I am trying to get my mind around metrics charts in azure portal for CosmosDB and i find it a bit confusing.
For example, i get charts like this:
What confuses me in particular is how to read combination of charts 1 and 3?
chart 1 shows a spike of roughly 100RU. That would mean, if there would be 4 times more, it would start with requests throttling.
On the other hand, chart 3 suggests that there is still alot of capacity left untill provisioned 400RU limit is met.
So, what should be concluded here about when will the first throttled request occur? in 3x more as with spike or in ~100x more as suggested by chart 3?
Graph 3 shows the average, which is pretty flat. Graph 1 shows actual RU/s consumed. It looks as though you had a temporary spike in RU consumption - perhaps even one query. Throttling is performed on a per second basis. To answer your question, if you had 3x more consumption in a single second, you'd be throttled.
Related
I am running an experiment on two cosmosDB with fixed and autoPilot R/U respectively. The request load and R/U consumption is exactly the same as well as all the other parameters except for the throughput setting. But there is big leap in hourly costing chart (autopilot is consuming one dollar whereas fixed is consuming 7 dollars per hour for the same throughput). I have checked all the parameters multiple times and both the experiments have exactly the same settings, however the costing chart is not making any sense.
It would be really helpful if someone can shed some light on this.
autopilot is renamed to autoscale now,and it has been changed.
I read an official blog and there is a word in it:
"Billing is done on a per-hour basis, for the highest RU/s the system scaled to within the hour."
The reason why autoscale only consumes one dollar may be your consumption of RU/s is low in that hour.
Here is the pricing page.
Hope these can help you.
When using https://www.linkedin.com/countserv/count/share?format=json&url= to access an article's sharecount, is there an api daily limit?
We noticed that the time it was taking to retrieve count data was taking as much as 20 seconds on our production server. We added logic to cache the number of counts, and the 20 second delay stopped the next day. We are left wondering though what the limit might be (we can't seem to find it in your documentation).
The goal flow report on my google analytics account shows some strange sampling behavior. While I can usually select up to a month of data before sampling starts it seems to be different for the goal flow report.
As soon as I select more than one day of data the used data set is getting smaller very fast. At three days the report ist based on only 50% of the sessions, which, according to analytics, comes to only 35 sessions.
Has anyone experienced a similar behavior of sampling although only very small data-sets are used?
Sampling is induced when your request is calculation-intensive; there's no 'garunteed point at which it trips.
Goal flow complexity will increase exponentially as you add goals, so even a low number of goals might make this report demand a lot of processing.
Meanwhile you'll find that moast of the standard reports can cover large periods of time without sampling; they are preaggreated, so it's very cheap to load them.
If you want to know more about sampling, see here:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/37386181/5815149
I have been a happy user of Graphite+Grafana for a few months now and I have been advocating it around my firm.
My approach has been to measure data of interest and collect them into 1-minute or 5-minute buckets and send that information to Graphite. I was recently contacted by a group that processes quotes (billions a day!) and their approach has been to create a log line each time their applications process 1 million quotes. The problem is that the interval between 2 log lines can be highly erratic from 1 second to a few hours.
The dilemma is then: should I set my retention policy to a 1-second bucket so that I can see all measurements associated with spikes or should I use say a 1-minute bucket so that the number of data points to be saved and later on queried is much more manageable. FYI, when I set it to 1-second, showing the data for 8 or 10 charts, for a few days was bringing the system (or at least my browser) to a crawl because of the numbers of data points (mostly NULL) being pushed around from Graphite to Grafana
Here's my retention policy: 1s:10d,1m:36d,5m:180d
Alternatively, is there a way to configure Grafana+Graphite to only retrieve non-NULL data points?
What do you recommend?
You can always specify a lower retention period for 1s metrics so when you show a longer range Graphite will send you only the more coarse level.
For example, you can specify: 1s:2d, 1m:7d, 5m:180d
This way, if you show a range more than 2 days in the past you will get 1m resolution (and so on), which won't make your browser crawl, while you will still be able to inspect spikes in the last 2 days.
I have an application that publishes a number of stats to graphite via statsd. One of the stats simply sends a stat increment to statsd every time a message is received by the service. I need to display a graph that shows the the relative traffic over time for this stat. Generally speaking, I should be able to display a graph that refreshes every, say 10 seconds, and displays how many messages were recived in those 10 seconds as well as the history for a given period of time. However, no matter how I format my API query I cannot seem to get accurate data. I've read a number of articles including this one:
http://code.hootsuite.com/accurate-counting-with-graphite-and-statsd/
That seems to give some good insight but is still not quite giving me what I need. this is the closes I have come:
integral(hitcount(stats.recieved, "10seconds"))
However, I don't like the cumulative result of this and when I run this I get statistics that come nowhere near to what I see n my logs for messages received. I am ok with accepting some packet loss but we talking about orders of magnitude. I know I am doing something wrong. Just hoping someone can give me some insight as to what.
A couple of things to check/try:
Configure Graphite for Statsd
Check to make sure that you've used the retention schema and aggregation settings in Graphite that match how Statsd will be sending data (i.e. it sends one data point per 10 second flush interval).
Run a single Statsd aggregator
Be sure you are only running one instance of Statsd as running multiple statsd daemons will cause metrics to be dropped (as Graphite will be configured to only store one data point for it's highest precision of 10s:6h)
Limit the time range in the UI or URL API to less than 6 hours
When displaying graphs with data that crosses over the 6 hour threshold (e.g. from now to 7 hours ago), you will begin seeing 1 minute worth of aggregated count data for the displayed graph (if you've configured Graphite for statsd with retentions = 10s:6h,1min:7d,10min:5y). Rollups will occur based on the oldest data point in the time range (e.g. now till 7+ days = you'll get 10 min rollups).
If sending sparse or "bursty" data AND displaying old time range (triggering aggregation)
Confirm that your xFilesFactor is low enough that aggregation produces non null values even with a high rate of nulls. For example, 100 requests in the first 10 seconds, and none for the remaining 50 seconds in a minute would cause a storage of 100, null, null, null, null, null which would be summed up to null when the data ages if the XFilesFactor is higher than 1/6. Using the statsd recommended graphite configuration handles this, but it is good to know about... as this can give the appearance of lost data.
Saving schema or aggregation changes
If you changed the graphite schema or aggregation settings after any metrics were stored (in whisper = graphite's storage) you'll need to either delete the .wsp files for the metric (graphite will recreate them) or run whisper-resize.py.
Validating settings
You can verify the settings against some whisper data by running whisper-info.py on a .wsp file. Find the .wsp file for one of your metrics in /graphite/storage/whisper/
Run: whisper-info.py my_metric_data.wsp. whisper-info.py output should tell you more about how the storage settings are working.
TLDR;
You should ensure that Graphite is set to store one data point per 10 second interval for metrics coming from StatsD. You should make sure that Graphite is summing (not averaging) for count data coming from Statsd. Both of these can be handled by using the recommended Statsd configuration settings. Don't run more than one Statsd aggregator. When using the UI, limit the data returned to less than 6 hours OR understand what rollup you are viewing when looking at data that crosses retention thresholds. Lastly, make sure the settings take (if you've already been sending metrics).