We have a couple of Relying party Trusts configured. They now get all the claims providers when they log in using AD FS.
Is it possible to manage which relying party that sees what claims provider?
Yes - as per this.
Set-AdfsRelyingPartyTrust -TargetName claimapp -ClaimsProviderName
#("Fabrikam","Active Directory")
Related
I'm building a multi tenant Service Fabric Application, that allows a tenant to specify a login type - Identity(asp.net)/Azure AD.
I have an Authentication service that checks to which tenant the user is linked to and then proceeds to check if the username:password for the user is valid, if valid it returns a JWT token to the gateway API/web API that then allows access to the rest of the services on the cluster.
This is further secured by roles to limit actions and data access etc.
Question 1
What would be a secure way to save the app id and secret given by that tenant if they use azure AD?
In my DB and encrypt the info, it would have to be decrypted to connect to the AD(Trying to keep in dynamic).
Question 2
I'm implementing my own sliding refresh tokens to obtain a new JWT after it expires, is there a better/standard approach?
Question 3
Is there a better/standard way to handle this multi-tenant sign in process.
Question 4
Is there a way to have optional claims set on the JWT Subject that would allow access to shared services but prevent access to tenant specific services if the claim value is incorrect?
Edit
Ideally the Roles should not be part of the tenants AD/B2C because they role are dynamic and managed from within the application.
Instead of building your own STS logic, have a look at IdentityServer, a popular and great OSS tool.
For example, have a look here for a multi-tenant example using asp.net core.
It supports adding custom claims to the token, by implementing a Profile Service. Services can be configured to use claims for authorization.
This blog post may also be useful.
I will very strongly advise you ride upon the Azure tenant model and let Azure AD manage all credentials and authentication. In today's world its a very bad idea to store and manage user credentials when there are plenty of Identity Providers available.
Recommended reading:
How to build a multi-tenant app with Azure AD
How to secure a Web API with Azure AD.
Libraries like MSAL.NET will automatically manage token caches and refreshes.
Use roles and groups in Azure AD
Claims in tokens issued can be customized to some extent.
disclaimer: I work for Microsoft
We have a an ASP.NET site using OWIN that stores a username\password in the DB and a client has ask if a third party system can authenticate against our data using an ADFS\SAML approach. Can we expose the data held to mimic ADFS\SAML?
Would anyone have a suggestion of how this could be possible? or even better an example of where this has been done?
Thanks
Jake
I assume you mean a 3rd party accessing your data by authenticating somewhere else and then passing a SAML token?
They would be using ADFS?
The problem is that your credentials are in a DB and ADFS requires the credentials to be in AD.
So you would have to be a SAML IDP and federate with ADFS.
This requires you to be the server side of SAML. Most libraries out there are for the client side of SAML.
So you could look at products like shibboleth, IDaaS e.g. Auth0 or commercial stacks e.g. ComponentSpace.
A diagram would be useful to clarify exactly what the use case is.
What is the best method of securing a REST Web API with the following requirements. The system has an Angular JS frontend with the REST APIs implemented in ASP.net.
There are two "roles" in the system, users will have one of the
roles. One role should allows access to some APIs (call it "VIEW"),
the other role allows access to other APIs
All users are in Active Directory, so if I have a username, I can check what role they are in- Some clients are on Windows boxes, the others are on Linux
I would like to persist the session so I don't have to look up AD for every API call
I would like single sign on. On the Windows machines, I don't require them to enter user and pass as I already can retrieve their username using Windows Authentication.
I believe that Oauth would be my best option.
There are two "roles" in the system, users will have one of the roles.
One role should allows access to some APIs (call it "VIEW"), the other
role allows access to other APIs
For role based authentication, you can use [Authorize("Role" = "Manager")]. The token will be provided by the identity server and will contain the claim as Role.
All users are in Active Directory, so if I have a username, I can
check what role they are in- Some clients are on Windows boxes, the
others are on Linux
If you have ADFS then you can have an Identity server that trusts the ADFS. The ADFS will provide a token which will have the claim for role and your Identity Server will do the claims transformation and will return the same Role claim back to angular app.
I would like to persist the session so I don't have to look up AD for
every API call
For this while requesting the token, you can ask for offline scope so the Identity server will provide the Refresh Token with Access Token so you don't need to ask for AD again and again.
I would like single sign on. On the Windows machines, I don't require
them to enter user and pass as I already can retrieve their username
using Windows Authentication.
For this one, you can have your Identity sever trust the WSFederation for windows Authentication.
So basically you need to setup Identity server that will provide you with the token and the REST API will use that token to verify claims to return the correct information back to the user.
