I have this model `
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Title { get; set; }
public int CopiesNum { get; set; }
public int CurrentCopiesNum { get; set; )
public Author author { get; set; }
public int AuthorId { get; set; }
i want throug this action to show up the name of author which i made it to search `
public ActionResult SearchForBook(string BookName)
{
var book1 = from s in db.Books
select s;
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(BookName))
{
book1 = book1.Where(c => c.Title.Contains(BookName));
}
ViewBag.AuthorId = new SelectList(db.Authors, "AuthorId", "Name").ToList();
// var book = db.Books.Include(b => b.author).ToList();
return View(book1);
}
when i try to show the name of author
<td>
#Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.author.Name)
</td>
it shows nothing
As you are using Eager loading, you need to include Author. Try something like this:
In your Controller-
var book1 = db.Books.Include(a => a.Author).ToList();
If you want to use lazy loading then in the model
public virtual Author author { get; set; }
Then your controller should work.
Modification
As you said about your requirement in the comment section, this can also be achieved like below:
In you Controller:
var book1 = new Book();
if (!string.IsNullOrEmpty(BookName))
{
book1 = _context.Books.Include(c => c.Author).SingleOrDefault(c => c.Title == "BookName");
}
You can simply send book1 to the view (You should check if book1 contains anything and if not then handle it properly).
And if you really don't want to change the way you coded, you can edit the Controller like below:
var book1 = from s in _context.Books.Include(c => c.Author)
select s;
And keep the rest of the code as it is. It should also work (though I do not recommend this.)
Related
I am developing a Web API using Core 6.0 with localization. Localization should be supported for both static (e.g., basic strings like greeting) and dynamic content (e.g., Values of the Product Instance).
I have implemented the localization for static content using JsonStringLocalizerFactory as discussed in this article - https://christian-schou.dk/how-to-add-localization-in-asp-net-core-web-api/.
public class LocalizerController : ControllerBase
{
private readonly IStringLocalizer<LocalizerController> _stringLocalizer;
public LocalizerController(IStringLocalizer<LocalizerController> stringLocalizer)
{
_stringLocalizer = stringLocalizer;
}
[HttpGet]
public IActionResult Get()
{
var message = _stringLocalizer["hi"].ToString();
return Ok(message);
}
[HttpGet("{name}")]
public IActionResult Get(string name)
{
var message = string.Format(_stringLocalizer["welcome"], name);
return Ok(message);
}
[HttpGet("all")]
public IActionResult GetAll()
{
var message = _stringLocalizer.GetAllStrings();
return Ok(message);
}
}
Next, I would like to implement localization for dynamic content (e.g., Details of the Product which will be sent to the WEB API and stored in the postgresql database table).
A possible approach is to duplicate the postgresql database table for each language (English and French). Could there be a better approach to avoid duplicate data and additional manual work?
You can create language table for each multi-language entity.
Langugage model;
public class Language
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string IsoCode { get; set; }
}
Static language list;
public class Constant
{
public static List<Language> Languages { get; set; } = new()
{
new Language
{
Id = 1,
Name = "English(United States)",
IsoCode = "en-US"
},
new Language
{
Id = 2,
Name = "Turkish",
IsoCode = "tr-TR"
}
};
}
Entities;
public class Product
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public decimal Price { get; set; }
public virtual ICollection<ProductLang> ProductLangs { get; set; }
}
public class ProductLang
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
[ForeignKey("Products")]
public Guid ProductId { get; set; }
public virtual Product Product { get; set; }
public int LanguageId { get; set; }
}
You can change the LanguageId property name. If you want to store languages in database, you can create a Languages table and create a relationship with that table from entity language tables. This can reduce duplication.
