Adding security to RESTful API [closed] - asp.net

Question

Closed. This question does not meet Stack Overflow guidelines. It is not currently accepting answers.
We don’t allow questions seeking recommendations for books, tools, software libraries, and more. You can edit the question so it can be answered with facts and citations.
Closed 6 years ago.
Improve this question
I am wanting to implement two websites that need to communicate with each other. (Since one of the sites has a separate deployment for each customer, and is spread across many servers, sharing a database or communicating privately is not an option.) So I've been looking into RESTful APIs.
Unfortunately, I'm running into a lot of information that I'm not familiar with. One issue is security. We don't need anything fancy--we're not a bank or anything. I think we can just get away with HTTPS and a basic username and password.
Questions:
How would I pass the username and password to the API? Would they just be passed as bare arguments in the URL?
Does .NET provide any mechanism for authorizing such username and passwords, or do I just manually see if the password is in our database on each and every request? (I would hash for security.)

Answer 1

How would I pass the username and password to the API? Would they just
be passed as bare arguments in the URL?
It can be either in the URL or in the header. If you are using HTTPS, it will all be encrypted so it will not be bare. Please see this for more details.
Does .NET provide any mechanism for authorizing such username and
passwords, or do I just manually see if the password is in our
database on each and every request? (I would hash for security.)
No you do not need to check the database on every request. You can check once, create a token with an expiry and the client can keep sending you the token. This way you do not have to keep checking the database every single time.
Please see see this answer for some helpful information.
I think basic authentication with base64 encoding will be sufficient. If not you can always change it. Here are the different ways to apply it to your backend code:
To apply an authentication filter to a controller, decorate the controller class with the filter attribute. The following code sets the [IdentityBasicAuthentication] filter on a controller class, which enables Basic Authentication for all of the controller's actions.
[IdentityBasicAuthentication] // Enable Basic authentication for this controller.
[Authorize] // Require authenticated requests.
public class HomeController : ApiController
{
public IHttpActionResult Get() { . . . }
public IHttpActionResult Post() { . . . }
}
To apply the filter to one action, decorate the action with the filter. The following code sets the [IdentityBasicAuthentication] filter on the controller's Post method.
[Authorize] // Require authenticated requests.
public class HomeController : ApiController
{
public IHttpActionResult Get() { . . . }
[IdentityBasicAuthentication] // Enable Basic authentication for this action.
public IHttpActionResult Post() { . . . }
}
To apply the filter to all Web API controllers, add it to GlobalConfiguration.Filters.
public static class WebApiConfig
{
public static void Register(HttpConfiguration config)
{
config.Filters.Add(new IdentityBasicAuthenticationAttribute());
// Other configuration code not shown...
}
}
Finally here is an example of the implementation, you may change it as you need:
using System;
using System.Net.Http;
using System.Net.Http.Headers;
using System.Security.Principal;
using System.Text;
using System.Threading;
using System.Threading.Tasks;
using System.Web.Http.Filters;
using BasicAuthentication.Results;
namespace BasicAuthentication.Filters
{
public abstract class BasicAuthenticationAttribute : Attribute, IAuthenticationFilter
{
public string Realm { get; set; }
public async Task AuthenticateAsync(HttpAuthenticationContext context, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
HttpRequestMessage request = context.Request;
AuthenticationHeaderValue authorization = request.Headers.Authorization;
if (authorization == null)
{
// No authentication was attempted (for this authentication method).
// Do not set either Principal (which would indicate success) or ErrorResult (indicating an error).
return;
}
if (authorization.Scheme != "Basic")
{
// No authentication was attempted (for this authentication method).
// Do not set either Principal (which would indicate success) or ErrorResult (indicating an error).
return;
}
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(authorization.Parameter))
{
// Authentication was attempted but failed. Set ErrorResult to indicate an error.
context.ErrorResult = new AuthenticationFailureResult("Missing credentials", request);
return;
}
Tuple<string, string> userNameAndPasword = ExtractUserNameAndPassword(authorization.Parameter);
if (userNameAndPasword == null)
{
// Authentication was attempted but failed. Set ErrorResult to indicate an error.
context.ErrorResult = new AuthenticationFailureResult("Invalid credentials", request);
return;
}
string userName = userNameAndPasword.Item1;
string password = userNameAndPasword.Item2;
IPrincipal principal = await AuthenticateAsync(userName, password, cancellationToken);
if (principal == null)
{
// Authentication was attempted but failed. Set ErrorResult to indicate an error.
context.ErrorResult = new AuthenticationFailureResult("Invalid username or password", request);
}
else
{
// Authentication was attempted and succeeded. Set Principal to the authenticated user.
context.Principal = principal;
}
}
protected abstract Task<IPrincipal> AuthenticateAsync(string userName, string password,
CancellationToken cancellationToken);
private static Tuple<string, string> ExtractUserNameAndPassword(string authorizationParameter)
{
byte[] credentialBytes;
try
{
credentialBytes = Convert.FromBase64String(authorizationParameter);
}
catch (FormatException)
{
return null;
}
// The currently approved HTTP 1.1 specification says characters here are ISO-8859-1.
// However, the current draft updated specification for HTTP 1.1 indicates this encoding is infrequently
// used in practice and defines behavior only for ASCII.
Encoding encoding = Encoding.ASCII;
// Make a writable copy of the encoding to enable setting a decoder fallback.
encoding = (Encoding)encoding.Clone();
// Fail on invalid bytes rather than silently replacing and continuing.
encoding.DecoderFallback = DecoderFallback.ExceptionFallback;
string decodedCredentials;
try
{
decodedCredentials = encoding.GetString(credentialBytes);
}
catch (DecoderFallbackException)
{
return null;
}
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(decodedCredentials))
{
return null;
}
int colonIndex = decodedCredentials.IndexOf(':');
if (colonIndex == -1)
{
return null;
}
string userName = decodedCredentials.Substring(0, colonIndex);
string password = decodedCredentials.Substring(colonIndex + 1);
return new Tuple<string, string>(userName, password);
}
public Task ChallengeAsync(HttpAuthenticationChallengeContext context, CancellationToken cancellationToken)
{
Challenge(context);
return Task.FromResult(0);
}
private void Challenge(HttpAuthenticationChallengeContext context)
{
string parameter;
if (String.IsNullOrEmpty(Realm))
{
parameter = null;
}
else
{
// A correct implementation should verify that Realm does not contain a quote character unless properly
// escaped (precededed by a backslash that is not itself escaped).
parameter = "realm=\"" + Realm + "\"";
}
context.ChallengeWith("Basic", parameter);
}
public virtual bool AllowMultiple
{
get { return false; }
}
}
}
If you still want to read more then here is a great article which goes into details. I have copied the above code from this article. It has lots of great information.

