Aligning flex items to the flex-end - css

Hei,
I'm creating grid layout and when trying to align items on flex-end or start, height/width becomes zero.
What I'm wondering is, is it possible to align items in flex container to the top/bottom/center WITHOUT specifying height/width? In my case I didn't specify any height and it doesn't work. If I specify it, it works. Line that doesn't work is commented in first example.
Here is code:
.flex-container {
display: flex;
background: silver;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
//align-items: flex-start;
}
.flex-item {
background: blue;
flex: 1 0 10px;
margin: 5px;
}
.flex-container2 {
display: flex;
background: silver;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
align-items: flex-end;
}
.flex-item2 {
background: blue;
height: 50px;
flex: 1 0 10px;
margin: 5px;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="flex-container2">
<div class="flex-item2"></div>
<div class="flex-item2"></div>
<div class="flex-item2"></div>
<div class="flex-item2"></div>
</div>

As the default value for align-items is stretch, hence they fill their parents height, and you change it to flex-start/flex-end, the row flex items becomes 0 in height, and will need content (or a height/min-height) for you to actually see them.
.flex-container {
display: flex;
background: silver;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
align-items: flex-start;
}
.flex-item {
background: blue;
min-height: 20px;
flex: 1 0 10px;
margin: 5px;
}
.flex-item:nth-child(even) {
align-self: flex-end;
}
.flex-container2 {
display: flex;
background: silver;
width: 400px;
height: 200px;
align-items: flex-end;
}
.flex-item2 {
background: blue;
height: 50px;
flex: 1 0 10px;
margin: 5px;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item">They need content or a height/min-height</div>
<div class="flex-item">They need content or a height/min-height</div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
<br>
<div class="flex-container2">
<div class="flex-item2"></div>
<div class="flex-item2"></div>
<div class="flex-item2"></div>
<div class="flex-item2"></div>
</div>

Related

How to move a flex container to the right?

I have a flex container that contains a varying number of other flex containers. I'm trying to get the outermost container to be justified to the right and only take up 60% of the available width. Then I want to have another flex container take up that space on the left. #Feed is the outermost container and the .tweets are its children. #friends is the independent flex container.
#feed {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
box-sizing: border-box;
width: 60%;
}
.tweet {
display: flex;
border: 2px solid red;
border-radius: 25px;
flex: 1;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
#friends {
display: flex;
}
Here is an example of two flex items taking up 40% and 60% space.
#wrapper {
display: flex;
}
.column-40 {
width: 40%;
background: lightgray;
}
.column-60 {
width: 60%;
background: grey;
}
.tweet {
border: 1px solid blue;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div class="column-40">
<div class="tweet">tweet</div>
<div class="tweet">tweet</div>
<div class="tweet">tweet</div>
</div>
<div class="column-60">
<div class="tweet">tweet</div>
<div class="tweet">tweet</div>
<div class="tweet">tweet</div>
</div>
</div>
When you just want the 60% wrapper to be aligned right you can remove the first column and justify the content to the end:
#wrapper {
display: flex;
justify-content: flex-end;
}
.column-60 {
width: 60%;
}
.tweet {
border: 1px solid blue;
}
<div id="wrapper">
<div class="column-60">
<div class="tweet">tweet</div>
<div class="tweet">tweet</div>
<div class="tweet">tweet</div>
</div>
</div>

