I'm trying to get an image to fit inside a container while keeping it's size ratio. The image should take full height or width depending on orientation. My solution does work on all browsers I've tested but IE11(works in 10 and 9 surprisingly).
In IE 11 the image is cropped on the right. I'd like a pure css way if possible and I don't care about centering it.
Here is the JSFiddle : https://jsfiddle.net/wagad0u8/
<div class="owl-item" style="width: 465px;">
<a class="img-flux" href="page1.html">
<img alt="omg" src="http://placehold.it/1000x100">
</a>
</div>
<div class="owl-item" style="width: 465px;">
<a class="img-flux" href="page1.html">
<img alt="omg" src="http://placehold.it/400x780">
</a>
</div>
.img-flux img {
border: 0;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
width: auto;
position: relative;
transition: all 0.3s;
margin: 0 auto;
float: none;
display: block;
vertical-align:middle;
}
#content-block *:last-child {
margin-bottom: 0px;
}
.owl-item, .owl-item .img-flux {
height: 100%;
}
.img-flux {
background-color: #ECECEC;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
align-items: center;
overflow: hidden;
}
.owl-item{
float:left;
height:300px;
margin-bottom:50px;
}
This seems to be a bug in IE11: Bug Report. Adding flex: 1 (as in the report)
.img-flux img {
flex: 1;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
works for me. Flexbox for the parent seems ok, so even centering is easy.
Another option is
flex: 0 0 auto; /* IE */
object-fit: scale-down; /* FF */
on the img, instead of flex: 1 , increasing compatibility with Firefox. See comments and bug report for more info.
.img-flux img {
border: 0;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
height: auto;
width: 100%;
position: relative;
transition: all 0.3s;
margin: 0 auto;
float: none;
display: block;
vertical-align: middle;
}
Use
vw - for width instead of %
and
vh - for height instead of %
that is supported in older versions like IE11.
https://jsfiddle.net/wagad0u8/1/
To ONLY apply the changed code to IE10+ use:
#media screen and (-ms-high-contrast: active), (-ms-high-contrast: none) {
/* IE10+ */
.img-flux img {
max-width : 100vw;
max-height : 100vh;
}
Related
I know there are a LOT of examples of this, and I have tried all of them to no avail. I am trying to create a carousel component that resizes images according to its boundary. I am using it in a myriad of places, in a myriad of different ways, so it MUST be responsive. I also need the images to be clickable as normal images for a11y and customers (managing expectations).
Here is my fiddle so far: https://codepen.io/skamansam/pen/NWvroeY?editors=1100
I can get all of the elements to resize accordingly (using max-width/height). when I use an image that is wider than taller, all works well. When I use an image that is taller than wider and exceeds the height of the box, the image overflows instead of respecting the max-width/height properties.
The most common answer involves wrapping the image in an html element and setting the width/height there, which I have done, but it doesn't solve the problem. Another common answer involves using combinations of position values, which didn't give any better results than I already have. Using the inspector, you can clearly see that all the elements EXCEPT the image are correctly sized, and the image overflows the container.
Is there any other way to get the img tag to respect height: 100% in the same way it respects width: 100%?
you are using image with a very high resolution (500x800) , you have use little lower resolution otherwise you have to use overflow:hidden; on your wrapping div.Using max-width:100%; the image is already resizing itself but cannot resize further more, inspect the element to get a better understanding.