I am not sure what you expect exactly. Anyway, first I'm gonna reformulate your question with requirements:
you accounts and role are in active directory
you want to manage roles based on an active directory group
you want anybody whatever the system (windows, linux, mac, mobile...) to connect on your application using the same authentication
you want to avoid your AD to be hit constantly (not at any call for example)
if the user is connected on an application that uses the authentication system, he doesn't have to do it so again on another application that uses the same authentication system
If these requirements are yours. I believe the only standard (and clean) solution is to use OAuth. I'm not gonna go in detailed description of OAuth, but this authentication protocol is the most standard one on the net (facebook, google, twitter...). Of course as you don't want to use facebook, google or twitter accounts in your business applications but your active directory accounts you'll have to install/setup/develop your OAuth identity provider using accounts of your active active directory server. Your choice will depend on how well you know ADFS protocol and its different flows (code, implicit, assersion) You have two solutions for it:
Use ADFS: install ADFS; it provides a OAuth portal that will work out of the box with asp.net mvc. This uses the code flow of OAuth that is the only OAuth flow supported by ADFS. For roles and its related AD groups, you'll have to map role claims with AD groups. (it's in the setup of adfs, you'll find many tutos on the net). You'll find lot of tutos as well about how to use ADFS with asp.net mvc/asp.net webapi. I mention .net here, but every technology has an implementation for OAuth authentication (nodeJs/express, php, java...).
Use thinktecture identity server (.net technology). This will provide all the foundation to implement a custom identity server with the least effort: http://www.thinktecture.com/identityserver / https://github.com/IdentityServer/IdentityServer3. It contains an addin to plug its accounts to active directory. With this, you can use implicit and assertion flows.
Use oauth2orize (for nodeJs): https://www.npmjs.com/package/oauth2orize. This will permit you to make the same than thinktecture identity server but in nodeJs. Apparently you'll have to make all the wirering with ad manually. With this, you can use implicit flows (not sure about assertion flows).
At application side, most of frameworks can authenticate easily using OAuth with a lot of existing frameworks. For example, even if you make a single page application, you can use adal.js or oidc.js for angular if you use angular. As I mentioned above, all this is taken in charge by asp.net mvc/webapi out of the box but I know it's the case for other server technologies. If you have more questions, don't hesitate as I'm not sure of what you expect exactly.
I need a good advise and wanted to know whether a solution is feasible or not. Right now one of my customer has a common login application which is based on Forms authentication(ASP.NET) using membership provider. All internal users use their AD credentials to logon and external users use custom username and password. Both are wrapped via Forms authentication. Now the new proposal is to replace this Forms authentication with ADFS. I have gone through various articles over internet and not able to come to a conclusion. Let me list my findings so far with ADFS extension points.
1) It is possible to add a custom attribute to ADFS claims by the approach mentioned in https://blogs.technet.microsoft.com/cloudpfe/2013/12/27/how-to-create-a-custom-attribute-store-for-active-directory-federation-services-3-0/.
2) It is possible to add a second level of authentication( or multifactor authentication) via the approach https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/jenfieldmsft/2014/03/24/build-your-own-external-authentication-provider-for-ad-fs-in-windows-server-2012-r2-walk-through-part-1/. Here I understand that after first level authentication done by AD then only our external provider will come into picture.
So I have a general question that is it really possible to achieve what I am looking for with ADFS. Please let me know.
This is based on where the user accounts are stored. If both internal and external users are in AD, you can just redirect to ADFS.
If internal is in AD and external is in an untrusted or other LDAP source, using ADFS 2016 you can link to both these account stores and still offload authentication to ADFS.
If external is in SQL, you can either use a virtual directory in front to project it as an LDAP store (previous option) or use IdentityServer.
If externs is something else, you'd need IdentityServer.
Thanks //Sam (#MrADFS)
Yes - you can add a custom attribute store.
Yes - you can add a custom authenticator.
A better way might be to use thinktecture's IdentityServer 3.0 for the ASP.NET Identity part and then federate IdentityServer and ADFS.
We have ADFS 2.0 running and have federated with various STS.
Is it possible to federate with Windows Live, OpenID and Facebook?
Some of our users already have these types of credentials and it would be a bonus to be able to use them.
If so, what URL would be used for the federation metadata address in the "Add Claims Provider Trust" wizard?
Any other gotchas?
ADFS doesn't natively support the protocols of those IP-STSs (with the possible exception of Windows Live). You'll need to put an FP-STS that understands those protocols (e.g., PingFederate) between ADFS and them.
We have been investigating this question a lot.
It seems that the best setup is to use ACS in combination with AD FS 2.0 as described in this article.
This setup also enables claims transformation, for example, if you want to add the corporate customer number as a claim.
We have not yet seen any examples where you can connect AD FS 2.0 directly to Facebook however.
Yes . there are no direct way to get the claims from ADFS , need to configure the ACS and need to set the ACS as ID providers to ADFS.
But the token validation for ACS is 24 hours at max , so you need to be happy with short-lived token for Social Id providers.