Is there a way to split Firestore Security Rules (firestore.rules) into separate / multiple files?
I would like to do a structure like so:
index.rules // imports all the rules
users.rules
posts.rules
comments.rules
helperFunctions.rules
// ... and so on
My firestore.rules file is getting quite big and this would make working with it much, much easier.
Unfortunately, I don't think it's possible at this time out of the box. However, I'm with you 100% with this issue.
There may be a rough workaround using npm (or whatever cli tool). Following this answer, you may be able to have a head, multiple inserts, and a foot. If you're able to find all files matching a pattern, you can concat them to the head, then concat the foot, ultimately naming this file firestore.rules.
OneLunch Man's answer inspired me to sit down and write a small Node.js module that shall make live easier organizing your Firestore rules:
https://github.com/lupas/firestore-rulez
As #OneLunch Man proposed above, this combines the different files into one single firestore.rules file. Additionally, and if configured, it adds some helper functions that you don't have to define yourself.
Hope it helps someone :)
I love the simplicity of security rules, though I hope organizing them will be even easier in the near future. But I'm very sure it will, right Frank? ;-)
Btw: I'll leave the question unanswered, maybe there's even better solutions?
I'm working on a sniff for PHP_CodeSniffer 3.x. For example, the class declaration class NoInlineFullyQualifiedClassNameUnitTestInc extends \PSR2R\Base\AbstractBase should be split into a uses and class AbstractBase. The sniff detects similar issues for method signatures.
I believe the problem is that I'm generating and inserting multiple use statements at the same line (i.e., same token), but doing so in separate fixer->beginChangeset() ... fixer->endChangeset() sequences. The fixer treats multiple sets of changes to the same token as a conflict, and things get messy (and wrong).
The GitHub issue is here: https://github.com/php-fig-rectified/psr2r-sniffer/issues/9
Has anyone figured out how to do this writing custom sniffs for the latest 3.x CodeSniffer?
You can also use SlevomatCodingStandard\Sniffs\Namespaces\ReferenceUsedNamesOnlySniff
It turns this
Into this
How to use it?
The best is to use it with EasyCodingStandard like this:
# easy-coding-standard.neon
checkers:
- SlevomatCodingStandard\Sniffs\Namespaces\ReferenceUsedNamesOnlySniff
Install it:
composer require --dev symplify\easy-coding-standard
Run it:
vendor/bin/ecs check src
Fix it:
vendor/bin/ecs check src --fix
Enjoy and let me know how it works for you.
If any troubles come up, just create an issue here. I'm happy to improve this tool as much as possible.
The problem is multiple Sniffer (fixer) changesets editing the same token. I was able to get the Sniff to work by collecting a list of USE statements and inserting them at the end of the Sniff's processing.
I identified the end of processing by searching backwards from the last token to find the first token of the list of registered tokens.
Edit: Here is the sniff: https://github.com/php-fig-rectified/psr2r-sniffer/blob/master/PSR2R/Sniffs/Namespaces/NoInlineFullyQualifiedClassNameSniff.php
well the question is, exist some app or language/etc to write a custom syntax to can check files?
You know, when we works in different places, ppl and projects every one have differents rules to how write, code style and all that things, the idea its can check all this things because at least to me normally i forgot something.
Ideally some app without a heavy GUI, thinking maybe a terminal app, or editors like gedit, avoid plis apps like Eclipse and similars.
For now i need only check simple parts, if you can recommend both a simple/limited app and a complex/full app would be great.
Obvs, if exist a simple/full app, will be better.
Thx.
If what you're looking for is a program that rewrites a source code given a specific coding style, I advise you to take a look at GNU Indent.
If you want to do more complex operations like build an AST and work on it to add things, edit, check for existing dependencies or whatever, you'll want to use a tool like Flex/Bison, Clang, Pyrser, etc.
I've been developing a lot of small web development projects in various IDEs, and find myself laboriously typing in jslint configuration headers to silence JSLint. Its warnings and errors are all valid, and I want to keep JSLint in my work cycle, but I spin up 2-3 isolated environments a day, sometimes from generators in Yeoman, other times by hand. These all end up with gripes from JSLint that require the following in every .js file:
/*jslint browser:true*/
/*global require,yada,yada,yada*/
JSHint has a wonderful feature whereby you can declare all these in a parent folder using the body of the .jshintrc file. Does JSLint have something like this? It seems like such an obvious addition, but I can find nothing like this which will work across IDEs (Visual Studio, IntelliJ, Brackets, Sublime Text,...).
I found this for .NET, but I find Visual Studio heavy for projects I might only spend a couple hours on and then throw away (https://jslintnet.codeplex.com/wikipage?title=JSLint.NET%20Settings).
Does someone have some insight on this?
Edit: (See my new answer below.)
I think the quick answer is that setting global settings for every file you JSLint is the job of your IDE or favorite text editor. That is, JSLint is essentially just a big javascript file. It doesn't care about file paths, etc, and won't look for a server-wide config.
