I am looking to workout a percentage total over a look back range in R.
I know how to do this in excel with the following formula:
=SUM(B2:B4)/SUM(B2:B4,C2:C4)
This is summing column B over a range of today looking back 3 lines. It then divides this sum buy the total sum of column B + C again looking back 3 lines.
I am looking to achieve the same calculation in R to run across my matrix.
The output would look something like this:
adv dec perct
1 69 376
2 113 293
3 270 150 0.355625492
4 74 371 0.359559402
5 308 96 0.513790386
6 236 173 0.491255962
7 252 134 0.663886572
8 287 129 0.639966969
9 219 187 0.627483444
This is a line of code I could perhaps add the look back range too:
perct <- apply(data.matrix[,c('adv','dec')], 1, function(x) { (x[1] / x[1] + x[2]) } )
If i could get [1] to sum the previous 3 line range and
If i could get [2] to also sum the previous 3 line range.
Still learning how to apply forward and look back periods within R. So any additional learning on the answer would be appreciated!
Here are some approaches. The first 3 use rollsumr and/or rollapplyr in zoo and the last one uses only the base of R.
1) rollsumr Create a matrix with rollsumr whose columns contain the rollling sums, convert that to row proportions and take the "adv" column. Finally assign that to a new column frac in DF. This approach has the shortest code.
library(zoo)
DF$frac <- prop.table(rollsumr(DF, 3, fill = NA), 1)[, "adv"]
giving:
> DF
adv dec frac
1 69 376 NA
2 113 293 NA
3 270 150 0.3556255
4 74 371 0.3595594
5 308 96 0.5137904
6 236 173 0.4912560
7 252 134 0.6638866
8 287 129 0.6399670
9 219 187 0.6274834
1a) This variation is similar except instead of using prop.table we write out the ratio. The code is longer but you may find it clearer.
m <- rollsumr(DF, 3, fill = NA)
DF$frac <- with(as.data.frame(m), adv / (adv + dec))
1b) This is a variation of (1) that is the same except it uses a magrittr pipeline:
library(magrittr)
DF %>% rollsumr(3, fill = NA) %>% prop.table(1) %>% `[`(TRUE, "adv") -> DF$frac
2) rollapplyr We could use rollapplyr with by.column = FALSE like this. The result is the same.
ratio <- function(x) sum(x[, "adv"]) / sum(x)
DF$frac <- rollapplyr(DF, 3, ratio, by.column = FALSE, fill = NA)
3) Yet another variation is to compute the numerator and denominator separately:
DF$frac <- rollsumr(DF$adv, 3, fill = NA) /
rollapplyr(DF, 3, sum, by.column = FALSE, fill = NA)
4) base This uses embed followed by rowSums on each column to get the rolling sums and then uses prop.table as in (1).
DF$frac <- prop.table(sapply(lapply(rbind(NA, NA, DF), embed, 3), rowSums), 1)[, "adv"]
Note: The input used in reproducible form is:
Lines <- "adv dec
1 69 376
2 113 293
3 270 150
4 74 371
5 308 96
6 236 173
7 252 134
8 287 129
9 219 187"
DF <- read.table(text = Lines, header = TRUE)
Consider an sapply that loops through the number of rows in order to index two rows back:
DF$pred <- sapply(seq(nrow(DF)), function(i)
ifelse(i>=3, sum(DF$adv[(i-2):i])/(sum(DF$adv[(i-2):i]) + sum(DF$dec[(i-2):i])), NA))
DF
# adv dec pred
# 1 69 376 NA
# 2 113 293 NA
# 3 270 150 0.3556255
# 4 74 371 0.3595594
# 5 308 96 0.5137904
# 6 236 173 0.4912560
# 7 252 134 0.6638866
# 8 287 129 0.6399670
# 9 219 187 0.6274834
Related
I have a list of lists, like so:
x <-list()
x[[1]] <- c('97', '342', '333')
x[[2]] <- c('97','555','556','742','888')
x[[3]] <- c ('100', '442', '443', '444', '445','446')
The first number in each list (97, 97, 100) refers to a node in a tree and the following numbers refer to traits associated with that node.