First-child full-width in Flexbox

How can I set the first-child of flexbox in full-width and all of the other childs set to flex:1(for split space)?
Like this:
You can set the :first-child to a width of 100%, and the rest of the childs :not(:first-child) to flex: 1.
To put them on multiple lines, use flex-wrap: wrap on the container:
.container {
display: flex;
justify-content: space-between;
flex-wrap: wrap;
background: #e2eaf4;
padding: 10px;
}
.child {
display: inline-block;
font-family: "Open Sans", Arial;
font-size: 20px;
color: #FFF;
text-align: center;
background: #3794fe;
border-radius: 6px;
padding: 20px;
margin: 12px;
}
.child:first-child {
width: 100%;
}
.child:not(:first-child) {
flex: 1;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="child">Child</div>
<div class="child">Child</div>
<div class="child">Child</div>
</div>
Add width: 100%; for your first item. And flex: 1; for others.
.flex {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.flex-item:not(:first-child) {
flex: 1;
}
.flex-item:nth-child(1) {
width: 100%;
}
/* Styles just for demo */
.flex-item {
background-color: #3794fe;
margin: 10px;
color: #fff;
padding: 20px;
border-radius: 5px;
}
<div class="flex">
<div class="flex-item">
Child
</div>
<div class="flex-item">
Child
</div>
<div class="flex-item">
Child
</div>
</div>
Another solution which utilises the flex-basis option (the third value when using this format flex: 1 1 100%).
MDN link for flex-basis
.flexContainer {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
}
.item:first-child {
flex: 1 1 100%;
margin-bottom: 20px;
}
.item {
flex: 1 1 40%;
height: 50px;
background-color: red;
margin: 0 20px;
}
<div class="flexContainer">
<div class="item"></div>
<div class="item"></div>
<div class="item"></div>
</div>
I find this solution simple. Just set desired child item height.
<div style={{ display: 'flex', flexWrap: 'wrap', gap:'32px'}}>
<div style={{ flex: '0 0 100%' }}>Some content</div>
<div style={{ flexGrow: 1 }}>Some content</div>
<div style={{ flexGrow: 1 }}>Some content</div>
</div>

How can I make flexbox wrap only an even number of items? [duplicate]

