I am processing 1k record however I get system violation error after 800 record. Could someone please suggest how can this error be resolved?
There are designated methods for using OQL, you should take care to
Use a cursor variable
Declare a size that makes sense for your query
Open the cursor (allocates memory)
Close the cursor (disposes memory)
procedure ShowMoviesInCategory(theCategory : tCategory)
var Curs : aOQLCursor
var curMovie : aMovie
Curs = Motor.OpenOQLCursor
Curs.BatchSize = 50
OQL select * from x in aMovie++ where x.Category = theCategory using Curs
forEach curMovie in Curs
WriteLn(curMovie)
endFor
Motor.CloseOQLCursor(Curs)
endProc
Please also refer to the eWAM Help under OQL and
wTECH 101 (week1 - day 5 "101A - OQL - Search.pptx"
In Wynsure there is a designated variable for this, please refer to the Wynsure Development Rules.docx
Related
I have a question regarding on how to retrieve the records that I have selected in a form, to a report.
Currently, I am able to select multiple records, but when it comes to the report, it keep on processing the same value. However the number of the records that it processed is correct, only the value is repeating.
I am not sure on how to fix this, therefore your help is kindly appreciated.
Below is the part that i get the record:
if (element.args() && element.args().dataset())
{
switch(args.dataset())
{
case tablenum(LedgerJournalTrans) :
ledgerJournalTrans = element.args().record();
info(ledgerJournalTrans.Voucher);
break;
case tablenum(LedgerJournalTable) :
ledgerJournalTable = args.record();
break;
}
}
The element.args().record() only points to the last selected record. Its datasource comes to rescue. The usual approach to process multi-selected records applies:
Common record;
FormDataSource fds;
fds = element.args().record().dataSource();
for (record = fds.getFirst(1) ? fds.getFirst(1) : fds.cursor(); record; record = fds.getNext())
{
// Do the printing using record
}
You often see this approach used in main methods of functions capable of processing multi-selected records.
The FormLetter.getFormRecord uses this pattern as well.
so I have a DBGRID that has this infos :
I wanted to edit values inside that DBGRID. I provide a button with codes :
var ptlok, idp, tgl, after, kode, jlh, sql, sqla:string;
begin
while not dbgrid2.DataSource.DataSet.Eof do
begin
ptlok:=dbgrid2.DataSource.DataSet.Fields[0].AsString;
tgl:=dbgrid2.DataSource.DataSet.Fields[1].AsString;
after := stringreplace(tgl, '/', '-', [rfReplaceAll, rfIgnoreCase]);
kode:=dbgrid2.DataSource.DataSet.Fields[2].AsString;
jlh:=dbgrid2.DataSource.DataSet.Fields[3].AsString;
idp:=dbgrid2.DataSource.DataSet.Fields[4].AsString;
sql:='update kasir_opname_detail set kode='+quotedstr(kode)+',
jumlah='+quotedstr(jlh)+' where ptlokasi='+quotedstr(ptlok)+' and
tanggal=to_date('+quotedstr(after)+','+quotedstr('dd-mm-yyyy')+')'+' and
idpay='+quotedstr(idp)+'';
sqla:=sql;
zquery13.close;
zquery13.sql.clear;
zquery13.sql.add(sqla);
zquery13.execsql;
dbgrid2.DataSource.dataset.Next;
showmessage(sqla);
//end;
label19.Caption:=sqla;
end;
showmessage('Data Berhasil Disimpan!');
end;
However the data aren't saved as expected. it will only read last line of DBGRID then updates all data with values from last line of DBGRID.
is there something wrong with the code?
(prev it works with different dbgrid)
I am using delphi 7 and oracle as database. Thanks in advance.
I have been trying to query elasticsearch from R using elastic package.
I was able to query and get data with
`Search(index = "tmp_test_data",
q = "_type: random AND log.type: regular", size = 10000)`
However, when I try to increase the size by adding body
`body1 <- '{"settings" : {"index" : {"max_result_window" : "170000"}}}'`
to the search query
`Search(index = "tmp_test_data",
q = "_type: random AND log.type: regular", body = body1)`
it returns, Error: 400 - Unknown key for a START_OBJECT in [settings].
Edit:
I have tried looping through using the from argument in search function with each search size = 1000 which is returning upto 10,000 records and throws Error: 500 - all shards failed after that.
I have also tried with elastic::scroll, tm_scroll = "5m" in the search function by following some of the examples given in the R documentation/help but it is returning the same error Error: 500 - all shards failed.
