Responsive arrangement of divs with flexbox [duplicate] - css

I have 3 divs inside a container. There are no nested divs.
I am using flex and order property.
On mobile, it is ok with order property.
But on larger screens it fails.
I did not use a container div for divs 2 and 3 in order to order them as 2,1,3 on mobile.
HTML FILE
<div class="container">
<div class="orange">1</div>
<div class="blue">2</div>
<div class="green">3</div>
</div>
CSS FILE
/*************** MOBILE *************/
.container
{
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
div.blue
{
order:1;
width: 100%;
}
div.orange
{
order:2;
width: 100%;
}
div.green
{
order:3;
width: 100%;
}
/***************************/
#media screen and (min-width:1200px)
{
.container
{
justify-content: space-between;
}
div.blue
{
order:2;
width: 36%;
}
div.orange
{
order:1;
width: 60%;
}
div.green
{
order:3;
width: 36%;
}
}

In your layout, using row wrap for the desktop view will be difficult, if not impossible, to implement with CSS. At a minimum, things would get overly complex. Why?
Because flexbox is not a grid system. It's a layout system designed to align content by distribution of space in the container.
In flexbox, items in a row wrap container must wrap to new rows. This means that div3 cannot wrap beneath div2. It must wrap beneath div1.
Here's how items wrap in a flex container with row wrap:
If div3 were to wrap under div2, that wouldn't be a row, that would be a grid, and flex items are confined to a straight, unbending row.
Put another way, you can't make a flex item wrap under another item in the same row.
As a result, white space created by items that aren't the tallest in the row is preserved in each column, creating unsightly gaps.
For your desired layout to work in row wrap, flex items would have to exit their row in order to close the gap – maybe with absolute positioning – which flexbox cannot do.
One way to align the items would be to wrap div2 and div3 in their own container. This new container would be a sibling to div1. It can then become a nested flex container with flex-direction: column. Now the gaps are gone and layout looks right.
Except, in this particular case, you need the order property to work (meaning all items must have the same parent), so a nested flex container is out of the question.
What may work is column wrap instead of row wrap:
/*************** MOBILE *************/
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 200px; /* necessary so items know where to wrap */
}
div.orange {
background-color: orange;
}
div.blue {
order: -1;
background-color: aqua;
}
div.green {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
.container > div {
width: 100%;
flex: 1;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
/***************************/
#media screen and (min-width: 800px) {
.container {
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
div.orange {
flex-basis: 100%;
width: 50%;
}
div.blue {
flex-basis: 50%;
width: 50%;
order: 0;
}
div.green {
flex-basis: 50%;
width: 50%;
}
}
<div class="container">
<div class="orange">1</div>
<div class="blue">2</div>
<div class="green">3</div>
</div>
jsFiddle
Here are two other options:
Desandro Masonry
Masonry is a JavaScript grid layout library. It
works by placing elements in optimal position based on available
vertical space, sort of like a mason fitting stones in a wall.
source: http://masonry.desandro.com/
CSS Grid Layout Module Level 1
This CSS module defines a two-dimensional grid-based layout system, optimized for user interface design. In the grid layout model, the children of a grid container can be positioned into arbitrary slots in a predefined flexible or fixed-size layout grid.
source: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/
Related post: Is it possible for flex items to align tightly to the items above them?

Related

Can't understand css flexbox in this situation [duplicate]