My goal is to create a dataframe that looks like this:
df= data.frame(node = c('97','97','97','97','97','97','100','100','100','100','100'),
trait = c('342','333','555','556','742','888','442','443','444','445','446'))
where each trait has its corresponding node.
I think the first thing I need to do is convert the list of lists into a single dataframe. I've tried doing so using:
do.call(rbind,x)
but that repeats the values in x[[1]] and x[[2]] to match the length of x[[3]]. I've also tried using:
dt_list <- map(x, as.data.table)
dt <- rbindlist(dt_list, fill = TRUE, idcol = T)
Which I think gets me closer, but I'm still unsure of how to assign the first node value to the corresponding trait values. I know this is probably a simple task but it's stumping me today!
Maybe you can try the code below
h <- sapply(x, `[`,1)
d <- lapply(x, `[`,-1)
df <- data.frame(node = rep(h,lengths(d)), trait = unlist(d))
such that
> df
node trait
1 97 342
2 97 333
3 97 555
4 97 556
5 97 742
6 97 888
7 100 442
8 100 443
9 100 444
10 100 445
11 100 446
You can create a data frame with the first value from the vector in column 'node' and the rest of the values in column 'trait'. This strategy can be applied to all entries in the list using the map_df() function from purrr package, giving the output you describe.
library(purrr)
library(dplyr)
x %>%
map_df(., function(vec) data.frame(node = vec[1],
trait = vec[-1],
stringsAsFactors = F))
An option with base R is
stack(setNames(lapply(x, `[`, -1), sapply(x, `[`, 1)))[2:1]
# ind values
#1 97 342
#2 97 333
#3 97 555
#4 97 556
#5 97 742
#6 97 888
#7 100 442
#8 100 443
#9 100 444
#10 100 445
#11 100 446
Another solution
library(tidyverse)
library(purrr)
node <- map(x, ~rep(.x[1], length(.x)-1)) %>% flatten_chr()
trait <- map(x, ~.x[2:length(.x)]) %>% flatten_chr()
out <- tibble(node, trait)
node trait
<chr> <chr>
1 97 342
2 97 333
3 97 555
4 97 556
5 97 742
6 97 888
7 100 442
8 100 443
9 100 444
10 100 445
11 100 446
I am not very experienced in if statements and loops in R.
Probably you can help me to solve my problem.
My task is to add +1 to df$fz if sum(df$fz) < 450, but in the same time I have to add +1 only to max values in df$fz till that moment when when sum(df$fz) is lower than 450
Here is my df
ID_PP <- c(3,6, 22, 30, 1234456)
z <- c(12325, 21698, 21725, 8378, 18979)
fz <- c(134, 67, 70, 88, 88)
df <- data.frame(ID_PP,z,fz)
After mutating the new column df$new_value, it should look like 134 68 71 88 89
At this moment I have this code, but it adds +1 to all values.
if (sum(df$fz ) < 450) {
mutate(df, new_value=fz+1)
}
I know that I can pick top_n(3, z) and add +1 only to this top, but it is not what I want, because in that case I have to pick a top manually after checking sum(df$fz)
From what I understood from #Oksana's question and comments, we probably can do it this way:
library(tidyverse)
# data
vru <- data.frame(
id = c(3, 6, 22, 30, 1234456),
z = c(12325, 21698, 21725, 8378, 18979),
fz = c(134, 67, 70, 88, 88)
)
# solution
vru %>% #
top_n(450 - sum(fz), z) %>% # subset by top z, if sum(fz) == 450 -> NULL
mutate(fz = fz + 1) %>% # increase fz by 1 for the subset
bind_rows( #
anti_join(vru, ., by = "id"), # take rows from vru which are not in subset
. # take subset with transformed fz
) %>% # bind thous subsets
arrange(id) # sort rows by id
# output
id z fz
1 3 12325 134
2 6 21698 68
3 22 21725 71
4 30 8378 88
5 1234456 18979 89
The clarifications in the comments helped. Let me know if this works for you. Of course, you can drop the cumsum_fz and leftover columns.