What is the appropriate way to increase the size of query in R elasticsearch?
You are trying to update a dynamic index setting. You cannot include it as part of a search.
To update it, you need to update it using the Update Settings API. I'm not sure how to do it with R but here is a http request example.
PUT http://myserver:9200/tmp_test_data/_settings
{
"index" : {
"max_result_window": 170000
}
}
I'm learning LINQ, and I'm trying to figure out how to get all members with the last order failed (each member can have many orders). For efficiency reasons I'd like to do it all in LINQ before putting it into a list, if possible.
So far I believe this is the right way to get all the members with a failed order which joined recently (cutoffDate is current date -10 days).
var failedOrders =
from m in context.Members
from o in context.Orders
where m.DateJoined > cutoffDate
where o.Status == Failed
select m;
I expect I need to use Last or LastOrDefault, or possibly I need to use
orderby o.OrderNumber descending
and then get the First or FirstOrDefault as suggested in this stackoverflow answer.
Note that I want to look at ONLY the last order for a given member and see if that has failed (NOT just find last failed order).
Normally you would write something like:
var failedOrders = from m in context.Members
where m.DateJoined > cutoffDate
select new
{
Member = m,
LastOrder = m.Orders.OrderByDescending(x => x.OrderNumber).FirstOrDefault()
} into mlo
// no need for null checks here, because the query is done db-side
where mlo.LastOrder.Status == Failed
select mlo; // or select mlo.Member to have only the member
This if there is a Members.Orders relationship
We're looking into refining our User Groups in Dynamics AX 2009 into more precise and fine-tuned groupings due to the wide range of variability between specific people within the same department. With this plan, it wouldn't be uncommon for majority of our users to fall user 5+ user groups.
Part of this would involve us expanding the default length of the User Group ID from 10 to 40 (as per Best Practice for naming conventions) since 10 characters don't give us enough room to adequately name each group as we would like (again, based on Best Practice Naming Conventions).
We have found that the main information seems to be obtained from the UserGroupInfo table, but that table isn't present under the Data Dictionary (it's under the System Documentation, so unavailable to be changed that way by my understanding). We've also found the UserGroupName EDT, but that is already set at 40 characters. The form itself doesn't seem to restricting the length of the field either. We've discussed changing the field on the SQL directly, but again my understanding is that if we do a full synchronization it would overwrite this change.
Where can we go to change this particular setting, or is it possible to change?
The size of the user group id is defined as as system extended data type (here \System Documentation\Types\userGroupId) and you cannot change any of the properties including the size 10 length.
You should live with that, don't try to fake the system using direct SQL changes. Even if you did that, AX would still believe that length is 10.
You could change the SysUserInfo form to show the group name only. The groupId might as well be assigned by a number sequence in your context.
I wrote a job to change the string size via X++ and it works for EDTs, but it can't seem to find the "userGroupId". From the general feel of AX I get, I'd be willing to guess that they just have it in a different location, but maybe not. I wonder if this could be tweaked to work:
static void Job9(Args _args)
{
#AOT
TreeNode treeNode;
Struct propertiesExt;
Map mapNewPropertyValues;
void setTreeNodePropertyExt(
Struct _propertiesExt,
Map _newProperties
)
{
Counter propertiesCount;
Array propertyInfoArray;
Struct propertyInfo;
str propertyValue;
int i;
;
_newProperties.insert('IsDefault', '0');
propertiesCount = _propertiesExt.value('Entries');
propertyInfoArray = _propertiesExt.value('PropertyInfo');
for (i = 1; i <= propertiesCount; i++)
{
propertyInfo = propertyInfoArray.value(i);
if (_newProperties.exists(propertyInfo.value('Name')))
{
propertyValue = _newProperties.lookup(propertyInfo.value('Name'));
propertyInfo.value('Value', propertyValue);
}
}
}
;
treeNode = TreeNode::findNode(#ExtendedDataTypesPath);
// This doesn't seem to be able to find the system type
//treeNode = treeNode.AOTfindChild('userGroupId');
treeNode = treeNode.AOTfindChild('AccountCategory');
propertiesExt = treeNode.AOTgetPropertiesExt();
mapNewPropertyValues = new Map(Types::String, Types::String);
mapNewPropertyValues.insert('StringSize', '30');
setTreeNodePropertyExt(propertiesExt, mapNewPropertyValues);
treeNode.AOTsetPropertiesExt(propertiesExt);
treeNode.AOTsave();
info("Done");
}