Populating a grid view is taking too much time - asp.net

I am trying to bind a gridview in asp.net, but it takes me too much time. I am using stored procedure, but in microsoft sql server management studio, the stores procedure takes only 2-3 second. My problem is when i load asp page. It takes 20-30 sec to populate my gridview... any idea?
UPDATE: My problem is in my stored procedure
SELECT
ROW_NUMBER() OVER
(
ORDER BY A.[ActiuniNumar] DESC
) as RowNum,
A.[Id],
A.[Societate_Id],
A.[Denumire],
A.[NrORC],
A.[CUI],
A.[CNP],
A.[Adresa],
A.[Localitate],
A.[Judet],
A.[Tip],
A.[ActiuniNumar],
A.[ActiuniSerie],
A.[ActiuniNumar] * [ValoareNominala] AS [ActiuniValoare],
CASE
WHEN S.[Capital] = 0 THEN 0
ELSE CAST(A.[ActiuniNumar] * 100 / S.ActiuniNumar AS decimal(18, 8))
END AS [ActiuniProcent],
A.[ActiuniNevandabileNumar],
A.[ActiuniNevandabileSerie],
A.[Diverse],
A.[SerieCI],
A.[Deleted],
A.[ModifiedBy],
A.[ModifiedAt]
INTO #Results2
FROM [dbo].[Actionar] A
INNER JOIN [dbo].[Societate] S ON A.[Societate_Id] = S.[Id]
WHERE 1 = 1
AND ((#ActiuniNumar IS NULL AND 1 = 1) OR (#ActiuniNumar IS NOT NULL AND (#ActiuniNumar = 0 AND A.[ActiuniNumar] <= 0) OR (#ActiuniNumar != 0 AND A.[ActiuniNumar] > 0)))
AND [Societate_Id] = #Id
AND ((#Filter = '' AND 1 = 1) OR (#Filter != '' AND (A.[Denumire] LIKE #Filter OR A.[NrORC] LIKE #Filter OR A.[CUI] LIKE #Filter OR A.[CNP] LIKE #Filter OR A.[ActiuniNumar] LIKE #Filter OR A.[SerieCI] LIKE #Filter)))
and A.[Deleted] = 0
ORDER BY A.[ActiuniNumar] DESC
SELECT * FROM #Results2 where RowNum BETWEEN(#pageIndex -1) * #pageSize + 1 AND(((#pageIndex -1) * #pageSize + 1) + #pageSize) - 1
It takes me 20 sec to run..

sorry if it's too late. But this happened to me. And the only solution that worked was this:
...
and A.[Deleted] = 0
--ORDER BY A.[ActiuniNumar] DESC
Comment the ORDER BY. That makes it slower.

Related

Is it possible to replace sub-queries, used as a scalar value, with CTE?