I made three changes:
Your slide needs width: auto; and height: 100%;
Your image needs width: 100%; and height: 100%;
Your image needs object-fit: contain; (not cover)
* {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
box-sizing: border-box;
}
.jumbotron {
display: block;
width: 100%;
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
background-color: #aaa;
/* overflow: hidden; */
height: 150px;
}
.jumbotron .container {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.my-carousel {
background-color: #77f;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
display: flex;
flex-direction: row;
// overflow: hidden;
}
.my-carousel .previous-btn, .my-carousel .next-btn {
font-size: 200%;
padding: 0px 10px;
display: flex;
flex-direction: column;
justify-content: center;
}
.my-carousel .content {
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
align-self: center;
flex-grow: 1;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.my-carousel .content .slide {
height: 100%;
//max-width: 100%;
display: none;
position: relative;
// width: 100%;
vertical-align: middle;
padding: 0px;
margin: 0px;
overflow: visible;
}
.my-carousel .content .slide.active {
display: block;
}
.my-carousel .content .slide img {
//position: relative;
// margin: 0px auto;
// box-sizing: border-box;
// vertical-align: middle;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
// max-width: 100%;
// max-height: 100%;
object-fit: contain;
object-position: center;
overflow: hidden;
}
.my-carousel .content .slide .caption {
position: absolute;
background-color: rgba(0,0,0,.4);
text-shadow: 2px 2px 4px #fff, -2px -2px 4px #fff;
stroke: 2px #fff;
padding: 10px;
bottom: 0px;
width: 100%;
font-size: 150%;
// color: #000;
// -webkit-text-stroke-width: 1px;
// -webkit-text-stroke-color: #fff;
}
<link href="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/npm/#mdi/font#6.3.95/css/materialdesignicons.min.css" rel="stylesheet"/>
<main role="main">
<section class="jumbotron text-center">
<div class="container">
<div class="my-carousel">
<div class="previous-btn">
<span class="mdi mdi-transfer-left"></span>
</div>
<div class="content">
<div class="slide active">
<img src="https://picsum.photos/500/800?random=1" />
<div class="caption">This is only a WIP to figure out how to style this carousel properly.</div>
</div>
<div class="slide">
<img src="https://picsum.photos/1000/400?random=1" />
</div>
</div>
<div class="next-btn">
<span class="mdi mdi-transfer-right" />
</div>
</div>
</div>
</section>
</main>
luckily, the answer is inside "picksum" itself, it allows you to choose the resolution of the image you want, you chose (500x800) that is way too large, you can use the following reduced resolutions >(50x80), (100x160), (180x288), (190x304), (200x320). I am sure you will get your desired result by using (180x288) or (190x304)
for example:<img src="https://picsum.photos/190/304?random=1" />
Use max-width and max-height
Like this
.slide {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
overflow: hidden;
}
.slide .img {
max-width: 100%;
max-height: 100%;
}
I am currently working on a project that has div with a background image sliding in using a transform: translate. This div has a z-index of zero while some other sibling elements have a higher z-index to ensure they are placed on top. This seems to work fine in my landscape version. However, as this use case only has a landscape version, I am also implementing a transform: rotate when in portrait mode to ensure landscape viewing. When viewing in portrait, the background image slides in above everything, then relocates to the back. Not breaking, but sloppy, as this should be rotated anyways. However, after deployment, I was informed that there have been two instances of the image never relocating to its 0 Z-index home and breaking the usage. I have looked at https://katydecorah.com/code/z-index-and-transform/ and z-index is canceled by setting transform(rotate) and am still not sure how to approach this.
The issue only seems to occur in Safari while applying the rotate.
Rough outline of HTML elements:
<div id="root">
<div class="App ">
<div class="mainView">
<div class="navBar"></div>
<div class="mainContent">
<div class="arrowWrapper">
<div class="arrow slideInItem"></div>
</div>
<div class="alphaView">
</div>
<div class="footerBar"></div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
Some of the relevant CSS:
.App {
text-align: center;
height: 100%;
width:100%;
}
.mainView{
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
background-color: #fff;
overflow:hidden;
position: relative;
transform-style: preserve-3d;
}
.navBar{
height: 79px;
width: 100%;
display:flex;
flex-direction: row;
align-items: center;
background-color: #fff;
}
.mainContent{
display:flex;
flex-direction:column;
justify-content:flex-end;
margin-top: 18px;
height:85.25%
}
.arrow{
position: absolute;
z-index: 0;
top: 0;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
background-size: contain;
background-image: url("../images/Page_background_Arrow.png");
background-repeat: no-repeat;
}
.arrowWrapper{
transform-style: preserve-3d;
position: absolute;
z-index: 0;
top: 97px;
width: 100%;
height: 86%;
}
.alphaView{
display: flex;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
overflow:hidden;
position: relative;
z-index: 10;
justify-content: space-around;
}
.footerBar{
z-index: 999;
position:fixed;
top:auto;
display:flex;
bottom:0;
height: 6.15%;
width:100%;
flex-direction:row;
align-items:center
}
/* portrait lock */
#media only screen and (min-width: 100px) and (orientation:
portrait) {
#root {
transform: rotate(-90deg);
transform-origin: left top;
height: 100vw;
width: 100vh;
overflow: hidden;
position: absolute;
top: 100%;
left: 0;
}
}
Thank you
Try setting a -1 index to the background image.