# Making variables to use in the calculation
df <- df %>%
arrange(fz) %>%
mutate(cumsum_fz = cumsum(fz),
leftover = 450 - cumsum_fz)
# Find the minimum, non-negative value to use for select values that need +1
min_pos <- min(df$leftover[df$leftover > 0])
# Creating a vector that adds 1 using the min_pos value and keeps
# the other values the same
df$new_value <- c((head(sort(df$fz), min_pos) + 1), tail(sort(df$fz), length(df$fz) - min_pos))
# Checking the sum of the new value
> sum(df$new_value)
[1] 450
>
> df
ID_PP z fz cumsum_fz leftover new_value
1 6 21698 67 67 383 68
2 22 21725 70 137 313 71
3 30 8378 88 225 225 89
4 1234456 18979 88 313 137 88
5 3 12325 134 447 3 134
EDIT:
Because utubun already posted a great tidyverse solution, I am going to translate my first one completely to base (it was a bit sloppy to mix the two anyway). Same logic as above, and using the data OP provided.
> # Using base
> df <- df[order(fz),]
>
> leftover <- 450 - cumsum(fz)
> min_pos <- min(leftover[leftover > 0])
> df$new_value <- c((head(sort(df$fz), min_pos) + 1), tail(sort(df$fz), length(df$fz) - min_pos))
>
> sum(df$new_value)
[1] 450
> df
ID_PP z fz new_value
2 6 21698 67 68
3 22 21725 70 71
4 30 8378 88 89
5 1234456 18979 88 88
1 3 12325 134 134
Sorry for the confusing title, but i wasn't sure how to title what i am trying to do. My objective is to create a dataset of 1000 obs each would be the length of the run. I have created a phase1 dataset, from which a set of control limits are produced. What i am trying to do now is create a phase2 dataset most likely using rnorm. what im trying to do is create a repeat loop that will continuously create values in the phase2 dataset until one of those values is outside of the control limits produced from the phase1 dataset. for example if i had 3.0 and -3.0 as control limits the phase2 dataset would create a bunch of observations until obs 398 when the value here happens to be 3.45, thus stopping the creation of data. my objective is then to record the number 398. Furthermore, I am then trying to loop the code back to the phase1 dataset/ control limits portion and create a new set of control limits and then run another phase2, until i have 1000 run lengths recorded. the code i have for the phase1/ control limits works fine and looks like this:
nphase1=50
nphase2=1000
varcount=1
meanshift= 0
sigmashift= 1
##### phase1 dataset/ control limits #####
phase1 <- matrix(rnorm(nphase1*varcount, 0, 1), nrow = nphase1, ncol=varcount)
mean_var <- apply(phase1, 2, mean)
std_var <- apply(phase1, 2, sd)
df_var <- data.frame(mean_var, std_var)
Upper_SPC_Limit_Method1 <- with(df_var, mean_var + 3 * std_var)
Lower_SPC_Limit_Method1 <- with(df_var, mean_var - 3 * std_var)
df_control_limits<- data.frame(Upper_SPC_Limit_Method1, Lower_SPC_Limit_Method1)
I have previously created this code in SAS and it looks like this. might be a better reference for what i am trying to achieve then me trying to explain it.
%macro phase2_dataset (n=,varcount=, meanshift=, sigmashift=, nphase1=,simID=,);
%do z=1 %to &n;
%phase1_dataset (n=&nphase1, varcount=&varcount);
data phase2; set control_limits n=lastobs;
call streaminit(0);
do until (phase2_var1<Lower_SPC_limit_method1_var1 or
phase2_var1>Upper_SPC_limit_method1_var1);
phase2_var1 = rand("normal", &meanshift, &sigmashift);
output;
end;
run;
ods exclude all;
proc means data=phase2;
var phase2_var1;
ods output summary=x;
run;
ods select all;
data run_length; set x;
keep Phase2_var1_n;
run;
proc append base= QA.Phase2_dataset&simID data=Run_length force; run;
%end;
%mend;
Also been doing research about using a while loop in replace of the repeat loop.
Im new to R so Any ideas you are able to throw my way are greatly appreciated. Thanks!
