The problem I have involves flex-basis: 0%; and how IE11 handles it when the user reduces the window's width. Could be related to the bug with box-sizing.
I have a variable number of flex-children, and each child is of unknown width. Each child has arbitrary dynamically-generated content. However, some of this content must have the ability to wrap text.
The flex-container itself must have 100% width and must be able to wrap its children (i.e., flex-wrap: wrap).
Let's assume three flex-children are present, with the last one requiring text-wrapping:
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-child">
<div>This text should not overlay other flex-children.</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-child">
<div>This text should not overlay other flex-children.</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-child">
<div class="text-break">This text should break on new lines when the container shrinks down</div>
</div>
</div>
The CSS can be defined as follows:
.flex-container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 100%;
}
.flex-child {
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 0;
flex-basis: 0%;
white-space: nowrap;
padding: 5px;
}
.text-break {
white-space: pre-wrap;
}
When the window is wide enough, each flex-child should be side-by-side, and the text not collapsed:
When the window is shrunken horizontally, the text in the right-most box should begin to break to new lines:
And when the text can no longer break into more lines, the flex-boxes themselves should begin to break lines:
This works great in most modern browsers but not our friend, IE11. In IE11, when changing the screen size, the text wraps fine, but the flex-children do not wrap at all. Because the flex-children do not wrap, their content overflows into one another:
Changing the flex basis to flex-basis: auto; has the opposite effect: the text will not wrap but the flex-children do, but no content overflows (in this screenshot, the text in the green box should be breaking lines rather than the flex-box breaking into a new line):
Most solutions I have seen require having fixed-length flex-children which I cannot afford to have here because they are dynamically generated. I intentionally did not use the flex shortcut property because of some other non-related issues with it. This answer recommends using _:-ms-fullscreen, :root .IE11-only-class { /* IE11 specific properties */ } which might work if I could get around the text-wrapping issue, but I cannot figure that out.
I should also say that I only need this to work on the latest browsers (technically only on certain versions of Chrome and IE11, but having other browsers and versions work as well is a plus).
Here is a code pen showing the problem in full (view in IE11 and Chrome to see the difference).
Does anyone have any ideas as to how to get around this issue?
Remember, the requirements are:
unknown number of flex-children of unspecified width
certain text must wrap before the flex-boxes wrap
flex-children must wrap once the text can no longer wrap more
Chrome (I am using 59.0.3071.109) and IE11 (I am using 11.0.9600.18816CO) should behave in the same way.
CSS-only solutions are preferred
Thank you.
Update:
A coworker of mine recommended using a separate class for flex-children that do not contain wrappable text. The following HTML and CSS were what he used:
<!--HTML-->
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-child child-1">
<div>This text should not overlay other flex-children.</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-child flex-child-without-textwrap child-2">
<div>This text should not overlay other flex-children.</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-child flex-child-with-textwrap child-3">
<div class="text-break">This text should break on new lines when the container shrinks down</div>
</div>
</div>
And
/*CSS*/
.flex-container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.flex-child {
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 1;
padding: 5px;
white-space: nowrap;
}
.flex-child-without-textwrap {
flex-basis: auto;
}
.flex-child-with-textwrap {
min-width: 200px;
flex-basis: 0%;
}
.text-break {
white-space: pre-wrap;
}
His solution technically fixed the problem as I presented it here, but I forgot to mention another requirement:
Within a flex-child, there can be any combination of wrappable text and unwrappable text
His solution does not succeed when changing the third flex-child to:
<div class="flex-child flex-child-with-textwrap child-3">
<div class="text-break">This text should break on new lines when the container shrinks down</div>
<div>This text should not break on new lines</div>
</div>
In this case, the text in the second div in the third flex-child flows out of its container, and the text begins wrapping too early.
A codepen showing this almost-working solution can be seen here (note that min-width was removed because it caused further issues on Chrome).
Update 2:
I don't think I was clear enough earlier: any, all, or none of the flex-children may have wrappable text. It all depends on the dynamically-generated content. In the example I gave, only the third flex-child has wrappable text, but that might not always be the case.
Note, this answer were posted prior to the question's 2 updates, which made it partially invalid, though I will leave it for now, someone might need it as is.
After a lot of trial-and-error, I came up with this set up, where I aim to make IE mimic the rest of the browsers behavior as much as possible.
IE need a minimum width on the break-able's parent, so the text won't collapse into 0 width before the element wrap, and as flex-basis needs to be auto in general but 0px on the break-able's parent, the flex-grow's need to be somewhere around 5.
I added the following rules using an IE11 only selector (which I showed in this answer of mine).