Is there a way to make a line break in multiple line flexbox?
For example to break after each 3rd item in this CodePen.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: gold;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(3n) {
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
Like
.item:nth-child(3n){
/* line-break: after; */
}
The simplest and most reliable solution is inserting flex items at the right places. If they are wide enough (width: 100%), they will force a line break.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(4n - 1) {
background: silver;
}
.line-break {
width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
But that's ugly and not semantic. Instead, we could generate pseudo-elements inside the flex container, and use order to move them to the right places.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(3n) {
background: silver;
}
.container::before, .container::after {
content: '';
width: 100%;
order: 1;
}
.item:nth-child(n + 4) {
order: 1;
}
.item:nth-child(n + 7) {
order: 2;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
</div>
But there is a limitation: the flex container can only have a ::before and a ::after pseudo-element. That means you can only force 2 line breaks.
To solve that, you can generate the pseudo-elements inside the flex items instead of in the flex container. This way you won't be limited to 2. But those pseudo-elements won't be flex items, so they won't be able to force line breaks.
But luckily, CSS Display L3 has introduced display: contents (currently only supported by Firefox 37):
The element itself does not generate any boxes, but its children and
pseudo-elements still generate boxes as normal. For the purposes of
box generation and layout, the element must be treated as if it had
been replaced with its children and pseudo-elements in the document
tree.
So you can apply display: contents to the children of the flex container, and wrap the contents of each one inside an additional wrapper. Then, the flex items will be those additional wrappers and the pseudo-elements of the children.
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
display: contents;
}
.item > div {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(3n) > div {
background: silver;
}
.item:nth-child(3n)::after {
content: '';
width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item"><div>1</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>2</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>3</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>4</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>5</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>6</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>7</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>8</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>9</div></div>
<div class="item"><div>10</div></div>
</div>
Alternatively, according to an old version of the spec, Flexbox allowed forced breaks by using break-before, break-after or their old CSS 2.1 aliases:
.item:nth-child(3n) {
page-break-after: always; /* CSS 2.1 syntax */
break-after: always; /* CSS 3 syntax */
}
But these forced line breaks only work on Firefox, and I don't think they are supposed to work according to the current spec. The new proposed way (not implemented anywhere) is with wrap-before or wrap-after:
.item:nth-child(3n) {
wrap-after: flex; /* New proposed syntax */
}
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(3n) {
page-break-after: always;
break-after: always;
wrap-after: flex;
background: silver;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
From my perspective it is more semantic to use <hr> elements as line breaks between flex items.
.container {
display: flex;
flex-flow: wrap;
}
.container hr {
width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<div>1</div>
<div>2</div>
<hr>
<div>3</div>
<div>2</div>
...
</div>
Tested in Chrome 66, Firefox 60 and Safari 11.
#Oriol has an excellent answer, sadly as of October 2017, neither display:contents, neither page-break-after is widely supported, better said it's about Firefox which supports this but not the other players, I have come up with the following "hack" which I consider better than hard coding in a break after every 3rd element, because that will make it very difficult to make the page mobile friendly.
As said it's a hack and the drawback is that you need to add quite a lot of extra elements for nothing, but it does the trick and works cross browser even on the dated IE11.
The "hack" is to simply add an additional element after each div, which is set to display:none and then used the css nth-child to decide which one of this should be actually made visible forcing a line brake like this:
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.item:nth-child(3n-1) {
background: silver;
}
.breaker {
display: none;
}
.breaker:nth-child(3n) {
display: block;
width: 100%;
height: 0;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">2</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">3</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">4</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">5</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">6</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">7</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">8</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">9</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
<div class="item">10</div>
<p class="breaker"></p>
</div>
You want a semantic linebreak?
Then consider using <br>. W3Schools may suggest you that BR is just for writing poems (mine is coming soon) but you can change the style so it behaves as a 100% width block element that will push your content to the next line. If 'br' suggests a break then it seems more appropriate to me than using hr or a 100% div and makes the html more readable.
Insert the <br> where you need linebreaks and style it like this.
// Use `>` to avoid styling `<br>` inside your boxes
.container > br
{
width: 100%;
content: '';
}
You can disable <br> with media queries, by setting display: to block or none as appropriate (I've included an example of this but left it commented out).
You can use order: to set the order if needed too.
And you can put as many as you want, with different classes or names :-)
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
background: gold;
height: 100px;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px
}
.container > br
{
width: 100%;
content: '';
}
// .linebreak1
// {
// display: none;
// }
// #media (min-width: 768px)
// {
// .linebreak1
// {
// display: block;
// }
// }
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<br class="linebreak1"/>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
No need to limit yourself to what W3Schools says:
I think the traditional way is flexible and fairly easy to understand:
Markup
<div class="flex-grid">
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-4">.col-4</div>
<div class="col-3">.col-3</div>
<div class="col-9">.col-9</div>
<div class="col-6">.col-6</div>
<div class="col-6">.col-6</div>
</div>
Create grid.css file:
.flex-grid {
display: flex;
flex-flow: wrap;
}
.col-1 {flex: 0 0 8.3333%}
.col-2 {flex: 0 0 16.6666%}
.col-3 {flex: 0 0 25%}
.col-4 {flex: 0 0 33.3333%}
.col-5 {flex: 0 0 41.6666%}
.col-6 {flex: 0 0 50%}
.col-7 {flex: 0 0 58.3333%}
.col-8 {flex: 0 0 66.6666%}
.col-9 {flex: 0 0 75%}
.col-10 {flex: 0 0 83.3333%}
.col-11 {flex: 0 0 91.6666%}
.col-12 {flex: 0 0 100%}
[class*="col-"] {
margin: 0 0 10px 0;
-webkit-box-sizing: border-box;
-moz-box-sizing: border-box;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
#media (max-width: 400px) {
.flex-grid {
display: block;
}
}
I've created an example (jsfiddle)
Try to resize the window under 400px, it's responsive!!
I just want to throw this answer in the mix, intended as a reminder that – given the right conditions – you sometimes don't need to overthink the issue at hand. What you want might be achievable with flex: wrap and max-width instead of :nth-child.
ul {
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
justify-content: center;
max-width: 420px;
list-style-type: none;
background-color: tomato;
margin: 0 auto;
padding: 0;
}
li {
display: inline-block;
background-color: #ccc;
border: 1px solid #333;
width: 23px;
height: 23px;
text-align: center;
font-size: 1rem;
line-height: 1.5;
margin: 0.2rem;
flex-shrink: 0;
}
<div class="root">
<ul>
<li>A</li>
<li>B</li>
<li>C</li>
<li>D</li>
<li>E</li>
<li>F</li>
<li>G</li>
<li>H</li>
<li>I</li>
<li>J</li>
<li>K</li>
<li>L</li>
<li>M</li>
<li>N</li>
<li>O</li>
<li>P</li>
<li>Q</li>
<li>R</li>
<li>S</li>
<li>T</li>
<li>U</li>
<li>V</li>
<li>W</li>
<li>X</li>
<li>Y</li>
<li>Z</li>
</ul>
</div>
https://jsfiddle.net/age3qp4d/
Another possible solution that doesn't require to add any extra markup is to add some dynamic margin to separate the elements.
In the case of the example, this can be done with the help of calc(), just adding margin-left and margin-right to the 3n+2 element (2, 5, 8)
.item:nth-child(3n+2) {
background: silver;
margin: 10px calc(50% - 175px);
}
Snippet Example
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: gold;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
.item:nth-child(3n+2) {
background: silver;
margin: 10px calc(50% - 175px);
}
<div class="container">
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
For future questions, It's also possible to do it by using float property and clearing it in each 3 elements.
Here's an example I've made.
.grid {
display: inline-block;
}
.cell {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
float: left;
margin: 8px;
width: 48px;
height: 48px;
background-color: #bdbdbd;
font-family: 'Helvetica', 'Arial', sans-serif;
font-size: 14px;
font-weight: 400;
line-height: 20px;
text-indent: 4px;
color: #fff;
}
.cell:nth-child(3n) + .cell {
clear: both;
}
<div class="grid">
<div class="cell">1</div>
<div class="cell">2</div>
<div class="cell">3</div>
<div class="cell">4</div>
<div class="cell">5</div>
<div class="cell">6</div>
<div class="cell">7</div>
<div class="cell">8</div>
<div class="cell">9</div>
<div class="cell">10</div>
</div>
.container {
background: tomato;
display: flex;
flex-flow: row wrap;
align-content: space-between;
justify-content: space-between;
}
.item {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: gold;
border: 1px solid black;
font-size: 30px;
line-height: 100px;
text-align: center;
margin: 10px;
}
<div class="container">
<div>
<div class="item">1</div>
<div class="item">2</div>
<div class="item">3</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="item">4</div>
<div class="item">5</div>
<div class="item">6</div>
</div>
<div>
<div class="item">7</div>
<div class="item">8</div>
<div class="item">9</div>
</div>
<div class="item">10</div>
</div>
you could try wrapping the items in a dom element like here. with this you dont have to know a lot of css just having a good structure will solve the problem.

