Resize the header and content div dimensions respond when the window size changes but maintain right sidebar dimensions - css

I am trying to use a flexbox approach to create a layout that will resize the header width and content dimensions when a window is resized, but maintain the sidebar dimensions.
I found the following example from this Flexbox Approach to get me started, and it works as desired for the content div itself. But after looking it over, I'm unsure how to make it work as described with a fixed width, 100% height sidebar.
CSS from example:
<style>
html, body {
height: 100%;
margin: 0
}
.box {
display: flex;
flex-flow: column;
height: 100%;
}
.box .row {
border: 1px dotted grey;
}
.box .row.header {
flex: 0 1 auto; /* The above is shorthand for: flex-grow: 0, flex-shrink: 1, flex-basis: auto */ }
.box .row.content {
flex: 1 1 auto;
}
.box .row.footer {
flex: 0 1 40px;
}
</style>
HTML from example:
<div class="row header">
<p><b>header</b> <br /> <br />(sized to content)</p>
</div> <div class="row content">
<p> <b>content</b> (fills remaining space) </p>
</div>
<div class="row footer">
<p><b>footer</b> (fixed height)</p>
</div>
</div>

The following codepen example gave me the information I needed to get my layout working:
http://codepen.io/JosephSilber/pen/HqgAz
CSS:
.header {
height: 50px;
}
.body {
position: absolute;
top: 50px;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
display: flex;
}
.sidebar {
width: 140px;
}
.main {
flex: 1;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.content {
flex: 1;
display: flex;
overflow: auto;
}
.box {
min-height: -webkit-min-content;
display: flex;
}
.column {
padding: 20px;
border-right: 1px solid #999;
}
.column > div {
height: 2000px;
background: red;
}
.column:nth-child(2) > div {
height: auto;
}
/* All of these are just for this demo's design. */
body {
font-family: sans-serif;
font-size: 20px;
line-height: 50px;
text-transform: uppercase;
font-weight: bold;
}
.header {
text-align: center;
color: #fff;
background: #444;
}
.sidebar {
background: #666;
padding: 4px 20px;
color: #fff;
}
.page-header {
padding: 6px 20px;
background: #004141;
color: #fff;
font-size: .8em;
}
.content {
background: #ddd;
}
HTML:
<div class="header">Main header</div>
<div class="body">
Move this: <div class="sidebar">Sidebar</div>
<div class="main">
<div class="page-header">Page Header. Content columns are below.</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="box">
<div class="column">
<div>Column 1</div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<div>Column 1</div>
</div>
<div class="column">
<div>Column 1</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
To here: <div class="sidebar">Sidebar</div>
</div>
To get the sidebar on the right side, I simply moved <div class="sidebar">Sidebar</div>to just above the closing div tag for the .body class.