Answer 2

If you control or exert significant influence on both sides of the connection, client ssl certificates is a really strong and powerful way of doing this. It's attractive to me in this case because it only requires distributing a trusted CA certificate which can be done before the client certificates are created. It's far more secure than any username and password could ever be ( because the password doesn't need to go across the wire).
Any other solution with authentication I can think of, you're going to have to have some sort of data source to verify the credentials. But x509 solves this problem for you. We've done it at work between applications and other than managing the certificates it works really, really well. And it's basically the most secure thing available.
I don't know much about .net in general, but ( not to lmgtfy ) https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/315588 seems like the step by step format you are looking for.

Answer 3

Just a thought, and it really depends on what you meant by "username/password". If this means "authorization"/access to some API call and you want to ensure that the client is "authorized" to make a call to your API (only apps A, B can make api calls to API - and it seems this is what you're looking for based on your comment above):
As in the comment above, authorization header, using JWT. There is an great/easy JWT library in Nuget
it's pretty much something like a "shared secret" used to sign a "payload" (the JWT)
the "sender" will build the JWT and sign it (and add to header or whatever protocol you want - it can be body if prefer it over headers)
the "receiver" will verify the JWT sent
this includes handling/mitigating "replays" - the JWT spec has an "expire" field (exp) that you can have the library validate as well (or not, it's up to you)
The project site is on Github with samples.
Hth.