I understand the problem, as described and answered here.
I have quite a complicated layout with a sidebar navigation, a top navigation, a fluid-container and then page-title and page-body structure for each page. So just adding another container did not solve the problem as suggested in that answer.
Once I get into the page-body, all the rows are stretching 'outside' the parent page-body.
Notice I have added padding to the default container-fluid to 'pull' all the content in from each side of the page. Removing them does not fix it.
I've tried every change I can think of except removing the padding from the default row, because I'm pretty sure that is a no-no.
Anyone have any idea how to get those pesky form controls to stay 'inside' the page body?
There is two solution either give an additional class to row and manipulate its layout or don't use row use <div class="col-md-*" /> without parent .row class div as many times u want and use <div class="clearfix"> if you want to break forcefully to next row
EDIT:-
For example
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-4">div1</div>
<div class="col-md-4">div2</div>
<div class="col-md-4">div3</div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="col-md-4">div4</div>
<div class="col-md-4">div5</div>
<div class="col-md-4">div6</div>
</div>
The same can be achieved without .row class
<div class="col-md-4">div1</div>
<div class="col-md-4">div2</div>
<div class="col-md-4">div3</div>
<div class="clearfix">div4</div>
<div class="col-md-4">div5</div>
<div class="col-md-4">div6</div>
<div class="col-md-4">div1</div>
So I've done a lot of research before asking this question. I already know how to use the if/else and conditional tags to make certain code applicable to only certain pages, BUT, I noticed that there isn't a single guide or question-answer out there addressing my question on only styling the first/most recent post in my blogger.
The closest I got to finding the solution (other than codes that I didn't have the skill to implement), was this one: http://helplogger.blogspot.ro/2014/01/create-magazine-style-layout-for-blogger-posts.html
Sample site from that tutorial: http://helploggertestblog.blogspot.com/
The problem with the above script is that was made to be too automated, and I don't need a post-summary or thumbnail for my other posts-- I'm only trying to change the look for the first post. I love that the first post's width was increased, bordered, color-changed, and what not.
Does anyone have any ideas on how I might isolate what I'm looking for, point me towards the right direction, or even hand me a general container so that I can get on with my life?
Without seeing any of your code it's kinda guessing, but I'll give it a try anyway.
I'm guessing that you have the posts in a div or other parent element. Something like this:
<div class="container">
<div>
<h3>Title</h3>
<p>Content of the post ... </p>
</div>
<div>
<h3>Title</h3>
<p>Content of the post ... </p>
</div>
<div>
<h3>Title</h3>
<p>Content of the post ... </p>
</div>
</div>
To style only the first div inside the container, you can use:
.container > div:nth-first-child {
/* your specific style here */
}
With your code, it would be easier to help...
EDIT
Use:
.blog-posts > .post-outer:first-child {
background: green;
}
There is a conditional tag available for 1st post
<b:if cond='data:post.isFirstPost'>
Your custom css only for the 1st post here
</b:if>
I have a page with two html files. I have exactly the same code for the footer in them. They use exactly the same CSS file but they look different and I still cannot find out why :
The code is here for the footer :
<div class="container_12">
<div class="grid_12"><footer>
<div class="socials">
facebook |
twitter |
google+
</div>
<div class="copy">COSMOSET © 2013 | Privacy Policy <!--{%FOOTER_LINK} -->
</div></footer>
</div>
</div>
Also if you visit the page here: HERE you can see the text-box-areas do not have the same transparent white background. I assume this one is a server issue (plesk). Because when i open the file on my PC (saved on my PC) it looks perfect.
If you go to the second link from the left (of your navigator) you can see that you have the following DOM structure:
The problem is that, on the page your provided in your post, the footer is a sibling of the <header>, <div class="clear"> and <div class="bg1"> elements, as you can see it in the following screenshot:
Your problem will get solved if you move the "container_12" to be a sibling of the elements I mentioned above.
LATER EDIT:
To answer your second question, for the #form textarea CSS selector you've added an extra . after the png extenstion:
I think my last question was misunderstood. I have pasted below, the HTML of the page I am having troubles with, but you can see it here: http://jsfiddle.net/wCZYU/6/
Basically I would like a fixed header (pageHeader) and a colored div that fills the browser window, NOT the entire page background. I then would like a div under this that the user will be required to scroll to see
<header class="pageHeader">
<div class="setWidth">
<div class="navMain">
Home
Work
Blog
Contact
</div>
</div>
</header>
<div class="secFill">i want to be below the navigation</div>
<div class="content">i want to be below secFill</div>
This is the image that I posted earlier that I want it to look like
http://i.stack.imgur.com/jZgMb.png
The navigation must be fixed and compatible in ie7/8.
