How can I render two different views in a one page app without changing URLs. I'm using meteor with the default blaze as well as the flow:router package. Right now I have it set up like this:
routes.js..
FlowRouter.route("/", {
name: "App.home",
action() {
BlazeLayout.render("App_body", {
main: "App_home",
mainContent: "calendar"
});
}
});
FlowRouter.route("/list", {
name: "App.list",
action() {
BlazeLayout.render("App_body", { main: "App_home", mainContent: "list" });
}
});
but this way I'm using the url /list and i dont want that. I would like to simply render an alternate component template in the same url. I'm very new to coding so forgive me if this is obvious. Essentially I just want two different view styles: a list and a calendar. So I would like a way to set it up so that a spacebars template can be rendered if a certain button is clicked, and a different one can be rendered instead if another button is clicked.
Thanks so much for any help, i've been at this for a couple of days :)
Create another template, which renders particular view conditionally. Something like this:
FlowRouter.route("/", {
name: "App.home",
action() {
BlazeLayout.render("App_body", {
main: "App_home",
mainContent: "listOrCal"
});
}
});
<template name="listOrCal">
{{#if showList}}
{{> list}}
{{else}}
{{> calendar}}
{{/if}}
<button id="switchView">Switch view</button>
</template>
Template.listOrCal.onCreated(function listOrCalOnCreated() {
this.showList = new ReactiveVar(true);
})
Template.listOrCal.helpers({
showList() {
return Template.instance().showList.get();
}
})
Template.listOrCal.events({
'click #switchView' {
let showList = Template.instance().showList.get();
Template.instance().showList.set(!showList);
}
})
You can handle this within a single template like so:
FlowRouter.route('/', {
name: 'App.home',
action() {
BlazeLayout.render('App_body', { main: 'App_home', mainContent: 'ListOrCalendar' });
}
And then the ListOrCalendar template would look like this:
{{#if displayList}}
{{> List}}
{{else}}
{{> Calendar}}
{{/if}}
<button>Switch</button>
You would set up a ReactiveVar in the ListOrCalendar template:
Template.ListOrCalendar.onCreated(function() {
const instance = this;
instance.displayList = new ReactiveVar(true);
});
See ReactiveVar explanation here (ignore Session)
Then you would have a helper which returns the value of your ReactiveVar:
Template.ListOrCalendar.helpers({
displayList() {
const instance = Template.instance();
return instance.displayList.get();
}
});
Finally, you would hook up an event to change the value of displayList to switch between templates:
Template.ListOrCalendar.events({
"click button"(event, instance) {
const displayListCurrent = instance.displayList.get();
const displayListNew = !displayListCurrent;
instance.displayList.set(displayListNew);
// or, more concisely, instance.displayList.set(!instance.displayList.get());
}
});
So, in summary:
When the template is created, your ReactiveVar is true
so your displayList returns true
so the #if displayList condition in the template is satisfied
and so the List template is displayed
When the button is clicked
The ReactiveVar is set to false
so the displayList helper returns false
so the #if displayList condition in the template is not satisfied and it goes to the else statement
and so, finally, the Calendar template is displayed
When the button is clicked again, the ReactiveVar is toggled back to true, and on we go as above
This might seem daunting or over-complicated, but there's nothing fancy going on here at all. You'll get used to it pretty quickly
Related
I'm trying to implement sort and search to my items, so i started with sort and it works:
Template
<button class="sort">Sort</button>
{{#each cvs}}
{{> Interviu}}
{{/each}}
JS:
Template.Interviuri.onCreated(function () {
var self = this
self.autorun(function () {
self.sortOrder = new ReactiveVar(-1)
})
Template.Interviuri.helpers({
cvs() {
const instance = Template.instance()
return Cvs.find({}, { sort: { createdAt: instance.sortOrder.get() } })
},
})
Template.Interviuri.events({
'click .sort'(event, instance) {
instance.sortOrder.set(instance.sortOrder.get() * -1)
Next i wanted to implement Search on the same page. So the best way i could found was EasySearch.
But using EasySearch, it means i must change the way my items are being displayed. And then the sort doesn't work anymore.
Template
<div class="searchBox pull-right">
{{> EasySearch.Input index=cvsIndex attributes=searchAttributes }}
</div>
{{#EasySearch.Each index=cvsIndex }}
{{> Interviu}}
{{/EasySearch.Each}}
Collection
CvsIndex = new EasySearch.Index({
collection: Cvs,
fields: ['name'],
engine: new EasySearch.Minimongo()
})
JS
cvsIndex: () => CvsIndex,
How can i have both search and sort working at the same time?
With EasySearch you can use two methods on your index, namely getComponentDict() and getComponentMethods().