flexbox vertical align child top, center another

I've got the following markup:
.row {
display: flex;
align-items: stretch;
margin: -16px;
background: #ddd;
}
.row .col {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
flex: 1;
margin: 16px;
background: #fff;
}
.header, .content, .footer {
padding: 16px;
background: red;
}
<div class="row">
<div class="col">
<div class="header">Header #1</div>
<div class="content">Lorem Ipsum<br />Dolor<br />Sit Amet</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
<div class="col">
<div class="header">Header #2</div>
<div class="content">Lorem Ipsum<br />Dolor</div>
</div>
</div>
Unfortunatly the second header isn't align vertically to the top. Is there a way to archive this with flexbox? I need the ".header" to be aligned the the top and the ".content" to be centered within the rest of the box.
Greetings!
No, not really, not without another wrapper which is a flex-container.
As flexbox is, to a certain extent based on manipulting margins, there is no method (AFAIK, although I'd be interested to find out if there is) to justify-content: center and then align-self a child element to somewhere else other than center.
I'd go with something like this: Add a wrapper to the "content" div, give it flex:1 to fill the remaining space below the header, then make that wrapper display:flex with justify-content:center.
This seems to be the most logical method
.col {
height: 150px;
width: 80%;
margin: 1em auto;
border: 1px solid grey;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
}
.header {
background: lightblue;
}
.content {
background: orange;
}
.flexy {
flex: 1;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
background: plum;
}
<div class="col">
<div class="header">Header #2</div>
<div class="flexy">
<div class="content">Lorem Ipsum
<br />Dolor</div>
</div>
</div>
Codepen Demo
Flexbox opens up all sorts of opportunities with margin: auto; this is one of them. Setting margin to auto along the flex axis (vertical in this case) will absorb any extra space before dividing it up between the flex items. Finally it's possible to vertically center stuff without creating a div soup.
.row {
display: flex;
align-items: stretch;
margin: -16px;
background: #ddd;
}
.row .col {
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
flex: 1;
margin: 16px;
background: #fff;
}
.header, .content, .footer {
padding: 16px;
background: red;
}
.content {
margin-top: auto;
margin-bottom: auto;
}
<div class="row">
<div class="col">
<div class="header">Header #1</div>
<div class="content">Lorem Ipsum<br />Dolor<br />Sit Amet</div>
<div class="footer">Footer</div>
</div>
<div class="col">
<div class="header">Header #2</div>
<div class="content">Lorem Ipsum<br />Dolor</div>
</div>
</div>