I have three elements I'm trying to align in my layout.
First, I have a div for feedback, and then a search input, and then a div element for suggestions.
I want the first and last element to have a width of 20%, and the search input to have a width of 60%. Using Flexbox I achieve what I want.
But there's a feature that grows all the divs to the highest element. This means that when search results pop up, the feedback and suggestion elements grow in height with the search div resulting in a messed up layout.
Is there a trick to not grow the divs with the highest element? Just make the divs (#feedback and #suggestions) have the height of the content in them?
#container_add_movies {
display: flex;
}
#container_add_movies #feedback {
width: 20%;
background-color: green;
}
#container_add_movies #search {
width: 60%;
background-color: red;
}
#container_add_movies #suggestions {
width: 20%;
background-color: yellow;
}
<div id='container_add_movies'>
<div id='feedback'>
Feedback
</div>
<div id='search'>
Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>
</div>
<div id='suggestions'>
Suggestions
</div>
</div>
http://codepen.io/alucardu/pen/PPjRzY
You're encountering the flex equal height columns feature.
An initial setting of a flex container is align-items: stretch.
This means that flex items automatically expand the full length of the cross axis of the container. In a row-direction container, the cross axis is vertical (height).
The tallest item sets the height for all siblings. As the tallest item expands, its siblings follow along. Hence, equal height for all items.
To override this default setting, add align-items: flex-start to the flex container:
#container_add_movies {
display: flex;
align-items: flex-start;
}
#container_add_movies {
display: flex;
align-items: flex-start; /* NEW */
}
#container_add_movies #feedback {
width: 20%;
background-color: green;
display: block;
}
#container_add_movies #search {
width: 60%;
background-color: red;
}
#container_add_movies #suggestions {
width: 20%;
background-color: yellow;
}
<div id='container_add_movies'>
<div id='feedback'>Feedback</div>
<div id='search'>
Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br> Search
<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>
</div>
<div id='suggestions'>Suggestions</div>
</div>
... or align-self: flex-start to the flex items:
#feedback {
align-self: flex-start;
width: 20%;
background-color: green;
}
#suggestions {
align-self: flex-start;
width: 20%;
background-color: yellow;
}
#container_add_movies {
display: flex;
}
#container_add_movies #search {
width: 60%;
background-color: red;
}
#feedback {
align-self: flex-start; /* NEW */
width: 20%;
background-color: green;
}
#suggestions {
align-self: flex-start; /* NEW */
width: 20%;
background-color: yellow;
}
<div id='container_add_movies'>
<div id='feedback'>Feedback</div>
<div id='search'>
Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br> Search
<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>
</div>
<div id='suggestions'>Suggestions</div>
</div>
align-items sets the default value of align-self. With align-self you can override the default on individual items.
More details in the spec:
8.3. Cross-axis Alignment: the align-items and align-self
properties
Flex items can be aligned in the cross axis of the current line of the
flex container, similar to justify-content but in the perpendicular
direction.
align-items sets the default alignment for all of the flex
container’s items, including anonymous flex items.
align-self allows this default alignment to be overridden for
individual flex items.
A bit of history
Since the beginnings of CSS, there have been two layout challenges that have regularly frustrated, perplexed, and annoyed front-end developers:
How to center things, especially vertically, and
How to create equal height columns (tables aside)
Today, with the advent of flexbox, these problems are over.
Centering things has never been easier:
#container {
display: flex;
justify-content: center; /* center flex items along the main axis */
align-items: center; /* center flex items along the cross axis */
}
Simple. Easy. Efficient. The craziness is over.
In terms of equal height columns, flexbox also excels: It does this by default.
#container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row; /* not even necessary; default rule */
align-items: stretch; /* not even necessary; default rule */
}
The align-items: stretch rule tells flex items to expand along the cross-axis as much as possible. Hence, in a row-direction container all items can be equal height. More craziness tamed by flexbox.
From one popular answer for equal height columns:
Give overflow: hidden to the container and large (and equal)
negative margin and positive padding to columns. Note that this
method has some problems, e.g. anchor links won't work within your
layout.
Now that's a hack!
The pendulum is now beginning to swing the other way: Designers are asking how to TURN OFF equal height columns.
You can add align-items: flex-start to your #container_add_movies. Here's an example
to have the unequal columns in bootstrap 4, first of all it needs to know how it is making it equal heights of the columns,so the reason is the
align-items: stretch
to remove this property it need to add align-items: flex-start so for this I have added the class="align-items-start" and the issue is fixed,
Setting the child element that was causing the problem to flex:none did the trick for me.

