I am an intro into computer science student and have learned more on how to use python and am now learning R. I'm not used to R, and I've figured out how to calculate overtime pay, but I am not sure what is wrong with my syntax:
computePay <- function(pay,hours){
}if (hours)>=40{
newpay = 40-hours
total=pay*1.5
return(pay*40)+newpay*total
}else{
return (pay * hours)
}
How would I code this correctly?
Without looking at things like vectorization, a direct correction of your function would look something like:
computePay <- function(pay,hours) {
if (hours >= 40) {
newpay = hours - 40
total = pay * 1.5
return(pay*40 + newpay*total)
} else {
return(pay * hours)
}
}
This supports calling the function with a single pay and a single hours. You mis-calculated newpay (which really should be named something overhours), I corrected it.
You may hear people talk about "avoiding magic constants". A "magic constant" is a hard-coded number within code that is not perfectly clear and/or might be useful to allow the caller to modify. For instance, in some contracts it might be that overtime starts at a number other than 40, so that might be configurable. You can do that by changing the formals to:
computePay <- function(pay, hours, overtime_hours = 40, overtime_factor = 1.5)
and using those variables instead of hard-coded numbers. This allows the user to specify other values, but if not provided then they resort to sane defaults.
Furthermore, it might be useful to call it with a vector of one or the other, in which case the current function will fail because if (hours >= 40) needs a single logical value, but (e.g.) c(40,50) >= 40 returns a logical vector of length 2. We do this by introducing the ifelse function. Though it has some gotchas in advanced usage, it should work just fine here:
computePay1 <- function(pay, hours, overtime_hours = 40, overtime_factor = 1.5) {
ifelse(hours >= overtime_hours,
overtime_hours * pay + (hours - overtime_hours) * overtime_factor * pay,
pay * hours)
}
Because of some gotchas and deep-nested readability (I've seen ifelse stacked 12 levels deep), some people prefer other solutions. If you look at it closer, you may find that you can take further advantage of vectorization and pmax which is max applied piece-wise over each element. (Note the difference of max(c(1,3,5), c(2,4,4)) versus pmax(c(1,3,5), c(2,4,4)).)
Try something like this:
computePay2 <- function(pay, hours, overtime_hours = 40, overtime_factor = 1.5) {
pmax(0, hours - overtime_hours) * overtime_factor * pay +
pmin(hours, overtime_hours) * pay
}
To show how this works, I'll expand the pmax and pmin components:
hours <- c(20, 39, 41, 50)
overtime_hours <- 40
pmax(0, hours - overtime_hours)
# [1] 0 0 1 10
pmin(hours, overtime_hours)
# [1] 20 39 40 40
The rest sorts itself out.
Your "newpay*total" expression is outside the return command. You need put it inside the parentheses. The end bracket at the beginning of the second line should be moved to the last line. You also should have "(hours>=40)" rather than "(hours)>=40". Stylistically, the variable names are poorly chosen and there's no indentation (this might have helped you notice the misplaced bracket). Also, the calculation can be simplified:
total_pay = hourly_wage*(hours+max(0,hours-40)/2))
For every hour you work, you get your hourly wage. For every hour over 40 hours, you get your hourly wage plus half your hourly wage. So the total pay is wage*(total hours + (hours over 40)/2). Hours over 40 is either going to be total hours minus 40, or zero, whichever is larger.
Related
I'm working on implementing a finance model in R. I'm using quantmod::getSymbols(), which is returning a xts object. I'm using both stock data from google (or yahoo) and economic/yield data from FRED. Right now I'm receiving errors for non-conformable arrays when attempting to do a comparison.
require(quantmod)
fiveYearsAgo = Sys.Date() - (365 * 5)
bondIndex <- getSymbols("LQD",src="google",from = fiveYearsAgo, auto.assign = FALSE)[,c(0,4)]
bondIndex$score <- 0
bondIndex$low <- runMin(bondIndex,365)
bondIndex$high <- runMax(bondIndex,365)
bondIndex$score <- ifelse(bondIndex > (bondIndex$low * 1.006), bondIndex$score + 1, bondIndex$score)
# Error in `>.default`(bondIndex, (bondIndex$low * 1.006)) :
# non-conformable arrays
bondIndex$score <- ifelse(bondIndex < (bondIndex$high * .994), bondIndex$score - 1, bondIndex$score)
# Error in `<.default`(bondIndex, (bondIndex$high * 0.994)) :
# non-conformable arrays
print (bondIndex$score)
I added the following before the offending line:
print (length(bondIndex))
print (length(bondIndex$low))
print (length(bondIndex$high))
My results were 5024, 1256, and 1256. I want them to be same length where every day has the close, 52 week high, and 52 week low. I additionally want to add more data so the days also have a 50 day moving average. Further still, what really put an ax in my progress was implementing yield data from FRED. My theory is that stock and bond markets have different holidays, resulting in slightly different days with day. In this case, I'd like to na.spline() the missing data.
