSS,
but I'm working on a project that I can't modify existing CSS and need to overwrite them.
Try this:
.box {
#at-root h3#{&}-title {
...
}
}
I used the sass interpolation #{} to compile expectedly the value of &, and #at-root to prevent the prefix .box (prevent resulting to .box h3.box-title because we want h3.box-title only - without the prefix .box)
Here's the captured result:
Anyway, I don't think this is a good practice to write sass/scss
.box
and
.box-title
are two different class names. Unless h3.box-title is a child of .box, honestly, there's no reason you should be nesting it.
Also & is used to look for additional class names. i.e.
.box {
&.box-title {}
}
would be
.box.box-title {}
In an attempt to avoid having to duplicate lots of CSS code for a bunch of different variants of CSS classes, I am attempting to cover it all in one statement. Let's say I have the following layout:
.body[class*="card--"] {
& .child[class*="card--"] {
/* apply some styles if they body have the SAME 'card--' class */
}
}
There are many variants of the "card--" class, such as "card--1" and so forth. I want to apply some styles to .child but only if they both have the same "card--" class.
I need to pierce the styles of my component from the global styles.scss file.
Basically, I've used mat-card component wrapped in a custom-component. In
some cases, I want to change styles to the mat-card when a custom-component is preceded by another custom-component
The idea would be:
global-styles.scss
custom-component ~ custom-component::ng-deep {
.mat-card {
background-color: red;
}
}
The host-context seemed like a good idea, I tried it this way
custom-component.scss
// does not work
host-context(~custom-component) { background-color: red; }
I've tried this and some other combinations, but they don't seem to work. How are we supposed to use the >, ~, + selectors to style angular components?.
Cheers
Personally I avoid piercing selectors at all costs. It breaks the entire component model, and tightly couples code.
I would approach this in a slightly different way. I would have my custom-component have an optional Input() embedded = false
Your usage could be as follows:
// top level
<custom-component></custom-component>
// nested level
<custom-component [embedded]="true"></custom-component>
Then use ngClass with the embedded property to trigger the color change.
See docs for more info on ngClass
https://angular.io/api/common/NgClass
Ok not a solution for this, but there's one thing to consider.
If you want to apply styles to your component using the selector your-component, you have to set display: block; property in your component :host. I totally missed this, but it would look like this:
your-component.css
:host {
display: block;
}
your parent component css
your-component ~ your-component {
margin-top: 15px;
}
And it works. My problem was originally related to that.
I'm looking into LESS because I definitely see some of their benefits. For instance colour declaration.
One thing I don't understand tho, and maybe I'm not getting the flow right is - why use the following LESS snippet
.radius {
-webkit-border-radius:5px;
-moz-border-radius:5px;
border-radius:5px;
}
.btn-red{
background-color:red;
.radius;
}
.btn-green{
background-color:green;
.radius;
}
...
When we can use the .radius class in the html file right away. I'm left with the impression that LESS will add a ton of duplicate code once it gets compiled.
I'm using the following, which makes more sense. Same with font-size, margins, etc... Aren't classes used in such cases?
<div class="btn-red radius">Cancel</div>
<div class="btn-green radius">Go</div>
The snippet above does not benefit from SASS/LESS capabilities that much. Lets have a closer look and check this SCSS snippet.
// Abstract placeholder.
%radius {
border-radius: 5px;
}
// Put your global styling here.
// I'm assuming that you can alter the markup and have button.btn.btn-green
.btn {
// Color modifier.
&-red {
#extend %radius;
background-color: red;
}
&-green {
#extend %radius;
background-color: green;
}
}
The CSS output will be:
.btn-red, .btn-green {
border-radius: 5px;
}
.btn-red {
background-color: red;
}
.btn-green {
background-color: green;
}
And then you have to pick up Autoprefixer and vendor-prefixes issue is solved once and for all.
Because now, you can just specify the class btn_red or btn_green and all the buttons will automatically have a radius.
Your HTML should contain only the semantics, and styling or classes referring to styling should not be part of it.
That applies to the other classes as well. If for instance, you would rename btn_red to btn_cancel, you have a meaningful classname that you can apply to any kind of cancel button. And in the CSS you can specify that a cancel button is red and a 'Go' button is green, and both have a radius, without needing to modify the HTML at all.
So, the ultimate goal is to have the HTML describe the structure and the CSS describe how that structure should look. And a CSS preprocessor is only their to make a bulky spaghetti-like CSS file more structured.
There are several benefits.
You can use more semantic class names. Rather than encoding style information directly in your class names, (btn-red, radius) you could use a single class that conveys the usage of the style, rather than its contents.
You can avoid repeating yourself.
#radius-size: 5px;
-webkit-border-radius:#radius-size;
-moz-border-radius:#radius-size;
border-radius:#radius-size;
You can parameterize it so that you'd be able to use different radiuses (radii?) in different contexts.
.radius(#radius-size) { ... }
Because there are cases that developer has-no-access or don't-want to change the markup. and the only solution is to include all props from a predefined class.
for example:
you have bootstrap loaded (then you already have .has-success and .has-error classes) and if you want to use HTML5's native form validation using input's :valid and :invalid states, you have to use JavaScript to add/remove success/error classes based on input's states. but with this feature of LESS you can include all props of success/error class inside input's states. the code for this example could be something like this:
#myinput {
&:valid { .has-success; }
&:invalid { .has-error; }
}
is it possible to set the style of alternating rows in a html table with style selectors that only take account of the hierarchy of elements and do not use style names?
i need to style html output produced by a server component and the output does not set styles for alternating rows. i could write a javascript (or just as well change the component) but i am curious about whether it is possible to do in pure css.
thanks
konstantin
In CSS 3:
tr:nth-child(odd) { background-color:#eee; }
tr:nth-child(even) { background-color:#fff; }
And in CSS 2, you have to use some class on e.g. even rows like:
.even { background-color: #00000; }
and you have to apply them when generating the rows server-side (or in hand ;-) ) or with e.g. jQuery like:
$(document).ready(function () {
$("tr.nth-child(even)").addClass("even");
//Or
$("tr:even").addClass("even");
});