I am building my docker image for my scale application with sbt-native-packager.
Now I need to introduce staging and followed the recipe from the sbt-native-packager site. The problem is, that the the mapped application.conf is not picked up on boot.
I have adjusted the build.sbt from the recipe by the main class.
lazy val testPackage = project
.in(file("build/test"))
.enablePlugins(JavaAppPackaging)
.settings(
name := "app-dev",
mainClass := Some("Main"),
resourceDirectory in Compile := (resourceDirectory in (app, Compile)).value,
mappings in Universal += {
((resourceDirectory in Compile).value / "test.conf") -> "conf/application.conf"
}
).dependsOn(app)
I build the docker image as followed: testPackage/docker:publishLocal
I also played around with the bash_template file and added the -D parameter to pass the config file location (-Dconfig.file=${{chdir}}/conf/application.conf), but I did not get it running this way either.
How is it possible to add the custom application.conf to the class path?
Related
I'd like to create an SBT project with inheritance and shared dependencies.
With Maven's POM files, there is the idea of Project Inheritance where you can set a parent project. I'd like to do the same thing with SBT.
The xchange-stream library uses Maven's Project Inheritance to resolve subproject dependencies when compiled from the parent project.
Here is my idea of what the file structure would look like:
sbt-project/
project/
dependencies.scala # Contains dependencies common to all projects
build.sbt # Contains definition of parent project with references
# to subprojects
subproject1/
build.sbt # Contains `subproject3` as a dependency
subproject2/
build.sbt # Contains `subproject3` as a dependency
subproject3/
build.sbt # Is a dependency for `subproject1` and `subproject2`
Where project1 and project2 can include project3 in their dependencies lists like this:
libraryDependencies ++= "tld.organization" % "project3" % "1.0.0"
Such that when subproject1 or subproject2 are compiled by invoking sbt compile from within their subdirectories, or when the parent: sbt-project is compiled from the main sbt-project directory, then subproject3 will be compiled and published locally with SBT, or otherwise be made available to the projects that need it.
Also, how would shared dependencies be specified in sbt-project/build.sbt or anywhere in the sbt-project/project directory, such that they are useable within subproject1 and subproject2, when invoking sbt compile within those subdirectories?
The following examples don't help answer either of the above points:
jbruggem/sbt-multiproject-example:
Uses recursive build.sbt files, but doesn't share dependencies among child projects.
Defining Multi-project Builds with sbt: pbassiner/sbt-multi-project-example:
Uses a single build.sbt file for the projects in their subdirectories.
sachabarber/SBT_MultiProject_Demo:
Uses a single build.sbt file.
Such that when subproject1 or subproject2 are compiled by invoking sbt compile from within their subdirectories...
Maybe Maven is meant to be used together with the shell environment and cd command, but that's not how sbt works at least as of sbt 1.x in 2019.
The sbt way is to use sbt as an interactive shell, and start it at the top level. You can then either invoke compilation as subproject1/compile, or switch into it using project subproject1, and call compile in there.
house plugin
A feature similar to parent POM would be achieved by creating a custom plugin.
package com.example
import sbt._
import Keys._
object FooProjectPlugin extends AutoPlugin {
override def requires = plugins.JvmPlugin
val commonsIo = "commons-io" % "commons-io" % "2.6"
override def buildSettings: Seq[Def.Setting[_]] = Seq(
organization := "com.example"
)
override def projectSettings: Seq[Def.Setting[_]] = Seq(
libraryDependencies += commonsIo
)
}
sbt-sriracha
It's not exactly what you are asking for, but I have an experimental plugin that allows you to switch between source dependency and binary dependency. See hot source dependencies using sbt-sriracha.
Using that you could create three individual sbt builds for project1, project2, and project3, all located inside $HOME/workspace directory.
ThisBuild / scalaVersion := "2.12.8"
ThisBuild / version := "0.1.1-SNAPSHOT"
lazy val project3Ref = ProjectRef(workspaceDirectory / "project3", "project3")
lazy val project3Lib = "tld.organization" %% "project3" % "0.1.0"
lazy val project1 = (project in file("."))
