As title, I want to know the NebulaGraph Database version.
I use nebula-console here.
[root]# ./nebula-console -addr 192.168.8.136 -port 9669 -u root -p nebula
Welcome to Nebula Graph!
(root#nebula) [(none)]> use basketballplayer
Execution succeeded (time spent 2206/2702 us)
Mon, 12 Dec 2022 06:09:16 UTC
As NebulaGraph is distributed, thus there is technically no version for the "database" but for each component, we could use SHOW HOSTS <type_of_the_process> to get this info since 2.x from the client side:
SHOW HOSTS STORAGE
SHOW HOSTS GRAPH
SHOW HOSTS META
SHOW HOSTS AGENT
There will be a version column of the output then.
Of course, from the server side, the binary itself supports checking the version like this:
/usr/local/nebula/bin/nebula-graphd --version
nebula-graphd version 2022.03.30-nightly, Git: 1e68162, Build Time: Mar 31 2022 02:31:25
This source code is licensed under Apache 2.0 License.
I'm trying to run a web application in a docker container, that as part of it's bootstrap it goes to get some information from services reachable through an open vpn.
The host machine is Mac and i couldn't find any way to do so.
The web application is jetty app running in docker-compose.
I need that other containers will be able to link to the webapp.
any idea ...?
Docker version:
Client:
Version: 17.12.0-ce
API version: 1.35
Go version: go1.9.2
Git commit: c97c6d6
Built: Wed Dec 27 20:03:51 2017
OS/Arch: darwin/amd64
Server:
Engine:
Version: 17.12.0-ce
API version: 1.35 (minimum version 1.12)
Go version: go1.9.2
Git commit: c97c6d6
Built: Wed Dec 27 20:12:29 2017
OS/Arch: linux/amd64
Experimental: true
I think you need to specify the path on your config file on your docker-compose.yaml so then you will be able to have it configure .
etc I guess something like https://github.com/kylemanna/docker-openvpn/blob/master/docs/docker-compose.md
Hope that helps!
I was trying Qualys SSL Labs test and It told me that the server is vulnerable to OpenSSL Padding Oracle vulnerability (CVE-2016-2107). I googled around on how to fix this, and although the OpenSSL version installed on my system (Ubuntu 14.04) should be patched for that according to this link I was still getting this error.
I tried upgrading OpenSSL but it was already the newest version, so I installed manually a newer version following the instructions here which went fine, but that didn't fix anything. Looking at the info from Nginx, It seems it still runs with the previous version:
nginx -V
nginx version: nginx/1.10.2
built with OpenSSL 1.0.1f 6 Jan 2014 (running with OpenSSL 1.0.2g-fips 1 Mar 2016)
while OpenSSL has clearly been updated:
openssl version
OpenSSL 1.0.2j 26 Sep 2016
Any idea how to get all this sorted out?
Note that yes, I did restart Nginx, I even tried sudo service nginx upgrade and even rebooted the server.
I am new to docker and currently struggling with the following problem:
After starting the command in the docker terminal:
OAUTH_CLIENT_ID=<...> OAUTH_CLIENT_SECRET=<...>
OAUTH_URL_CALLBACK=http://192.168.99.100/api/v1/auth/login docker-compose --
file test/docker-compose.yml up
I get the following error message:
ERROR: for platform Cannot start service platform: invalid header field
value "oci runtime error: container_linux.go:247: starting container process
caused \"process_linux.go:359: container init caused \\\"rootfs_linux.go:53:
mounting \\\\\\\"/c/users/m_konk01/documents/GitHub/o2r-
platform/test/nginx.conf\\\\\\\" to rootfs
\\\\\\\"/mnt/sda1/var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/29c14c514916cf09070c6dd084bee55fa899d9
79b3f7b9521f1ab25e3a8232a0\\\\\\\" at
\\\\\\\"/mnt/sda1/var/lib/docker/aufs/mnt/29c14c514916cf09070c6dd084bee55fa899d9
79b3f7b9521f1ab25e3a8232a0/etc/nginx/nginx.conf\\\\\\\" caused \\\\\\\"not
a directory\\\\\\\"\\\"\"\n" [31mERROR[0m: Encountered errors while bringing up the project.
The docker-compose.yml starts several docker containers and contains the following platform settings:
platform:
image: nginx:latest
depends_on:
- container1
- container2
- container3
- container4
volumes:
- "./nginx.conf:/etc/nginx/nginx.conf:ro"
- "../client:/etc/nginx/html"
ports:
- "80:80"
Docker version
$ docker version
Client:
Version: 1.12.3
API version: 1.24
Go version: go1.6.3
Git commit: 6b644ec
Built: Wed Oct 26 23:26:11 2016
OS/Arch: windows/amd64
Server:
Version: 1.12.3
API version: 1.24
Go version: go1.6.3
Git commit: 6b644ec
Built: Wed Oct 26 23:26:11 2016
OS/Arch: linux/amd64
Would be happy for any ideas. My search was not successful so far.
it seems like you want to mount a file to a file. i remember on your docker-version its not allowed. you have to move your nginx.conf inside of your Dockerfile
Dockerfile:
....