How to adapt height of div to its content while in flex wrapper [duplicate]

I have three elements I'm trying to align in my layout.
First, I have a div for feedback, and then a search input, and then a div element for suggestions.
I want the first and last element to have a width of 20%, and the search input to have a width of 60%. Using Flexbox I achieve what I want.
But there's a feature that grows all the divs to the highest element. This means that when search results pop up, the feedback and suggestion elements grow in height with the search div resulting in a messed up layout.
Is there a trick to not grow the divs with the highest element? Just make the divs (#feedback and #suggestions) have the height of the content in them?
#container_add_movies {
display: flex;
}
#container_add_movies #feedback {
width: 20%;
background-color: green;
}
#container_add_movies #search {
width: 60%;
background-color: red;
}
#container_add_movies #suggestions {
width: 20%;
background-color: yellow;
}
<div id='container_add_movies'>
<div id='feedback'>
Feedback
</div>
<div id='search'>
Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>Search
<br>
</div>
<div id='suggestions'>
Suggestions
</div>
</div>
http://codepen.io/alucardu/pen/PPjRzY
You're encountering the flex equal height columns feature.
An initial setting of a flex container is align-items: stretch.
This means that flex items automatically expand the full length of the cross axis of the container. In a row-direction container, the cross axis is vertical (height).
The tallest item sets the height for all siblings. As the tallest item expands, its siblings follow along. Hence, equal height for all items.
To override this default setting, add align-items: flex-start to the flex container:
#container_add_movies {
display: flex;
align-items: flex-start;
}
#container_add_movies {
display: flex;
align-items: flex-start; /* NEW */
}
#container_add_movies #feedback {
width: 20%;
background-color: green;
display: block;
}
#container_add_movies #search {
width: 60%;
background-color: red;
}
#container_add_movies #suggestions {
width: 20%;
background-color: yellow;
}
<div id='container_add_movies'>
<div id='feedback'>Feedback</div>
<div id='search'>
Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br> Search
<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>
</div>
<div id='suggestions'>Suggestions</div>
</div>
... or align-self: flex-start to the flex items:
#feedback {
align-self: flex-start;
width: 20%;
background-color: green;
}
#suggestions {
align-self: flex-start;
width: 20%;
background-color: yellow;
}
#container_add_movies {
display: flex;
}
#container_add_movies #search {
width: 60%;
background-color: red;
}
#feedback {
align-self: flex-start; /* NEW */
width: 20%;
background-color: green;
}
#suggestions {
align-self: flex-start; /* NEW */
width: 20%;
background-color: yellow;
}
<div id='container_add_movies'>
<div id='feedback'>Feedback</div>
<div id='search'>
Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br> Search
<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>Search<br>
</div>
<div id='suggestions'>Suggestions</div>
</div>
align-items sets the default value of align-self. With align-self you can override the default on individual items.
More details in the spec:
8.3. Cross-axis Alignment: the align-items and align-self
properties
Flex items can be aligned in the cross axis of the current line of the
flex container, similar to justify-content but in the perpendicular
direction.
align-items sets the default alignment for all of the flex
container’s items, including anonymous flex items.
align-self allows this default alignment to be overridden for
individual flex items.
A bit of history
Since the beginnings of CSS, there have been two layout challenges that have regularly frustrated, perplexed, and annoyed front-end developers:
How to center things, especially vertically, and
How to create equal height columns (tables aside)
Today, with the advent of flexbox, these problems are over.
Centering things has never been easier:
#container {
display: flex;
justify-content: center; /* center flex items along the main axis */
align-items: center; /* center flex items along the cross axis */
}
Simple. Easy. Efficient. The craziness is over.
In terms of equal height columns, flexbox also excels: It does this by default.
#container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row; /* not even necessary; default rule */
align-items: stretch; /* not even necessary; default rule */
}
The align-items: stretch rule tells flex items to expand along the cross-axis as much as possible. Hence, in a row-direction container all items can be equal height. More craziness tamed by flexbox.
From one popular answer for equal height columns:
Give overflow: hidden to the container and large (and equal)
negative margin and positive padding to columns. Note that this
method has some problems, e.g. anchor links won't work within your
layout.
Now that's a hack!
The pendulum is now beginning to swing the other way: Designers are asking how to TURN OFF equal height columns.
You can add align-items: flex-start to your #container_add_movies. Here's an example
to have the unequal columns in bootstrap 4, first of all it needs to know how it is making it equal heights of the columns,so the reason is the
align-items: stretch
to remove this property it need to add align-items: flex-start so for this I have added the class="align-items-start" and the issue is fixed,
Setting the child element that was causing the problem to flex:none did the trick for me.

