I am working on a fresh .netcore api project. I am trying to deploy the application using octopus.
I need help on executing the migrations from command line and I am not getting a lot of help. If some one can help me it will really help.
Here is what I have tried so far:
I have taken help of the following link to come up with a solution but it does not really work for me.
https://www.benday.com/2017/03/17/deploy-entity-framework-core-migrations-from-a-dll/
I had to make few modifications to the script in order to set the dll paths right.
Here is how it is looking now
set EfMigrationsNamespace=%Dummy.WebAPI
set EfMigrationsDllName=%Dummy.WebAPI.deps.dll
set EfMigrationsDllDepsJson=%Dummy.WebAPI.deps.json
set EfMigrationsStartupAssembly=%Dummy.Data.dll
set DllDir=%cd%
set PathToNuGetPackages=%USERPROFILE%\.nuget\packages
set PathToEfDll=%PathToNuGetPackages%\microsoft.entityframeworkcore.tools\1.1.1\tools\netcoreapp1.0\ef.dll
ECHO %PathToEfDll%
dotnet exec --depsfile .\%EfMigrationsDllDepsJson% --additionalprobingpath %PathToNuGetPackages% %PathToEfDll% database update --assembly .\%EfMigrationsDllName% --startup-assembly .\%EfMigrationsStartupAssembly% --project-dir . --content-root %DllDir% --data-dir %DllDir% --verbose --root-namespace %EfMigrationsNamespace%
However the script throws index oput of bound error which is very confusing to me. Here is the exception.
System.IndexOutOfRangeException: Index was outside the bounds of the array.
at Microsoft.DotNet.Cli.CommandLine.CommandLineApplication.ParseOption(Boolean isLongOption, CommandLineApplication c
ommand, String[] args, Int32& index, CommandOption& option)
at Microsoft.DotNet.Cli.CommandLine.CommandLineApplication.Execute(String[] args)
at Microsoft.EntityFrameworkCore.Tools.Program.Main(String[] args)
Index was outside the bounds of the array.
Any clue to this error? Or if I should take any other approach?
It seems that the dotnet exec command is not build correctly, seeing as it has problems parsing your commands.
I'm using dotnet core 2-preview and had to change the batch file slightly. I now works for me:
set EfMigrationsNamespace=%1
set EfMigrationsDllName=%1.dll
set EfMigrationsDllDepsJson=%1.deps.json
set DllDir=%cd%
set PathToNuGetPackages=%USERPROFILE%\.nuget\packages
set PathToEfDll=%PathToNuGetPackages%\microsoft.entityframeworkcore.tools\2.0.0-preview2-final\tools\netcoreapp2.0\ef.dll
dotnet exec --depsfile .\%EfMigrationsDllDepsJson% --additionalprobingpath %PathToNuGetPackages% %PathToEfDll% database update --assembly .\%EfMigrationsDllName% --startup-assembly .\%EfMigrationsDllName% --project-dir . --data-dir %DllDir% --verbose --root-namespace %EfMigrationsNamespace%
Related
I am getting error on debug session start on my dot net core API project; since I updated visual studio to latest version 17.1.1. Following is the exception detail, it is showing on console. I tried by deleting temp, bin, obj folders but nothing worked. Has somebody faced such an issue or know how to fix?
Unhandled exception. System.ObjectDisposedException: Cannot access a disposed object.
Object name: 'ConfigurationManager'.
at Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.ReferenceCountedProviderManager.AddProvider(IConfigurationProvider provider)
at Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.AddSource(IConfigurationSource source)
at Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.ConfigurationManager.Microsoft.Extensions.Configuration.IConfigurationBuilder.Add(IConfigurationSource source)
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder.WebApplicationBuilder.<>c__DisplayClass25_0.b__2(HostBuilderContext context, IServiceCollection services)
at Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.HostBuilder.CreateServiceProvider()
at Microsoft.Extensions.Hosting.HostBuilder.Build()
at Microsoft.AspNetCore.Builder.WebApplicationBuilder.Build()
at Program.$(String[] args) in Program.cs:line 40
It is because you use the old way of getting the settings from the configuration manager, like:
using (var serviceProvider = services.BuildServiceProvider())
{
...
