Intro
this is similar to this question but unfortunately the answer only applies to greasmonkey (which only works on firefox). Further, this was asked on the stylish forum but the answer was ambiguous.
Question
I want to remove the left column in the azure help page and
expand the main body to make it cover the widht of the screen.
The first part can easily be done by this
#sidebarContent {display:none}
How ever the second part must conver this
media (max-width: 1199.99999px)
to this
media (max-width: 100%)
But I have no idea how to do that using stylish.. ideas?
To override a media query you just need to load another media query - that also applies to your device - after it.
Well...you want a blunt media query that applies to everything. The best way is to use #media (min-width: 1px) since that includes all devices.
Now, put it all together - along with some other CSS cleanups like padding and margin removal and setting a new width for .mainContainer and you get this
#sidebar {
display: none;
}
#media (min-width: 1px) {
.mainContainer {
margin: 0 auto;
width: 100vw;
padding: 0;
}
body>.container {
padding: 0;
}
}
New code: (with different selector for width)
#sidebar {
display: none;
}
#media (min-width: 1px) {
.mainContainer { /*example styles*/
margin: 0 auto;
width: 100vw;
}
body>.container {
padding: 0;
}
body>.mainContainer>main {
max-width: 100vw!important;
}
}
You still have to adjust the padding to your preference as setting the padding to 0 breaks the design a little bit but this should be good starting point.
Before:
After:
Related
In my class we are starting to use Media Queries and I am having a little trouble with an assignment. For a previous assignment we were tasked with remaking a website called "the Toast" as best we could, which I have here. Now for this assignment we are to use media query to do a few things:
This assignment is all about media queries and getting your site to be
responsive. We will be using the website The toast again for this
assignment. You will be laying out two columns for the content area.
When the screen size hits 960px the right column must disappear. The
articles in the left column must adjust to the width of the screen.
The images must get bigger and fill the article at 960 px as well.
At 760 px the support us button, love the toast text and the social
media must disappear.
In the code I have two columns, a "bigColumn" and a "adColumn". Now to my understanding to make the adcolumn disappear and adjust the bigColumn I simply have to add:
#media only screen and (max-width: 960px) {
.main {
.bigColumn {
width: 100%;
}
.adColumn {
display: none;
}
}
}
However this is not working. The ad never disappears and the rest of the content doesn't do anything in terms of filling the rest of the page when shrinking the window. If I change the background color in the .main the color changes, but changing anything in the two divs has no effect that I can see. I can get the social media icons to disappear at 760px just fine, so am I just missing something with the media query for the columns? Or could something else be interfering with it?
EDIT: Guess I should mention that yes, I am indeed using SASS in the project.
Here is the styling I have for the columns before I started the media query:
.main {
width: 90%;
display: flex;
min-height: 200px;
margin: 0 auto;
//column for main-page content
.bigColumn {
width: 800px;
height: 100%;
margin-top: 20px;
margin-right: 9%;
margin-left: 13%;
}
.adColumn {
margin-top: 20px;
position: relative;
min-height: 120px;
}
}
I don't believe you can nest your CSS like that unless you are using a preprocessor like LESS or SASS. Try taking the .bigColumn CSS out of the .main brackets and leave it on its own.
#media only screen and (max-width: 960px) {
.bigColumn {
width: 100%;
}
.adColumn {
display: none;
}
}
Based on your css I think you're close, but there appears to be a an error in the way you've structured your css. Give this a try. I'm assuming .bigColumn and .adColumn are children of .main:
/* All screens 960px or less */
#media only screen and (max-width: 960px) {
.main .bigColumn {
width: 100%;
}
.main .adColumn {
display: none;
}
}
I have been searching for a while trying different methods to try and remove white space between my images on the home screen on my mobile version. It only occurs on my mobile version. My url for the site is below:
https://athleteperks.co.uk
I also have a thin small white gap between two images on my home screen which wold also be great to remove. It would be great if someone could help.
thanks
If you are referring to the bottom 5 images before the footer there is padding that needs to be removed on mobile state 767 like so:
.fw-row .blog-grid-items {
padding:0;
}
.blog-grid-items .blog-item.col-sm-sf-5 {
padding:0;
}
Adding the above CSS makes the last 5 images full width on mobile and eliminates white space.
Also removing the below CSS eliminates the small 1px gap between the two images on your home screen:
.row:not(.fw-row) .spb_swift-slider .swift-slider {
margin-left: 0;
}
Edited Answer
The below CSS needs to be added to your stylesheet in order to remove the white space from the images on mobile:
.spb_text_column, .spb_content_element {
margin-bottom: 0;
}
/* Mobile media query */
#media (max-width: 767px) {
.swift-slider-outer {
height: auto !important;
}
}
In order for the above media query to work you must have in your head file the following:
<meta name="viewport" content="width=device-width, initial-scale=1">
here is the code if you want to rid out the space in between the 5 images in the same row:
.col-sm-sf-5 {
width: 25%;
padding: 0px;
float: left;
}
.row:not(.fw-row) .spb_swift-slider .swift-slider {
margin-left: 0px;
}
.row {
margin-left: -15px;
margin-right: -15px;
}
.blog-grid-items .blog-item {
margin: 0 0 0px;
height: 330px;
padding-top: 0;
}
If you want to modify the design only for a mobile version, with resolution 1024 px, add this code and put inside this code your new classes above.