I want to replace a long sub-query that return a scalar value or does not exist with just a short alias, because I place it 3 times to the UPDATE statement. Sub-query takes the last value in UncoveredLoss, if there is one, and the new UncoveredLoss value is calculated in the updated row depending on the last UncoveredLoss value.
It is a non-correlated query, but it is used in SELECT clause, not in the FROM clause. Maybe I should somehow modify the UPDATE statement in the trigger.
The working code:
CREATE TRIGGER Result
UPDATE OF Win ON Log
BEGIN
UPDATE Log
SET Profit = CASE
WHEN NEW.Win = 0
THEN - Stake
WHEN NEW.Win = 1
THEN Rate * Stake / 100
WHEN NEW.Win = 2
THEN 0
END
WHERE ID = OLD.ID;
UPDATE Log
SET SumProfit = (
SELECT Sum(Profit)
FROM (
SELECT StrategyAccountID
,Profit
FROM Log
WHERE DATE <= NEW.DATE
)
GROUP BY StrategyAccountID
HAVING StrategyAccountID = NEW.StrategyAccountID
)
WHERE ID = NEW.ID;
UPDATE Log
SET UncoveredLoss = CASE
WHEN EXISTS (
SELECT UncoveredLoss
FROM Log
WHERE DATE < NEW.DATE
AND StrategyAccountID = NEW.StrategyAccountID
ORDER BY DATE DESC LIMIT 1
)
AND (
SELECT UncoveredLoss
FROM Log
WHERE DATE < NEW.DATE
AND StrategyAccountID = NEW.StrategyAccountID
ORDER BY DATE DESC LIMIT 1
) + NEW.Profit < 0
THEN (
SELECT UncoveredLoss
FROM Log
WHERE DATE < NEW.DATE
AND StrategyAccountID = NEW.StrategyAccountID
ORDER BY DATE DESC LIMIT 1
) + NEW.Profit
WHEN NOT EXISTS (
SELECT UncoveredLoss
FROM Log
WHERE DATE < NEW.DATE
AND StrategyAccountID = NEW.StrategyAccountID
ORDER BY DATE DESC LIMIT 1
)
AND NEW.Profit < 0
THEN NEW.Profit
ELSE 0
END
WHERE ID = NEW.ID;
END;
The simple replacement of the sub-query using CTE not working:
CREATE TRIGGER Result
UPDATE OF Win ON Log
BEGIN
UPDATE Log
SET Profit = CASE
WHEN NEW.Win = 0
THEN - Stake
WHEN NEW.Win = 1
THEN Rate * Stake / 100
WHEN NEW.Win = 2
THEN 0
END
WHERE ID = OLD.ID;
UPDATE Log
SET SumProfit = (
SELECT Sum(Profit)
FROM (
SELECT StrategyAccountID
,Profit
FROM Log
WHERE DATE <= NEW.DATE
)
GROUP BY StrategyAccountID
HAVING StrategyAccountID = NEW.StrategyAccountID
)
WHERE ID = NEW.ID;
WITH Loss
AS (
SELECT UncoveredLoss
FROM Log
WHERE DATE < NEW.DATE
AND StrategyAccountID = NEW.StrategyAccountID
ORDER BY DATE DESC LIMIT 1
)
UPDATE Log
SET UncoveredLoss = CASE
WHEN EXISTS (Loss)
AND (Loss) + NEW.Profit < 0
THEN (Loss) + NEW.Profit
WHEN NOT EXISTS (Loss)
AND NEW.Profit < 0
THEN NEW.Profit
ELSE 0
END
WHERE ID = NEW.ID;
END;
Error: near "UPDATE": syntax error
It works nicely when I don't replace the sub-query, but when I try to use CTE it fails. I work in sql.el mode in Emacs.
Yeah, that can be cleaned up a lot. Consider something like:
CREATE TRIGGER Result UPDATE OF Win ON Log BEGIN
UPDATE Log
SET SumProfit = (SELECT sum(Profit)
FROM Log
WHERE Date <= NEW.Date AND StrategyAccountID = NEW.StrategyAccountID)
, UncoveredLoss = ifnull((SELECT min(UncoveredLoss + NEW.Profit, 0)
FROM Log
WHERE Date < NEW.Date AND StrategyAccountID = NEW.StrategyAccountID
ORDER BY Date DESC
LIMIT 1), 0)
WHERE ID = NEW.ID;
END;
which I'm pretty sure calculates the same results as yours. (Actual sample table definition and data to work with would be nice)
Also note that in recent Sqlite3 releases (3.25 and later), your SumProfit column can easily be computed on demand instead of taking up space in the table:
SELECT *
, sum(profit) OVER (PARTITION BY StrategyAccountID ORDER BY Date) AS SumProfit
FROM Log;

Update statement not providing correct result in a BTEQ after Teradata 15 upgradation

An update statement is not working when executed inside BTEQ after Teradata 15 upgrade. The statement gives required output if executed from SQL Assistant manually. The statement is having a simple code.
---Update statement
UPDATE MAIN2
FROM
PSE_BIX_ABT.TP_ABT_DT_MOB_SBSCR_MAIN2 AS MAIN2,
(
SELECT DISTINCT
SBSCR_ID,
( SELECT DT FROM PSE_BIX_ABT.TP_ABT_DT_MOB_SBSCR_DT WHERE ID = 1 ) AS SNAP_DT,
SRVC_PRVDR_ID AS PORTED_IN_DNR_SP_ID,
SRVC_PRVDR_NM AS PORTED_IN_DNR_SP_NM,
OREPLACE(OREPLACE(SRVC_PRVDR_DESC,'[Fixed]',''),'[Mobile]','') AS PORTED_IN_DNR_SP_DESC,
PORT_STRT_DT AS PORTED_IN_DT,
CASE
WHEN PORTED_IN_DT = SNAP_DT THEN 1
ELSE 0
END AS PORTED_IN_CNT
FROM
PSE_BIX_SL_VW.V_F_PORTED_SBSCRS AS PORTED_SBSCR
INNER JOIN
PSE_BIX_SL_VW.V_SRVC_PRVDR SRVC
ON PORTED_SBSCR.DNR_SRVC_PRVDR_ID = SRVC.SRVC_PRVDR_ID
WHERE
PORT_IN_FL = 1
AND SBSCR_ID <> -1
AND PORT_STRT_DT <= ( SELECT DT FROM PSE_BIX_ABT.TP_ABT_DT_MOB_SBSCR_DT WHERE ID = 1 )
AND (SBSCR_ID,PORT_STRT_DT) IN (SEL SBSCR_ID,MAX(PORT_STRT_DT) FROM PSE_BIX_SL_VW.V_F_PORTED_SBSCRS WHERE PORT_STRT_DT <= ( SELECT DT FROM PSE_BIX_ABT.TP_ABT_DT_MOB_SBSCR_DT WHERE ID = 1 ) GROUP BY 1 )
) D_PORT_IN
SET
PORTED_IN_DNR_SP_ID = D_PORT_IN.PORTED_IN_DNR_SP_ID,
PORTED_IN_DNR_SP_NM = D_PORT_IN.PORTED_IN_DNR_SP_NM,
PORTED_IN_DNR_SP_DESC = D_PORT_IN.PORTED_IN_DNR_SP_DESC,
PORTED_IN_DT = D_PORT_IN.PORTED_IN_DT,
PORTED_IN_CNT = D_PORT_IN.PORTED_IN_CNT
WHERE
MAIN2.SBSCR_ID = D_PORT_IN.SBSCR_ID
AND MAIN2.SNAP_DT = D_PORT_IN.SNAP_DT;
Kindly help on the same.
Current Teradata 15.10.04.05 (Upgraded from 14)