With getComponentDict() you can access search definition and options:
index.getComponentDict().get('searchDefinition');
index.getComponentDict().get('searchOptions');
You also have the corresponding setters to change the search definition/option.
getComponentMethods has mehods like
index.getComponentMethods().loadMore(integer);
index.getComponentMethods().hasMoreDocuments();
index.getComponentMethods().addProps(prop, value);
index.getComponentMethods().removeProps([prop])
From that you can set your prop, say index.getComponentMethods().addProp('sort', -1) and then on the index definition, in your MongoDB engine, set the sort from that prop:
index = new EasySearch.index({
// other parameters
engine: new EasySearch.MongoDB({
sort: function(searchObject, options) {
if(options.search.props.sort) {
return parseInt(options.search.props.sort);
}
return 1;
}
})
});
See EasySearch Engines for more info.
I am new to meteor, and have a basic understanding of what is going on, but I am stuck with this example (the problem has been simplified as much as possible):
I have a template, and a child template:
<template name="test">
{{#each items}}
{{> testItem}}
{{/each}}
{{#each items}}
{{> testItem}}
{{/each}}
</template>
<template name="testItem">
<div {{ b "click: toggle"}}>{{value}}</div>
</template>
Template.test.viewmodel({
items: [],
onCreated: function() {
this.items().push({ value: 'test' });
}
})
Template.testItem.viewmodel({
toggle: function() {
this.value("changed");
}
});
The thing here is we have a single array of items in the viewmodel, and we render it through a child template multiple times.
When we toggle the item, it only toggles the single item template, not the other representation of it. It is behaving like it is copying the value, or some sort of scoping is taking place.
My expectation would be the second item to also change, but this is not the case - what am I missing, or misunderstanding here?
EDIT - Additional Investigation
If I change the item through the parent, and notify it has changed, the changes propogate throughout the child templates
Template.testItem.viewmodel({
toggle: function () {
this.parent().items()[0].value = "changed";
this.parent().items().changed();
}
});
Thanks!
You're right, when you do this.value("changed"); you're changing the value of the testItem view model, not the parent array. If you're going to modify the properties of objects in an array I highly recommend you use a client side Mongo collection instead. It will save you a lot of headaches.
Items = new Mongo.Collection(null);
Template.test.viewmodel({
items: function() {
return Items.find();
},
onCreated: function() {
Items.insert({ _id: "1", value: 'test' });
}
})
Template.testItem.viewmodel({
toggle: function() {
Items.update({ _id: this._id() }, { value: 'changed' });
}
});
btw, I rarely check SO. You will get quicker responses on viewmodelboard.meteor.com
I'd like to only have Ember load associated data when it's needed and rendered to the template. I thought setting async to true would do that, but it simply loads the data asynchronously as soon as the parent object is rendered. Alternatively, I'm trying to only load it when an action has occurred.
JS Bin of code is here (non-working, but shows general idea):
http://jsbin.com/tekaju/2/edit
For those not caring to check it out, gist is:
Models.Visit = DS.Model.extend({
visitors: DS.hasMany("user", { async: true })
});
VdAdmin.VisitController = Ember.ObjectController.extend({
showVisitors: false,
showVisitorsObserver: function(value){
showVisitors = value;
return value;
}.observes('showVisitors')
actions: {
loadVisitors: function(){
this.set('showVisitorsObserver', true);
}
}
});
<button ... {{action 'loadVisitors'}}>Click to Load</button>
{{#if showVisitorsObserver }}
I don't want to asynchronously grab related `visitors` data until `showVisitors` is true
{{visitors.length}}
{{/if}}
You shouldn't be watching an observer, it doesn't return values. It's used for reaction, not as a property. You should instead watch showVisitors.
App.ItemController = Em.ObjectController.extend({
showVisitors:false,
actions: {
loadVisitors: function(){
this.set('showVisitors', true);
}
}
});
{{#if showVisitors }}
I don't want to asynchronously grab related `visitors` data until `showVisitors` is true
{{visitors.length}}
{{/if}}
Example: http://emberjs.jsbin.com/qabaf/4/edit
In Iron-router, we can pass the data to a page in the data field. For example:
Router.map(function () {
this.route('myroute', {
path: '/route',
template: 'myTemplate',
data: function () {
return {
title: getTitle(),
description: getDescription(),
}
}
});
});
In the template, title and description are actually some value passed to subtemplates:
<template name="myTemplate">
{{> titleTemplate title}}
{{> descriptionTemplate description}}
</template>
Since the data field in the iron-router is reactive, whenever a session variable change, the data field is recalculated.