Masonry with Flexbox, dynamic height [duplicate]

I have 3 divs inside a container. There are no nested divs.
I am using flex and order property.
On mobile, it is ok with order property.
But on larger screens it fails.
I did not use a container div for divs 2 and 3 in order to order them as 2,1,3 on mobile.
HTML FILE
<div class="container">
<div class="orange">1</div>
<div class="blue">2</div>
<div class="green">3</div>
</div>
CSS FILE
/*************** MOBILE *************/
.container
{
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
div.blue
{
order:1;
width: 100%;
}
div.orange
{
order:2;
width: 100%;
}
div.green
{
order:3;
width: 100%;
}
/***************************/
#media screen and (min-width:1200px)
{
.container
{
justify-content: space-between;
}
div.blue
{
order:2;
width: 36%;
}
div.orange
{
order:1;
width: 60%;
}
div.green
{
order:3;
width: 36%;
}
}
In your layout, using row wrap for the desktop view will be difficult, if not impossible, to implement with CSS. At a minimum, things would get overly complex. Why?
Because flexbox is not a grid system. It's a layout system designed to align content by distribution of space in the container.
In flexbox, items in a row wrap container must wrap to new rows. This means that div3 cannot wrap beneath div2. It must wrap beneath div1.
Here's how items wrap in a flex container with row wrap:
If div3 were to wrap under div2, that wouldn't be a row, that would be a grid, and flex items are confined to a straight, unbending row.
Put another way, you can't make a flex item wrap under another item in the same row.
As a result, white space created by items that aren't the tallest in the row is preserved in each column, creating unsightly gaps.
For your desired layout to work in row wrap, flex items would have to exit their row in order to close the gap – maybe with absolute positioning – which flexbox cannot do.
One way to align the items would be to wrap div2 and div3 in their own container. This new container would be a sibling to div1. It can then become a nested flex container with flex-direction: column. Now the gaps are gone and layout looks right.
Except, in this particular case, you need the order property to work (meaning all items must have the same parent), so a nested flex container is out of the question.
What may work is column wrap instead of row wrap:
/*************** MOBILE *************/
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 200px; /* necessary so items know where to wrap */
}
div.orange {
background-color: orange;
}
div.blue {
order: -1;
background-color: aqua;
}
div.green {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
.container > div {
width: 100%;
flex: 1;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
/***************************/
#media screen and (min-width: 800px) {
.container {
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
div.orange {
flex-basis: 100%;
width: 50%;
}
div.blue {
flex-basis: 50%;
width: 50%;
order: 0;
}
div.green {
flex-basis: 50%;
width: 50%;
}
}
<div class="container">
<div class="orange">1</div>
<div class="blue">2</div>
<div class="green">3</div>
</div>
jsFiddle
Here are two other options:
Desandro Masonry
Masonry is a JavaScript grid layout library. It
works by placing elements in optimal position based on available
vertical space, sort of like a mason fitting stones in a wall.
source: http://masonry.desandro.com/
CSS Grid Layout Module Level 1
This CSS module defines a two-dimensional grid-based layout system, optimized for user interface design. In the grid layout model, the children of a grid container can be positioned into arbitrary slots in a predefined flexible or fixed-size layout grid.
source: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/
Related post: Is it possible for flex items to align tightly to the items above them?

How can I make this vertical list fill the vertical height of the container?