This is a very good article for z-index too What the heck, z-index??
How do I fix the CSS so that the resolution is not lost when I scale down?
Here is the HTML:
<span class="image main small"><img src="images/example.png" alt="" /></span>
CSS for the <img> :
.image.main img {
width: 100%;
}
.image img {
border-radius: 0px;
display: block;
}
CSS for the <span>:
.image.small {
padding: 2.5em 6em 0.8em 6em;
max-width: 100%;
}
.image.main {
display: block;
margin: 0 0 1.5em 0;
max-width: 100%;
}
.image {
border-radius: 4px;
border: 0;
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
}
(there are multiple classes because the original code was from a template, and I'm just modifying it. If you know how to make this simpler, please let me know!)
screenshot of the demo is below. Notice how the image resolution is bad. The original example.png is quite crisp and resolution is high.
How do I fix the CSS so that the resolution is not lost when I scale down?
I have also looked at a Similar Question Here, but it didn't help much.
I also tried using Picturefill, I couldn't completely understand how to use it with my situation.
Maybe it is about the aspect ratio. By using an height: auto on the image this will solve that. Give the container, in this case the <span> a max-width 100%, and set the width of the image in what you want. Now the image will have the correct width/height ratio.
/*
<span class="image main small"><img src="images/example.png" alt="" /></span>
*/
.image {
display: inline-block;
position: relative;
border-radius: 4px;
line-height: 1;
}
.image.main {
display: block;
max-width: 100%;
margin: 0 0 1.5em 0;
}
.image.small {
max-width: 100%;
padding: 2.5em 6em 0.8em 6em;
}
.image img {
width: 100%;
height: auto;
border: 0;
border-radius: 4px;
}
.image.main img {
width: 100%;
}
I'm trying to understand what appears to be unexpected behaviour to me:
I have an element with a max-height of 100% inside a container that also uses a max-height but, unexpectedly, the child overflows the parent:
.container {
background: blue;
padding: 10px;
max-height: 200px;
max-width: 200px;
}
img {
display: block;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/400/500" />
</div>
This is fixed, however, if the parent is given an explicit height:
.container {
background: blue;
padding: 10px;
max-height: 200px;
max-width: 200px;
height: 200px;
}
img {
display: block;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/400/500" />
</div>
Does anyone know why the child would not honour the max-height of its parent in the first example? Why is an explicit height required?
When you specify a percentage for max-height on a child, it is a percentage of the parent's actual height, not the parent's max-height, oddly enough. The same applies to max-width.
So, when you don't specify an explicit height on the parent, then there's no base height for the child's max-height to be calculated from, so max-height computes to none, allowing the child to be as tall as possible. The only other constraint acting on the child now is the max-width of its parent, and since the image itself is taller than it is wide, it overflows the container's height downwards, in order to maintain its aspect ratio while still being as large as possible overall.
When you do specify an explicit height for the parent, then the child knows it has to be at most 100% of that explicit height. That allows it to be constrained to the parent's height (while still maintaining its aspect ratio).
.container {
background: blue;
padding: 10px;
max-height: 200px;
max-width: 200px;
float: left;
margin-right: 20px;
}
.img1 {
display: block;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
.img2 {
display: block;
max-height: inherit;
max-width: inherit;
}
<!-- example 1 -->
<div class="container">
<img class='img1' src="http://via.placeholder.com/350x450" />
</div>
<!-- example 2 -->
<div class="container">
<img class='img2' src="http://via.placeholder.com/350x450" />
</div>
I played around a little. On a larger image in firefox, I got a good result with using the inherit property value. Will this help you?
.container {
background: blue;
padding: 10px;
max-height: 100px;
max-width: 100px;
text-align:center;
}
img {
max-height: inherit;
max-width: inherit;
}
Instead of going with max-height: 100%/100%, an alternative approach of filling up all the space would be using position: absolute with top/bottom/left/right set to 0.