Related

Account for gap when calculating flex-basis

I'm trying to use gap to specify gaps between flexed items within my grid system, but running in to a major drawback. It seems that when you're using flex-grow: 0;/flex-shrink: 0; in conjunction with gap and flex-basis values that fill the entire available width (i.e. three columns with flex: 0 0 33.3333%;), the columns overflow their parent container as the gap doesn't account for the fixed width as specified with flex: 0 0 33.3333%.
Similar to box-sizing: border-box;, is there some way to instruct the rendering engine that the gap should be subtracted when determining the width of these columns?
Demonstration:
.row {
display: flex;
gap: 30px;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.col {
flex: 0 0 33.3333%;
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
}
:root {
font-family: sans-serif;
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<h2>With gap:</h2>
<div class="row">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
</div>
<h2>Without gap:</h2>
<div class="row" style="gap:0;">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
</div>
Note: I could account for this with a formula like flex-basis: calc($width - ($gap / ($number-of-columns / 2));, but as this is for a reusable grid system, I can't practically account for every possible scenario.
Here is another not very elegant quick way to hack your way forward. Similar to the answer by UPinar it alters the outer flex container. Here with negative margin on the right (this might cause other layout problems!). This "solution" is using shrink 0. Also it works with a wrapping flex.
I agree that this should not be so complicated and hacky. Maybe we are missing something? I am also under the impression that this is not the really the desired box-sizing border-box behavior which I hoped to find in combination with the gap property.
flex and gap should be hack free like: Draw three containers each consuming a third of the width and have some space between em. AFAIK gap works that way with CSS grid and CSS columns.
.flex {
display: flex;
flex-grow: 0;
flex-shrink: 0;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.flex.gap {
gap: var(--space-s);
margin-right: calc(-1 * var(--space-s));
}
.col {
flex-basis: 33.3333%;
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
}
.flex.gap .col {
flex-basis: calc(33.3333% - var(--space-s));
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
}
:root {
font-family: sans-serif;
--space-s: 1rem;
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<h2>With gap</h2>
<div class="flex gap">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
<div class="col">
4
</div>
<div class="col">
5
</div>
<div class="col">
6
</div>
</div>
<h2>Without gap</h2>
<div class="flex">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
<div class="col">
4
</div>
<div class="col">
5
</div>
<div class="col">
6
</div>
</div>
The formula you mentioned works... you can use CSS variables to make a reuseable grid system. A buddy and I came up with this:
.flex{
--columns:3;
--gap:30px;
--gap-count:calc( var(--columns) - 1 );
display:flex;
gap:var(--gap);
}
.flex-child {
flex-basis: calc( calc( 100% / var(--columns) ) - calc( var(--gap) / var(--columns) * var(--gap-count) ) );
}
#media (max-width: 992px) {
.flex{
--columns:2;
}
}
#media (max-width: 767px) {
.flex{
--columns:1;
}
}
So then all you need to change are the variables --columns and --gap
https://codepen.io/pyledigital/pen/mdWmjQb
When you add a padding-right: calc(var(--gap-space) * 2); to parent container. Parent container width will calculte before child containers use 100% which is parent container width. You need to change parent containers width before using its width inside child container.
*,
*::before,
*::after {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
body {
min-height: 100vh;
text-rendering: optimizeSpeed;
line-height: 1.5;
margin: 0;
background-color: bisque;
display: grid;
place-content: center;
}
:root{
--gap-space:30px;
font-family: sans-serif;
}
.row-1 {
display: flex;
gap: var(--gap-space);
border: 2px solid red;
padding-right: calc(var(--gap-space) * 2);
}
.row-1 .col{
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
flex: 0 0 calc(100% / 3);
}
.row-2{
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.row-2 .col{
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
flex: 0 0 calc(100% / 3);
}
<h2>With gap:</h2>
<div class="row-1">
<div class="col">1</div>
<div class="col">2</div>
<div class="col">3</div>
</div>
<h2>Without gap:</h2>
<div class="row-2" style="gap: 0">
<div class="col">1</div>
<div class="col">2</div>
<div class="col">3</div>
</div>
What's wrong with using only width?
.col {
width: 33.3333%;
...
}
.row {
display: flex;
gap: 30px;
border: 2px solid red;
}
.col {
width: 33.3333%;
background: teal;
border: 2px solid #004D4D;
color: white;
font-weight: 700;
padding: 50px;
text-align: center;
}
:root {
font-family: sans-serif;
}
* {
box-sizing: border-box;
}
<h2>With gap:</h2>
<div class="row">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
</div>
<h2>Without gap:</h2>
<div class="row" style="gap:0;">
<div class="col">
1
</div>
<div class="col">
2
</div>
<div class="col">
3
</div>
</div>

