Is there any way to make semi-transparent overlapping elements, from which only higher z-index will be visible? I would like the images to be transparent to the background, but not to the other pictures. Here is fiddle.
body {
background: white;
}
section {
height: 400px;
position: relative;
perspective: 500px;
}
img {
height: 300px;
left: 50%;
margin: -100px;
position: absolute;
top: 40%;
transform: rotateY(-30deg);
width: 200px;
}
img:nth-child(1) {
left: 30%;
opacity: 0.8;
z-index: 3;
}
img:nth-child(2) {
left: 45%;
opacity: 0.4;
z-index: 2;
}
img:nth-child(3) {
left: 60%;
opacity: 0.2;
z-index: 1;
}
<section>
<img src="https://media4.s-nbcnews.com/j/newscms/2016_36/1685951/ss-160826-twip-05_8cf6d4cb83758449fd400c7c3d71aa1f.nbcnews-ux-2880-1000.jpg">
<img src="http://toprozdily.cz/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/slon-africky.jpg">
<img src="http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/,scalefit_950_800_noupscale/55fc14631c00004800082775.jpeg">
</section>
So what you're going to need to do is put the images each in their own div container and set the div background-color to white. That way you see the white background through the semi-opaque images and not the image underneath.
I edited your fiddle to give you the functionality you're looking for. Hope it helps!
There isn't a way to make an element be transparent to one element but opaque to another.
However, you might be able to simulate the transparency by tinting the images instead, either by positioning a partially-transparent div of that color over each image, or with CSS filters:
https://www.w3schools.com/cssref/css3_pr_filter.asp
Related
I have a stackblitz here
This should be the simplest thing but I can't see why its not working.
I have react app with Typescript and a styled components, I'm sure none of that is the problem this is just css.
I'm trying to position two divs on top of each other.
The container has position: relative;
And then the div are absolutely positioned.
.FlexContainerColOne,
.FlexContainerColTwo{
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
But both div disappear, what am I missing
From what I am seeing here is that they are not disappearing, you just can't see them because they don't have a width assigned or content. See the following, I added width, and opacity to show the two divs merging over each other.
stackblitz snippet
Result:
flexcontainer {
position: relative;
}
.FlexContainerColOne,
.FlexContainerColTwo {
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
}
.FlexContainerColOne {
background: red;
height: 500px;
width: 500px;
opacity: 0.5;
}
.FlexContainerColTwo {
background: green;
height: 500px;
width: 500px;
opacity: 0.3;
}
<flexcontainer>
<div class="FlexContainerColOne"></div>
<div class="FlexContainerColTwo"></div>
</flexcontainer>
on my home page I have a grid block with 6 images on it
On hover, it becomes more transparent thanks to CSS (opacity: 0.6)
I also would like that when I hover on the button at the center of the image, the image itself keeps being transparent
Since it's not the case here
So I have applied some code here, but I couldn't figure why it doesn't work
.flexItem.grid_sections .button:hover ~ .grid_sections img {
opacity: 0.6;
}
Those elements appear on my homepage, 5th section
URL: https://www.tresor-ethnique.com/
Any idea?
Let me know, and thank you in advance :)
Pascal
Try
div {
height: 260px;
width: 260px;
position: relative;
}
div > img {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
position: absolute;
z-index: 1;
opacity: 0.6;
}
div > button {
position: absolute;
z-index: 2;
top: 45%;
left: 30%;
width: 80px;
height: 45px;
}
div > button:hover + img {
opacity: 1;
}
<div>
<button>Button</button>
<img src="https://via.placeholder.com/260x260">
</div>
NOTE: you must put the button tag before img tag
Closed. This question needs to be more focused. It is not currently accepting answers.
Want to improve this question? Update the question so it focuses on one problem only by editing this post.
Closed 4 years ago.
Improve this question
He everyone i am strugling to find a css that will work to get a overlay on my feautured image so you can see my title more clear. For the site www.quinstudio.nl/gallery. Any idea how i can get this to work?
? {
background: #000;
opacity: .1;
}
There are several ways you could approach this. There's no real difference in how they'll turn out; you can use whichever works better with the markup you have. The first option is a little simpler because there's no empty div being added as a color overlay.
Option 1: Make the colored background opaque, and the image partially transparent.
.image-wrapper {
display: inline-block;
background: #0cd;
/* You need this line for the centered h1 below to work. */
position: relative;
}
.image-wrapper img {
opacity: 0.5;
display: block;
}
.image-wrapper h1 {
/* Here's a trick for centering your title, if you want. */
position: absolute;
left: 50%;
top: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
margin: auto;
color: #fff;
}
<div class="image-wrapper">
<img src="https://loremflickr.com/320/240" alt="Kitten">
<h1>Kitty!</h1>
</div>
Option 2: Make the image opaque, and put a partially transparent overlay on top of it.