#media only screen and (max-width : 1024px) {
.classname {
/* other styles here */
}
}
I'm trying to make a website that is essentially a few vertically positioned slides. I had been hoping to make a responsive design so my "slides" are appropriately resized on larger screen sizes or are padded appropriately in strange dimensions. Here is my LESS file setting the appropriate dimensions:
html, body {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
padding: 0;
margin: 0;
}
//============================================================
// Dimensions for each section for standard desktop screen
//============================================================
#home {
#media screen and (min-aspect-ratio: 16/10) {
height: 92%;
width: 160vh;
padding: 0 calc(50% - 80vh);
}
#media screen and (max-aspect-ratio: 16/10) {
width: 100%;
height: 57.5vw;
}
}
#about {
#media screen and (min-aspect-ratio: 16/10) {
height: 108%;
width: 160vh;
padding: 0 calc(50% - 80vh)
}
#media screen and (max-aspect-ratio: 16/10) {
width: 100%;
height: 67.5vw;
}
}
#experience, #hobbies, #contact {
#media screen and (min-aspect-ratio: 16/10) {
height: 100%;
width: 160vh;
padding: 0 calc(50% - 80vh);
}
#media screen and (max-aspect-ratio: 16/10) {
width: 100%;
height: 62.5vw;
}
}
//============================================================
// colors
//============================================================
#home {
background-color: black;
}
#about {
background-color: #488BFF;
}
#experience {
background-color: #B3B3B3;
}
#hobbies {
background-color: #FF7F35;
}
#contact {
background-color: #803A7D;
}
It seems to work for the most part when I run it with a simple html file with the 5 divs (home, about, experience, hobbies, contact). However, on chrome, a bug seems to occur while I resize. Sometimes, my webpage simply disappears, replaced with some black/gray cross. If I resize very quickly (rapidly resizing the window), a checkerboard appears or even some other webpage completely on a different tab. I tried testing resizing another webpage also using media queries, and this problem did not happen. Is there something inherently wrong with how I'm using media queries?
EDIT: Sample images showing the strange problems:
After a long and arduous chat session, we have worked out a fix for the bug. Here is the summary:
What's Wrong
For some reason, Chrome has a problem rendering large divs. As of now, I'm not sure where the bug lies exactly, but a simple example with 5 100% width/height divs causes this strange problem. Here is a JSFiddle with this example. The bug only manifests outside of a frame, so you must copy the frame source into its own webpage.
From what I can gather, something strange is happening under the hood in Chrome's rendering engine on Windows, which causes the strange black & gray crosses to appear when resizing a window.
The Fix
The fix isn't very elegant, but it works. Simply apply a transform:rotate(0) on each of the divs to force gpu acceleration. With this, the cross vanishes. Here is the resulting JSFiddle that applies this fix on the previous example.
TL;DR
When Chrome isn't rendering the pages with the graphics card, strange things occur. Use transform:rotate(0) on broken items to force graphic card rendering.
I am looking for a solution where I define 1 variable globally and than overwrite it inside a media query - without putting the entire code in it (like LESS CSS set variables in media query?).
I thought something like that(defining):
#media (min-width: 768px) {
#BWInputHeight: 40px;
}
#media (max-width: 768px) {
//responsive screens
#BWInputHeight: 20px;
}
And using it like that:
.dataTables_filter input {
.form-control;
max-width: 135px;
display: inline-block;
height: #BWInputHeight;
padding: 1px 6px;
margin-right: 15px;
}
The problem here, "#BWInputHeight" is a undeclared variable. How can I solve this with LESS ?
You can sort of achieve this by using list arrays for each property and screen-width (like the below sample):
#BWInputHeight: '20px','40px','60px'; // Height of the button for min-width=320 and min-width=768 respectively
#minwidths: '320px','768px','1024px'; // The widths for which you need the media queries to be created
.loop-column(#index) when (#index > 0) { // Loop to iterate through each value in #minwidths and form the corresponding output
.loop-column(#index - 1);
#width: extract(#minwidths, #index); // extracts width based on array index
#media (min-width: e(#width)){
.dataTables_filter input{
height: e(extract(#BWInputHeight,#index)); // extracts button height for the corresponding screen width
max-width: 135px;
display: inline-block;
padding: 1px 6px;
margin-right: 15px;
}
}
}
.loop-column(length(#minwidths)); // calling the function
Demo in Code-pen - Modify output area width to see difference and click the eye icon in CSS tab to see compiled CSS.
Note: As per this Stack Overflow thread, both dotless and less.js should be 99% compatible and hence I have given this answer. In case this doesn't work for you, I will happily have this answer removed.