After include the language table to the entity, you can write an extension method to easily get the requested language data.
public static string GetLang<TEntity>(this IEnumerable<TEntity> langs, Expression<Func<TEntity, string>> propertyExpression, int defaultLangId)
{
var languageIdPropName = nameof(ProductLang.LanguageId);
var requestedLangId = GetCurrentOrDefaultLanguageId(defaultLangId);
if (langs.IsNullOrEmpty())
return string.Empty;
var propName = GetPropertyName(propertyExpression);
TEntity requestedLang;
if (requestedLangId != defaultLangId)
requestedLang = langs.FirstOrDefault(lang => (int)lang.GetType()
.GetProperty(languageIdPropName)
.GetValue(lang) == requestedLangId)
?? langs.FirstOrDefault(lang => (int)lang.GetType()
.GetProperty(languageIdPropName)
.GetValue(lang) == defaultLangId);
else requestedLang = langs.FirstOrDefault(lang => (int)lang.GetType().GetProperty(languageIdPropName).GetValue(lang) == defaultLangId);
requestedLang ??= langs.FirstOrDefault();
return requestedLang.GetType().GetProperty(propName).GetValue(requestedLang, null)?.ToString();
static int GetCurrentOrDefaultLanguageId(int defaultLanguageId)
{
var culture = CultureInfo.CurrentCulture;
var currentLanguage = Constant.Languages.FirstOrDefault(i => i.IsoCode == culture.Name);
if (currentLanguage != null)
return currentLanguage.Id;
else
return defaultLanguageId;
}
static string GetPropertyName<T, TPropertyType>(Expression<Func<T, TPropertyType>> expression)
{
if (expression.Body is MemberExpression tempExpression)
{
return tempExpression.Member.Name;
}
else
{
var op = ((UnaryExpression)expression.Body).Operand;
return ((MemberExpression)op).Member.Name;
}
}
}
This extension method checks for 3 conditions;
If there is data in the requsted language, it returns this data,
If there is no data in the requsted language, it checks if there is data in the default language. If the data is available in the default language, it will return the data,
Returns the first available language data if there is no data in the default language
Usage;
var defaultLangId = 1;
Product someProduct = await _dbContext.Set<Product>().Include(i => i.ProductLangs).FirstOrDefaultAsync();
var productName = someProduct.ProductLangs.GetLang(i => i.Name, defaultLangId);
It is up to you to modify this extension method according to your own situation. I gave you an example scenario where languages are kept in a static list.
I'm trying to perform a search on top of a dictionary using the Search method from RavenDB 4. Strangely, if the search term is the word in or it I get random results back. I'm absolutely sure that none of the records contains those words. It also happens when executing the equivalent lucene query on the studio. It works as expected when I enter a valid search term like the employee's name, number, etc.
I've managed to create this simple scenario based on the real one.
Here's the index:
public class Search : AbstractIndexCreationTask<Employee, Page>
{
public Search()
{
Map = employees => from employee in employees
select new
{
Id = employee.Id,
Details = employee.Details
};
Reduce = results => from result in results
group result by new
{
result.Id,
result.Details
}
into g
select new
{
g.Key.Id,
g.Key.Details
};
Index("Details", FieldIndexing.Search);
}
}
Employee class:
public class Employee
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public Dictionary<string, object> Details { get; set; }
}
Adding employees:
details = new Dictionary<string, object>();
details.Add("EmployeeNo", 25);
details.Add("FirstNames", "Yuri");
details.Add("Surname", "Cardoso");
details.Add("PositionCode", "XYZ");
details.Add("PositionTitle", "Developer");
employee = new Employee
{
Details = details
};
session.Store(employee);
session.SaveChanges();
Search method:
var searchTerm = "in";
var result = session
.Query<Page, Search>()
.Search(i => i.Details, $"EmployeeNo:({searchTerm})")
.Search(i => i.Details, $"FirstNames:({searchTerm})", options: SearchOptions.Or)
.Search(i => i.Details, $"Surname:({searchTerm})", options: SearchOptions.Or)
.Search(i => i.Details, $"PositionCode:({searchTerm})", options: SearchOptions.Or)
.Search(i => i.Details, $"PositionTitle:({searchTerm})", options: SearchOptions.Or)
.ToList();
Lucene query outputed:
from index 'Search' where search(Details, "EmployeeNo:(it)")
or search(Details, "FirstNames:(it)")
or search(Details, "Surname:(it)")
or search(Details, "PositionCode:(it)")
or search(Details, "PositionTitle:(it)")
Any idea why random results are returned when those specific words are enterered?
The issue is stop words. Certain terms are so common, that they are meaningless for searching using full text search.
is, it, they, are, etc.
They are erased by the query analyzer.
See the discussion here: https://ravendb.net/docs/article-page/4.2/Csharp/indexes/using-analyzers
You can use a whitespace analyzer, instead of the Standard Analyzer, since the former doesn't eliminate stop words.