}
If you remove these lines and just use the configuration as-is with
options = configuration.GetOptions<Object>("xxx");
it will work
we also had this issue since march 8.
is was introduced with the release of 6.0.3, see a github post about the issue : https://github.com/dotnet/aspnetcore/issues/40614
for now what we did is revert to the 6.0.2 version (this is a temporary work around, i will hope to figure out what was wrong asap)
for docker images:
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/aspnet:6.0.2 AS base
WORKDIR /app
EXPOSE 80
EXPOSE 443
FROM mcr.microsoft.com/dotnet/sdk:6.0.200 AS build
WORKDIR /src
if you are using it in yml also probably
use dotnetversion
DotNetVersion: "6.0.200" instead of "6.0.x"
6.0.200 is the sdk version of 6.0.2 framework https://dotnet.microsoft.com/en-us/download/dotnet/6.0
11/03/2022
see also this https://github.com/dotnet/core/issues/7259 were i have pinpointed the issue in our code and added a sample app to reproduce
if we look into that repo https://github.com/microsoft/ApplicationInsights-Kubernetes/blob/69f44c6ec3fda26d76a01836b851402e3f8a02ad/src/ApplicationInsights.Kubernetes/Extensions/ApplicationInsightsExtensions.cs
we indeed find the same piece of code on the other answers
i faced to this problem when i update my SDK both in docker and my window 11
my sdk is : 6.0.3
but i cant understand why this problem is happend
We are trying to update the schema of an Sqlite database during continuous integration. Here is a simplified version of our scenario.
The deployment script publishes the project.
cd App
App> dotnet publish <args>
That creates the following directory structure.
artifacts/
App.dll
Database.sqlite
The-rest-of-the-publish-output
web.config
App/
Migrations/
Program.cs
project.json
Startup.cs
The deployment script then runts the migrations.
App> dotnet ef
--assembly ..\artifacts\App.dll
--startup-assembly ..\artifacts\App.dll
database update
The issue is that we receive the following message:
Unexpected value '..\artifacts\App.dll' for option 'assembly'
We have also tried other ways to run dotnet ef database update on the compiled project but have not been able to determine how to update the database in the artifacts directory.
In our current scenario, we do it like this on Startup.cs:
if (migrateDb)
{
try
{
using (var serviceScope = app.ApplicationServices.GetService<IServiceScopeFactory>()
.CreateScope())
{
serviceScope.ServiceProvider.GetService<ApplicationDbContext>()
.Database.Migrate();
}
}
catch { }
}
while on development migrateDb resolves to false so we can add/remove and apply migrations as desired. On production that will resolve to true for convenience.
There may be well more valid/appropiate options, usually depends on the context and/or project needs. This is just one way of many.
I have changed my project to use net451 instead of dnx451, since dnx is going out.
To publish the project now, you have to use the command
dotnet publish
When i run this command i get an error saying
An item with the same key has already been added: Key:
Microsoft.DotNet.ProjectModel.ProjectContextBuilder+LibraryKey
Does anyone know how to sort this?
I'm trying to deploy an ASP.NET web application to Azure. It's hybrid Web Forms, MVC, and WebAPI, and there are a TON of aspx/ascx files, such that they really need to be precompiled or every deploy will render the site sluggish for awhile.
I am trying to deploy via SCM integration with GitHub via kudu, with precompiled views, all merged to a single assembly.
Note that:
Deploy works fine with precompilation disabled.
Deploy works fine from Visual Studio
Build works fine if I copy the msbuild command from the Azure log, replace the relevant paths, and run it locally on my Windows 8.1 machine.
I've set up the Advanced Precompile settings as:
Don't allow precompiled site to be udpatable
Don't emit debug information
Merge all pages and control outputs to a single assembly = AppViews.dll
Here's the .deployment file for Azure
[config]
project = WebSite/WebSite.csproj
SCM_BUILD_ARGS=/p:Configuration=Release;PublishProfile=azure-prod /v:n
You notice I'm sending the verbosity /v to "normal" for extra diagnostic information.
Here is info I get toward the tail of the deployment log:
AspNetPreCompile:
D:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\aspnet_compiler.exe -v \ -p D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\obj\Release\AspnetCompileMerge\Source -c D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\obj\Release\AspnetCompileMerge\TempBuildDir
GenerateAssemblyInfoFromExistingAssembleInfo:
Creating directory "obj\Release\AssemblyInfo".
D:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319\Csc.exe /out:obj\Release\AssemblyInfo\AssemblyInfo.dll /target:library Properties\AssemblyInfo.cs
AspNetMerge:
Running aspnet_merge.exe.
D:\Program Files (x86)\Microsoft SDKs\Windows\v8.0A\bin\NETFX 4.0 Tools\aspnet_merge.exe D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\obj\Release\AspnetCompileMerge\TempBuildDir -w AppViews.dll -copyattrs obj\Release\AssemblyInfo\AssemblyInfo.dll -a
aspnet_merge : error 1003: The directory 'D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\obj\Release\AspnetCompileMerge\TempBuildDir' does not exist. [D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\WebSite.csproj]
Done Building Project "D:\home\site\repository\WebSite\WebSite.csproj" (Build;pipelinePreDeployCopyAllFilesToOneFolder target(s)) -- FAILED.
Build FAILED.