In other words, the HTML would look like the following:
<div class="flex-content">
<div class="scrollable-content-wrapper">
<div class="scrollable-content">
1, 2, 3
</div>
</div>
</div>
.flex-content {
flex-grow: 1;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.scrollable-content-wrapper {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
overflow: auto;
}
.scrollable-content {
/* Add styling here */
}
Try it below:
.flex-content {
flex-grow: 1;
position: relative;
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.scrollable-content-wrapper {
position: absolute;
left: 0;
right: 0;
top: 0;
bottom: 0;
overflow: auto;
}
html {
height: 50%;
width: 50%;
}
body {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.parent {
height: 100%;
outline: 1px solid red;
}
<html>
<body>
<div class="parent">
<div class="flex-content">
<div class="scrollable-content-wrapper">
<div class="scrollable-content" id="scrollable">
1, 2, 3
</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<button onClick="scrollable.innerText += '\nSome more text'" style="margin-top: 1rem;">Add Line</button>
<p>
The red outline represents the parent. Click above to add a line until overflow occurs to see that the size of the parent is not increased.
</p>
</body>
</html>
I found a solution here:
http://www.sitepoint.com/maintain-image-aspect-ratios-responsive-web-design/
The trick is possible because it exists a relation between WIDTH and PADDING-BOTTOM of an element. So:
parent:
container {
height: 0;
padding-bottom: 66%; /* for a 4:3 container size */
}
child (remove all css related to width, i.e. width:100%):
img {
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
position: absolute;
display:block;
margin:0 auto; /* center */
left:0; /* center */
right:0; /* center */
}
You can use the property object-fit
.cover {
object-fit: cover;
width: 150px;
height: 100px;
}
Like suggested here
A full explanation of this property by Chris Mills in Dev.Opera
And an even better one in CSS-Tricks
It's supported in
Chrome 31+
Safari 7.1+
Firefox 36+
Opera 26+
Android 4.4.4+
iOS 8+
I just checked that vivaldi and chromium support it as well (no surprise here)
It's currently not supported on IE, but... who cares ? Also, iOS supports object-fit, but not object-position, but it will soon.
Here is a solution for a recently opened question marked as a duplicate of this question. The <img> tag was exceeding the max-height of the parent <div>.
Broken: Fiddle
Working: Fiddle
In this case, adding display:flex to the 2 parent <div> tags was the answer
Maybe someone else can explain the reasons behind your problem but you can solve it by specifying the height of the container and then setting the height of the image to be 100%. It is important that the width of the image appears before the height.
<html>
<head>
<style>
.container {
background: blue;
padding: 10px;
height: 100%;
max-height: 200px;
max-width: 300px;
}
.container img {
width: 100%;
height: 100%
}
</style>
</head>
<body>
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/400/500" />
</div>
</body>
</html>
The closest I can get to this is this example:
http://jsfiddle.net/YRFJQ/1/
or
.container {
background: blue;
border: 10px solid blue;
max-height: 200px;
max-width: 200px;
overflow:hidden;
box-sizing:border-box;
}
img {
display: block;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
The main problem is that the height takes the percentage of the containers height, so it is looking for an explicitly set height in the parent container, not it's max-height.
The only way round this to some extent I can see is the fiddle above where you can hide the overflow, but then the padding still acts as visible space for the image to flow into, and so replacing with a solid border works instead (and then adding border-box to make it 200px if that's the width you need)
Not sure if this would fit with what you need it for, but the best I can seem to get to.
A good solution is to not use height on the parent and use it just on the child with View Port :
Fiddle Example: https://jsfiddle.net/voan3v13/1/
body, html {
width: 100%;
height: 100%;
}
.parent {
width: 400px;
background: green;
}
.child {
max-height: 40vh;
background: blue;
overflow-y: scroll;
}
Containers will already generally wrap their content nicely. It often doesn't work as well the other way around: children don't fill their ancestors nicely. So, set your width/height values on the inner-most element rather than the outer-most element, and let the outer elements wrap their contents.
.container {
background: blue;
padding: 10px;
}
img {
display: block;
max-height: 200px;
max-width: 200px;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/mpalpha/71Lhcb5q/
.container {
display: flex;
background: blue;
padding: 10px;
max-height: 200px;
max-width: 200px;
}
img {
object-fit: contain;
max-height: 100%;
max-width: 100%;
}
<div class="container">
<img src="http://placekitten.com/400/500" />
</div>
This question already has answers here:
How can I horizontally center an element?
(133 answers)
Closed 4 years ago.
I have a div tag with width set to 800 pixels. When the browser width is greater than 800 pixels, it shouldn't stretch the div, but it should bring it to the middle of the page.