.enablePlugins(FooProjectPlugin)
.sourceDependency(project3Ref, project3Lib)
.settings(
name := "project1"
)
With this setup, you can launch sbt -Dsbt.sourcemode=true and it will pick up project3 as a subproject.
You can use Mecha super-repo concept. Take a look on the setup and docs here: https://github.com/storm-enroute/mecha
The basic idea is that you can combine dependent sbt projects (with their own build.sbt) under single root super-repo sbt project:
/root
/project/plugins.sbt
repos.conf
/project1
/src/..
/project/plugins.sbt
build.sbt
/project2
/src/..
/project/plugins.sbt
build.sbt
Please, note that there is no build.sbt in the root folder!
Instead there is repos.conf file. It contains definition of the sub-repos and looks like the folowing:
root {
dir = "."
origin = ""
mirrors = []
}
project1 {
dir = "project1"
origin = "git#github.com:some_user/project1.git"
mirrors = []
}
project2 {
dir = "project2"
origin = "git#github.com:some_user/project2.git"
mirrors = []
}
Then you can specify the Inter-Project, source-level Dependencies within individual projects.
There are two approaches:
dependencies.conf file
or in the build source code
For more details, please, see the docs
I'm attempting to use the sbt-aspectj plugin with the sbt native packager and am running into an issue where the associated -javaagent path to the aspectj load time weaver jar references an ivy cache location rather than something packaged.
That is, after running sbt stage, executing the staged application via bash -x target/universal/stage/bin/myapp/ results in this javaagent:
exec java -javaagent:/home/myuser/.ivy2/cache/org.aspectj/aspectjweaver/jars/aspectjweaver-1.8.10.jar -cp /home/myuser/myproject/target/universal/stage/lib/org.aspectj.aspectjweaver-1.8.10.jar:/home/myuser/myproject/target/universal/stage/lib/otherlibs.jar myorg.MyMainApp args
My target platform is Heroku where the artifacts are built before being effectively 'pushed' out to individual 'dynos' (very analogous to a docker setup). The issue here is that the resulting -javaagent path was valid on the machine in which the 'staged' deployable was built, but will not exist where it's ultimately run.
How can one configure the sbt-aspectj plugin to reference a packaged lib rather than one from the ivy cache?
Current configuration:
project/plugins.sbt:
addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.sbt" % "sbt-aspectj" % "0.10.6")
addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.sbt" % "sbt-native-packager" % "1.1.5")
build.sbt (selected parts):
import com.typesafe.sbt.SbtAspectj._
lazy val root = (project in file(".")).settings(
aspectjSettings,
javaOptions in Runtime ++= { AspectjKeys.weaverOptions in Aspectj }.value,
// see: https://github.com/sbt/sbt-native-packager/issues/598#issuecomment-111584866
javaOptions in Universal ++= { AspectjKeys.weaverOptions in Aspectj }.value
.map { "-J" + _ },
fork in run := true
)
Update
I've tried several approaches including pulling the relevant output for javaOptions from existing mappings, but the result is a cyclical dependency error thrown by sbt.
I have something that technically solves my problem but feels unsatisfactory. As of now, I'm including an aspectjweaver dependency directly and using the sbt-native-packager concept of bashScriptExtraDefines to append an appropriate javaagent:
updated build.sbt:
import com.typesafe.sbt.SbtAspectj._
lazy val root = (project in file(".")).settings(
aspectjSettings,
bashScriptExtraDefines += scriptClasspath.value
.filter(_.contains("aspectjweaver"))
.headOption
.map("addJava -javaagent:${lib_dir}/" + _)
.getOrElse(""),
fork in run := true
)
You can add the following settings in your sbt config:
.settings(
retrieveManaged := true,
libraryDependencies += "org.aspectj" % "aspectjweaver" % aspectJWeaverV)
AspectJ weaver JAR will be copied to ./lib_managed/jars/org.aspectj/aspectjweaver/aspectjweaver-[aspectJWeaverV].jar in your project root.
