I am trying to make a simple cube in CSS using a before and after pseudo selector.
This however leaves a slight gap between the top of the cube and the sides where you can see the magenta background through the cube.
body{background:magenta;perspective: 300000;}
div{
width:100px;
height:100px;
background:yellow;
transform-style: preserve-3d;
transform: rotateX(60deg) rotateZ(-45deg) translateX(50px) translateY(100px);
}
/* Right */
div:after {
background: #c5c500;
transform: rotateX(-90deg);
transform-origin: 100% 0%;
top: 100%;
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
content: '';
position: absolute;
backface-visibility: hidden;
background-clip:content-box;
}
/* Left */
div:before {
background: #f3f370;
transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateY(-90deg);
transform-origin: 0 100%;
width: 100px;
height: 100%;
content: '';
position: absolute;
backface-visibility: hidden;
background-clip:content-box;
}
You can see this in action in this fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/04ggen30/
How can I get rid of this gap so that the background is not visible through the cube?
It aren't really gaps.
In the border, there are pixels where the element only covers a fraction of the pixel. The antialiasing blends the color of the element with the color of the background. Repeat this for the other face of the cube, covering also part of the pixel, and there is still a small contribution of the background to the result.
You can solve it if you set 3 divs in the HTML, one for each face.
Now, you can use pseudo elements, moved 1px inside the cube, to make it more opaque
body{background:magenta;perspective: 300000;}
div{
width:100px;
height:100px;
background:yellow;
transform-style: preserve-3d;
transform: rotateX(60deg) rotateZ(-45deg) translateX(50px) translateY(100px);
}
.right {
background: #c5c500;
transform: rotateX(-90deg);
transform-origin: 100% 0%;
top: 100%;
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
position: absolute;
backface-visibility: hidden;
background-clip:content-box;
}
.left {
background: #f3f370;
transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateY(-90deg);
transform-origin: 0 100%;
width: 100px;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
backface-visibility: hidden;
background-clip:content-box;
}
.right::after, .left:after {
content: '';
top: 0px;
width: inherit;
height: inherit;
position: absolute;
background: inherit;
transform: translateZ(-1px);
}
<div>
<div class="right"></div>
<div class="left"></div>
</div>
Another posibility using shadows and a single element
body{background:magenta;perspective: 300000;}
div{
width:100px;
height:100px;
background:yellow;
transform-style: preserve-3d;
transform: rotateX(60deg) rotateZ(-45deg) translateX(50px) translateY(100px);
}
/* Right */
div:after {
background: #c5c500;
transform: rotateX(-90deg);
transform-origin: 100% 0%;
top: 100%;
width: 100%;
height: 100px;
content: '';
position: absolute;
backface-visibility: hidden;
background-clip:content-box;
box-shadow: 0px -1px 0px 0px #c5c500;
}
/* Left */
div:before {
background: #f3f370;
transform: translateZ(-100px) rotateY(-90deg);
transform-origin: 0 100%;
width: 100px;
height: 100%;
content: '';
position: absolute;
backface-visibility: hidden;
background-clip:content-box;
box-shadow: 1px 1px 0px 0px #f3f370;
}
<div></div>
I just changed the width: 101px; to both before and after elements. You can see this fiddle http://jsfiddle.net/04ggen30/2/. Or you can change the transform property with transform: translateZ(-99px) rotateY(-90deg); just decreased translateZ from -100px to 99px.