<body>
<div style="width:800px; margin:0 auto;">
centered content
</div>
</body>
position: absolute and then top:50% and left:50% places the top edge at the vertical center of the screen, and the left edge at the horizontal center, then by adding margin-top to the negative of the height of the div, i.e., -100 shifts it above by 100 and similarly for margin-left. This gets the div exactly in the center of the page.
#outPopUp {
position: absolute;
width: 300px;
height: 200px;
z-index: 15;
top: 50%;
left: 50%;
margin: -100px 0 0 -150px;
background: red;
}
<div id="outPopUp"></div>
Flexbox solution is the way to go in/from 2015. justify-content: center is used for the parent element to align the content to the center of it.
HTML
<div class="container">
<div class="center">Center</div>
</div>
CSS
.container {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
Output
.container {
display: flex;
justify-content: center;
}
.center {
width: 400px;
padding: 10px;
background: #5F85DB;
color: #fff;
font-weight: bold;
font-family: Tahoma;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="center">Centered div with left aligned text.</div>
</div>
Do you mean that you want to center it vertically or horizontally? You said you specified the height to 800 pixels, and wanted the div not to stretch when the width was greater than that...
To center horizontally, you can use the margin: auto; attribute in CSS. Also, you'll have to make sure that the body and html elements don't have any margin or padding:
html, body { margin: 0; padding: 0; }
#centeredDiv { margin-right: auto; margin-left: auto; width: 800px; }
<div></div>
div {
display: table;
margin-right: auto;
margin-left: auto;
}
To make it also work correctly in Internet Explorer 6 you have to do it as follows:
HTML
<body>
<div class="centered">
centered content
</div>
</body>
CSS
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
text-align: center; /* !!! */
}
.centered {
margin: 0 auto;
text-align: left;
width: 800px;
}
Div centered vertically and horizontally inside the parent without fixing the content size
Here on this page is a nice overview with several solutions, too much code to share here, but it shows what is possible...
Personally I like this solution with the famous transform translate -50% trick the most. It works well for both fixed (% or px) and undefined height and width of your element.
The code is as simple as:
HTML:
<div class="center"><div>
CSS:
.center {
position: absolute;
left: 50%;
top: 50%;
-moz-transform: translate(-50%, -50%); /* Firefox */
-ms-transform: translate(-50%, -50%); /* IE 9 */
-webkit-transform: translate(-50%, -50%); /* Safari and Chrome*/
-o-transform: translate(-50%, -50%); /* Opera */
transform: translate(-50%, -50%);
/* optional size in px or %: */
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
}
Here a fiddle that shows that it works
You can also use it like this:
<div style="width: 60%; margin: 0px auto;">
Your contents here...
</div>
Simply use the center tag just after the body tag, and end the center tag just before body ends:
<body>
<center>
... Your code here ...
</center>
</body>
This worked for me with all the browsers I have tried.
This can be easily achieved via flex container.
.container{
width: 100%;
display: flex;
height: 100vh;
justify-content: center;
}
.item{
align-self: center;
}
Preview Link
Add this class to the div you want centered (which should have a set width):
.marginAutoLR
{
margin-right:auto;
margin-left:auto;
}
Or, add the margin stuff to your div class, like this:
.divClass
{
width:300px;
margin-right:auto;
margin-left:auto;
}
Use the CSS flex property: http://jsfiddle.net/cytr/j7SEa/6/show/
body { /* Centered */
display: box;
flex-align: center;
flex-pack: center;
}
Some other pre-existing setups from older code that will prevent div page centering L&R are:
Other classes hidden in external stylesheet links.
Other classes embedded in something like an img (like for older external CSS print format controls).
Legend code with IDs and/or CLASSES will conflict with a named div class.
Centering without specifying div width:
body {
text-align: center;
}
body * {
text-align: initial;
}
body div {
display: inline-block;
}
This is something like <center> tag does, except:
all direct inline childs elements (eg. <h1>) of <center> will also positioned to center
inline-block element can have different size (comapred to display:block setting) according to browser defaults
Use the below code for centering the div box:
.box-content{
margin: auto;
top: 0;
right: 0;
bottom: 0;
left: 0;
position: absolute;
width: 800px;
height: 100px;
background-color: green;
}
<div class="box-content">
</div>
If you have some regular content, and not only one line of text, the only possible reason I know is to calculate margin.