Image overlay doesn't fit

I've a problem with image overlay.
Code is here: https://codepen.io/r-smal/pen/BOBdmX
<section class="team">
<h2 class="team__title">team</h2>
<div class="team__wrapper container__team ">
<div>
<div class="team__card ">
<div class="team__overlay"></div>
<img class="team__img" src="https://i.imgur.com/vWIuUtd.jpg" alt="mako">
</div>
<h3 class="team__description">lorem</h3>
<p class="team__span">ipsum</p>
</div>
<div>
<div class="team__card ">
<div class="team__overlay"></div>
<img class="team__img" src="https://i.imgur.com/vWIuUtd.jpg" alt="mako">
</div>
<h3 class="team__description">lorem</h3>
<p class="team__span">ipsum</p>
</div>
<div>
<div class="team__card ">
<div class="team__overlay"></div>
<img class="team__img" src="https://i.imgur.com/vWIuUtd.jpg" alt="mako">
</div>
<h3 class="team__description">lorem</h3>
<p class="team__span">ipsum</p>
</div>
</section>
.container__team {
max-width: 1700px;
margin: 0 auto;
}
.team {
&__title {
margin: 100px;
text-align: center;
font-size: 30px;
text-transform: uppercase;
position: relative;
&::after{
content: "";
position: absolute;
width: 85px;
border-bottom: solid 3px #5dc6e8;
left: 48.5%;
top: 50px;
}
}
&__wrapper {
display: grid;
grid-template-columns: 33.33% auto auto;
text-align: center
}
&__description {
margin: 50px 0 20px;
text-align: center;
font-size: 35px;
}
&__span{
font-size: 35px;
text-align: center;
}
&__card {
position: relative;
}
&__overlay {
position: absolute;
background: rgba(0,0,0,0.6);
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
display: none;
}
&__img{
}
}
.team__card:hover .team__overlay{
display: block;
transition: 0.3s;
}
As you can see on codepen overlay on top of image is bigger than my image and I can't figure out why. I made it 'fit" but I have to use static margins so in resoult in mobile version it doesn't look right.
And one last question how do I position ::after element center under my text that will stay here even in mobile?Without using static margin like in my code.

CSS How do I force a container to be displayed underneath a preceding container whose elements float left