After getting help from the RavenDB group guys, we've managed to find a solution for my scenario.
Employee:
public class Employee
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string DepartmentId { get; set; }
public Dictionary<string, object> Details { get; set; }
}
Department:
public class Department
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
}
Page:
public class Page
{
public string Id { get; set; }
public string Department { get; set; }
public Dictionary<string, object> Details { get; set; }
}
Index (with dynamic fields):
public class Search : AbstractIndexCreationTask<Employee, Page>
{
public Search()
{
Map = employees => from employee in employees
let dept = LoadDocument<Department>(employee.DepartmentId)
select new
{
employee.Id,
Department = dept.Name,
_ = employee.Details.Select(x => CreateField(x.Key, x.Value))
};
Store(x => x.Department, FieldStorage.Yes);
Index(Constants.Documents.Indexing.Fields.AllFields, FieldIndexing.Search);
}
}
Query:
using (var session = DocumentStoreHolder.Store.OpenAsyncSession())
{
var searchTearm = "*yu* *dev*";
var result = await session
.Advanced
.AsyncDocumentQuery<Page, Search>()
.Search("Department", searchTearm)
.Search("EmployeeNo", searchTearm)
.Search("FirstNames", searchTearm)
.Search("Surname", searchTearm)
.Search("PositionCode", searchTearm)
.Search("PositionTitle", searchTearm)
.SelectFields<Page>()
.ToListAsync();
}
Everything seems to be working fine this way, no more random results.
Big thanks to Ayende and Egor.
How to solve one to many relational issue in asp.net?
I have Topic which contain many playlists.
My code:
public class Topic
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public String Name { get; set; }
public String Image { get; set; }
---> public virtual List<Playlist> Playlist { get; set; }
}
and
public class Playlist
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public String Title { get; set; }
public int TopicId { get; set; }
---> public virtual Topic Topic { get; set; }
}
My controller function
[Route("data/binding/search")]
public JsonResult Search()
{
var search = Request["term"];
var result= from m in _context.Topics where m.Name.Contains(search) select m;
return Json(result, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
When I debug my code I will see an infinite data because Topics will call playlist then playlist will call Topics , again the last called Topic will recall playlist and etc ... !
In general when I just use this relation to print my data in view I got no error and ASP.NET MVC 5 handle the problem .
The problem happens when I tried to print the data as Json I got
Is there any way to prevent an infinite data loop in JSON? I only need the first time of data without call of reference again and again
You are getting the error because your entity classes has circular property references.
To resolve the issue, you should do a projection in your LINQ query to get only the data needed (Topic entity data).
Here is how you project it to an anonymous object with Id, Name and Image properties.
public JsonResult Search(string term)
{
var result = _context.Topics
.Where(a => a.Name.Contains(term))
.Select(x => new
{
Id = x.Id,
Name = x.Name,
Image = x.Image
});
return Json(result, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
If you have a view model to represent the Topic entity data, you can use that in the projection part instead of the anonymous object
public class TopicVm
{
public int Id { set;get;}
public string Name { set;get;}
public string Image { set;get;}
}
public JsonResult Search(string term)
{
var result = _context.Topics
.Where(a => a.Name.Contains(term))
.Select(x => new TopicVm
{
Id = x.Id,
Name = x.Name,
Image = x.Image
});
return Json(result, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
If you want to include the Playlist property data as well, you can do that in your projection part.
public JsonResult Search(string term)
{
var result = _context.Topics
.Where(a => a.Name.Contains(term))
.Select(x => new
{
Id = x.Id,
Name = x.Name,
Image = x.Image,
Playlist = x.Playlist
.Select(p=>new
{
Id = p.Id,
Title = p.Title
})
});
return Json(result, JsonRequestBehavior.AllowGet);
}
I have searched around and not had much luck finding a solution to my exact problem.
Model
public class PageDetailsViewModel
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public string Name { get; set; }
public string Description { get; set; }
public string Image { get; set; }
}
Controller
public ActionResult Search(int SysID)
{
var query = from r in _db.Auctions
from d in _db.Product_Details
where SysID == d.Id && r.BidStatus == "Open" && d.Id == r.Product_DetailsId
select new PageDetailsViewModel
{
Name = d.Name,
Description = d.Description,
Image = d.Image
};
return View(query);
}
View
#model IEnumerable<ProjectT.Models.PageDetailsViewModel>
#Html.DisplayNameFor(x => x.Name)
This fails to bring the name through. However, if I use a foreach
#foreach (var item in Model)
{
#item.Name
}
It brings through the name no problem.