Here is an example:
HTML
<div id="supercontainer">
<div id="middlecontainer">
<div class="common" id="first">first</div>
<div id="container">
<div class="common" id="second">second</div>
<div class="common" id="third">third</div>
</div>
</div>
</div>
CSS
body {
margin: 0;
padding: 0;
}
.common {
border: 1px solid black;
}
#supercontainer {
width: 1200px;
background: aqua;
float: left;
}
#middlecontainer {
float: left;
width: 104px;
margin: 0 549px;
}
#container {
float: left;
}
#first {
background: red;
height: 102px;
width: 50px;
float: left;
}
#second {
background: green;
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
}
#third {
background: yellow;
height: 50px;
width: 50px;
}
So, #supercontainer is your "whole page" and its width is 1200px.
#middlecontainer is div with content of your site; it's width 102px. In case the width of content is known, you need to divide the page's size to 2, and subtract half of content's width from the result:
1200 / 2 - (102 / 2) = 549;
Yes, I'm also seeing that this is der grosse fail of CSS.
.middle {
margin:0 auto;
text-align: center;
}
/* it brings div to center */
parent {
position: relative;
}
child {
position: absolute;
left: 50%;
transform: translateX(-50%);
}
<parent>
<child>
</child>
</parent>
Use justify-content and align-items to horizontally and vertically align a div
https://developer.mozilla.org/de/docs/Web/CSS/justify-content
https://developer.mozilla.org/en/docs/Web/CSS/align-items
html,
body,
.container {
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.container {
display: flex;
align-items: center;
justify-content: center;
}
.mydiv {
width: 80px;
}
<div class="container">
<div class="mydiv">h & v aligned</div>
</div>
body, html {
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
.container {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.container .box {
width: 100px;
height: 100px;
background: red;
margin: 0 auto;
}
http://jsfiddle.net/NPV2E/
"width:100%" for the "body" tag is only for an example. In a real project you may remove this property.
Simple http://jsfiddle.net/8pd4qx5r/
html {
display: table;
height: 100%;
width: 100%;
}
body {
display: table-cell;
vertical-align: middle;
}
.content {
margin: 0 auto;
width: 260px;
text-align: center;
background: pink;
}
This also works in Internet Explorer, but auto margins do not.
.centered {
position: absolute;
display: inline-block;
left: -500px;
width: 1000px;
margin: 0 50%;
}
If your center content is deep inside other divs then only margin can save you. Nothing else. I face it always when not using a framework like Bootstrap.
In my case, the phone screen size is unknown, and here is what I did.
HTML
<div class="loadingImg"></div>
CSS
.loadingImg{
position: fixed;
top: 0px;
left: 0px;
z-index: 9999999;
border: 0;
background: url('../images/loading.gif') no-repeat center;
background-size: 50px 50px;
display: block;
margin: 0 auto;
-webkit-border-radius: 50px;
border-radius: 50px;
}
JavaScript (before you need to show this DIV)
$(".loadingImg").css("height",$(document).height());
$(".loadingImg").css("width",$(document).width());
$(".loadingImg").show();
<body>
<div style=" display: table; margin: 250 auto;">
In center
</div>
</body>
If you want to change the vertical position, change the value of 250 and you can arrange the content as per your need. There is no need to give the width and other parameters.
For some reason, none of the previous answers worked for me really. This is what worked for me and it works across browsers as well:
.center {
text-align: center;
height: 100%;
/* Safari, Opera, and Chrome */
display: -webkit-box;
-webkit-box-pack: center;
-webkit-box-align: center;
/* Firefox */
display: -moz-box;
-moz-box-pack: center;
-moz-box-align: center;
/* Internet Explorer 10 */
display: -ms-flexbox;
-ms-flex-pack: center;
-ms-flex-align: center;
}
Get the width of the screen.
Then make margin left 25%
Make margin right 25%
In this way the content of your container will sit in the middle.
Example: suppose that container width = 800px;
<div class='container' width='device-width' id='updatedContent'>
<p id='myContent'></p>
<contents></contents>
<contents></contents>
</div>
if ($("#myContent").parent === $("updatedContent"))
{
$("#myContent").css({
'left': '-(device-width/0.25)px';
'right': '-(device-width/0.225)px';
});
}