I want to know the meaning of the exten, which is one member of the structure ngx_http_request_t, also, ngx_http_set_exten hopes to be excavated.
I believe that it means file extension, being the part of the final path element that follows a period. It is used to lookup the MIME type in the types data structure, to be used in the response.
Relevant code is here. Line 1701.
Related
I have researched a lot on internet, but still not able to get exact solution for my problem. The problem mentioned in below link is much similar to mine, but this will not work.
If record exists then map, if not map another - Biztalk mapping
My Problem:
I have xml source file which has invoice information, something like this.
-<invoice>
<invoiceNumber>1124</invoiceNumber>
+<invoiceHeader>
+<invoiceDetails>
</invoice>
<invoiceNumber>1598</invoiceNumber>
+<invoiceHeader>
+<invoiceDetails>
</invoice>
It is possible that, sometimes the subnode ie. invoiceDetails information can be missing for few invoice Numbers,but header information will be present.
Output required:
The output file (.csv) should have all invoice numbers irrespective of detail tag present or not?
Add a Looping Functoid to the Map with the source link from and the target from the Looping Functoid linked to the row element in the Flat File Schema.
It will work, trust us. :)
It depends on how is the output schema, but solution must be easy only link tag to the output.
Behind the scenes, the XSLT produced is a loop for each tag and copy that value to the output, irrespective of detail tag present or not.
I have two separate paths defined in my schema:
/team/{id}/people/{modified}:
get:
/team/{id}/people/{person_id}:
delete:
So these are two completely separate "things" because one is a get and one is a delete, and the second parameter name doesn't make sense as something generic. The 'get' is passing in a modified timestamp at that location and the delete is passing in an actual person identifier.
This shows up properly in Swagger UI, but the Swagger Editor is giving an error telling me that an equivalent path already exists. It's hard to just ignore it because that scatters errors all over the file making it hard to debug real issues.
What's the solution to something like this?
you should be use /team/{id}/people/delete/{person_id}:
Should the following URLs be considered functionally equivalent?
http://example.com/foo?a=&b=
http://example.com/foo?a&b
This came about when a user of a Drupal module I wrote which parses apart and then rewrites URIs noticed that the code sometimes causes the query string parts to change in unexpected ways due to how some of the underlying PHP functions behave. For example:
parse_str("a&b", $values); print http_build_query($values);
a=&b=
Is this something I should bother worrying about?
Edit so SO stops complaining that this question is similar to another one: The question is whether it's safe to assume that "no value for X" and "empty value for X" are equivalent, not whether the "no value" style is syntactically correct (which it is).
RFC 3986 Uniform Resource Identifier (URI): Generic Syntax doesn't have anything to say about the structure of the query string aside from how characters like ? should be dealt with. So strictly speaking, your two example URLs are different. Of course, the application which receives those query strings may treat them as functionally equivalent, but this isn't something you can determine from the URL alone.
As per RFC6570 empty query parameters are allowed. Please refer to section 3.2.9
Example Template Expansion
{&x,y,empty} &x=1024&y=768&empty=
I've tried to find the answer in other questions, and none of the "standard" answers are working, so I'm hoping someone can either point me to where this has already been answered, or can tell me how to do this.
I have a large file with multiple documents within it. For a sample, assume something like this
DOCUMENT_IDENTIFIER 123400000000000000000123457 OTHER STUFF HERE
LINE WITH STUFF HERE
LINE WITH STUFF HERE
DOCUMENT_IDENTIFIER 123500000000000000000127456 OTHER STUFF HERE
LINE WITH STUFF HERE
LINE WITH STUFF HERE
Now, I'll need to preserve everything in the DOCUMENT_IDENTIFIER Line starting with the first 0 through the 123 (or 127 in the second Document) That header line, plus the all the LINE WITH STUFF HERE lines below it should make up one Document, and a new document should start at the second DOCUMENT_IDENTIFIER line.
When I attempt to use the standard Debatching techniques, the pipeline fails: either it just fails completely (when, for instance, I try to define a header and body schemas for the pipeline) or it never starts the second document (if I try just a body schema).
I'm certain this is something fairly simple, but I'm completely missing how to get it done. Any suggestions/direction would be welcome.
If it matters, I'm stuck on BT2006 R2, at current.
What does your Body Schema look like? I would start getting that right and make sure that you have something that will create xml with separate records of all the "DOCUMENT_IDENTIFIER 1234" records.
I would use the "DOCUMENT_IDENTIFIER "1234 bit as the Tag Identifier, and then I would set the Tag Offset to 4, to avoid the first 4 characters.
You should have a
RecordForDocumentIdentifiers (Root of your Schema) Group Maxoccurs=*
RecordForDocumentIdentifier (Set the Tag Identifier here)
Fields for the columns you want to parse
RecordForOtherLines Group Maxoccurs=*
RecordForOtherLine Maxoccurs=* or whatever your rules are.
Fields for the columns of other lines
When that seems to parse your example okay, and generate the XML you want, I would start creating my header and body schemas from that. I know it is 2 steps, but it takes some of the guesswork out of it.
I guess the Header schema would be picked from the RecordDocumentIdentifier and the body would be RecordForOtherLines (The outer record for that).
I hope that helps. If not, post your actual file and schema and let us take a look at it.
What is the simplest way to remove the header row from a flat file in BizTalk? I have implemented this by creating a separate schema for the header row (and one for the body) and then set the HeaderSpecName property in the 'Configure Pipeline' dialog to the header schema I've just created and then the PreserveHeader property to false. My problem, however, is that with this solution I need to create a schema that does nothing other than it needs to exist so I can remove the header row.
I believe what you stated is the recommended way to do what you are asking. I just had to do this on a project i am working on and chose to have the extra schema.
Another option would be to write your own custom pipeline component for the Disassemble stage that executes before the flat file dissassembler. The Decode stage would work too, but it seems that the disassemble stage is made for this type of work.
This second option would make the removing of the header row more generic and could be used across many different schemas so you wouldn't have to create a separate header schema for each flat file schema.
i recommend doing this through the flat file schema wizard; define your first record as a singular record and then your other records as repeating records. then in whatever map or transformations you're working with you can just ignore the header record. you could also ignore the header record when going through the FF wizard by ignoring it altogether, but i prefer to have everything defined in my schemas...
check out the help and microsoft tutorials, also there's a decent article on the code project that incorporates identifying header records. note that if you know the absolute position of the header record (like: "always the first line") you don't need to mess with record tagging.
http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/13706/Creating-Flat-File-schemas-using-the-BizTalk-Serve
You could always just parse the header row and not map it.
The schema exists for many reasons. One such reason is to capture the structure of the message generated by a party which effectively means the agreement. So it is good to capture the schema as it is even though you may not use the fields.
I don't think PreserveHeader acts as you may expect. This property simply determines whether or not values from the header are promoted into the context of the XML message that comes out of the disassembler.