Any help is much appreciated.
This extension method shows the value of the DisplayNameAttribute from DataAnnotations namespace. Consider this a label. Typically it is used like this:
[DisplayName("The Name")]
public string Name { get; set; }
And in the view:
#Html.DisplayNameFor(x => x.Name) <-- displays The Name
The code above will work only if the model is a single item. For the list case, as you have, you need to do some tricks, say a for loop, so you could do something like:
#Html.DisplayNameFor(x => x[i].Name): #Model[i].Name <-- displays The Name: Bill
I'm creating my first ASP.NET MVC 3 website for my company's intranet. It's a pretty cool, I play audio recorded by our phone system and saved in our db. That's working good, but I'm having a hard time figuring out how to do something that should be simple. Please forgive any syntax errors I most likely have, this is a rough draft.
I have a table in the Index View /Apps that list all the AppName's, and next to each AppName I want to display a link to another view, with the text of the link being a Count() of all CallDetails associated with that App.
I have two classes:
public class Apps
{
public int AppId { get; set; }
public string AppName { get; set; }
}
public class CallDetail
{
public int Id { get; set; }
public int AppID { get; set; }
public byte[] FirstName { get; set; }
public byte[] LastName { get; set; }
....etc
}
a context for each:
public class AppsContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<Apps> Apps { get; set; }
}
public class CallContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<CallDetail> CallDetails { get; set; }
}
a controller method for each:
// AppsController
private AppsContext db = new AppsContext();
public ViewResult Index()
{
return View(db.Apps.ToList());
}
// CallController method (from my current attempt)
public ActionResult CallCheck(int id)
{
bool? enabled = null;
var appcalls = from s in db.CallDetails
where s.AppID == id
&& s.Enabled.Equals(enabled)
select s;
string callnum = appcalls.Count().ToString();
return View(callnum);
}
It displays the AppName just fine in this portion of the View below, and I can create a link to a View for each associated CallDetail just fine. But I don't know how to display info I'd get from the CallDetail Controller since the View's Model is Apps and its Controller, AppsController.
#model IEnumerable<myMessagePlayer.Models.Apps>
...
#foreach (var item in Model)
{
<tr>
<td>
#Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.AppName)
</td>
<td class="appLink">
...
</td>
</tr>
}
I've tried many different methods, some that I might have gotten to work, but they seemed semantically un-MVC. So I figured I'd just ask a general "whats the standard practice?" type of question.
The path you are currently going down would end up hitting the database for each app you have in your database. There is a way to display all the information with only one hit to the database.
Your context needs to change to this:
public class ApplicationContext : DbContext
{
public DbSet<Apps> Apps { get; set; }
public DbSet<CallDetail> CallDetails { get; set; }
}
You could create a view model object called AppCallInfo that has three properties:
public class AppCallInfo
{
public int AppID { get; set; }
public string AppName { get; set; }
public int CallCount { get; set; }
}
In your Index action you need to do something like this:
public ViewResult Index()
{
var model = from a in db.Apps
join c in db.CallDetails on a.AppID equals c.AppID
where c.Enabled == enabled
group a by new { AppName = a.AppName, AppID = a.AppID } into g
select new AppCallInfo {
AppName = g.Key.AppName,
AppID = g.Key.AppID,
CallCount = g.Count()
};
return View(model.ToList());
}
Now you have everything you need for each row in your table in one object.
#model List<myMessagePlayer.ViewModels.AppCallInfo>
...
#foreach (var item in Model)
{
<tr>
<td>
#Html.DisplayFor(modelItem => item.AppName)
</td>
<td class="appLink">
#Html.ActionLink(item.CallCount, "ViewCalls", "Call", new { Id = item.AppID }, null)
</td>
</tr>
}
Using this method avoids hitting the database for each app you have in your table.
Is the view CallCheck a partial view?
In your index view you could use
#Html.RenderAction("CallCheck", "AppsController", new { Id = #Model.AppId } )
The syntax may not be 100% correct, but it should get you going in the right direction.