.image-wrapper {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
}
.image-wrapper img {
display: block;
}
.image-overlay {
background: #000;
opacity: 0.5;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
z-index: 2; /* puts this div 'in front' of the image */
}
.image-wrapper h1 {
position: absolute;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
color: #fff;
z-index: 3; /* puts the text in front of the dark overlay */
}
<div class="image-wrapper">
<img src="https://loremflickr.com/320/240" alt="Kitty!">
<div class="image-overlay"></div>
<h1>Kitty?</h1>
</div>
While #jack's answer is good, I'd like to share an alternative one that doesn't use an <img> element and instead uses the :after pseudo-element.
This allows you to use the CSS background image on the container and essentially add a fake element that has the color overlay on it:
.container {
background: url(https://loremflickr.com/320/240);
width: 320px;
height: 240px;
position: relative;
}
.overlay > * {
z-index: 1;
position: relative;
color: #fff;
}
.overlay:after {
content: "";
background: #0095ee;
position: absolute;
top: 0;
left: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
opacity: .65;
}
<div class="overlay container">
<h1>Title</h1>
</div>
Edit:
Your situation is a little different. You can just lower the opacity of the image and add a black background to it's parent container. Try the following:
.edgt-justified-layout .edgt-ni-inner .edgt-ni-image-holder .edgt-post-image img {
opacity: .75;
}
.edgt-justified-layout .edgt-ni-inner .edgt-ni-image-holder .edgt-post-image {
background: #000;
}
It will lower the opacity of the image (which will make it look "whiter", so we can add a black (or whatever color you want) background to it's parent container to compensate and darken it instead.
This is what i am trying to achive
i have :
#image1 {
position: absolute;
bottom: 0px;
align-self: auto;
background-color: #dc022e;
width: 340px;
height: 100px;
border-radius: 50% / 100%;
border-bottom-left-radius: 0;
/*transform: rotate(10deg);*/
border-bottom-right-radius: 0;
opacity: 0.8;
}
#image2 img {
width: 80%;
}
<div>
<div id="image2">
<img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcThtVuIQ7CBYssbdwtzZjVLI_uw09SeLmyrxaRQEngnQAked5ZB">
</div>
<div id="image1"></div>
</div>
Finally I don't know how to make it rotated and with the margins cut like in the picture
A Quick example of this would use a pseudo element and have the image set in the background.
div {
position: relative;
height: 300px;
width: 500px;
background: url(http://lorempixel.com/500/300);/*image path*/
overflow: hidden;/*hides the rest of the circle*/
}
div:before {
content: "";
position: absolute; /*positions with reference to div*/
top: 100%;
left: 50%;
width: 0;/*define value if you didn't want hover*/
height: 0;
border-radius: 50%;
background: tomato;/*could be rgba value (you can remove opacity then)*/
opacity: 0.5;
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);/*ensures it is in center of image*/
transition: all 0.4s;
}
/*Demo Only*/
div:hover:before {/*place this in your pseudo declaration to remove the hover*/
height: 100%;
width: 150%;/*this makes the shape wider than square*/
transform: translate(-50%, -50%) rotate(5deg);/*ensures it is in center of image + rotates*/
}
div {/*This stuff is for the text*/
font-size: 40px;
line-height: 300px;
text-align: center;
}
<div>HOVER ME</div>
Instead of nested elements, you can just use a pseudo element. This is placed at the bottom of the container div. For this to work, you need position:relative and overflow:hidden on the container div. Also, pseudo elements always need the content declaration.
To modify the border radius, you just play around with left | width | height of the pseudo element. You don't need any rotation.
Instead of hex color and opacity you can as well use the "new" color space rgba(r,g,b,a) where a is the opacity value.
For the passepartout you simply use the border declaration.
#image2{
position:relative;
border:10px solid #888;
overflow:hidden;
box-shadow:0 0 4px #aaa;
}
#image2::after {
content:"";
display:block;
position: absolute;
bottom: 0;left:-10%;
background-color: #dc022e;
width: 120%;
height: 60%;
border-radius: 100% 100% 0 0;
opacity: 0.8;
}
#image2 img {
width: 100%;
display:block;
position:relative;
}
<div id="image2">
<img src="http://t1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcThtVuIQ7CBYssbdwtzZjVLI_uw09SeLmyrxaRQEngnQAked5ZB">
</div>
You can just use position: absolute for your image and position: relative for your overlay, adjusting the top position and width according to your needs. Here's a Fiddle. Hope this helps!
Edit: Here's an updated version of the Fiddle demonstrating border and overflow properties on the img container. As CBroe mentioned, rotating a circle is probably not a good use of your time in this case. Also, I definitely agree that using a pseudo element is a much cleaner approach than nesting images.
As I was in the process of trying to make an animated figure (transitions on hover), I found out that the background of my <figure> is showing near the edges when I apply border-radius: 50% to it, even though my image should be taking up all available space.