Related
I am trying to create a simple effect so that when I hover on the inner most circle, the two outer rings rotate around to create a cool effect. I thought this would be an easy task but I cannot seem to figure out what I am doing wrong. When I hover over the inner circle, all that changes are the two inner rings move towards the bottom right hand corner of the screen, without rotating at all. What am I missing here? Thanks
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
margin: auto auto;
background: black;
}
.circle {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: grey;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
.circle-1 {
width: 108px;
height: 108px;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: transparent;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
border: 2px;
border-style: solid;
border-color: white white white transparent;
transition: 1.5s all ease-in-out;
}
.circle-2 {
width: 118px;
height: 118px;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: transparent;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
border: 2px;
border-style: solid;
border-color: white transparent white white;
transition: 1.5s all ease-in-out;
}
.circle:hover .circle-2 {
transform: rotate(360deg);
}
.circle:hover .circle-1 {
transform: rotate(-360deg);
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="circle">
<div class="circle-1"></div>
<div class="circle-2"></div>
</div>
</div>
You are using transform with translation in order to center your element then you are overriding the transform with the rotation which create the issue. Instead you can adjust the top/left values in order to center and avoid using transform then you will have the needed rotation:
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
margin: auto auto;
background: black;
}
.circle {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: grey;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
.circle-1 {
width: 108px;
height: 108px;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: transparent;
position: absolute;
top: calc(50% - 55px);
left: calc(50% - 55px);
border: 2px;
border-style: solid;
border-color: white white white transparent;
transition: 1.5s all ease-in-out;
}
.circle-2 {
width: 118px;
height: 118px;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: transparent;
position: absolute;
top: calc(50% - 60px);
left:calc(50% - 60px);
border: 2px;
border-style: solid;
border-color: white transparent white white;
transition: 1.5s all ease-in-out;
}
.circle:hover .circle-2 {
transform: rotate(360deg);
}
.circle:hover .circle-1 {
transform: rotate(-360deg);
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="circle">
<div class="circle-1"></div>
<div class="circle-2"></div>
</div>
</div>
You can also simplify your code by using pseudo elements like this:
* {
box-sizing:border-box;
}
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
margin: auto;
background: black;
}
.circle {
width: 120px;
height: 120px;
border-radius: 50%;
background:radial-gradient(circle at center, grey 50px,transparent 51px);
position: absolute;
top:50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
.circle:before,
.circle:after {
content:"";
border-radius: 50%;
position: absolute;
transition: 1.5s all ease-in-out;
border: 2px solid white;
}
.circle:before {
top:0;
left:0;
right:0;
bottom:0;
border-left-color:transparent;
}
.circle:after{
top:5px;
left:5px;
bottom:5px;
right:5px;
border-right-color:transparent;
}
.circle:hover::before {
transform: rotate(360deg);
}
.circle:hover::after {
transform: rotate(-360deg);
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="circle">
</div>
</div>
Setting the transform property in the :hover will overwrite the existing transform property, so you need to include the translate transforms in the :hover versions to avoid moving the circles in the process of setting their rotation.
If you want the rotation to animate you'll also need to set initial values for the rotation transform.
One additional note: using transition, the rotation will only happen once. If you want repeated rotations you'll need to use an animation (you can do this by uncommenting the animation lines in the snippet).
Demo:
.wrapper {
position: relative;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
margin: auto auto;
background: black;
}
.circle {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: grey;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
}
.circle-1 {
width: 108px;
height: 108px;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: transparent;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(0deg);
border: 2px;
border-style: solid;
border-color: white white white transparent;
transition: 1.5s all ease-in-out;
}
.circle-2 {
width: 118px;
height: 118px;
border-radius: 50%;
background-color: transparent;
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(0deg);
border: 2px;
border-style: solid;
border-color: white transparent white white;
transition: 1.5s all ease-in-out;
}
.circle:hover .circle-2 {
/*animation: spin 1.5s infinite linear;*/
transform: translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(360deg);
}
.circle:hover .circle-1 {
/*animation: spin 1.5s infinite linear reverse;*/
transform: translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(-360deg);
}
#keyframes spin {
0% {
transform: translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(0deg);
}
100% {
transform: translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(360deg);
}
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="circle">
<div class="circle-1"></div>
<div class="circle-2"></div>
</div>
</div>
This question already has answers here:
Left/right transparent cut out arrow
(4 answers)
Closed 6 years ago.
I'm trying to put a transparent arrow on the right side of an image, vertically in the centre and showing the background image.
I've read this answer, and this codepen is basically exactly what I want, but I can't get my head around why it works and what I'd need to change to place it on the right hand side.