I know I'm going about this wrong way, what's the best way to do what I'm attempting? I want to have each row be a day, then have columns for close price, high, low, moving average, a few different yields for that day and finally a "score" that has a daily value based on the other data for that day.
Thanks for the help and let me know if you want or need more information.
You need to tell your statement what variable you want. right now you are asking if bondIndex is greater or less than low or high. This doesn't make sense. Presumably you want bondIndex[,1] aka bondIndex$LQD.Close:
bondIndex$score <- ifelse(bondIndex[,1] > (bondIndex$low * 1.006), bondIndex$score + 1, bondIndex$score)
bondIndex$score <- ifelse(bondIndex[,1] < (bondIndex$high * .994), bondIndex$score - 1, bondIndex$score)
As a side note, Sys.Date() - (365 * 5) is not five years ago (hint, leap years). This will be a bug that might bite you down the line.
I was using the following code to calculate the age of a person:
var year = 1964;
var month = 1;
var day = 20;
var age = moment(year + '-' + month + '-' + date, 'YYYY-MM-DD').fromNow(true);
The problem with fromNow() is that it rounds the number up or down depending on the decimal point. I would like it to only round down. In the above example the person's real age is 51 but it's returning 52 because his age is actually something like 51.75.
If I use diff() instead it rounds down which is perfect. But it doesn't give me the pretty text 51 years old.
var age = moment().diff([year, month - 1, date], 'years');
My question is, is there a way to make fromNow() round down?
You can configure a custom rounding function:
moment.relativeTimeRounding(Math.floor)
The provided solution is correct but I thought I'd add a little explanation as this was the first google result.
Say I have a scenario where I want dates that were 1m 30s ago to display a minute ago rather than two minutes ago:
const minuteAndAHalfAgo = new Date();
minuteAndAHalfAgo.setMinutes(minuteAndAHalfAgo.getMinutes() - 1);
minuteAndAHalfAgo.setSeconds(minuteAndAHalfAgo.getSeconds() - 30)
moment.relativeTimeRounding(Math.floor);
console.log(moment(minuteAndAHalfAgo).fromNow()); // a minute ago
the relativeTimeRounding function takes a function as an argument which in our case is Math.floor which means the relative time evaluation will be rounded down. This can be found in the docs https://momentjs.com/docs/#/customization/relative-time-rounding/ - you can also specify a relativeTimeThreshold — the point at which to round the number.
Full disclosure: I've only been using Julia for about a day, so it may be too soon to ask questions.
I'm not really understanding the utility of the Dates module's Period types. Let's say I had two times and I wanted to find the number of minutes between them. It seems like the natural thing to do would be to subtract the times and then convert the result to minutes. I can deal with not having a Minute constructor (which seems most natural to my Python-addled brain), but it seems like convert should be able to do something.
The "solution" of converting from Millisecond to Int to Minute seems a little gross. What's the better/right/idiomatic way of doing this? (I did RTFM, but maybe the answer is there and I missed it.)
y, m, d = (2015, 03, 16)
hr1, min1, sec1 = (8, 14, 00)
hr2, min2, sec2 = (9, 23, 00)
t1 = DateTime(y, m, d, hr1, min1, sec1)
t2 = DateTime(y, m, d, hr2, min2, sec2)
# println(t2 - t1) # 4140000 milliseconds
# Minute(t2 - t1) # ERROR: ArgumentError("Can't convert Millisecond to Minute")
# minute(t2 - t1) # ERROR: `minute` has no method matching
# minute(::Millisecond)
# convert(Minute, (t2-t1)) # ERROR: `convert` has no method matching
# convert(::Type{Minute}, ::Millisecond)
delta_t_ms = convert(Int, t2 - t1)
function ms_to_min(time_ms)
MS_PER_S = 1000
S_PER_MIN = 60
# recall that division is floating point unless you use div function
return div(time_ms, (MS_PER_S * S_PER_MIN))
end
delta_t_min = ms_to_min(delta_t_ms)
println(Minute(delta_t_min)) # 69 minutes
(My apologies for choosing a snicker-inducing time interval. I happened to convert two friends' birthdays into hours and minutes without really thinking about it.)
Good question; seems like we should add it! (Disclosure: I made the Dates module).
For real, we had conversions in there at one point, but then for some reason or another they were taken out (I think it revolved around whether inexact conversions should throw errors or not, which has recently been cleaned up quite a bit in Base for Ints/Floats). I think it definitely makes sense to add them back in. We actually have a handful in there for other operations, so obviously they're useful.
As always, it's also a matter of who has the time to code/test/submit and hopefully that's driven by people with real needs for the functionFeel free to submit a PR if you're feeling ambitious!
