This question is about Windows Workflow Foundation. I am working with Windows Workflow Foundation 4.5 hosted in a MVC Web application.
I have a requirement where user would like to ‘approve’ (resume bookmarks) multiple instances of requests in a ‘batch’ with all or nothing approach. Meaning they would like to roll back the workflow instances in the batch to previous state if any on the instance encountered exception while being resumed.
Currently I am just naively looping through each instance in the batch and calling resume bookmark. It works somewhat until it does not. We are seeing some issues where one of the instance in the batch failed due to some exception.
I have searched everywhere and could not find any useful information. I was hoping you could have some insight to it.
Would there be a way to wrap the entire loop within ‘TransactionSope’?
Related
I've got this situation.
I need to test a web application that was created with asp.net and c#.
This application has one special process that does the heaviest and the most important process in all the application. This process is part of the webservice that I need to test.
Now I've been asked to come up with any kind of program to simulate a specific number of simultaneous requests to the process, to see how it reacts to a certain number of user trying to call and use the same process.
I've never done anything like this before, but some ideas have come to mind, like maybe creating a little program in visual studio using the BackgroundWorker class and in this backgroundworker call the webservice , then call this backgroundworker the number of times specified by the user.
As I mentioned, I've never done anything similar, so I'm open to suggestions.
What would you do if you had do something similar?
Don't write this yourself, go straight to a web load testing tool.
See also
Performing a Stress Test on Web Application?
We are referencing a 3rd party proprietary CLI DLL in our .net project. This DLL is only an interface to their proprietary C++ library. Our project is an asp.net (MVC4/Web API) web application.
The C++ unmanaged library is rather unstable. Sometimes it crashes with e.g. dangling pointers. We have no way of solving it, and using this library is a first-class customer requirement.
When the application crashes, the application pool in IIS doesn't respond anymore. We have to restart it, and doing so takes a couple minutes (yes, that long!).
We would like to keep this unstable DLL from crashing our application. What's the best way of doing it? Can we keep the CLI DLL in a separate AppDomain? How?
Thanks in advance.
I think every answer to this question will be some kind of work around.
My workaround would be to not interact directly with the DLL from your web application.
Instead write your requests from the web application to either a Message Queue or a SQL table. You can then have another application such as a Windows Service which reads the requests, interacts with the DLL and then writes the results back for your web application to read.
I'm not saying that SQL / Message Queues are the right way, I'm more thinking of the general process flow.
I had this exact problem with a third party library that accessed protected memory for purposes of interacting with a hardware copy protection dongle. It worked fine in a console or winforms app, but crashed like crazy when called from an IIS application.
We tried several different things, some of which are mentioned in other answers on this page. But ultimately, the best solution for us was to us a very old technology - .Net Remoting. I know - it's somewhat frowned on these days. But it fit this particular need quite well.
The unstable code was placed in a Windows Service application. The web application made remoting calls to this service, which relayed the commands to the third-party library.
Now I'm sure you could do the same thing with WCF, sockets, etc. But remoting was quick and easy to setup, and since we only talk to the same server it works without opening any ports. It just talks on a named pipe.
It does mean a second service to install besides the web application, but that was acceptable in my particular use case.
If you did something similar, and the third-party code actually crashed the service, you could probably write some code in your main application to bring it back up.
So perhaps a process boundary is more useful than an App Domain when you have unstable code to wrangle.
I would first increase the IIS process recyling rate, maybe the the DLL code fails after a certain number of calls, or after the process reaches a certain amount of memory usage.
You can find information on the configuration of IIS 7.0 recycling options here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc753179(v=ws.10).aspx
In your case I would recycle the process at a specific time, when you know there is less load on the application. And after a certain number of requests (lower than the default) to try and have "fresh" process most of the time.
The recycling process is graceful in the sense that the the old process is not terminated until the one that will replace it is ready, so there should be no noticeable downtime.
More information about the recycling mechanism here: http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/cc745955.aspx
If the above does not solve the problem I would wrap the calls in my own code that manages the unstable DLL execution.
This code should recover from the failures for example by repeating the failing calls until a result is obtained and failing with a graceful error if it is not possible after a number of attempts.
Internally the calls to the unstable DLL could be made in a spawned thread or even the code could be in an new external executable that you could launch with Process.Start.
This last option has more overhead but it might be your only option. See this SO question for more information on this: How do you handle a thread that has a hung call?
I suggest following solution.
Wrap this dll with another web application. Can be one of the following ones. Since you already use web api, it is most suitable for you.
Simple ASMX Web Service
WCF Service
Asp.Net MVC - WEB Api Service
Control your p-invoke code so that you do not have any bug? See following articles.
The Black Art of P/Invoke and Marshaling in .NET
P/Invoke Revisited
Publish this application to IIS with different application pool.
Use standard techniques suggested before like. I suggest configure recycling IIS for both memory and scheduled times.
IIS process recycling rate
How to limit the memory used by an application in IIS?
Recently we have upgraded our main product to be an ASP.NET 4.0 Project (upgraded from 2.0). This project is the main source of traffic to the web service, the other forms have not changed in this release. The web service has been running without issue for a couple years now.
Following the release of the 4.0 environment to our main product our web service starting to die after about an hour and would do nothing but timeout until we restarted the worker process.
