I'm trying to set up a git repository for my bespoke WordPress theme builds, using gulp to compile the code but im struggling to understand how to manage the repo.
The outcome I'm after:
Use a separate repo to pull in my gulp workflow. (Could be housed as a submodule)
Offer developers full access to my gulp workflow, src and build.
Push the build folder to remote servers such as production and staging.
Current Scenario
My gulp workflow will be held in a separate repo as it will be used amongst several different builds.
The current workflow I can think of would look like this:
gulp-wp-build -> git repo
src -> git repo
build -> WordPress ready theme not held in a repo
Ideally though I'd like to be able to push my code to the production and staging servers through git and I understand that to do this I'd need to do include the build folder inside of my repo. But would including both my src folder and build folder within the repo be overkill?
I like the idea of containing everything inside of one repo so other developers can work on the theme later down the line using either their gulp workflow or the one I used for the build.
But really in terms of pushing changes through git I'd only want the build to be pushed live so could I separate this build folder from the repo when pushed to a certain remote?
Use a .gitignore file to do that.
create a .gitignore file and inside put the path or the files that will be ignored by git.
relative/Path/to/your/autogenerated/files/*
after you finish, commit and push your file to your remote repository
check this link
Related
I created a generic repo in Artifactory which I want to deploy my artifacts to.
I'm trying to setup a simple-layout folder structure such as:
I can get this structure only if i'll deploy couple of sub folders.
When deploying I get in Artifactory this structure:
Which is anyoing because I set properties on the build_definition_name level
which I want to read and write to but they are not visible as it now points to
the version folder.
Any suggestion?
Artifactory by default compresses empty folders in the UI.
You can disable it easily by unchecking the following:
I am developing a wordpress theme. I am new to using Grunt and composer for packages.
I have also integrated git flows. At the moment I am developing on develop branch and then merge to master once I am satisfied with the code.
The problem I am facing is that my master branch has Gruntfile.js as well as package.json in it. Similarly there are sass files in css folders. I want a clean release branch, in which there are only required theme files and no gruntjs, pacakge.json and sass files.
These all files are being tracked in master, how can I create a clean release branch.
I have followed the Woocommerce repository for making my development environment.
I could not find a build process in it also. Am I missing any proper step?
P.S : I don't know if I should be sharing any code samples here, but if you want anything I can share it here.
As far as I'm aware you can't do what you're trying to do and I don't believe git is meant to work that way. Having your grunt & SASS files in the master branch is the correct way of doing this, those files are also in the Woocommerce repository you've linked to.
I'm guessing what you're trying to do is create a release of a theme that doesn't have any of the 'development only files', for lack of a better term, to give to the the end user installing the theme? If so that release would be a separate 'thing' to git as git is mainly for developer version control. What I think you're after is just creating a stand-alone downloadable zip file by the sounds of things?
For example if you were to submit your theme to WordPrss.org they take it as a zip file rather than a link to a git repository.
Closed. This question is opinion-based. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it can be answered with facts and citations by editing this post.
Closed 7 years ago.
Improve this question
I'm currently working with Git, Git Flow, Gulp and Bower. I'm working on the develop branch and create releases with Git Flow to the master branch. So develop is equal to my local and test environment, release/version to the acceptance environment and the master branch is equal to the production environment. See: http://nvie.com/files/Git-branching-model.pdf. On every environment runs Git, so deploying is nothing more than: git pull origin master.
I've got some dependencies like Bootstrap and Font Awesome handled with Bower and I'm using Gulp to watch .less files for "compiling" to css, minifying css/js, etc.
Now toward to the questions: what should be in my Git repository? Let's say I'm working on a Magento project, it would be overkill to put Magento and all dependencies from Bower in the repository. Currently I'm excluding only the node_modules (for Gulp) and bower_components (contains dependencies) directories, when I run Gulp the .less files from Bootstrap will be "merged" and "compiled" with my project related .less files. The "compiled" .css file is currently included in my repository, else it's not possible to do a deploy with just git pull. To get it working without having the "compiled" version in Git I've to run Gulp on the production server.
What is the best method for not having my platform (Magento or Wordpress) in my Git repository, but keep the possibility to easily update? I came across this solution: http://blog.g-design.net/post/60019471157/managing-and-deploying-wordpress-with-git where they're using Git Submodules. Nice solution, but this way the platform needs to be in a sub directory. Not ideal because I've to "hack" to get it working that way (copy the index.php and change the include paths, etc).
What about plugins/modules? 3th party plugins shouldn't be in my repository too? Only the plugins I've created by myself. But not all 3th party plugins does have a Git repository to use with for example Git Submodules. For Wordpress it's just one directory, so in theory it's possible but for Magento the most plugins aren't just one directory (they have files in the app/code, app/design, skin, etc directories). I've a lot of Wordpress and Magento sites with multiple matching plugins/modules now every plugin/module is in each sites repository.