Using margin on flex items

I was under the impression that a margin can be added to flex items/children, and flexbox should automatically take that into account and calculate the correct spacing between the items.
I can't seem to get this working as I would like though.
Fiddle here: https://jsfiddle.net/dba5ehcw/1/
.flex-item{
border: 1px solid blue;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 160px;
width: 50%;
}
So each flex item at the moment is half the width of the container, and they flow nicely next to each other.
I would like to be able to add a margin of say, 1em to the flex-items in order to give them some breathing room, but in doing so, they become larger than the 50% and no longer stack next to each other on the same line because they are too wide.
Is there a way to use margin on the flex-items and have the flexbox container take this into account and adjust (decrease) their widths accordingly?
There are multiple ways to do this:
Use calc:
.flex-item {
width: calc(50% - 2em);
margin: 1em;
}
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item {
border: 1px solid blue;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: calc(160px - 2em);
width: calc(50% - 2em);
margin: 1em;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
Use nested boxes:
.flex-item {
width: 50%;
display: flex;
}
.flex-item > div {
border: 1px solid blue;
flex: 1;
margin: 1em;
}
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item {
height: 160px;
width: 50%;
display: flex;
}
.flex-item > div {
border: 1px solid blue;
flex: 1;
margin: 1em;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
</div>
Place each row in a nowrap container, and use a positive flex-shrink factor
.row {
display: flex;
}
.flex-item {
width: 50%;
margin: 1em;
}
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
width: 320px;
}
.row {
height: 160px;
display: flex;
}
.flex-item {
border: 1px solid blue;
width: 50%;
margin: 1em;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="row">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
<div class="row">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
</div>
Don't use width. Instead, force line-breaks at the right places, and use flex: 1 to make the elements grow to fill remaining space.
.flex-item {
flex: 1;
}
.line-break {
width: 100%
}
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item {
border: 1px solid blue;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: calc(160px - 2em);
flex: 1;
margin: 1em;
}
.line-break {
width: 100%;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="line-break"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
You need to do it with padding - which, when in border-box mode does not make the container larger than it's specified width - not margin, and a nested flex div. This is how all flexbox-based grid systems work. Code below:
.flex-container{
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item{
padding:1em;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 160px;
width: 50%;
display:flex;
}
.flex-item>div {
border: 1px solid blue;
flex: 1 1 auto;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
<div class="flex-item"><div></div></div>
</div>
instead of using margins, try adding a gap on your flex container
.flex-container {
display: flex;
gap: 1em
}
flex-item {
width 50%
}
Try this : -
.flex-container {
border: 1px solid red;
box-sizing: border-box;
display: flex;
flex-wrap: wrap;
width: 320px;
}
.flex-item {
justify-content: space-around;
margin: 1%;
background: red;
border: 1px solid blue;
box-sizing: border-box;
height: 160px;
width: 48%;
}
<div class="flex-container">
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
<div class="flex-item"></div>
</div>
I believe I was trying to achieve the same thing, from my understanding, with the addition that I wanted the two boxes to stack on top of each other when the viewport gets small enough (when viewing on mobile/tablet).
For some reason I thought this would be way easier as I saw something similar in a Bootstrap tutorial video I watched but I think he was using row and col classes, with a g gutter class, and not Flex.
Anyway, HTML:
<div class="d-flex flex-wrap flex-half-screen-responsive">
<div class="col-lg-6">
Lorem Ipsum
</div>
<div class="col-lg-6">
Lorem Ipsum
</div>
</div>
CSS:
.flex-half-screen-responsive {
margin: -0.5em;
}
.flex-half-screen-responsive > * {
flex: 1 1 48%;
margin: 0.5em;
}
I don't like how I have to specify that hardcoded 48% value but it seems to work just as I want it so whatever; spent way too much time on this already lol. Anyway I hope this helps someone looking for the same behavior.

Resources