Using a while loop indeed seems to be the way to go. Here's what I think you're looking for:
set.seed(10) #Making results reproducible
replicate(100, { #100 is easier to display here
phase1 <- matrix(rnorm(nphase1*varcount, 0, 1), nrow = nphase1, ncol=varcount)
mean_var <- colMeans(phase1) #Slightly better than apply
std_var <- apply(phase1, 2, sd)
df_var <- data.frame(mean_var, std_var)
Upper_SPC_Limit_Method1 <- with(df_var, mean_var + 3 * std_var)
Lower_SPC_Limit_Method1 <- with(df_var, mean_var - 3 * std_var)
df_control_limits<- data.frame(Upper_SPC_Limit_Method1, Lower_SPC_Limit_Method1)
#Phase 2
x <- 0
count <- 0
while(x > Lower_SPC_Limit_Method1 && x < Upper_SPC_Limit_Method1) {
x <- rnorm(1)
count <- count + 1
}
count
})
The result is:
[1] 225 91 97 118 304 275 550 58 115 6 218 63 176 100 308 844 90 2758
[19] 161 311 1462 717 2446 74 175 91 331 210 118 1517 420 32 39 201 350 89
[37] 64 385 212 4 72 730 151 7 1159 65 36 333 97 306 531 1502 26 18
[55] 67 329 75 532 64 427 39 352 283 483 19 9 2 1018 137 160 223 98
[73] 15 182 98 41 25 1136 405 474 1025 1331 159 70 84 129 233 2 41 66
[91] 1 23 8 325 10 455 363 351 108 3
If performance becomes a problem, perhaps it would be interesting to explore some improvements, like creating more numbers with rnorm() at a time and then counting how many are necessary to exceed the limits and repeat if necessary.
I have a binomail dataset that looks like this:
df <- data.frame(replicate(4,sample(1:200,1000,rep=TRUE)))
addme <- data.frame(replicate(1,sample(0:1,1000,rep=TRUE)))
df <- cbind(df,addme)
df <-df[order(df$replicate.1..sample.0.1..1000..rep...TRUE..),]
The data is currently soreted in a way to show the instances belonging to 0 group then the ones belonging to the 1 group. Is there a way I can sort the data in a 0-1-0-1-0... fashion? I mean to show a row that belongs to the 0 group, the row after belonging to the 1 group then the zero group and so on...
All I can think about is complex functions. I hope there's a simple way around it.
Thank you,
Here's an attempt, which will add any extra 1's at the end:
First make some example data:
set.seed(2)
df <- data.frame(replicate(4,sample(1:200,10,rep=TRUE)),
addme=sample(0:1,10,rep=TRUE))
Then order:
with(df, df[unique(as.vector(rbind(which(addme==0),which(addme==1)))),])
# X1 X2 X3 X4 addme
#2 141 48 78 33 0
#1 37 111 133 3 1
#3 115 153 168 163 0
#5 189 82 70 103 1
#4 34 37 31 174 0
#6 189 171 98 126 1
#8 167 46 72 57 0
#7 26 196 30 169 1
#9 94 89 193 134 1
#10 110 15 27 31 1
#Warning message:
#In rbind(which(addme == 0), which(addme == 1)) :
# number of columns of result is not a multiple of vector length (arg 1)
Here's another way using dplyr, which would make it suitable for within-group ordering. It's also probably pretty quick. If there's unbalanced numbers of 0's and 1's, it will leave them at the end.
library(dplyr)
df %>%
arrange(addme) %>%
mutate(n0 = sum(addme == 0),
orderme = seq_along(addme) - (n0 * addme) + (0.5 * addme)) %>%
arrange(orderme) %>%
select(-n0, -orderme)
I have a data which has two parameters, they are data/time and flow. The flow data is intermittent flow. Lets say at times there is zero flow and suddenly the flow starts and there will be non-zero values for sometime and then the flow will be zero again. I want to understand when the non-zero values occur and how long does each non-zero flow last. I have attached the sample dataset at this location https://www.dropbox.com/s/ef1411dq4gyg0cm/sampledataflow.csv
The data is 1 minute data.
I was able to import the data into R as follows:
flow <- read.csv("sampledataflow.csv")
summary(flow)
names(flow) <- c("Date","discharge")
flow$Date <- strptime(flow$Date, format="%m/%d/%Y %H:%M")
sapply(flow,class)
plot(flow$Date, flow$discharge,type="l")
I made plot to see the distribution but couldn't get a clue where to start to get the frequency of each non zero values. I would like to see a output table as follows:
Date Duration in Minutes
Please let me know if I am not clear here. Thanks.