It looks like aspnet_compiler.exe runs, but doesn't do what it's supposed to, which is why the TempBuildDir directory (supposed to be the output of the compiler) does not exist in time for the AspNetMerge target. Contrast that with my system, where that directory DOES in fact exist, containing the marker aspx/ascx/etc. files, static content, a PrecompiledApp.config file, and a whole mess of stuff in the bin directory.
aspnet_compiler.exe has an -errorstack flag but it's not clear to me how I could get MSBuild to add this just via the .deployment file, or even if that app is really even throwing an error.
I could just deploy via Visual Studio, but I would really like to take advantage of the SCM integration so I can just push to my prod branch and let it go. Any suggestions?
I replied on https://github.com/projectkudu/kudu/issues/1341, but copying my answer here in case someone lands here...
Way back, we had found that aspnet_compiler.exe was not working within Azure Websites due to how it dealt with the profile folder. We made a change at the time that's a bit of a hack but got us going: we turned it into a no-op, by pointing HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\SOFTWARE\Microsoft\Windows NT\CurrentVersion\Image File Execution Options\aspnet_compiler.exe to our own dummy exe (D:\Program Files (x86)\aspnet_compiler\KuduAspNetCompiler.exe).
But trying it now, it appears to work correctly today, likely thanks to improvements in the Azure Websites hosting environment. So we will try getting rid of this hack and doing a full test pass to make sure it doesn't cause any major regressions. If all goes well, we can get that into production, which should enable those scenarios.
In the short term, you may be able to work around this by having your build script:
copy aspnet_compiler.exe from D:\Windows\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v4.0.30319 into your own site files, but under a different name (e.g. aspnet_compiler2.exe)
convince msbuild to use that one
Note: This GitHub issue on projectkudu will eventually make this solution obsolete, but for the meantime, that issue is filed as Backlog, and this works right now.
Thank you thank you David Ebbo. With this information, I was able to bootstrap my build to work for the short term.
First, I downloaded the aspnet_compiler.exe from the Azure instance using the Diagnostic Console available at https://{WEBSITE_NAME}.scm.azurewebsites.net/DebugConsole and added that to my own repository. This way there's no question about any difference between 32/64-bit, etc. I renamed it to azure_aspnet_compiler.exe in my repository.
Second, the AspNetCompiler task doesn't give you the option to change the tool name. It's hardcoded, but as a virtual property so it's overrideable. So I had to create my own task class, and package it in its own assembly, which I built in Release mode and also included in my repository.
public class AzureAspNetCompiler : Microsoft.Build.Tasks.AspNetCompiler
{
private string _toolName = "aspnet_compiler.exe";
protected override string ToolName
{
get { return _toolName; }
}
public string CustomToolName // Because ToolName cannot have a setter
{
get { return _toolName; }
set { _toolName = value; }
}
}
Next I needed to replace the AspNetPreCompile task in MSBuild, but I couldn't figure out how to do that directly. But that task wasn't doing anything anyway, so why not just run right after it?
I added this to the top of my Website.csproj file to import the DLL containing the AzureAspNetCompiler class. Note that the path is relative to the Website.csproj file I'm editing.
<UsingTask TaskName="AzureBuildTargets.AzureAspNetCompiler"
AssemblyFile="..\DeploymentTools\AzureBuildTargets.dll" />
Then I added this right below it, which is basically stealing the MSBuild target definition of AspNetPreCompile from C:\Program Files (x86)\MSBuild\Microsoft\VisualStudio\v11.0\Web\Transform\Microsoft.Web.Publishing.AspNetCompileMerge.targets, with some of the property setting stuff near the top of it left out (because the original task will do that for us anyway.) Just take note of the ToolPath and CustomToolName values at the bottom of the (renamed) AzureAspNetCompiler element.
<PropertyGroup>
<!--Relative to solution root apparently-->
<LocalRepoDeploymentTools>.\DeploymentTools</LocalRepoDeploymentTools>
<AzureAspnetCompilerPath>$([System.IO.Path]::GetFullPath($(LocalRepoDeploymentTools)))</AzureAspnetCompilerPath>
</PropertyGroup>
<Target Name="NoReallyAspNetPreCompile" AfterTargets="AspNetPreCompile">
<AzureAspNetCompiler
PhysicalPath="$(_PreAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)"
TargetPath="$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)"
VirtualPath="$(_AspNetCompilerVirtualPath)"
Force="$(_AspNetCompilerForce)"
Debug="$(DebugSymbols)"
Updateable="$(EnableUpdateable)"
KeyFile="$(_AspNetCompileMergeKeyFile)"
KeyContainer="$(_AspNetCompileMergeKeyContainer)"
DelaySign="$(DelaySign)"
AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers="$(AllowPartiallyTrustedCallers)"
FixedNames="$(_AspNetCompilerFixedNames)"
Clean="$(Clean)"
MetabasePath="$(_AspNetCompilerMetabasePath)"
ToolPath="$(AzureAspnetCompilerPath)"
CustomToolName="azure_aspnet_compiler.exe"
/>
<!--
Removing APP_DATA is done here so that the output groups reflect the fact that App_data is
not present
-->
<RemoveDir Condition="'$(DeleteAppDataFolder)' == 'true' And Exists('$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)\App_Data')"
Directories="$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)\App_Data" />
<CollectFilesinFolder Condition="'$(UseMerge)' != 'true'"
RootPath="$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)" >
<Output TaskParameter="Result" ItemName="_AspnetCompileMergePrecompiledOutputNoMetadata" />
</CollectFilesinFolder>
<ItemGroup Condition="'$(UseMerge)' != 'true'">
<FileWrites Include="$(_PostAspnetCompileMergeSingleTargetFolderFullPath)\**"/>
</ItemGroup>
With this in place, everything works as I would expect it to.