We have changed it so that the web service was also in the 4.0 Framework. However this did nothing. Other possible attempts we have tried have also failed such as making it a service instead of a web reference, and updating our certificate validation to also use the proper/current framework techniques.
The worst part is that there is no log in the event viewer being created so I have no leads as to what the problem is. We have applied a band-aid solution of recycling the app pool every 20 min (the recompile takes a second as the web service is very small) and it seems to be holding for now, but we would rather fix the problem than rely on this.
So does anyone have any additional idea/suggestions as to where our problem may be coming from? Or anyone experience anything similar?
Both projects exist in the same web farm and all machines are using IIS 6 32 bit.
Thanks!
edit- Some more info, The web service has a couple basic functions:
1 - accepts XML documents loads them into a dataset then updates internal DBs with the information sent - and simply returns true
2 - receives a request for processed data through XML and queries the DB for it builds XML response and sents it out
3 - receives a confirmation that the data requested in step 2 was recieved and deletes it from the DB
4 - hits a function that updates a DB so we can monitor some applications on our clients systems.
First of all, can you reproduce the problem on a dev box (using some load testing platform to simulate production load)?
If so, then it sounds like an issue with your code. You could then take it a step further and profile the code on the dev server to pinpoint the issue.
If that isn't an option, I would fire up Process Explorer and watch the server resources over time. I'm not sure what your service does, but it sounds like it could be spinning up threads and then not cleaning up after itself.
It might help if you posted some sample code so we could see what could've been affected by the change from .NET 2.0 to 4.0.
I am writing a web application in ASP.NET 3.5 that takes care of some basic data entry scenarios. There is also a component to the application that needs to continuously poll some data and perform actions based on business logic.
What is the best way to implement the "polling" component? It needs to run and check the data every couple of minutes or so.
I have seen a couple of different options in the past:
The web application starts a background thread that will always run while the web application does. (The implementation I saw started the thread in the Application_Start event.)
Create a windows service that is always running
What are the benefits to either of these options? Are there additional options?
I am leaning toward a windows service because it is separated and can run on a different server (more scalable) as well as there is more control over when it is started/stopped, etc. However, I feel like the compactness of having the "background" logic running in the process of the web application might make the entire solution more understandable.
I'd go for the separate Windows service primarily for the reasons you give:
You can run it on a different server if necessary.
You can start and stop it independently of the web site.
I'd also add that it could well have some impact on the performance of the web site itself - something you want to avoid.
The buzz-word here is "separation of concerns". The web site is concerned with presenting the data to the user, the service with checking the integrity of the data.
You can also update the web site and service independently of each other should you need to.
I was going to suggest that you look at a scheduled task and let Windows control when the process runs, but I re-read your question and noted that you wanted the checks to run every couple of minutes. The overhead of starting the process might be too great in this case - though some experimentation would probably prove this one way or the other.
If you use a scheduled task there's also the possibility that you could start the next check before the current one has finished - something you can code for if you're in complete control.
Why not just use a console app that has no ui? Can do all that the windows service can and is much easier to debug and maintain. I would not do a windows service unless you absolutely have to.
You might find that the SQL Server job scheduler sufficient for what you want.
Console application does not do well in this case. I wrote a TAPI application which has to stay in the background and intercept incoming calls. But it did it only once because the tapi manager got GCed and was never available for the second incoming call.
I have a website that's running on a Windows server and I'd like to add some scheduled background tasks that perform various duties. For example, the client would like users to receive emails that summarize recent activity on the site.
If sending out emails was the only task that needed to be performed, I would probably just set up a scheduled task that ran a script to send out those emails. However, for this particular site, the client would like a variety of different scheduled tasks to take place, some of them always running and some of them only running if certain conditions are met. Right now, they've given me an initial set of things they'd like to see implemented, but I know that in the future there will be more.
What I am wondering is if there's a simple solution for Windows that would allow me to define the tasks that needed to be run and then have one scheduled task that ran daily and executed each of the scheduled tasks that had been defined. Is a batch file the easiest way to do this, or is there some other solution that I could use?
To keep life simple, I would avoid building one big monolithic exe and break the work to do into individual tasks and have a Windows scheduled task for each one. That way you can maintain the codebase more easily and change functionality at a more granular level.
You could, later down the line, build a windows service that dynamically loads plugins for each different task based on a schedule. This may be more re-usable for future projects.
But to be honest if you're on a deadline I'd apply the KISS principle and go with a scheduled task per task.
I would go with a Windows Service right out of the gates. This is going to be the most extensible method for your requirements, creating the service isn't going to add much to your development time, and it will probably save you time not too far down the road.
We use Windows Scheduler Service which launches small console application that just passes parameters to the Web Service.
For example, if user have scheduled reports #388 and #88, scheduled task is created with command line looking like this:
c:\launcher\app.exe report:388 report:88
When scheduler fires, this app just executes web method on web service, for example, InternalService.SendReport(int id).
Usually you already have all required business logic available in your Web application. This approach allows to use it with minimal efforts, so there is no need to create any complex .exe or windows service with pluggable modules, etc.
The problem with doing the operations from the scheduled EXE, rather than from inside a web page, is that the operations may benefit from, or even outright require, resources that the web page would have -- IIS cache and an ORM cache are two things that come to mind. In the case of ORM, making database changes outside the web app context may even be fatal. My preference is to schedule curl.exe to request the web page from localhost.
Use the Windows Scheduled Tasks or create a Windows Service that does the scheduling itself.