Thanks alot (again)
If I'm understanding correctly, you just need to define .secFill as height:100%.
.secFill {
height:100%;
background-color:red;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/wCZYU/7/
I read about semantic HTML online...
Semantic HTML means using HTML tags for their implied meaning, rather than just using (meaningless) div and span tags for absolutely everything.
If you use <h1> instead of <div class="header">, and <h2> instead of , et cetera, Google and other search engines will interpret your headers as being important titles in your page. This way, when people search on the words in your headers and sub-headers, your page will be considered more relevant (and rank higher). Plus, it's much shorter and cleaner.
So, below is semantic,
<h1>My Website Name</h1>
<h2>My Website Tagline </h2>
What about this below?
<div id="header">
<h1><span class="hide">My Website Name</span></h1>
<h2><span class="hide">My Website Tagline</span></h2>
</div>
I tend to combine h tags with div and span tags like above - is this practised considered as the lack of semantic?
The reason why I have the span with the hide class is that I want to display the site logo instead of text. So use CSS to set the background of h1 as image and then hide the text. is this incorrect practise?
Then, if I don't use div, what can I use to make a box around the h1 and h2?
As far as I know, html 5 is not fully ready yet, we must not use <header> yet, must we??
Thanks.
I would do something like the following if I was going to use HTML5:
<header>
<hgroup>
<h1>My Website Name</h1>
<h2>My Website Tagline</h2>
</hgroup>
</header>
Remember to add display: block; to the HTML5 elements and createElement for IE in the CSS though. The header element shows the block is a header and the hgroup element is there to show that the second h* element is a sub heading, so shouldn't be taken into account when calculating the header levels in the document.
If you don't want to use HTML5 yet then you could use divs instead of the new elements, and use the HTML5 element names as the class value. This will make it easier to switch over when you feel comfortable using HMTL5 on a live site.
You don't really need to use the span elements. You can use tricks such as using a large negative text-indent in the CSS to hide the text off the screen.
If you want to display a logo instead of text, use an image. Google say so (even if they don't know the difference between a tag and an attribute). Taglines, BTW, are not subheadings (and the site name (and thus logo) is usually only a heading on the homepage).
<div id="header">
<h1><img src="foo.png" alt="My Website Name"></h1>
<p><img src="foo.png" alt="My Website Tagline"></p>
</div>
Unfortunately, Internet Explorer 8 does not recognize many HTML5 tags, and when I've tested it, I was unable to set CSS values for the <header> tag, for example. So for now I would recommend that you continue to use div tags to group your semantic meaning.
As a sidenote, Google does not like hidden text, and if you have a lot of it, it will consider it deceptive coding. One is probably fine, but you'd be better off using the alt attribute on the image tag.
Nobody suggested that you should not use DIVs at all... semantic HTML does not mean there cannot be div or span tags in your code. It just only means that whenever possible (there is a specific tag available for a specific semantic meaning) you should try to give semantic meaning.
h2 is not to be used for taglines, as somebody else already suggested.
Also, in my interpretation (some will argue), h1 is not for the name of your website. It is the title for the content on a specific page.
I agree with #David Dorward, the tag line should be in a p tag.
Your example (wrapping the header elements with a div) is perfectly acceptable, though I would like to raise a small caution: Be careful that you do not get in the habit of wrapping everything in div tags. For example:
<div class="content">
<div class="list">
<ul>
<li>something</li>
<li>something</li>
<li>something</li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
Since a ul tag is already a block element, the above markup would be better off like this:
<div class="content">
<ul class="list">
<li>something</li>
<li>something</li>
<li>something</li>
</ul>
</div>
And then just style the ul to look like the div.
On the matter of displaying the logo as an image:
If your logo is text-based, or has text in it, you would be better off doing the following:
HTML
<div id="header">
<h1 class="logo">My Logo Text - My Website Tagline</h1>
</div>
CSS
.logo { text-indent:-9999px;background-image:url(thelogo.jpg) no-repeat;}
/* Also add height and width based on your logo height and width */