How to calculate a row value based on the previous row value in the same column

I have the following data set:
DATE CODE RANK PARTITION
? ABS 0 1
12/04/2014 RET 1 1
20/04/2014 RET 2 1
01/05/2014 ABS 2 1
13/05/2014 RET 2 1
01/06/2015 ABS 2 1
09/10/2015 RETk 2 1
? ABS 0 2
02/04/2015 RET 1 2
03/04/2015 RET 2 2
04/04/2015 ABS 2 2
05/04/2015 STT 3 2
06/04/2015 RETk 4 2
07/04/2015 RETk 4 2
RANK is the column I want to calculate in my SQL given the columns DATE, CODE AND the previous value of the same column. It's initialized here to 0.
The logic I want to implement is as follows:
If RANK-1 (previous row) IS NULL AND CODE = ABS THEN RANK = 0
If RANK-1 (previous row) IS NULL AND CODE <> ABS THEN RANK <- (RANK-1) + 1
If RANK-1 = 0 or 1 AND CODE = RET THEN RANK <- (RANK-1) + 1
If RANK-1 = 2 AND CODE = STT THEN RANK <- (RANK-1) + 1
If RANK-1 = 3 AND CODE = RETk THEN RANK <- (RANK-1) + 1
If CODE = ABS THEN RANK <- (RANK-1) (previous row)
Else 0
The Teradata release I am using is R14. The calculation is done on a partition basis as shown in the example above. I have added some more constraints in the model to make it clearer. In this example, if the current code is RET, I do not increase the rank until the previous one is 0 or 1. Similarly, If my current code is RETk, I do not increase the rank until the previous one is equal to 3, otherwise, I do not change the rank. I repeat the same process in the following partition and so on ...
I cannot figure out how to update the current column value given the previous one... I tried many logic implementation with OLAP functions without success.
Can anyone give me a hint?
Thank you very much for your help
You can always use a recursive query for tasks like this. But performance will be bad unless the number of rows per group is low.
First you need a way to advance to the next row, as the next row's date can't be calculated based on the current row's date you must materialize the data and add a ROW_NUMBER:
CREATE TABLE tab(dt DATE, CODE VARCHAR(10), rnk INT, part INT);
INSERT INTO tab( NULL,'ABS' ,0 , 1);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2014-04-12','RET' ,1 , 1);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2014-04-20','RET' ,2 , 1);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2014-05-01','ABS' ,2 , 1);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2014-05-13','RET' ,2 , 1);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2014-06-01','ABS' ,2 , 1);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2014-10-09','RETk',2 , 1);
INSERT INTO tab( NULL,'ABS' ,0 , 2);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2015-04-02','RET' ,1 , 2);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2015-04-03','RET' ,2 , 2);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2015-04-04','ABS' ,2 , 2);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2015-04-05','STT' ,3 , 2);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2015-04-06','RETk',4 , 2);
INSERT INTO tab(DATE'2015-04-07','RETk',4 , 2);
CREATE VOLATILE TABLE vt AS
(
SELECT dt, code, part
-- used to find the next row
,ROW_NUMBER() OVER (PARTITION BY part ORDER BY dt) AS rn
FROM tab
) WITH DATA
PRIMARY INDEX(part, rn)
ON COMMIT PRESERVE ROWS
;
And now it's just applying your logic using CASE row after row:
WITH RECURSIVE cte (dt, code, rnk, part, rn) AS
(
SELECT
dt
,code
,CASE WHEN code = 'ABS' THEN 0 ELSE 1 END
,part
,rn
FROM vt
WHERE rn = 1
UNION ALL
SELECT
vt.dt
,vt.code
,CASE
WHEN cte.rnk IN (0,1) AND vt.CODE = 'RET' THEN cte.rnk + 1
WHEN cte.rnk = 2 AND vt.CODE = 'STT' THEN cte.rnk + 1
WHEN cte.rnk = 3 AND vt.CODE = 'RETk' THEN cte.rnk + 1
WHEN vt.CODE = 'ABS' THEN cte.rnk
ELSE cte.rnk
END
,vt.part
,vt.rn
FROM vt JOIN cte
ON vt.part =cte.part
AND vt.rn =cte.rn + 1
)
SELECT *
FROM cte
ORDER BY part, dt;
But I think your logic is not actually like this (based on the previous rows exact RANK value), you're just stuck in procedural thinking :-)
You might be able to do what you want using OLAP-functions only...
Something along the lines of:
create table table1
(
datecol date,
code varchar(10),
rankcol integer
);
--insert into table1 select '2014/05/13', 'RETj', 0;
select
case
when s1.code='ABS' and s2.rankcol = 1 then 1
when s1.code='RET' and s2.rankcol = 0 then 1
when s1.code='RET' and s2.rankcol = 1 then 2
else 0
end RET_res,
s1.*, s2.*
from
(select rankcol, code, row_number() OVER (order by datecol) var1 from table1) s1,
(select rankcol, code, row_number() OVER (order by datecol) var1 from table1) s2
where s1.var1=s2.var1-1
order by s1.var1
;