ADD nginx.conf /tmp/
RUN mv /tmp/nginx.conf /etc/nginx/nginx.conf && \
....
this should work for you. if not show me your next error code
I faced similar issue due to volume mount was not worked properly.
So docker default behavior consider this /nginx.conf as directory and gives this error.
To confirm this, you can ssh into your image and go to shared directory and check the files exist or not.
Example: docker exec -it nginx sh and go to /etc/nginx/html you won't see your local files. Then you can confirm volume share was not working. you need to fix that.
If you are using windows 10 (hyper-v), first you need to share your drive and check.
However you need to find the solution to mound your shared directory first.
I'm running a debian stable ThinkPad X1 (1294-3QG) with exactly three packages from squeeze-backports needed for the GraphicsModi:
initramfs-tools 0.99~bpo60+1
linux-base 3.4~bpo60+1
linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64 3.2.9-1~bpo60
While running that kernel, starting for example paraview results in those errors:
Unrecognized deviceID 126
X Error: BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation) 11
Extension: 154 (Uknown extension)
Minor opcode: 3 (Unknown request)
Resource id: 0x3200273
X Error: GLXBadContext 169
Extension: 154 (Uknown extension)
Minor opcode: 5 (Unknown request)
Resource id: 0x32002b0
paraview: ../../src/xcb_io.c:183: process_responses: Zusicherung »!(req && current_request && !(((long) (req->sequence) - (long) (current_request)) <= 0))« nicht erfüllt.
Somewhere on the net, I found the hint to offer the memory settings in the xorg.conf, but that did not solve my problem.
Starting within the current stable kernel works fine.
Running glxgearsresults similar:
Unrecognized deviceID 126
X Error of failed request: BadAlloc (insufficient resources for operation)
Major opcode of failed request: 154 (GLX)
Minor opcode of failed request: 3 (X_GLXCreateContext)
Serial number of failed request: 27
Current serial number in output stream: 29
I further tried, to solve the problem by updating xserver-xorg-video-intel (and all dependencies libdrm-intel1 libxfont1, xserver-common, xserver-xorg, xserver-xorg-core, xserver-xorg-input-evdev, xserver-xorg-video-fbdev and xserver-xorg-video-vesa) to backports, but that was not prosperous.
Additional, I found the entry
[drm] MTRR allocation failed. Graphics performance may suffer.
in the output of dmesg.
I had the same issue on self-made server station with Intel i7 2700k (which has Intel HD 3000) running Debian Stable 6.0.4 (squeeze) x64. Basically I knew that this platform has loads of problems with unix systems (as always intel GPU does), but it purpose is server, so on-board graphic is fair enough for that. Anyways I wanted someday to run just a move (on TV connected via HDMI*/VGA), so I installed gnome-core with gdm3 to run manually.
With kernel 2.6.32-5-amd64 everything was excellent, besides few things, which forced me to upgrade kernel:
SSD support (added & improved from linux-image-2.6.33)
HDMI - no devices was recognized, couldn't add & change resolution (cvt xrandr).
So I added squeeze-backports to sources.list and upgraded only kernel (same what you did).
After that HDMI connection works great, but I noticed slow refresh rate - tearing during loading gdm3 login screen and after. I checked dmesg and kernel messages for some infos
cat dmesg | grep failed && cat dmesg | grep drm && cat /var/log/messages | grep failed && cat /var/log/messages | grep drm - found same. Than I run glxgears and found same error.
I was digging net for few days after some solutions and ideas.
Found many useless things about allocating RAM (enable_mtrr_cleanup) etc.
Basically for my hardly ever cinematic needs it wasn't tragedy, but I like when everything is perfect, so I still was working around to fix it.
And at last! Got it solved! Problem was not with the RAM or new kernel itself.
I have to mention here, that I compiled Debian kernel myself - 3.2 based on settings from previous install.
I removed also all unneeded libs for my architecture (i.e. libdrm for nvidia radeon and others - even VESA!!!)
I added just for a moment wheezy (testing) repositories, upgraded and installed new packages with dependences as root (only this ones):
echo deb http://ftp.pl.debian.org/debian/ testing main contrib non-free >> /etc/apt/sources.list
apt-get update
apt-get install --reinstall -t testing libdrm2 libdrm-intel1 xserver-xorg-video-intel xserver-xorg-core libgl1-mesa-glx libgl1-mesa-dri mesa-utils
dpkg-reconfigure xserver-xorg
That fixed all problems with rendering and allocation on Intel GPU :)
Think it should works for you and everyone with Intel GPU-s. Don't forget to remove wheeze (testing) from sources.list when you are done.
Regards, T_Send.
I solved it now on my own by updating some mesa concerning packages. I'm running debian stable with those following packages from backports:
initramfs-tools, libdrm-intel1, libgl1-mesa-dev, libgl1-mesa-dri,
libgl1-mesa-glx, linux-base, linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-all-amd64,
linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-amd64, linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-common,
linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-common-rt,
linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.1-rt-amd64,
linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-all-amd64,
linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64, linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-common,
linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-common-rt,
linux-headers-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-rt-amd64, linux-image-3.2.0-0.bpo.2-amd64,
linux-kbuild-3.2, mesa-common-dev
Hoping this info will help other, too.