Codepen code:
.wrap {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
width: 70%;
height:150px;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color:#fff;
}
.wrap img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
display: block;
}
.wrap:before, .wrap:after {
content:'';
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
width: 50%;
background-color: inherit;
padding-bottom:3%;
}
.wrap:before {
right: 50%;
-ms-transform-origin: 100% 100%;
-webkit-transform-origin: 100% 100%;
transform-origin: 100% 100%;
-ms-transform: skewX(45deg);
-webkit-transform: skewX(45deg);
transform: skewX(45deg);
}
.wrap:after {
left: 50%;
-ms-transform-origin: 0 100%;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0 100%;
transform-origin: 0 100%;
-ms-transform: skewX(-45deg);
-webkit-transform: skewX(-45deg);
transform: skewX(-45deg);
}
There are two polygons with white background over the image, it is not an arrow but the space between the two polygons. Changin the width and the position of :before and :after you can move the triangle.
.wrap {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
width: 70%;
height:150px;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color:#fff;
}
.wrap img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
display: block;
}
.wrap:before, .wrap:after {
content:'';
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
width: 100%;
background-color: inherit;
padding-bottom:3%;
}
.wrap:before {
-ms-transform-origin: 100% 100%;
-webkit-transform-origin: 100% 100%;
transform-origin: 100% 100%;
-ms-transform: skewX(45deg);
-webkit-transform: skewX(45deg);
transform: skewX(45deg);
}
.wrap:after {
left: 97%;
-ms-transform-origin: 0 100%;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0 100%;
transform-origin: 0 100%;
-ms-transform: skewX(-45deg);
-webkit-transform: skewX(-45deg);
transform: skewX(-45deg);
}
<div class="wrap">
<img src="https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7187/6895047173_d4b1a0d798.jpg" />
</div>
In Firefox in some resolutions appears a pixel of the image in the bottom, can fix width bottom:-1px in .wrap::before, .wrap::after
Main css properties that you need to change are transform-origin and transform with some other changes as done below:
.wrap {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
width: 70%;
height:150px;
margin: 0 auto;
background-color:#fff;
}
.wrap img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
display: block;
}
.wrap:before, .wrap:after {
content:'';
position: absolute;
right: 0;
height: 50%;
background-color: inherit;
padding-right:3%;
}
.wrap:before {
bottom: 50%;
-ms-transform-origin: 100% 100%;
-webkit-transform-origin: 100% 100%;
transform-origin: 100% 100%;
-ms-transform: skewY(45deg);
-webkit-transform: skewY(45deg);
transform: skewY(45deg);
}
.wrap:after {
top: 50%;
-ms-transform-origin: 100% 0;
-webkit-transform-origin: 100% 0;
transform-origin: 100% 0;
-ms-transform: skewY(-45deg);
-webkit-transform: skewY(-45deg);
transform: skewY(-45deg);
}
<div class="wrap">
<img src="https://farm8.staticflickr.com/7187/6895047173_d4b1a0d798.jpg" />
</div>
I am some time trying to make a complicated effect on the image, I made some attempts however not got it. I need this effect only in css without using javascript.
CSS
.container{
width: 500px;
background-color: #0c2f45;
}
.image-container {
background-color: #194c6e;
width: 266px;
}
.image-container img{
width: 250px;
-moz-transform: scaleX(-1);
-o-transform: scaleX(-1);
-webkit-transform: scaleX(-1);
transform: scaleX(-1);
filter: FlipH;
-ms-filter: "FlipH";
}
jsfiddle
You could achieve something like this through a couple of transformed pseudo elements*. By skewing the two pesudos, you can create the triangular effect.
A quick demo would be:
div {
height: 200px;
width: 300px;
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/300/200);
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
}
div:before,
div:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
height: 50%;
width: 20%;
background: tomato;
border-left: 10px solid firebrick;
left: 80%;
}
div:before {
top: 0;
transform: skewX(10deg);
}
div:after {
top: 50%;
transform: skewX(-10deg);
}
<div></div>
* this would assume you wish to have a solid colour on the right hand side
I am aware this has been answered previously however that was for the bottom of a div and I cannot work out how to do it for the left and right of a div.