Additional Info:
I think we need to check the non-zero value first and then find how many non zero values are there continuously before it reaches zero value again. What I want to understand is the flow release durations. For eg. in one day there might be multiple releases and I want to note at what time did the release start and how long did it continue before coming to value zero. I hope this explain the problem little better.
The first point is that you have too many NA in your data. In case you want to look into it.
If I understand correctly, you require the count of continuous 0's followed by continuous non-zeros, zeros, non-zeros etc.. for each date.
This can be achieved with rle of course, as also mentioned by #mnel under comments. But there are quite a few catches.
First, I'll set up the data with non-NA entries:
flow <- read.csv("~/Downloads/sampledataflow.csv")
names(flow) <- c("Date","discharge")
flow <- flow[1:33119, ] # remove NA entries
# format Date to POSIXct to play nice with data.table
flow$Date <- as.POSIXct(flow$Date, format="%m/%d/%Y %H:%M")
Next, I'll create a Date column:
flow$g1 <- as.Date(flow$Date)
Finally, I prefer using data.table. So here's a solution using it.
# load package, get data as data.table and set key
require(data.table)
flow.dt <- data.table(flow)
# set key to both "Date" and "g1" (even though, just we'll use just g1)
# to make sure that the order of rows are not changed (during sort)
setkey(flow.dt, "Date", "g1")
# group by g1 and set data to TRUE/FALSE by equating to 0 and get rle lengths
out <- flow.dt[, list(duration = rle(discharge == 0)$lengths,
val = rle(discharge == 0)$values + 1), by=g1][val == 2, val := 0]
> out # just to show a few first and last entries
# g1 duration val
# 1: 2010-05-31 120 0
# 2: 2010-06-01 722 0
# 3: 2010-06-01 138 1
# 4: 2010-06-01 32 0
# 5: 2010-06-01 79 1
# ---
# 98: 2010-06-22 291 1
# 99: 2010-06-22 423 0
# 100: 2010-06-23 664 0
# 101: 2010-06-23 278 1
# 102: 2010-06-23 379 0
So, for example, for 2010-06-01, there are 722 0's followed by 138 non-zeros, followed by 32 0's followed by 79 non-zeros and so on...
I looked a a small sample of the first two days
> do.call( cbind, tapply(flow$discharge, as.Date(flow$Date), function(x) table(x > 0) ) )
2010-06-01 2010-06-02
FALSE 1223 911
TRUE 217 529 # these are the cumulative daily durations of positive flow.
You may want this transposed in which case the t() function should succeed. Or you could use rbind.
If you jsut wante the number of flow-postive minutes, this would also work:
tapply(flow$discharge, as.Date(flow$Date), function(x) sum(x > 0, na.rm=TRUE) )
#--------
2010-06-01 2010-06-02 2010-06-03 2010-06-04 2010-06-05 2010-06-06 2010-06-07 2010-06-08
217 529 417 463 0 0 263 220
2010-06-09 2010-06-10 2010-06-11 2010-06-12 2010-06-13 2010-06-14 2010-06-15 2010-06-16
244 219 287 234 31 245 311 324
2010-06-17 2010-06-18 2010-06-19 2010-06-20 2010-06-21 2010-06-22 2010-06-23 2010-06-24
299 305 124 129 295 296 278 0
To get the lengths of intervals with discharge values greater than zero:
tapply(flow$discharge, as.Date(flow$Date), function(x) rle(x>0)$lengths[rle(x>0)$values] )
#--------
$`2010-06-01`
[1] 138 79
$`2010-06-02`
[1] 95 195 239
$`2010-06-03`
[1] 57 360
$`2010-06-04`
[1] 6 457
$`2010-06-05`
integer(0)
$`2010-06-06`
integer(0)
... Snipped output
If you want to look at the distribution of these durations you will need to unlist that result. (And remember that the durations which were split at midnight may have influenced the counts and durations.) If you just wanted durations without dates, then use this:
flowrle <- rle(flow$discharge>0)
flowrle$lengths[!is.na(flowrle$values) & flowrle$values]
#----------
[1] 138 79 95 195 296 360 6 457 263 17 203 79 80 85 30 189 17 270 127 107 31 1
[23] 2 1 241 311 229 13 82 299 305 3 121 129 295 3 2 291 278