I am trying to create an OpenShift application using the --from-code option to grab the application code from GitHub. I've created two different OpenShift QuickStarts -- with one, the --from-code option works, and with the other, it doesn't work.
So clearly I'm doing something wrong in the QuickStart that isn't working. But I can't see what I'm doing wrong. I either get error 504 or an error occurred, neither of which tells me what the problem is, and there doesn't seem to be a verbose flag to get more details on the error.
Tests-Mac:~ testuser$ rhc app create sonr diy-0.1 http://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=smarterclayton/openshift-redis-cart --from-code https://github.com/citrusbyte/SONR.git
The cartridge 'http://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=smarterclayton/openshift-redis-cart' will be downloaded and installed
Application Options
-------------------
Domain: schof
Cartridges: diy-0.1, http://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=smarterclayton/openshift-redis-cart
Source Code: https://github.com/citrusbyte/SONR.git
Gear Size: default
Scaling: no
Creating application 'sonr' ... Server returned an unexpected error code: 504
Tests-Mac:~ testuser$ rhc app create sonr diy-0.1 http://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=smarterclayton/openshift-redis-cart --from-code https://github.com/citrusbyte/SONR.git
The cartridge 'http://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=smarterclayton/openshift-redis-cart' will be downloaded and installed
Application Options
-------------------
Domain: schof
Cartridges: diy-0.1, http://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=smarterclayton/openshift-redis-cart
Source Code: https://github.com/citrusbyte/SONR.git
Gear Size: default
Scaling: no
Creating application 'sonr' ...
An error occurred while communicating with the server. This problem may only be temporary. Check that you have correctly specified your
OpenShift server 'https://openshift.redhat.com/broker/rest/domain/schof/applications'.
Tests-Mac:~ testuser$
That's creating an application with --from-code using this repo: https://github.com/citrusbyte/SONR . If I use this repo it works flawlessly: https://github.com/citrusbyte/openshift-sinatra-redis
The code itself seems to be good, as I can create an empty new application, merge the SONR code in, and it works flawlessly.
What am I doing wrong?
UPDATE: I've worked around this issue by creating the app in two stages instead of doing it in one stage:
rhc app create APPNAME diy-0.1 http://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=smarterclayton/openshift-redis-cart
cd APPNAME
git remote add github -f https://github.com/citrusbyte/SONR.git
git merge github/master -s recursive -X theirs
git push origin master
I'd still love to know why doing it in one step was failing, though.
#developercorey had the right idea.
I tried with a ridiculous timeout of 99999, and then got a different timeout error that I don't think I can change:
$ rhc app create APPNAME diy-0.1 http://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=smarterclayton/openshift-redis-cart --from-code https://github.com/citrusbyte/SONR.git --timeout 99999
...
Creating application 'APPNAME' ...
The initial build for the application failed: Shell command '/sbin/runuser -s /bin/sh 5328a9385973ca70150002af -c "exec /usr/bin/runcon 'unconfined_u:system_r:openshift_t:s0:c5,c974' /bin/sh -c \"gear postreceive --init >> /tmp/initial-build.log 2>&1\""' exceeded timeout of 229
The fix I mentioned in my earlier update is working perfectly, and that's what I recommend anyone with a similar problem try -- I'm creating the app as empty without the --from-code option, and then merging in the code I wanted to use in a separate step:
rhc app create APPNAME diy-0.1 http://cartreflect-claytondev.rhcloud.com/reflect?github=smarterclayton/openshift-redis-cart
cd APPNAME
git remote add github -f https://github.com/citrusbyte/SONR.git
git merge github/master -s recursive -X theirs
git push origin master
It could be that the application takes to long to clone/setup, and the creation is timing out. Something you can try is to create the application without the --from-code, then clone it locally, and merge in your code from github, then do a git push. This operation has a much longer timeout period, and will also let you see what, if any, errors that you get since the application won't disappear if it doesn't succeed, unlike an app create.