I am trying to acheive the same effect as this:
BODY {
background: url(http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5506/9699081016_ba090f1238_h.jpg) 0 -100px;
}
#wrapper {
overflow: hidden;
height: 116px;
}
#test {
height: 100px;
background-color: #ccc;
position: relative;
}
#test:before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
left: -6px;
width: 50%;
height: 16px;
top: 100px;
background-color: #ccc;
-webkit-transform: skew(-40deg);
-moz-transform: skew(-40deg);
-o-transform: skew(-40deg);
-ms-transform: skew(-40deg);
transform: skew(-40deg);
}
#test:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
right: -6px;
width: 50%;
height: 16px;
top: 100px;
background-color: #ccc;
-webkit-transform: skew(40deg);
-moz-transform: skew(40deg);
-o-transform: skew(40deg);
-ms-transform: skew(40deg);
transform: skew(40deg);
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="test"></div>
</div>
But with the cut out on the left and another with the cut out on the right.
This solution is adapted from this answer : Transparent arrow/triangle
The point is to use two skewed pseudo elements to make the transparent cut out arrow. Both pseudo elements are absolutely positioned and skewed.
In the following demo, the arrow is on the left. To make the same on on the right, you could duplicate the .arrow element and use scaleX(-1) + positioning on the second one. This will allow you to change both sides at the same time and have less CSS. Or you can make a new element based on the first one and change the positioning and skew properties.
DEMO
.wrap {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
width: 70%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.wrap img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
display: block;
}
.arrow {
position: absolute;
left: 0; top:0;
width: 3%;
height:100%;
background-color: rgba(255,255,255,.8);
}
.arrow:before, .arrow:after {
content:'';
position: absolute;
left: 100%;
width: 100%;
height:50%;
background-color: inherit;
}
.arrow:before {
bottom: 50%;
-ms-transform-origin: 0 100%;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0 100%;
transform-origin: 0 100%;
-ms-transform: skewY(-45deg);
-webkit-transform: skewY(-45deg);
transform: skewY(-45deg);
}
.arrow:after {
top: 50%;
-ms-transform-origin: 0 0;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0 0;
transform-origin: 0 0;
-ms-transform: skewY(45deg);
-webkit-transform: skewY(45deg);
transform: skewY(45deg);
}
<div class="wrap">
<img src="https://farm7.staticflickr.com/6217/6216951796_e50778255c.jpg" />
<div class="arrow"></div>
</div>
For the same output, you can use an svg :
DEMO
.wrap {
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
width: 70%;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.wrap img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
display: block;
}
.arrow{
position:absolute;
left:0; top:0;
height:100%;
}
<div class="wrap">
<img src="https://farm7.staticflickr.com/6217/6216951796_e50778255c.jpg" />
<svg class="arrow" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" viewbox="0 0 10 100">
<path d="M-1 -1 H10 V45 L5 50 L10 55 V101 H-1z" fill="#fff" fill-opacity="0.8" stroke-width="0"/>
</svg>
</div>
It can be made with a single element using inset box-shadow and pseudo-elements :before and :after
The elements are skewed by 45deg and -45deg to create the transparent gap. Inset box-shadow is used to increase the width of the arrow banner.
Fiddle (1 element)
body {
font-size: 10px;
}
div {
background: url('https://farm7.staticflickr.com/6217/6216951796_e50778255c.jpg');
height: 33.3em;
width: 50em;
position: relative;
overflow: hidden;
box-shadow: inset 2em 0 0 0 rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.6);
}
div:before, div:after {
content: "";
position: absolute;
left: 2em;
background-color: rgba(255, 255, 255, 0.6);
height: 25em;
width: 2em;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0% 0%;
-moz-transform-origin: 0% 0%;
-ms-transform-origin: 0% 0%;
transform-origin: 0% 0%;
}
div:before {
bottom: -8.35em;
-webkit-transform: skewY(45deg);
-moz-transform: skewY(45deg);
-ms-transform: skewY(45deg);
transform: skewY(45deg);
}
div:after {
top: -8.35em;
-webkit-transform: skewY(-45deg);
-moz-transform: skewY(-45deg);
-ms-transform: skewY(-45deg);
transform: skewY(-45deg);
}
<div></div>
Bugs : Browser rendering of box-shadow isn't consistent when using veiwport units. On zooming-out to 33%, GC shows 1px gap b/w pseudo-element and box-shadow. This bug doesn't occur with px and em units on zooming.