I got this math problem. I am trying to calculate the max amount of samples when the response time is zero. My test has 3 samples (HTTP Request). The total test wait time is 11 seconds. The test is run for 15 minutes and 25 seconds. The ramp up is 25 seconds, this means that for every second 2 users are created till we reach 50.
Normally you have to wait for the server to respond, but I am trying to calculate the max amount of samples (this means response time is zero.) How do i do this. I can't simply do ((15 * 60 + 25) / 11) * 50. Because of the ramp up.
Any ideas?
EDIT:
Maybe I should translate this problem into something generic and not specific to JMeter So consider this (maybe it will make sense to me aswel ;)).
50 people are walking laps around the park. Each lap takes exactly 11 seconds to run. We got 15 minutes and 25 seconds to walk as many as possible laps. We cannot start all at the sametime but we can start 2 every second (25seconds till we are all running). How many laps can we run?
What i end up doing was manually adding it all up...
Since it takes 25s to get up to full speed, only 2 people can walk for 900s and 2 people can walk for 901s and 2 people can walk for 902s all the way to total of 50 people..
Adding that number together should give me my number i think.
If I am doing something wrong or based on wrong conclusion I like to hear your opinion ;). Or if somebody can see a formula.
Thanks in advance
I have no idea about jmeter, but I do understand your question about people running round the park :-).
If you want an exact answer to that question which ignores partial laps round the park, you'll need to do (in C/java terminology) a for loop to work it out. This is because to ignore partial laps it's necessary to round down the number of possible laps, and there isn't a simple formula that's going to take the rounding down into account. Doing that in Excel, I calculate that 4012 complete laps are possible by the 50 people.
However, if you're happy to include partial laps, you just need to work out the total number of seconds available (taking account of the ramp up), then divide by the number of people starting each second, and finally divide by how many seconds it takes to run the lap. The total number of seconds available is an arithmetic progression.
To write down the formula that includes partial laps, some notation is needed:
T = Total number of seconds (i.e. 900, given that there are 15 minutes)
P = number of People (i.e. 50)
S = number of people who can start at the Same time (i.e. 2)
L = time in seconds for a Lap (i.e. 11)
Then the formula for the total number of laps, including partial laps is
Number of Laps = P * (2 * T - (P/S - 1)) / (2*L)
which in this case equals 4036.36.
Assume we're given:
T = total seconds = 925
W = walkers = 50
N = number of walkers that can start together = 2
S = stagger (seconds between starting groups) = 1
L = lap time = 11
G = number of starting groups = ceiling(W/N) = 25
Where all are positive, W and N are integers, and T >= S*(G-1) (i.e. all walkers have a chance to start). I am assuming the first group start walking at time 0, not S seconds later.
We can break up the time into the ramp period:
Ramp laps = summation(integer i, 0 <= i < G, N*S*(G-i-1)/L)
= N*S*G*(G-1)/(2*L)
and the steady state period (once all the walkers have started):
Steady state laps = W * (T - S*(G-1))/L
Adding these two together and simplifying a little, we get:
Laps = ( N*S*G*(G-1)/2 + W*(T-S*(G-1)) ) / L
This works out to be 4150 laps.
There is a closed form solution if you're only interested in full laps. If that's the case, just let me know.
Hey all, i am trying to figure out how to calculate the wage for an employee when they clock out. This is the code i am currently using:
Dim theStartTime As Date
Dim theEndTime As Date
Dim totalTime As String
theStartTime = "16:11:06"
theEndTime = "18:22:01"
totalTime = Format(CDbl((theEndTime - theStartTime) * 24), "#0.0")
So workable hours would be: 2h 11m
Right now, with my calculation code above, i get 2.2. What would i need to add in order to get it to calculate the correct time of 2:11 instead of 2:20?
David
Note that 2.2 hours is not 2:20, it's 2:12.
Change
Format(CDbl((theEndTime - theStartTime) * 24), "#0.0")
to
Format(theEndTime - theStartTime, "h:mm")
You're getting the right value, just rounding it off when you print. theEndTime - theStartTime is a time span equal to the difference between the two times. As you discovered, multiplying it by 24 will give you the number of hours different. However, you then have to divide by 24 again to use date/time formatting.
Check out all the ways to format dates and time in VB6.
First, I highly suggest going to the .NET framework (with it's easy-to-use TimeSpan class) if possible.
But, dealing in VB6 you should be able to use the DATEDIFF function (and it's been many years since I've touched VB6 so the specific syntax might be a bit off
Dim iHours As Integer, iMins As Integer
iMins = DateDiff("n", theStartTime, theEndTime)
iHours = iMins / 60
iMins = iMins Mod 60
You should also try casting it to the Currency type which can represent all numeric values (within 4 digits to the left of decimal point and 15 digits to the right).
Format(CCur((theEndTime - theStartTime) * 24), "#0.00")