Should "compiled" files be in a repository? If you ask me: no, but I'm currently doing it so it's easy deploying. Is it general to have Bower and run Gulp on a production server for dependencies and to "compile" on the production server right after a git pull? Continues running a Gulp watcher (like I do locally) on production takes some extra unnecessary resources?
I hope someone can put me in the right direction.
It's difficult to provide a universal answer that works for Magento, WordPress, and other platforms. My answer primarily targets Magento, but I'm sure that similar concepts could be applied to WordPress and other platforms.
It's possible to automatically install Magento as a dependency using Composer with magento-composer-installer. You can either use a public mirror, like this one, or set up your own repository. Once you've installed Magento itself as a dependency, it should be very straight forward to update it, just like any other dependency.
You can use Composer for modules as well (after all, Magento itself is just a bunch of modules and a few scripts to glue everything together). FireGento has a lot of common Magento modules which can be used with Composer out of the box. You can also set up your own repositories to use with Composer (we do this for internal modules that we use for multiple sites).
As for modules that don't have their own repositories, well, you have three options: don't use them (the less modules, the better), create your own repositories for them, or just commit them along with the rest of your codebase.
In an ideal world, your repository should only consist of your own source files. Everything else - whether it's compiled, installed through a dependency manager, or otherwise somehow automatically created - should not be in the repository.
But we don't live in an ideal world - it's painful to run Composer, Bower, Git, Gulp, Sass, and everything else that you're using on each and every environment that you want to deploy to (development machines, testing server(s), staging server(s), production server(s), and so on).
And what if those dependencies have dependencies? What if you're using a Gulp plugin that works well on one of your servers, but fails on another one? What if someone makes a deployment and forgets to run some of the required builds via Gulp? Of course, the answer to these questions is testing and automation. You should be able to click a button (or type a command, for the purists) and have everything automatically deploy - a git pull is issued, the appropriate gulp commands are run, and so on. But unless you have the manpower and manhours to set up such a sophisticated system, it's not worth it.
Overall, we use a combination of the different points above. In the end, we end up committing (almost) everything to the repository - resulting in deployments as simple as git pull or svn up. Of course, configuration files (credentials, .htaccess files, and so on) don't go in the repository, and neither do fingerprinted files (which we manually upload).
Fabrizio Branca has an excellent blog post here which goes through many of the described points in order to clean up and upgrade a Magento setup.
What's the proper way to handle having multiple developers on a Meteor application? On each computer that I want to develop the app on I have to follow these steps to get it running after cloning from the repo:
Rename my-app/ to app/
Run meteor create my-app
Move all files from app/ into my-app/
Delete the auto generated my-app.*files
Re-add all packages (jquery, iron:router, etc...)
Note that I'm not including the .meteor/local directory in the repository.
I feel like I'm missing something obvious but it's not making itself apparent.
Push to the repo all files at the same level as the .meteor directory. Nothing to rename or meteor create. Yes, packages do need to be added, but the list of packages is specified in a file inside .meteor.
Just include the full .meteor/ directory in your repository. That way whenever the repo is cloned they will get the right version of meteor, a list of all the installed packages (which are downloaded at runtime) and any settings they need to run the app.
As far as I'm aware there is nothing in the .meteor/ directory that can't be shared across to different developers.
My team has is working on a git repository which contains a fully deployable Wordpress app. This was configured in this way so that it could be deployed to a AWS stack quite easily. The repository contains a caching plugin which creates two folders in the wp-content/ folder named
cache/
w3tc-config/
When devs are checking out this application they are removing the caching features for development and thus the plugin is writing these changes to the two directories it uses. Which then encourages .git to stage them for a commit.
Is there anyway we can ignore these folders on dev machines but not remove them from the repo? Also i'd be interested in hearing other solutions which might help me get round this problem even if it is a larger change.
If you check out your repository and let master follow that, then you can create a devel branch where you just add cache w3tc-config to .gitignore.
I do something similar at work where I use git-svn to work with a svn repository which "links" in another svn repository for a sub module. Git clone did not fetch that sub module, so I just copied in the content from a svn checkout, checked into a devel branch (leaving master following the svn trunk branch), and added the sub module directory to .gitignore.
This is a solution that will require specific action from each developer, and not something you can push out from the repository. But similar to git hooks, if you create a tools/do_it.sh script that does the required actions it is possible to lower the bar considerably.
You cannot have it both ways. Either the files are tracked or they are not. You cannot keep files in the repository but avoid tracking changes to them. Once they are tracked, it is up to you to not git add them. (And it is worth noting that git does not track folders ever.)
Create an archive called UnzipMeRightAfterCloning.zip that contains all the stuff you want ignored. Anyone cloning the repo needs to extract that archive, and it will add all the files/folders blocked by your .gitignore settings. (And given your current setup, you will have to untrack the files in those folders first.)
Put these in your .gitignore file. (Do not put in asterisk.)
cache/
w3tc-config/
Yes, create a local .gitignore file in the project directory.
in the file paste the following
cache/*
w3tc-config/*
Now, these files will be excluded from git, but they won't be removed from the repository.