_:-ms-fullscreen, :root .flex-child {
flex-basis: auto;
}
_:-ms-fullscreen, :root .child-3 {
flex: 5 0 0px;
min-width: 80px;
}
Updated codepen
Stack snippet
.wrapper {
width: 80%;
}
.flex-container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 100%;
}
.flex-child {
flex: 1 0 0%;
white-space: nowrap;
padding: 5px;
}
_:-ms-fullscreen, :root .flex-child {
flex-basis: auto;
}
_:-ms-fullscreen, :root .child-3 {
flex: 5 0 0px;
min-width: 80px;
}
.text-break {
white-space: pre-wrap;
}
/*Add backgrounds for display*/
.child-1 {
background-color: pink;
}
.child-2 {
background-color: lightblue;
}
.child-3 {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-child child-1">
<div>This text should not overlay other flex-children.</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-child child-2">
<div>This text should not overlay other flex-children.</div>
</div>
<div class="flex-child child-3">
<div class="text-break">This text should break on new lines when the container shrinks down</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
This is NOT a preferred solution because it uses Javascript. However, it works.
After creating all flex-children, and whenever the screen size changes, check if the width of each flex-child is less than the width of its content (for this to work, the content must be wrapped with something with display: table-cell). If so, add a minimum width to the flex-child equal to the width of its content. Once a min-width is added, the calculation need not be done again, so no longer check when screen size changes. Only do this on IE11.
I used jquery to implement this solution.
HTML:
<div class="flex-container">
<div id="1" class="flex-child child-1">
<div class="content-container">This text should not overlay other flex-children.</div>
</div>
<div id="2" class="flex-child child-2">
<div class="content-container">This text should not overlay other flex-children.</div>
</div>
<div id="3" class="flex-child child-3">
<div class="content-container">
<div class="text-break">This text should break on new lines when the container shrinks down</div>
<div>This text should not break on new lines</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.flex-container {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 100%;
}
.flex-child {
flex-grow: 1;
flex-shrink: 0;
flex-basis: 0%;
white-space: nowrap;
padding: 5px;
}
.text-break {
white-space: pre-wrap;
}
.content-container {
display: table-cell;
}
Jquery:
if (!!window.MSInputMethodContext && !!document.documentMode) {//if IE11
$(".flex-child").each(function (i, elem) {
var $flex_child = $(elem);
var child_id = $flex_child.attr("id");
//add resize event to window
$(window).on("resize." + child_id, function () {
var width_of_flex_child = $flex_child.outerWidth();
var content_width = $flex_child.children(".content-container").outerWidth();
if (width_of_flex_child < content_width) {
$flex_child.css("min-width", content_width + "px");
//remove event
$(window).off("resize." + child_id);
}
}).trigger("resize." + child_id);
});
}
The codepen to view this solution can be found here.
Unfortunately, this solution requires additional overhead when managing resources because of the window event.
Related
There's a certain peculiarity about flexbox that I both understand and don't understand:
If I am to declare the following:
#container {
display: flex;
border: 1px solid gray;
flex-direction: column;
}
.one {
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
background-color: red;
display: block;
}
.two {
height: 100px;
width: 100px;
background-color: green;
display: block;
}
<div id="container">
<div class="item one"></div>
<div class="item two"></div>
</div>
The container will basically inherit the height of whatever children it has.
Now here's the thing: almost every single layout out there has the main container, the "everything goes here" type of div.
But what happens now is that if the children themselves are not tall enough to push the last child to "stick to the bottom", you'll have a layout looking like this:
But the problem here is that if you make the height of all the children be a percentage of the total height, then things become literally ugly really fast.
Why does flex choose to do this and how can we work around it?
I would keep the footer in it's separate div from the container at the very end.
<div class="content-main">
<div class="main-content">
</div>
</div>
<div class="footer-content">
</div>
If the wordpress template you are using is coded where the footer is inside the same container as main content. I would link to the site/and or test site, so we can better figure out the root cause because the image you posted does not show the browser window, so I cannot see exactly how big of a space on the bottom you have.
Firstly, let me say that unfortunately I do have to support IE11 still and I don't believe this is a duplicate question, although I have found a few that were kinda similar.
I have a simple modal window which contains 3 flexible components in a column, header, footer and main.
The plan is that the outer box should grow as the content grows, until it is 80% of the height of the screen, at which point the middle section of the modal which is set to overflow-y:auto should get a scrollbar and the main modal will not get any taller.
Here is my markup
<div class="modal-wrapper">
<div class="modal">
<div class="modal-header">Header</div>
<div class="modal-main">
<div>Content goes here, could get very long</div>
</div>
<div class="modal-footer">Footer</div>
</div>
</div>
Fairly standard stuff. The modal is set to flex and the header and footer are fixed height. The middle section is set to grow and shrink as necessary. The main thing is that the .modal should never overflow the .modal-wrapper.