A better approach than the one given above would be to use one element on top of img element. The rest properties (overflow: hidden;, box-shadow) too are used, but this doesn't have the gap between the arrow even on zooming.
Fiddle (2 elements)
Note :
Ideas used from earlier post here.
All measurements are done in em with a set font-size of 10px.
You could use CSS3's clip-path property but it's a bit bleeding-edge. However, if you don't need to support IE there are plenty of useful examples at http://css-tricks.com/clipping-masking-css/
div {background: yellow; width:400px; height:300px;}
div img {
-webkit-clip-path: polygon(10% 0%, 90% 0%, 90% 100%, 90% 40%, 100% 50%, 90% 60%, 90% 100%, 10% 100%, 10% 60%, 0% 50%, 10% 40%);
clip-path: polygon(10% 0%, 90% 0%, 90% 100%, 90% 40%, 100% 50%, 90% 60%, 90% 100%, 10% 100%, 10% 60%, 0% 50%, 10% 40%);
}
<div><img src="http://lorempixel.com/400/300/nature/" /></div>
Hey I just modified your existing one. Probably could have done it a bit cleaner but you get the idea. This is the left side. Pretty easy to swap it to the right from this.
JSFiddle
HTML
<div id="wrapper">
<div id="test"><div id="fill"></div>
<div id="fill2"></div></div>
</div>
CSS
BODY{
background: url(http://farm6.staticflickr.com/5506/9699081016_ba090f1238_h.jpg) 0 -100px;}
#wrapper {
overflow: hidden;
height: 116px;}
#fill{
height: 40px;
position:absolute;
width:30px;
left:-30px;
background: #ccc;}
#fill2{
height: 40px;
position:absolute;
width:30px;
background: #ccc;
bottom:0;
left:-30px;}
#test {
height: 116px;
width: 692px;
background-color: #ccc;
position: relative;
float:right;}
#test:before {
content:"";
position: absolute;
top: 40px;
height: 50%;
width: 30px;
left: 0;
background-color: #ccc;
-webkit-transform: skew(40deg);
-moz-transform: skew(40deg);
-o-transform: skew(40deg);
-ms-transform: skew(40deg);
transform: skew(40deg);}
#test:after {
content:"";
position: absolute;
bottom: 40px;
height: 50%;
width: 30px;
left: 0;
background-color: #ccc;
-webkit-transform: skew(-40deg);
-moz-transform: skew(-40deg);
-o-transform: skew(-40deg);
-ms-transform: skew(-40deg);
transform: skew(-40deg);}
Can I transform: rotateY a div to counter the transform: rotateY of his parent ?
For example: if I have a parent div with rotateY(-45deg), all his childrens will be -45deg. Why can't I add rotateY(45deg) to the children to make it look like no rotation affected it?
Demo: http://jsfiddle.net/eBT4A/
You can add rotateY(45deg) to the children where parent div have rotateY(-45deg), to make it look like no rotation affected it only when you set same pivot point to these two rotation,
in your demo example you have not apply same pivot point,
Try this...
<html>
<head>
<style type="text/css">
body {
-webkit-perspective: 500;
}
#content {
position:absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 300px;
height: 500px;
background: #000;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0px 0px;
-webkit-transform: rotate(45deg);
-moz-transform-origin: 0px 0px;
-moz-transform: rotate(45deg);
}
#element {
position:absolute;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
background: #f00;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0px 0px;
-webkit-transform: rotate(-45deg);
-moz-transform-origin: 0px 0px;
-moz-transform: rotate(-45deg);
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div id="content">
<div id="element"></div>
</div>
</body>
</html>
You need to add preserve-3d to the parent:
body {
-webkit-perspective: 500;
}
#content {
position:fixed;
top: 20px;
left: 0;
width: 300px;
height: 500px;
background: #000;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0 0;
-webkit-transform: rotateY(45deg);
-webkit-transform-style: preserve-3d;
}
#element {
position:fixed;
top: 20px;
left: 50%;
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
background: #f00;
-webkit-transform-origin: 0 0;
-webkit-transform: rotateY(-45deg);
}
updated fiddle
As far as I know, that won't work in IE.