I am using flexbox to create my 2 column layout. Everything is working well, however I'd like to have my list items in my right column always take up the full height. Each <li> element contains an <img> element.
When I start to shrink the window width, as you can see, the <ul> element's height starts to scale up to keep it's aspect.
If I make the window really wide, the list element(s) will start to get clipped off.
I'd like to always be able to see all 4 list items. I'd be OK if I have to lock the width(s) or height(s) down. As you can see, I've set a min/max height but no luck. I am also OK with using the <li> elements as a container/viewable area for the images. Meaning, if the image inside the <li> gets clipped off overflow:hidden or something - that's fine. I am just trying to keep the two columns 50% each, and the right column always take the full height.
HTML
<div id="container">
<div id="foo">
...
</div>
<div id="bar">
<ul>
<li><img></li>
<li><img></li>
</ul>
</div>
</div>
CSS
#container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
height: 600px;
min-height: 600px;
max-height: 600px;
}
#foo {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
order: 1;
width: 50%;
}
#bar {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
order: 2;
width: 50%;
}
Only give display: flex to the parent container. All children the inside parent container will be equal to the height of the child with the maximum height.
.container {
display: flex;
}
.foo {
width: 50%;
order: 1;
}
.bar {
width: 50%;
order: 2;
}

Flexbox wrapping issues [duplicate]

I have 3 divs inside a container. There are no nested divs.
I am using flex and order property.
On mobile, it is ok with order property.
But on larger screens it fails.
I did not use a container div for divs 2 and 3 in order to order them as 2,1,3 on mobile.
HTML FILE
<div class="container">
<div class="orange">1</div>
<div class="blue">2</div>
<div class="green">3</div>
</div>
CSS FILE
/*************** MOBILE *************/
.container
{
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
div.blue
{
order:1;
width: 100%;
}
div.orange
{
order:2;
width: 100%;
}
div.green
{
order:3;
width: 100%;
}
/***************************/
#media screen and (min-width:1200px)
{
.container
{
justify-content: space-between;
}
div.blue
{
order:2;
width: 36%;
}
div.orange
{
order:1;
width: 60%;
}
div.green
{
order:3;
width: 36%;
}
}
In your layout, using row wrap for the desktop view will be difficult, if not impossible, to implement with CSS. At a minimum, things would get overly complex. Why?
Because flexbox is not a grid system. It's a layout system designed to align content by distribution of space in the container.
In flexbox, items in a row wrap container must wrap to new rows. This means that div3 cannot wrap beneath div2. It must wrap beneath div1.
Here's how items wrap in a flex container with row wrap:
If div3 were to wrap under div2, that wouldn't be a row, that would be a grid, and flex items are confined to a straight, unbending row.
Put another way, you can't make a flex item wrap under another item in the same row.
As a result, white space created by items that aren't the tallest in the row is preserved in each column, creating unsightly gaps.
For your desired layout to work in row wrap, flex items would have to exit their row in order to close the gap – maybe with absolute positioning – which flexbox cannot do.
One way to align the items would be to wrap div2 and div3 in their own container. This new container would be a sibling to div1. It can then become a nested flex container with flex-direction: column. Now the gaps are gone and layout looks right.
Except, in this particular case, you need the order property to work (meaning all items must have the same parent), so a nested flex container is out of the question.
What may work is column wrap instead of row wrap:
/*************** MOBILE *************/
.container {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
height: 200px; /* necessary so items know where to wrap */
}
div.orange {
background-color: orange;
}
div.blue {
order: -1;
background-color: aqua;
}
div.green {
background-color: lightgreen;
}
.container > div {
width: 100%;
flex: 1;
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
/***************************/
#media screen and (min-width: 800px) {
.container {
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
div.orange {
flex-basis: 100%;
width: 50%;
}
div.blue {
flex-basis: 50%;
width: 50%;
order: 0;
}
div.green {
flex-basis: 50%;
width: 50%;
}
}
<div class="container">
<div class="orange">1</div>
<div class="blue">2</div>
<div class="green">3</div>
</div>
jsFiddle
Here are two other options:
Desandro Masonry
Masonry is a JavaScript grid layout library. It
works by placing elements in optimal position based on available
vertical space, sort of like a mason fitting stones in a wall.
source: http://masonry.desandro.com/
CSS Grid Layout Module Level 1
This CSS module defines a two-dimensional grid-based layout system, optimized for user interface design. In the grid layout model, the children of a grid container can be positioned into arbitrary slots in a predefined flexible or fixed-size layout grid.
source: https://drafts.csswg.org/css-grid/
Related post: Is it possible for flex items to align tightly to the items above them?

Resources