I have a jsfiddle set up and it's tested in Chrome, Firefox, Safari and iOS and it's working fine if you drag the bottom right box height up and down you'll see how it is supposed to behave. IE11 though is a mess.
https://jsfiddle.net/jonhobbs/sf6untnt/3/
Now, I have a feeling it may be related to the min-height bug here:
https://connect.microsoft.com/IE/feedback/details/802625/min-height-and-flexbox-flex-direction-column-dont-work-together-in-ie-10-11-preview
but I'm not convinced it's exactly that bug because none of the workarounds for that bug seem to work (e.g. using min-height:1px instead of 0, wrapping in another flexbox etc).
Hopefully somebody on SO can take a look at the jsfiddle and see an obvious problem
Maybe if you make it a flex child and use flex:0 1 80%; , it should fixe your trouble with IE :
example
html, body{
height: 100%;
display:flex;
flex-flow:column;
}
.modal-wrapper{
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
width: 70%;
margin: 0 auto;
flex:0 1 80%;/* IE gets it , because the flow is column */
max-height:80%;/* others such as FF gets it */
background: white;
}
.modal{
display: flex;
flex-glow: 1;/* doesn't exist */
flex/*-shrink*/: 1; /* good enough */
flex-direction: column;
min-height: 1px;
}
.modal-main{
flex: 1;/* good enough */
min-height: 1px;
overflow-y: auto;
padding: 20px;
}
.modal-header, .modal-footer{
flex-grow: 0;
flex-shrink: 0;
height: 60px;
color: white;
line-height: 60px;
text-align: center;
background: dodgerblue;
}
<div class="modal-wrapper">
<div class="modal">
<div class="modal-header">Header</div>
<div class="modal-main">
<div>This content could get very long so I'm going to put a big long div in it</div>
<div style=" width:100px; height:1000px; background-color:red; opacity:0.1;"></div>
</div>
<div class="modal-footer">Footer</div>
</div>
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/sf6untnt/7/
I have a container with 3 children elements.
<div class="container">
<img />
<div class="element1"></div>
<div class="element2 bottom"></div>
</div>
They must be positioned as shown on the diagram below:
image is in the top of the left column and nothing goes below it (it is the only element in the left column)
element1 is in the top of the right column
element2 is stick to the bottom of the right column (and must not collide with the element1 which is above it)
Does somebody know how to achieve such layout using pure CSS? Ideally I wouldn't like to add any markup, but I can do that if that's the only possible way.
The biggest problem I'm facing here is how to stick that second element (non-image) to the bottom of the container without removing it from the flow. Because if I use position: absolute and remove it from the flow, the elment above it can collide with it (both elements have unknown height).
Here's a pen to work on: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/yNwGvQ
I would suggest you to use two columns in your html and then use the property display: flex; for your right column as suggested in the article A Complete Guide to Flexbox.
http://codepen.io/AlexisBertin/pen/QboYyY
All the HTML:
<div class="container">
<div class="column column-left">
<div class="image">This is an image</div>
</div>
<div class="column column-right">
<div class="element1">This container has dynamic content so it's height is unknown and may change.<br/><br/> Some random content to make it larger. Some random content to make it larger. Some random content to make it larger. Some random content to make it larger. Some random content to make it larger.</div>
<div class="element2">This container also has dynamic content so it's height is unknown and may change</div>
</div>
</div>
Part of this CSS:
.column {
float: left;
height: 100%;
}
.column.column-left { width: 100px; }
.column.column-right {
width: calc(100% - 100px);
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: space-between;
}
Hope you get the idea. Good Luck'.
EDIT:
The easiest way to achieve this without declaring height to the container seems to only create a third parent div to the first block of the second column and define it as flex: 1; while the second block of this same second column would be define as flex: 0;.
http://codepen.io/anon/pen/yNwZmJ
More details explained in the comments.
The easiest solution I figured out is this one:
First you create this CSS:
.container {
width: 400px;
padding: 10px;
border: 1px solid red;
background-color: white;
}
.container > img {
float: left;
}
.container > div {
position: relative;
overflow: auto;
padding-left: 5px;
min-height: 120px;
}
.container > div > .bottom{
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;
display: block;
}
And then use these divs, depending on your content. The first one you use when you know your text is short:
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/120x120">
<div>
<div>
<p>This container has dynamic content so it's height is unknown and may change.</p>
</div>
<div class="bottom">
<p>This container also has dynamic content so it's height is unknown and may change</div>
</div>
</div>
The second one you use when you know your text is long
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placehold.it/120x120">
<div>
<div>
<p>This container has dynamic content so it's height is unknown and may change.</p>
<p>Some random content to make it larger. Some random content to make it larger. Some random content to make it larger. Some random content to make it larger. Some random content to make it larger.</p>
</div>
<div>
<p>This container also has dynamic content so it's height is unknown and may change</p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
The difference is that you remove bottom class from the last div in your div that has long text.