I want the div which displays "D" to appear beneath that one which displays "A" so that divs with matching background colours appear stacked over one another. However, I am getting this:
Where exactly in my CSS code must I clear my float?
#container {
background-color: #333333;
width: 990px;
}
#left {
background-color: red;
width: 300px;
float: left;
}
#splitter {
background-color: green;
width: 90px;
float: left;
}
#right {
background-color: blue;
width: 200px;
float: left;
}
<div id="container">
<div id="left">A</div>
<div id="splitter">B</div>
<div id="right">C</div>
</div>
<div id="container">
<div id="left">D</div>
<div id="splitter">E</div>
<div id="right">F</div>
</div>
You have to deal with floats and for this you need to understand what floats and BFC are :
a few ways to do this, that you should understand once you been reading a bit about floats, clearing and Block formating context.
(last example in the snippet below, oldish, even avoids the floats but does the layout)
/* DEMO purpose : Show the id or class being used on that container*/
section:before {
content: attr(id)' 'attr(class);
display: table;
background: #177EE5;
padding: 5px;
margin: 5px;
color: #fff;
text-shadow: 0 0 1px black, 0 0 1px black, 0 0 1px black, 0 0 1px black, 0 0 1px black, 0 0 1px black;
letter-spacing: 1px;
font-variant: small-caps;
}
/* your css turned into class to be valid since used for many tags */
.container {
background-color: #333333;
width: 990px;
}
.left {
background-color: red;
width: 300px;
float: left;
}
.splitter {
background-color: green;
width: 90px;
float: left;
}
.right {
background-color: blue;
width: 200px;
float: left;
}
/* wrapper for each examples */
section {
clear: both;
overflow: hidden;
margin: 1em;
}
/* different ways shown, usefull for testing only if you read about floats and dig a bit */
/* table */
.table .container {
display: table;
}
/* overflow */
.overflow .container {
overflow: hidden;
}
/* float */
.float .container {
float: left;
}
/* flex */
.flex .container {
display: flex;
}
/* inline-block */
.inline-block .container {
display: inline-block;
vertical-align: top;
}
/* last examples without floats */
/*no float & ie8 */
#table div {
float: none
}
#table #first-row,
#table > div {
display: table-row;
}
#table > div > div {
display: table-cell;
}
#table {
background-color: #333333;
width: 990px;
table-layout: fixed;
}
#left {
width: 300px;
}
#splitter {
width: 90px;
}
#right {
width: 200px;
}
#table > div > div {
background-color: red;
}
#table > div > div + div {
background-color: green;
}
#table > div > div + div + div {
background-color: blue;
}
#table:before {
display: table-caption;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
}
#table > div:after {
content: "Notice there's a gap to fill here since cols do not cover the 990px";
display: table-cell;
}
<section class="your CSS :-: no BFC involved">
<div class="container">
<div class="left">A</div>
<div class="splitter">B</div>
<div class="right">C</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="left">D</div>
<div class="splitter">E</div>
<div class="right">F</div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="table">
<div class="container">
<div class="left">A</div>
<div class="splitter">B</div>
<div class="right">C</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="left">D</div>
<div class="splitter">E</div>
<div class="right">F</div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="overflow">
<div class="container">
<div class="left">A</div>
<div class="splitter">B</div>
<div class="right">C</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="left">D</div>
<div class="splitter">E</div>
<div class="right">F</div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="float">
<div class="container">
<div class="left">A</div>
<div class="splitter">B</div>
<div class="right">C</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="left">D</div>
<div class="splitter">E</div>
<div class="right">F</div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="flex">
<div class="container">
<div class="left">A</div>
<div class="splitter">B</div>
<div class="right">C</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="left">D</div>
<div class="splitter">E</div>
<div class="right">F</div>
</div>
</section>
<section class="inline-block">
<div class="container">
<div class="left">A</div>
<div class="splitter">B</div>
<div class="right">C</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div class="left">D</div>
<div class="splitter">E</div>
<div class="right">F</div>
</div>
</section>
<p>another way without float including IE8 ?</p>
<section id="table" class="table">
<div id="first-row">
<div id="left">A</div>
<div id="splitter">B</div>
<div id="right">C</div>
</div>
<div>
<div>D</div>
<div>E</div>
<div>F</div>
</div>
</section>
There could be more examples from the same chunks of code and floatting children.
Clear the floats in the container.
You have 3 simple ways to do that:
1. Float
#container {
clear: both;
}
2. Overflow
#container {
overflow: hidden;
}
3. Micro clearfix hack
Link
Here is what you want done bro..
this one is by using display:inline-block https://jsfiddle.net/p4domjrb/
this one is by using float:left https://jsfiddle.net/p4domjrb/1/
.container {
background-color: #333333;
width: 990px;
display: block;
position: relative;
}
.left {
background-color: red;
width: 300px;
display: inline-block;
margin-left: -4px;
}
.splitter {
background-color: green;
width: 90px;
display: inline-block;
margin-left: -4px;
}
.right {
background-color: blue;
width: 200px;
display: inline-block;
margin-left: -4px;
}
don't use id I suggest use class isntead because idis called only once.
<style>
.container{
background-color: #333333;
width:990px;
display:block;
clear:both;
}
#left{
background-color: red;
width:300px;
float:left;
}
#splitter{
background-color: green;
width:90px;
float:left;
}
#right{
background-color: blue;
width: 200px;
float:left;
}
</style>
<body>
<div class="container">
<div id="left">A</div>
<div id="splitter">B</div>
<div id="right">C</div>
</div>
<div class="container">
<div id="left">D</div>
<div id="splitter">E</div>
<div id="right">F</div>
</div>
</body>
result is

How can I make flexbox wrap only an even number of items? [duplicate]