I mean, you can change the options used when JSLint is called, but that essentially reduces to the same problem you have now.
So then the question is, if you don't like Visual Studio, what tools do you use? In VS, I've used this tool and liked it a good deal. I think that's different (as in not forked or related, but I could be wrong) than the one you found. In Sublime Text, there are two. I've been using Darren Deridder's, but I get the impression that it's the less popular of the two. Etc etc.
So this isn't a javascript/JSLint question so much as a JSLint wrapper question.
It should be said that JSLint's code is very clean, and it's easy to rig up your own process using Node or something similar. I've done it with JavaScript.NET, though I'd use Node if I was doing it again.
And I'd also suggest you consider keeping the file-by-file JSLint headers. I tend to do so, and it keeps your use "excuses" to a minimum, keeping your code tighter. It's way too easy to get a giant /*global ...*/ header line, for instance, if you have a lot of shared config info. It also means that when someone else uses a "shell" tool different than yours to JSLint your files, you know they're using pretty close to your intended accepted behaviors.
So the literal answer to your question is, "No, JSLint doesn't inherently support a box-wide config file." The longer answer is, "Tell us where you do like to work." ;^)
EDIT: Debated staying out of the usual 'Hint vs. 'Lint discussion, but I will quickly say I like how you're thinking. JSLint is more draconian, but JSLinted code means something more specific than code that's been JSHinted. I won't argue that more specific means better, per se, but I will say that I see JSLint's draconian-ness to be an advantage. It might not be the only way to do something, but there's nothing that Crockford's telling you that's a bad idea, and it's nice to get familiar with those conventions. In the parlance of my times, Crockfords's not wrong, Walter.
EDIT 2: So Brackets looks like it's come a long way since I last used it. Seems to have JSLint by default.
It looks like you can set global JSLint options using the jslint.options setting in your preferences file (and there might be/have been a goal to make that a more interactive UI eventually), like this...
{
"debug.showErrorsInStatusBar": false,
"styleActiveLine": true,
"jslint.options": { "sloppy":true, "white":true, "browser": true }
}
And it does allow settings at the top of the file to override these settings.
This really is approaching a golden age of text editors. I still fall back on VIm a lot, but mainly live VS and Sublime Text, with even jEdit, Coda, and PhpStorm for specific tasks. Looks like this might be my new Sublime for Node & html frontend dev. The quick CSS edit is wonderful, though bindings will complicate it. Thanks!
While the previous excepted answer is an excellent one (and many thanks to its author for making it even better over time!), the world has moved on from JSLint. I'd recommend to anyone reading this very old question that you seriously consider chucking JSLint out of your development cycle in favor of its very effective successor, ESLint. For an even better experience, I'd suggest taking a hard look at the ES7 vs. TypeScript paths, with TSLint being your best option for TypeScript linting.
However, for the development experience that trumps even these modern libraries, go directly for Prettier.js. With Prettier, your linting woes become irrelevant, since Prettier will rewrite your code in an opinionated manner every time it's run.
For the best results with Prettier, add the packages "lint-staged" and "husky" to your dev-dependencies, then add the following in your package.json:
"husky": {
"hooks": {
"pre-commit": "lint-staged"
}
},
"lint-staged": {
"*.{js,json,css,md}": [
"prettier --write",
"git add"
]
},
This will force Prettier's auto-linting behavior to run every time Git's commit command runs.
I can't tell you what a relief using Prettier has been for the front-end development teams and projects I am responsible for. We've gone from code reviews bleeding with linting correction comments to zero almost immediately. Feedback from the teams has been universally positive.
The only modification I've made has been to the tabs-vs.-spaces setting. I've modified my .prettierrc.json file to select tabs instead of spaces, because use of spaces at different widths causes dirty git merge histories. You can't control the indentation of 250+ developers spread over multiple hemispheres, some of whom drop in and out of the project before you even know their names. So, setting tabs as the default indentation allows all of the developers to operate with the indentation they're comfortable with without modifying lines in Git. Here's my .prettierrc.json file, with some other slight modifications:
{
"arrowParens": "always",
"bracketSpacing": false,
"singleQuote": true,
"useTabs": true,
"trailingComma": "none"
}
I'm a little new to Grunt and am using it in our automated build system (on Windows). When running Grunt manually in the console, the coloring is extremely helpful. However, when running it in an automated setup, it results in color information in the build log, like this:
[4mRunning "sass:all" (sass) task [24m
The extra characters decrease the readability of the build log and I'd like to get rid of them.
I'm aware of the grunt.log.uncolor method for individual strings, but I'm wondering if there's a way to configure Grunt to output all logs without color information or if there's an existing plugin to do this. If not, I'll likely write my own plugin.
I feel like this would be a common occurrence — using Grunt in an automated system where you'd want to read the build log as plain text — so maybe I'm just missing something.
Of course, I finally find the answer right after asking the question...
Use the simple command-line option --no-color.
I was scouring the API but somehow missed the "Using the CLI" section of the documentation.