Also in your CSS you can see .container > div{... min-height: 120px; ...}, you should set it to height of your image. In case you want the bottom text more down then you have to increase min-height to be bigger than your image height.
Here is it in action: http://codepen.io/anon/pen/YXgBXx
Here's a CSS puzzle for you all.
I'm using flexbox in my layout. I have a header with a few buttons on the left side, some text in the center, and another button on the right. Here's an ascii drawing:
[btn][btn2][btn3][ text ][btn4]
Unfortunately, this looks weird because the text isn't centered in the header. What I really want is this:
[btn][btn2][btn3][ text ][btn4]
Ideally, I'd like to continue using flexbox to achieve this because it makes most of the horizontal layout really easy, but I'm willing to fall back to floats and/or positioning if need be.
One problem with positioning the text element absolutely is that long text will under/overlap the buttons on the side. I currently use text-overflow: ellipsis and as a bonus, I would love to continue to if possible:
[btn][btn2][btn3][ long text causes elli... ][btn4]
I'm also okay with adding extra container elements if that helps. Perhaps there's a way to solve this by adding left buttons and right buttons in containers and then ensuring those containers are always the same width?
Edit: I think I took a step in the right direction with this CodePen. It properly centers the text. The only downside is that the h1 needs a fixed or percentage width, and if that width is wider than the space available, it seems to just overlap the neighboring elements.
You came very close to a working sample. I forked your CodePen with a solution that don't require widths of any kind. It's using the power of flex to position elements.
The H1 will always be in the middle, with a width of the same size as the surrounding left-btnsand right-btns, using flex: 1;
You can, of course, specify your H1 to a fixed width as you did, or make it for example flex: 2; to have it take up 50% space instead of 33%.
Here's the fork on CodePen. I've removed unnecessary code.
And the code:
HTML
<div class="wrapper">
<div class="left-btns">
<div class="box"></div>
<div class="box"></div>
<div class="box"></div>
</div>
<h1>center me! center me! center me! test woah asdf veasdf veasdf veasdf veasdf ve</h1>
<div class="right-btns">
<div class="box"></div>
</div>
</div>
<h1>center me!</h1>
CSS
.wrapper {
background: green;
display: flex;
margin: 5px;
}
h1 {
flex: 1;
text-align: center;
margin: 5px;
background: yellow;
overflow: hidden;
text-overflow: ellipsis;
white-space: noWrap;
}
.box {
width: 50px;
height: 50px;
margin: 1px;
background: red;
}
.left-btns,
.right-btns {
margin: 5px;
display: flex;
flex: 1;
background: blue;
}
.right-btns {
justify-content: flex-end;
}
I'm trying to create a flexible layout in CSS3 with 3 boxes stacked on each other. The boxes are siblings and thus have the same parent element. The height of the first box must fit its content. The height of the following two boxes shall grow to fit their respective content until they're about to overflow their parent. In that case, they shall shrink so that they don't overflow.
The problem is that I can't figure out how to prevent one of the shrinking boxes from becoming crushed if its content is small in relation to the other shrinking box. I want those boxes to shrink down to a certain point where they won't shrink anymore – let's say the equivalent of two rows of text for example. Setting min-width isn't an option because I don't want the boxes to be taller than their content in case the content is only one row for example. If any of the boxes has come to the point where it shall not shrink anymore and the parent can't hold them without overflowing, the parent shall get a scrollbar.
I don't know the content in advance so the layout has to be dynamic. I want to solve this only with CSS, if possible.
Here's an example of the problem where box3 is too small:
p {
margin: 0;
}
.container, .box {
border: 1px solid black;
}
.box {
background-color: white;
margin: 1em;
overflow: auto;
}
#container {
background-color: yellow;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 15em;
overflow: auto;
}
#box1 {
flex: 0 0 auto;
}
#box2 {
}
#box3 {
}
<div id="container" class="container">
<div id="box1" class="box">
<p>◼</p>
</div>
<div id="box2" class="box">
<p>◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼◼</p>
</div>
<div id="box3" class="box">
<p>◼◻◻</p>
<p>◼◼◻</p>
<p>◼◼◼</p>
</div>
</div>
IF I understand your question correctly, the flex-shrink property should be what you are looking for.
Set #box1 to flex-shrink: 0
Set #box2 to flex-shrink: 1
Set #box3 to flex-shrink: 1