Is there a way to make a line break in multiple line flexbox?
For example to break after each 3rd item in this CodePen.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: gold;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(3n) {
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
Like
.item:nth-child(3n){
/* line-break: after; */
}
The simplest and most reliable solution is inserting flex items at the right places. If they are wide enough (width: 100%), they will force a line break.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(4n - 1) {
background: silver;
}
.line-break {
width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
But that's ugly and not semantic. Instead, we could generate pseudo-elements inside the flex container, and use order to move them to the right places.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(3n) {
background: silver;
}
.container::before, .container::after {
content: '';
width: 100%;
order: 1;
}
.item:nth-child(n + 4) {
order: 1;
}
.item:nth-child(n + 7) {
order: 2;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
</div>
But there is a limitation: the flex container can only have a ::before and a ::after pseudo-element. That means you can only force 2 line breaks.
To solve that, you can generate the pseudo-elements inside the flex items instead of in the flex container. This way you won't be limited to 2. But those pseudo-elements won't be flex items, so they won't be able to force line breaks.
But luckily, CSS Display L3 has introduced display: contents (currently only supported by Firefox 37):
The element itself does not generate any boxes, but its children and
pseudo-elements still generate boxes as normal. For the purposes of
box generation and layout, the element must be treated as if it had
been replaced with its children and pseudo-elements in the document
tree.
So you can apply display: contents to the children of the flex container, and wrap the contents of each one inside an additional wrapper. Then, the flex items will be those additional wrappers and the pseudo-elements of the children.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
display: contents;
}
.item > div {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(3n) > div {
background: silver;
}
.item:nth-child(3n)::after {
content: '';
width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item"><div>1</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>2</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>3</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>4</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>5</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>6</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>7</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>8</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>9</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>10</div></div>
</div>
Alternatively, according to an old version of the spec, Flexbox allowed forced breaks by using break-before, break-after or their old CSS 2.1 aliases:
.item:nth-child(3n) {
page-break-after: always; /* CSS 2.1 syntax */
break-after: always; /* CSS 3 syntax */
}
But these forced line breaks only work on Firefox, and I don't think they are supposed to work according to the current spec. The new proposed way (not implemented anywhere) is with wrap-before or wrap-after:
.item:nth-child(3n) {
wrap-after: flex; /* New proposed syntax */
}
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(3n) {
page-break-after: always;
break-after: always;
wrap-after: flex;
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
From my perspective it is more semantic to use <hr> elements as line breaks between flex items.
.container {
display: flex;
flex-flow: wrap;
}
.container hr {
width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div>1</div>
<div>2</div>
<hr>
<div>3</div>
<div>2</div>
...
</div>
Tested in Chrome 66, Firefox 60 and Safari 11.
#Oriol has an excellent answer, sadly as of October 2017, neither display:contents, neither page-break-after is widely supported, better said it's about Firefox which supports this but not the other players, I have come up with the following "hack" which I consider better than hard coding in a break after every 3rd element, because that will make it very difficult to make the page mobile friendly.
As said it's a hack and the drawback is that you need to add quite a lot of extra elements for nothing, but it does the trick and works cross browser even on the dated IE11.
The "hack" is to simply add an additional element after each div, which is set to display:none and then used the css nth-child to decide which one of this should be actually made visible forcing a line brake like this:
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(3n-1) {
background: silver;
}
.breaker {
display: none;
}
.breaker:nth-child(3n) {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">2</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">3</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">4</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">5</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">6</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">7</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">8</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">9</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">10</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
</div>
You want a semantic linebreak?
Then consider using <br>. W3Schools may suggest you that BR is just for writing poems (mine is coming soon) but you can change the style so it behaves as a 100% width block element that will push your content to the next line. If 'br' suggests a break then it seems more appropriate to me than using hr or a 100% div and makes the html more readable.
Insert the <br> where you need linebreaks and style it like this.