For a quick demo that illustrates the problem, please look at http://codepen.io/anon/pen/KwMMKz
HTML
<figure>
<img src="http://placehold.it/400x400" alt>
<figcaption>Demo</figcaption>
</figure>
CSS
figure {
background-color: red;
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
border-radius: 50%;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative; /* For caption */
}
img {
border-radius: 50%; /* Forced on image for smooth transition */
width: 100%;
transition: opacity 1s ease-out;
}
figcaption {
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
color: hotpink;
text-align: center;
transition: top 1s ease-out;
}
figure:hover img {
opacity: 0;
}
figure:hover figcaption {
top: 50%;
}
Please note: I know that placing the background-color on figure:hover is a work-around, but I am more interested in the reason why this "jagged border"-like look is appearing.
My guess is that it has to do with AA rendering (or something related) of the browser and that it treats the <figure> element differently than a media element such as <img>, but I can't find any proof of this online. Is this a bug, is it a "feature", or is it something I can actually fix?
Lastly, I also know that I could have used transform: translateY(); here for the animation, but that's not part of my question so please don't provide it as an answer.
UPDATE 17/12 14:03
It appears that this issue is not exclusive to border-radius: 50%. The issue can occur when any wrapping element uses border-radius in combination with overflow: hidden, when the wrapper contains content that is equal or bigger than the wrapper's dimensions.
UPDATE 17/12 14:14
Neither the usage of overflow: hidden on the wrapper element, nor the usage of border-radius on the contained image (or any other child element) seem to be the cause of this as they can be interchanged and the pixelated edge will still appear.
This seems to indicate that this issue is solely caused by 2 DOM elements being in exactly the same place, when any sort of border-radius is applied to the wrapper element and the visible area of the child is limited to that of the parent's.
I've been having same issue and ended up using pseudo element instead of background, kinda like that:
figure::before {
content: '';
display: block;
background-color: red;
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
transform: scale(0.997);
border-radius: 50%;
}
This allowed me to create 'pseudo background' which I later shrinked a little bit with transform: scale(0.997); so it will be just the same size but a bit below visible edge. Of course in your case you would also need to position image absolutely so it is not pushed below by this ::before.
It appears that it is indeed a "feature" of how the browser handles border-radius to give a smooth edge to the rounded corners of a container. The image background is anti-aliased in the same way (but as it is transparent has no effect) as can be seen by setting the img background color.
When the border is anti-aliased it "bleeds" into the background to soften the edges and so you are seeing that around the image as a "jaggy" ring in much the same way you would see a corona around the moon during a full solar eclipse.
the issue is always there, whether the anti-aliased object is covered or not, if you were to draw a circle then anti-alias it, you would see the circle is marginally narrower than the anti-aliased version. Most anti-aliasing algorithms aggregate the surrounding pixels of the object rather than those contained within it.
To overcome it, you'd either need to make your image large enough to cover the space taken up by the anti-aliased edge or reduce the container such that the anti-aliased area is smaller than the image.
You could add a new tag with an opacity of 0 then have that fade in with the image fading out.
figure {
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
border-radius: 50%;
overflow: hidden;
position: relative; /* For caption */
}
background {
background-color: red;
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
border-radius: 50%;
overflow: hidden;
opacity: 0;
position: fixed;
z-index: 5;
transition: opacity 1s ease-out;
}
img {
border-radius: 50%; /* Forced on image for smooth transition */
width: 100%;
transition: opacity 1s ease-out;
position: relative;
z-index: 100;
}
figcaption {
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
color: hotpink;
text-align: center;
transition: top 1s ease-out;
z-index: 10000;
}
figure:hover img {
opacity: 0;
}
figure:hover background {
opacity: 1;
}
figure:hover figcaption {
top: 50%;
}
<figure>
<background></background>
<img src="http://placehold.it/400x400" alt>
<figcaption>Demo</figcaption>
</figure>
Notice I added the background tag and removed background-color from figure
http://codepen.io/marczking/pen/KwMgaR
So after playing around (used background-image and pseudo-elements, changes nothing...) you notice that this light border is only visible if you apply round corners. So I am assuming here it has to do how the Browser renders the CSS, nothing wrong with the CSS-rules ^^)
<figure>
<figcaption>Demo</figcaption>
</figure>
figure {
background-color: red;
width: 400px;
height: 400px;
border-radius: 100px;
position: relative; /* For caption */
}
figure::before {
content: "";
position: absolute;
left: 0;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
background: url("http://placehold.it/400x400") no-repeat;
border-radius: 100px; /* Forced on image for smooth transition */
transition: opacity 1s ease-out;
}
figcaption {
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 0;
width: 100%;
color: hotpink;
text-align: center;
transition: top 1s ease-out;
}
figure:hover::before {
opacity: 0;
}
figure:hover figcaption {
top: 50%;
}