group by time interval

Assume I have a table like
how can I create a table like
where the groups are created of timeintervals with the length of 1 second.
Thank you in advance!
Here is an idea, but you need a table of numbers
select (m.startts + n.n - 1) as starttime,
(m.startts + n.n) as enddtime,
sum(case when vehicle_type = 'bus' then 1 else 0 end) as bus,
sum(case when vehicle_type = 'car' then 1 else 0 end) as car
from (select min(Timestamp) as startts from table t) m cross join
(select 1 as n union all select 2 union all select 3) n left join
table t
on t.timestamp >= m.startts + n.n - 1 and
t.timestamp < m.startts + n.n
group by m.startts + n.n;
This is a little dangerous because of the floating point arithmetic, but it will probably work for your purposes.

SQL Server 2012 query to compute calculations

I am building a query within SQL Server that is calculating scores we receive for our surveys. We have a column called overall_score, where the user inputs a number from 1-5 as a rating. I am trying to create a stored procedure that will calculate ratings based off the scores.
Score rating = (Total count of scores 4 and 5)/(Total number of responses) * 100
I have three separate select statements that create results I need, but when I go to combine them together my output is 0.
Can someone please guide me on what I am doing wrong here?
Separate SQL Statements:
SELECT count(overall_score) FROM Layer1_DataMerge WHERE overall_score = 4;
SELECT count(overall_score) FROM Layer1_DataMerge WHERE overall_score = 5;
SELECT count(overall_score) FROM Layer1_DataMerge;
Combined together:
SELECT distinct
(
(
(SELECT count(overall_score) FROM Layer1_DataMerge WHERE Overall_Score = 4) +
(SELECT count(overall_score) FROM Layer1_DataMerge WHERE overall_score = 5)
) / (SELECT count(overall_score) FROM Layer1_DataMerge)
) AS CSAT
FROM Layer1_DataMerge;
Well the reason you're getting zero is because you're doing integer division. With integer division 1/3 = 0. You need to convert to floating-point arithmetic, plus you can do it all in one query:
SELECT 100.0 *
(SUM(CASE WHEN overall_score = 4 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) +
SUM(CASE WHEN overall_score = 5 THEN 1 ELSE 0 END)) /
COUNT(overall_score)
or
SELECT 100.0 *
SUM(CASE WHEN overall_score IN (4,5) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) /
COUNT(overall_score)
To only show 2 decimals you can either cast to a numeric type with 2 decimals:
SELECT CAST(
100.0 *
SUM(CASE WHEN overall_score IN (4,5) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) /
COUNT(overall_score)
AS NUMERIC(5,2))
Or use STR to convert to a string:
SELECT STR(
100.0 *
SUM(CASE WHEN overall_score IN (4,5) THEN 1 ELSE 0 END) /
COUNT(overall_score)
,5,2)

Resources