// Use `>` to avoid styling `<br>` inside your boxes
.container > br
{
width: 100%;
content: '';
}
You can disable <br> with media queries, by setting display: to block or none as appropriate (I've included an example of this but left it commented out).
You can use order: to set the order if needed too.
And you can put as many as you want, with different classes or names :-)
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.container > br
{
width: 100%;
content: '';
}
// .linebreak1
// {
// display: none;
// }
// #media (min-width: 768px)
// {
// .linebreak1
// {
// display: block;
// }
// }
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<br class="linebreak1"/>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
No need to limit yourself to what W3Schools says:
I think the traditional way is flexible and fairly easy to understand:
Markup
<div class="flex-grid">
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-3">.col-3</div>
<div class="col-9">.col-9</div>
<div class="col-6">.col-6</div>
<div class="col-6">.col-6</div>
</div>
Create grid.css file:
.flex-grid {
display: flex;
flex-flow: wrap;
}
.col-1 {flex: 0 0 8.3333%}
.col-2 {flex: 0 0 16.6666%}
.col-3 {flex: 0 0 25%}
.col-4 {flex: 0 0 33.3333%}
.col-5 {flex: 0 0 41.6666%}
.col-6 {flex: 0 0 50%}
.col-7 {flex: 0 0 58.3333%}
.col-8 {flex: 0 0 66.6666%}
.col-9 {flex: 0 0 75%}
.col-10 {flex: 0 0 83.3333%}
.col-11 {flex: 0 0 91.6666%}
.col-12 {flex: 0 0 100%}
[class*="col-"] {
margin: 0 0 10px 0;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
#media (max-width: 400px) {
.flex-grid {
display: block;
}
}
I've created an example (jsfiddle)
Try to resize the window under 400px, it's responsive!!
I just want to throw this answer in the mix, intended as a reminder that – given the right conditions – you sometimes don't need to overthink the issue at hand. What you want might be achievable with flex: wrap and max-width instead of :nth-child.
ul {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: center;
max-width: 420px;
list-style-type: none;
background-color: tomato;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 0;
}
li {
display: inline-block;
background-color: #ccc;
border: 1px solid #333;
width: 23px;
height: 23px;
text-align: center;
font-size: 1rem;
line-height: 1.5;
margin: 0.2rem;
flex-shrink: 0;
}
<div class="root">
<ul>
<li>A</li>
<li>B</li>
<li>C</li>
<li>D</li>
<li>E</li>
<li>F</li>
<li>G</li>
<li>H</li>
<li>I</li>
<li>J</li>
<li>K</li>
<li>L</li>
<li>M</li>
<li>N</li>
<li>O</li>
<li>P</li>
<li>Q</li>
<li>R</li>
<li>S</li>
<li>T</li>
<li>U</li>
<li>V</li>
<li>W</li>
<li>X</li>
<li>Y</li>
<li>Z</li>
</ul>
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/age3qp4d/
Another possible solution that doesn't require to add any extra markup is to add some dynamic margin to separate the elements.
In the case of the example, this can be done with the help of calc(), just adding margin-left and margin-right to the 3n+2 element (2, 5, 8)
.item:nth-child(3n+2) {
background: silver;
margin: 10px calc(50% - 175px);
}
Snippet Example
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: gold;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(3n+2) {
background: silver;
margin: 10px calc(50% - 175px);
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
For future questions, It's also possible to do it by using float property and clearing it in each 3 elements.
Here's an example I've made.
.grid {
display: inline-block;
}
.cell {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
float: left;
margin: 8px;
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
background-color: #bdbdbd;
font-family: 'Helvetica', 'Arial', sans-serif;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: 400;
line-height: 20px;
text-indent: 4px;
color: #fff;
}
.cell:nth-child(3n) + .cell {
clear: both;
}
<div class="grid">
<div class="cell">1</div>
<div class="cell">2</div>
<div class="cell">3</div>
<div class="cell">4</div>
<div class="cell">5</div>
<div class="cell">6</div>
<div class="cell">7</div>
<div class="cell">8</div>
<div class="cell">9</div>
<div class="cell">10</div>
</div>
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: gold;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
<div class="container">
<div>
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
you could try wrapping the items in a dom element like here. with this you dont have to know a lot of css just having a good structure will solve the problem.

Float second div to right only when its fits next to the first

I have the following (simplified) html & css:
<div class="container">
<div class="one">Some text for div 1</div>
<div class="two">Some text for div 2</div>
</div>
<style>
.two {float: right}
</style>
When both elements fit together in their container, I want it to look like;
Some text for div 1 Some text for div 2
However when they do not fit next to each other I want the second div's float to be removed, like;
Some text for div 1
Some text for div 2
How can I achieve this?
Flexbox can do that;
.parent {
border: 1px solid red;
margin: 1em auto;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.skinny {
width: 60%;
}
.left {
height: 50px;
background: green;
flex: 0 0 250px
}
.right {
height: 50px;
background: pink;
flex: 0 0 250px;
}
<div class="parent">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
</div>
<div class="parent skinny">
<div class="left"></div>
<div class="right"></div>
</div>
my variant without flexbox and more cross-browser
.container{
font-size: 0;
text-align: justify;
}
.container::after{
content: "";
display: inline-block;
width: 100%;
height: 0;
visibility: hidden;
}
.class-1, .class-2{
display: inline-block;
font-size: 14px;
text-align: left;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="class-1">Some text for div 1</div>
<div class="class-2">Some text for div 2</div>
</div>

Resources