In this case, however, the session variable in getTitle function only changes the template "titleTemplate", and the session variable in getDescription() function only changes the template "descriptionTemplate".
If the session variable in the getTitle() function changes, I would like to only execute the getTitle() function, and do not execute the getDescription() function. If possible, I would also like to only render the "titleTemplate" and do not render "descriptionTemplate".
I wonder whether that is possible. If this is not the right way of writing the Meteor application, what is a better way to do it?
Thanks.
This is an interesting situation. Despite the fact that the getTitle and getDescription functions may be dependent on completely different reactive variables, they will both be recomputed whenever either one of them changes.
One possible solution is to pass the functions themselves instead of the result of calling the functions. That may or may not be convenient depending on how they are used in the sub-templates, but it will prevent them from both being run every time. Here is a simple example:
<template name="myTemplate">
{{> titleTemplate title}}
{{> descriptionTemplate description}}
</template>
<template name="titleTemplate">
<p>{{excitedTitle}}</p>
</template>
<template name="descriptionTemplate">
<p>{{this}}</p>
</template>
var getTitle = function() {
console.log('computed title');
return Session.get('title');
};
var getDescription = function() {
console.log('computed description');
return Session.get('description');
};
Router.map(function() {
this.route('home', {
path: '/',
template: 'myTemplate',
data: function() {
return {
title: getTitle,
description: getDescription
};
}
});
});
Meteor.startup(function() {
Session.setDefault('title', 'title1');
Session.setDefault('description', 'description1');
});
Template.titleTemplate.excitedTitle = function() {
return "" + (this.toUpperCase()) + "!";
};
From the console you can change the session variables (title and description) and you will see that only one function will be run at a time. I hope that helps.
One way to solve this is to not use the data context, but just use template specific helpers. Since I don't know what your getTitle and getDescription function do, I can't tell whether that is an option for you. It depends on whether you need to use the this object in those functions and need this to refer to the route object or not. If not, then the following seems like the better solution:
JS:
Router.map(function () {
this.route('myroute', {
path: '/route',
template: 'myTemplate'
});
});
Template.myTemplate.title = getTitle;
Template.myTemplate.description = getDescription;
HTML:
<template name="myTemplate">
{{> titleTemplate title}}
{{> descriptionTemplate description}}
</template>
If I have an {{# each}} binding in Meteor, and I want to update a property on only one instance of the template inside the #each. How would I do that? I've tried setting a value on the "template" object inside the events map, but that doesn't seem to be reactive. I've also tried binding to a Session property, but that will cause every instance to update instead of just the one I want...
for example:
{{#each dates}}
{{> dateTemplate}}
{{/each}}
<template name="dateTemplate">
{{date}}
<span style="color: red;">{{errorMsg}}</span> <--- how do i update errorMsg?
</template>
Template.dateTemplate.events({
'click': function(event, template) {
template.errorMsg = 'not valid'; <--- this doesn't do anything
}
});
EDIT TO ADDRESS ANSWER BELOW:
Template.dateTemplate.events({
'click': function(event, template) {
template.errorMsg = function() { return 'not valid';} <--- this also doesn't do anything
}
});
You don't have to use handlebars for this, because its not something that needs reactivity to pass the message through, reactive variables work best with db data, or data that would be updated by another client over the air.
You could use JQuery (included by default) to update it, it can also get a bit fancier:
<template name="dateTemplate">
{{date}}
<span style="color: red;display: none" class="errorMessage"></span>
</template>
Template.dateTemplate.events({
'click': function(event, template) {
$(template.find('.errorMessage')).html('Your Error Message').slideDown();
}
});
Ive edited it so the error is hidden by default, and slides down with an animation
I'm experimenting handling this by passing a different reactive object to each instance of the template. Then the template can bind to the reactive object (which is unique per instance) and we don't have any extra boilerplate.
It ends up looking like this:
Initial render:
Template.firstTemplateWithPoll(ContextProvider.getContext())
Template.secondTemplateWithPoll(ContextProvider.getContext())
// (I actually pass getContext an identifier so I always get the same context for the same template)
JS:
Template.poll.events = {
'click .yes' : function() {
this.reactive.set('selection', 'yes');
},
'click .no' : function() {
this.reactive.set('selection', 'no');
}
};
Template.poll.selection = function(arg) {
return this.reactive.get('selection');
}
Template:
<template name="poll">
<blockquote>
<p>
Your selection on this poll is {{selection}}
</p>
</blockquote>
<button class='yes'>YES</button>
<button class='no'>NO</button>
</template>
template.errorMsg should be a function that returns your error.
Template.dateTemplate.events({
'click': function(event, template) {
template.errorMsg = function() { return 'not valid'; };
}
});