I'm attempting to use some media queries for a website I'm building. The problem I'm having however, is while the media query styles are actually being applied, they're being overridden. I can't for the life of me tell why because I'm using the same exact selectors. Can anyone point out something that I'm not seeing?
ORIGINAL CSS
#global-wrapper-outer > #global-wrapper-inner {
width: 85%;
height: 100%;
margin: 0 auto;
position: relative;
}
#global-wrapper-outer > #global-wrapper-inner > nav {
background: #fff;
padding-bottom: 20px;
box-shadow: 0 4px 2px -2px gray;
}
MEDIA QUERY CSS
#media screen and (max-width:1024px) {
#global-wrapper-outer > #global-wrapper-inner {
width: 100%;
}
#global-wrapper-outer > #global-wrapper-inner > nav {
display: none;
}
}
The second media query is working fine, where I set the nav to have a display of none. However, when I try to set the width of #global-wrapper-inner to 100% it doesn't apply. I can see the style being "applied" when I press F12 and select that element. However, the style itself is crossed out and not actually applied and it still has the original width of 85%.
The selectors in your original CSS have the same specificity as the selectors within your media queries (the first declarations are also targeting the same property - width) and because the media query rule set is being overridden I'm going to assume that it appears before the original rule set.
The second media query selector works because it's targeting a property that wasn't set in your original CSS, so specificity isn't relevant.
To have the first media query selector take precedence, prepend an ancestor element to it:
#media screen and (max-width:1024px) {
body #global-wrapper-outer > #global-wrapper-inner {
width: 100%;
}
#global-wrapper-outer > #global-wrapper-inner > nav {
display: none;
}
}
You need to link the media query file (queries.css) later than the normal css file (style.css). That way the rules in the queries.css will override those in style.css.
I have been at least 2 hours trying to find the override CSS problem till I found that my line comments where wrong... And the second definition of CSS wasn't working:
So, don't be so stupid as I !:
/* LITTLE SCREENS */
#media screen and (max-width: 990px) {
... whatever ...
}
/* BIG SCREENS */
#media screen and (min-width: 990px) {
... whatever more ...
}
never use: Double bar as I did:
// This is not a comment in CSS!
/* This is a comment in CSS! */
Here is the answer. (at least what worked for me)
I've had this problem before, and it took me a while to realize what I did, but once I figured it out it's actually pretty easy.
Ok so imagine I have this as the html
<main>
<div class = "child1"> </div>
<div class = "child2"> </div>
</main>
and then this as the CSS
main .child1{
height: 50px;
}
/* now let's try to use media quaries */
#media only screen and (max-width: 768px) {
.child1{
width: 75%;
}
}
The code above won't affect the .child. Just like someone mentioned above, the main .child1 overrides .child1. So the way you make it work is to select the element just like we did at the very beginning of the CSS above.
/* this will work */
#media only screen and (max-width: 768px) {
main .child1{
width: 75%;
}
}
So as a conclusion... select the elements the same way every time.
Meaning ... for example in the above code, in your CSS, you should either select it as main .child1throughout the whole CSS or .child1 or else they get mixed up, one ends up overriding the other.
From the code you submitted, this probably won't resolve your issue. However, in your CSS if you are nesting styles inside of one another:
.main-container {
.main {
background: blue;
}
}
A media query for .main won't work because of the nesting. Take .main out of .main-container and then the media query will work as assumed:
.main-container {
}
.main {
background: blue;
}
Check if your media query braces are equal.
Sometimes it is very subtle but when you miss a single brace the rest of the media queries mentioned for certain break points will not work
example:
#media(min-width: 768px) and (max-width: 991px){
#media (max-width: 767px){
.navbar-brand p {
font-size: .6em;
margin-top: 12px;}
.navbar-brand img {height: 20px;}
#collapsable-nav a {
font-size: 1.2em;
}
#collapsable-nav a span {
font-size: 1.2em;}
}
Here you can see i have started the braces for max-width:991px but forgot to end so the next set of codes in media query for max-width:767px will not work.
It is a very simple mistake but took hours because of lot of braces in the codes.
Hope it helps. Happy Coding!
What about using !important? If you range your media query from ( min-width: 176px ) and ( max-width: 736px ) or even up to 980px?
There can be some reasons because of which this type of error may occur.
I myself faced this issue where I was not able to understand what I am needed to do and was confused that, does media query just overrides the elements.
Here's what I understood:
MEDIA QUERY CSS:
#media screen and (max-width:1024px) {
#global-wrapper-outer > #global-wrapper-inner {
width: 100%;
}
#global-wrapper-outer > #global-wrapper-inner > nav {
display: none;
}
}
here you were able to override #global-wrapper-inner > nav i.e., 2nd media query selector, by display: none;
because you never added the display line in the original css, because of which there was nothing to override you just have given that display type should be none.
Whereas just in the 1st media query selector you already had given width:80%;
Basically media query doesn't override as far as I have understood but it take precedence, like already explained by one of them
by which media query comes to work:
https://stackoverflow.com/a/19038303/15394464
also if still did not get your doubt clear, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=acqN6atXVAE&t=288s
then this might help.