I am developing a BLE android application where I have used RxAndroidBLe for BLE communication.
Everything working fine except one issue that the application is not receiving every scan response broadcasted by the BLE device (I am not sure whether it is an issue or not). The BLE device is set to broadcast it in every 1 second. It broadcasts the scan response on all the three channels 37,38,39 in round robin fashion. The application is intend to scan continuously until the application gets closed. But I observed that the application is not receiving all the scan response. Means it is not receiving scan response from the devices in every 1 second. Sometimes there is a gap of 2,3 seconds or more. I want to know is there any solution to overcome this issue or this is a valid behavior?
Any suggestion would be appreciated. Thanks in advance.
Due to nature of BLE scanning it is not certain that you will receive each scan response broadcast. At basic, it depend mostly on scan interval and scan window parameters (host side) and the interval you are broadcasting responses.
You can try low latency scan mode to improve your results.
Related
I am planning to develop a small project with a NRF52 (or other BLE chip if that'd matter). Preliminary, I would like to know, if I can broadcast data without "abusing" the advertising bytes?
Scenario: Two smartphones connect with my device and they enable some notify-characteristic over which i would like to receive data with a potentially high frequency (up to 100Hz maybe) on both devices. (I know 100Hz is already close to the minimum 7,5ms or so that ble supports... just to say i wanna reach that limit basically and be as fast as possible with receiving)
So: if I connect two central devices, will they receive the same notify signal or will I have to send one for each central device, essentially lowering the max frequency at which i can receive data?
In the latter case, is the best way to broadcast ble data to multiple devices via the advertising bytes?
Kind regards, have a good one
When you use GATT notifications over BLE, the notifications are individual per connection. So if you want to send the same notification to two connected clients, the data is duplicated over the air. In general, all GATT traffic is individual per connection.
If you send one packet per 10 ms to two devices, that should be fine. Note though if one packet is lost, it will be resent during the next connection event and hence then two packes will be sent to that device (assuming you produce an additional packet after 10 ms as usual).
You can use advertising instead to broadcast data. Every device that scans can see your data. Data you send in ADV_IND can be seen by an unlimited amount of scanners.
If it's better to use advertisements or GATT to send data to multiple devices depends on a lot of factors. You should experiment what works best for you.
I am working on Android BLE as a peripheral connected to a custom device that runs Nordic NRF51 as a central. The project requires Android peripheral to connect to two NRF51 central devices.
Android is advertising two different Advertisement UUIDs one for left and other for right Nordic NRF51 devices. Ideally, I would like to have both Nordic Centrals to connect to the Android at the same time.
I have two main issues.
First issue. Android can get both connections fine. The problem occurs when Android sending notification or Android sending reply back as result of Write Request from the central. When both Centrals are connected, often notification nor the send reply works. I confirmed that the Nordic central does not receive the notification nor the reply. Does anyone have experiences in Android as a Peripheral supporting multiple connections at the same time? I have tried two BluetoothGattServer instances (one for each device) as well as one instance of BluetoothGattServer and based on the connected device, I can tell which Central the event if for and handle it correctly. It is sending notification or send reply to Write Request that at times it does not get sent from Android. I am using synchronized methods on the GattServerCallback event handlers.
Second Issue. Due to the first issue, I am now only advertising one UUID at a time. The idea is to switch between two advertising UUIDs, thus have only one connection at time. The problem now is switch advertising. About 1 out 3 times, when I start advertising with first UUID with its name (LFDroid), it appears that it is actually advertising second UUID with its name (RTDroid) briefly (1 or 2 seonds) and then advertises what was requested. Note that second UUID advertising was stopped on previous switching. It almost looks like when I ask to advertise, it starts to advertise with the last advertised UUID and name and then quickly advertises what is requested. This now causes problem because both Nordic Centrals sees the advertisement and connects.
Any suggestions would be appreciated.
I read in some places that advertising packets are sent to every one in the distance range. However, should the other device be scanning to receive them or it will receive it anyways?
The problem:
let's say I'm establishing a piconet between 5 or 6 BLE devices. At some point I have some connections between the slaves and one master. Then if one of the devices get removed/shut off for a few days I would like it to reconnect back to the network as soon as turned on.
I read about the autoconnect feature but it seems when you set it true, the device creates a background scanning which is actually slower (in frequency) than the manual scanning. This makes me conclude that for the autoConnect to work the device which is being turned on again needs to advertise again, right? Therefore, if autoconnect really runs a slow scan on background so it seems to me that you can never receive the adv packets instantly unless you're scanning somehow. Does that make sense?
If so, is there any way around it? I mean, detect the device that is comming back to the range instantly?
Nothing is "Instant". You are talking about radio protocols with delays, timeouts, retransmits, jamming, etc. There are always delays. The important thing is what you consider acceptable for your application.
A radio transceiver is either receiving, sleeping or transmitting, on one given channel at a time. Transmitting and receiving implies power consumption.
