Our company has several organizations within it. We'd like our API Owners to be responsible for publishing their APIs via the publisher. However, my current understanding is that if you have the ability to publish an API, you get the ability to publish all APIs in the system.
Is it possible to establish publisher roles by team, and the appropriate ownership of APIs?
For example:
Team 1 owns APIs A,B,C
Team 2 owns APIs X,Y,Z
A member of Team 1 can only edit/publish A,B,C.
Thanks
WSO2 API Manager support publisher access control. With that, you can define role-based access control to your APIs. So you can enable read/update(publish) restrictions to user groups with roles.
Related
I'm using Microsoft Graph SDK for .NET Core. I'm trying to get a list of all Office 365 plans in all Azure Active Directory groups within my organization.
I have been reading through a lot of questions, but haven't found a clear answer to my problem: As it's stated in the official documentation, you cannot list plans in a group using client credentials (application permissions), which is the exact authentication method I'm using. Given this, how can I achieve my objective?
As per documentation, the only way to list plans in groups is to use Delegated Permissions, but in that case, and according to the Microsoft Graph permissions:
either the user or an administrator consents to the permissions that the app requests and the app can act as the signed-in user when making calls to Microsoft Graph.
If the signed-in user is a regular user then the application will only access the groups that user is a member of. Bear in mind that there may not be a single user that is a member of all groups.
Is there a way to get my application to list all plans in all groups within my organization?
You can now use application permissions.
Outdated Reply:
Planner currently does not support application permissions. Depending
on what your scenario is, you have couple of options. One option is to
create a user account to be used by your app, and add that user to all
the groups. Then you'll be able to query the plans with the
credentials of that user.
I have a sheets bound google apps script file that is triggered by the installable trigger onFormSubmit(), which was set up by me. The script, therefore, always runs with my data, no matter who fills out the google form which I am collecting data from.
As a part of this script, the Drive advanced API is utilized, and I create and edit teamdrives using this advanced service.
I want to be able to use the Drive Advanced Service, with all of its authentication management and autocomplete features, while using a service account.
I've seen from other questions on this topic that there are libraries for the management and use of service accounts within Google Apps Script, but they require managing authorization tokens and such of the users which the service account acts on behalf of, and using them to access the API. Going this route, I will have to use the HTTP Interface for the Drive API rather than the Advanced Service, which isn't optimal, but still doable.
Is there a way to authorize advanced services such as the Drive API for a service account acting on behalf of a particular user of my G suite organization in my scenario?
Thanks in advance!
I have successfully deployed a Google Cloud Endpoints Developer Portal for my API running on Endpoints. I would like to provide access to testing to people outside my organisation that are not using GCP in their projects.
Login to the portal works correctly if I enable the Service Consumer role for these people (on per-email basis). However, when they open it for the first time, they are being asked to grant some extra permissions to the portal:
This form can create totally unnecessary security concerns. Does anyone know, why is it needed?
I only would like my clients to be able to test my API using a GUI, before they could start connecting their projects (not necessary on GCP) to mine. This seems to be a valid use case for me, however I might be misunderstanding some basic concepts.
Or should I submit a feature request to Google about a new role that only enables the access to the portal, and nothing else, so no such forms are shown?
Since Endpoints APIs must be explicitly shared with customers, the portal needs to verify that the logged-in user has permission to view that Endpoints API. So the short answer is that these scopes are being requested primarily so the portal can check the user's access to this API.
Longer answer is that we (the Endpoints team) are looking into if it's possible to build narrower OAuth scopes that would correspond to the access checks we perform. We agree that it's unnecessarily broad of an access request and are hoping to improve this in the future. Thanks for your comment!
I'm exploring WSO2 API Manager platform to use in Open API project. The idea is that we forbid registration in Store and creating users by ourselves. But we also want to give them only Sandbox API as a starting point and then, explicitly allow particular users to consume Production API. Haven't find any information. Is it possible? If yes - where to look?
You can restrict the token generation for the Production endpoints by using Workflows. Follow the documentation[1].
You could configure ProductionApplicationGeneration to use ApplicationRegistrationWSWorkflowExecutor and SandbobApplicationGeneration to use ApplicationRegistrationSimpleWorkflowExecutor.
With this approach if the subscriber tried to generate a token for production endpoints, it will trigger a human task, which needs to be approved from the Admin Portal.
For your requirement, you could write a custom workflow extension which allows restriction by role or user name. For more information on Writing custom workglow extension please follow [2]
[1] https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM210/Adding+an+Application+Registration+Workflow
[2] https://docs.wso2.com/display/AM210/Customizing+a+Workflow+Extension
Thanks and Regards
I have a saas platform I'm building and I'm currently struggling with how to model my auth flow. The system is going to be multiple multi-tenant applications but I would like to unify user authorization & authentication. Basically, each US State will have its own web app/resource server/database and every county in that state will be a separate tenant. I cannot combine all states into one application, so that is not an option.
I would like to throw all users and their information/password into one database connected to my auth service. But each county (tenant) admin within each state (web app) needs to be able to add & manager their users and their roles. So the auth service needs to be aware of all the different tenants across each application. I also need to be able to link items created in each database to the user that created it. If I create object "X" and another user in my county views that item, they can see "Kovaci" created this.
I also do NOT want SSO between states but if possible I would like users to be a part of multiple tenants within one app (not a requirement though). Native iOS/Mobile apps are another client I need to support with this flow.
I used this bitoftech article to base off of: http://bitoftech.net/2014/10/27/json-web-token-asp-net-web-api-2-jwt-owin-authorization-server/comment-page-1/#comments
And here is my paint quick mockup: multi saas design
My question is just generally how do I design this auth part? Can I store all users in one auth db like my goal? If so, how do tenant admins manage them and how do I link tables in my separate app db's to the users' current info in the auth db?