I actually solved this by using the sbt-javaagent plugin to adding agents to the runtime
There is sbt project declaration
lazy val myProject = (Project("myProject", file("someRoot"))
enablePlugins ...
settings (...)
It has taskKey that extracts some dependencies to file system.
My problem is that for the moment of loading SBT I can't determine all the dependencies, it could be done only after private Command Alias is executed
addCommandAlias("resolveDependencies", "; resolveDependenciesTask; TODO: update myProject dependencies and reload it")
Is there anyway to do that?
Actually, disregard my comment on your question. You can use a command to modify the state of the build, so after you run it, the changes it made stay.
Something along these lines:
// in your build.sbt
commands += Command.command("yourCustomCommand")(state =>
Project.extract(state).append(
Seq(libraryDependencies += // settings you want to modify
"com.lihaoyi" % "ammonite-repl" % "0.5.7" cross CrossVersion.full),
state))
Then call it with sbt yourCustomCommand.
The state instance you return from the command becomes the new state of the build, i.e. if you've added some dependencies, the build will see them.
So I'm using the packageArchetype.java_server and setup my mappings so the files from "src/main/resources" go into my "/etc/" folder in the debian package. I'm using "sbt debian:package-bin" to create the package
The trouble is when I use "sbt run" it picks up the src/main/resources from the classpath. What's the right way to get the sbt-native-packager to give /etc/ as a resource classpath for my configuration and logging files?
plugins.sbt:
addSbtPlugin("com.typesafe.sbt" % "sbt-native-packager" % "0.7.0-M2")
build.sbt
...
packageArchetype.java_server
packageDescription := "Some Description"
packageSummary := "My App Daemon"
maintainer := "Me<me#example.org>"
mappings in Universal ++= Seq(
file("src/main/resources/application.conf") -> "conf/application.conf",
file("src/main/resources/logback.xml") -> "conf/logback.xml"
)
....
I took a slightly different approach. Since sbt-native-packager keeps those two files (application.conf and logback.xml) in my package distribution jar file, I really just wanted a way to overwrite (or merge) these files from /etc. I kept the two mappings above and just added the following:
src/main/templates/etc-default:
-Dmyapplication.config=/etc/${{app_name}}/application.conf
-Dlogback.configurationFile=/etc/${{app_name}}/logback.xml
Then within my code (using Typesafe Config Libraries):
lazy val baseConfig = ConfigFactory.load //defaults from src/resources
//For use in Debain packaging script. (see etc-default)
val systemConfig = Option(System.getProperty("myapplication.config")) match {
case Some(cfile) => ConfigFactory.parseFile(new File(cfile)).withFallback(baseConfig)
case None => baseConfig
}
And of course -Dlogback.configuration is a system propety used by Logback.
In my Build.scala, I have:
override def rootProject = Some(frontendProject)
I'm trying to convert to the newer build.sbt format, but don't know the equivalent of this line. How do I set the project for sbt to load by default when using build.sbt?
I'm still not sure that I understood you right, but you said about multi-project build, so I assume that you want to define a root project which aggregates subprojects. Here is how you can do that (in your root build.sbt):
lazy val root = project.in( file(".") ).aggregate(subProject1, subProject2)
lazy val subProject1 = project in file("subProject1")
lazy val subProject2 = project in file("subProject2")
See sbt documentation about multi-projects.
Then if you want to set the default project to load on sbt startup to a sub-project, in addition to your answer to this SO question, I can suggest
run sbt with sbt "project XXX" shell command
or adding this line to your build.sbt:
onLoad in Global := { Command.process("project XXX", _: State) } compose (onLoad in Global).value
In both cases sbt first loads the root project and then the subproject.
I've found the following script to be helpful:
#!/usr/bin/env bash
exec "sbt" "project mysubproject" "shell"
exit $?