When a Central is idle (not handling any connection at all), all it has to do is scanning. It can do it full time (even if spec says this should be duty cycled). You can expect to actually receive an advertising packet from peer Peripheral the first time it is transmitted.
When a Central is maintaining a connection to multiple peripherals, its transceiver time is shared between all the connections to maintain. Background scanning is considered low priority, and takes some of the remaining transceiver time. Then an advertising Peripheral may send its ADV packet while Central is not listening.
Here comes statistical magic:
Spec says interval between two advertising events must be augmented with a (pseudo-)random delay. This ensures Central (scanner) and Peripheral (advertiser) will manage to see each other at some point in time. Without this random delay, their timing allocations could become harmonic, but out of phase, and it could happen they never see each other.
Depending on the parameters used on Central and Peripheral (advInterval, advDelay, scanWindow, scanInterval) and radio link quality, you can compute the probability to be able to reach a node after a given time. This is left as an exercise to the reader... :)
In the end, the question you should ask yourself looks like "is it acceptable my Peripheral is reconnected to my Central after 300 ms in 95% of cases" ?
I'm trying to establish a bluetooth low energy link between a custom pcb and a mobile device. The application requires a tablet device and a BLE link that operates as fast as possible.
Since the BLE Speed is main defined by the allowed number of packages per connection interval and the minimal connection interval I'm trying to find a tablet with those capabilitys.
I have been searching a lot and just found the following information:
IOS device are stuck with a minimal connection interval of 30ms
Android devices are technically able to deliver 6 packets each 7.5ms, but usually it wont settle for anything below 20ms.
I find it very hard to get solid information on that topic. I found nothing about Windows Tablets and Tizen Tablets.
Does anyone have information about that topic?
You see, the standard Android bluetooth code is (with sometimes small adjustments by each manufacturers) the same on every device and the bluetooth controllers available on the market tend to only send 3-6 packets each connection event if the min/max connection event length is set to 0, which it is by default in Android's code.
Is it possible for you to work with AOSP, i.e. modify the Android source code? If so you could change the HCI call where a connection is created or connection parameters are updated. Change the min/max connection event length (Minimum_CE_Length and Maximum_CE_Length) to some large value and you will then be able to write many many packets in one connection event regardless of connection interval.
The relevant places in the code are https://android.googlesource.com/platform/system/bt/+/d35bb40dd563e7f37df0a2fa9c0f61d0958b9601/stack/l2cap/l2c_ble.c#945 and https://android.googlesource.com/platform/system/bt/+/488005b16bd2552ce7e5f9c1e1b3d4072397fc26/stack/btm/btm_ble_bgconn.cc#394.
What exactly is a BLE scan response packet?
Since there is almost nothing to be found online, we would like to now this.
Does a scan response packet, respond on a device scan or is it like the advertisement packet sent every x seconds?
A BLE scan response is the packet that is sent by the advertising device (peripheral) upon the reception of scanning requests (i.e. yes, it is a response to a device scan). The scan response usually has more data than the advertising packets. In other words, central devices send scan requests to the advertising device in order to get additional user data through the scan response. Please also note that scan responses are considered to have fixed 'static' data relative to the more dynamic advertising data.
Advertising packets and scan response share the same format, and are transmitted over the same three physical channels (they are both sent as advertising events), but are otherwise two different things.
For more information, I recommend reading about scan response packets in the SIG's core specification found here.
I hope this helps
An important addition to yousif saeed's answer:
According to the Bluetooth 4.x specification, Peripheral devices accepting Scan Requests,
Must advertise this by using a specific Advertising Type value in the protocol header.
Must use advertising intervals of equal or bigger than, at least, 100 ms, so that the Central/Peripheral devices can exchange the Scan Request/Response packets in the time between two consecutive advertising packets (advertising interval).
Keep in mind, also, that depending on your particular hardware platform and Bluetooth Low Energy software stack,
You may find that a peripheral device accepting Scan Requests is non connectable, that is, may be limited to behave as a pure beacon (connection-less).
I was just looking for this information and it is difficult to find good technical resources beyond the basic description.
There is a great few pages on one of the manufacturer's sites that goes into the details of how their hardware interacts with these communications.
The scan response packet consists of:
Device name,
Transmission power,
Beacon ID,
Firmware version,
Battery level
https://support.kontakt.io/hc/en-gb/articles/201492492-iBeacon-advertising-packet-structure
https://support.kontakt.io/hc/en-gb/articles/201493072-Beacon-services
https://support.kontakt.io/hc/en-gb/articles/201492492-iBeacon-advertising-packet-structure
I am not promoting Kontakt.io, but they did a pretty good job of providing this answer in good detail.
Yes it does depend on device scan.
I recently had this experience.
I was working with Nordic device and started sending advertising packets which included scan rsp data. But either I was getting no scan rsp packet or hardly any packet. The issue was I was not scanning from my other nordic device. Once I started scanning from another device, scan rsp packets started coming quickly.